How Do The Best Short Story Contests Handle Publishing Rights For Winners?

Question

Do anthologies for top competitions like the O. Henry Prize take full copyright, or just limited rights for a print cycle?

StoryBird · Answer

Translation rights are almost never something a short story contest should need. If a contest is asking for the right to translate your story into other languages, that's a massive red flag unless the contest is specifically international and run by a major global publisher. For a typical small-to-mid-tier contest, this is a sign they're overreaching wildly, hoping to exploit your work in ways they haven't even figured out yet.

JacobBoyd · Answer

Hmm, I'm not sure I have the full legal expertise on this, but I've submitted to a few. Usually, it says right in the guidelines. Might be worth waiting to see if someone who's actually won one of the bigger contests chimes in with their experience.

OneDream · Answer

Ugh, this is such a minefield. I submitted to a contest once that, buried in the terms, claimed the right to use my story 'in any media now known or hereafter devised' without further compensation. I didn't win, but it was a wake-up call. The better contests are the ones that treat it like a prestigious magazine publication—they get to be the first to publish it, and that's the honor. After that, it's yours again. Look for phrases like 'non-exclusive archival rights' for keeping it on their website. If they want 'all copyright' or 'exclusive rights in all formats,' run. Your story is worth more than a potential cash prize and a line on your bio if it means you can never do anything else with it.

RubyBlack · Answer

The whole system feels skewed toward the contests, doesn't it? They get hundreds of fees and give away one prize, and then they want to own the winning story too? The truly 'best' contests are the ones that actively push back against that model and put the writer's ownership first. They're rare, but they exist. They're usually the ones run by writers' organizations who have been on the other side of the table.

AdrianKit · Answer

LOL, after reading some of these horror stories in the comments, I'm just sitting here glad I only write fanfiction. The rights are a whole different nightmare over there, but at least you know going in that you don't own the IP! Contests for original work seem like a legal battlefield.

RioRay · Answer

Don't forget about audio rights! With the rise of podcasts and audiobooks, this is a new frontier. Some contests now produce audio versions of winning stories. The fair way to handle this is to license the audio rights separately, often for a small additional fee or as part of the prize package. The unfair way is to bundle audio rights into a catch-all 'multi-media' rights grab in the initial contract. If a contest mentions audio, look for a specific clause about it, and ensure you're compensated or at least give explicit, limited consent for that specific use.

ReidLake · Answer

What about contests that offer publication as the 'prize' with no cash award? These are especially dangerous for rights grabs. They might offer you 'exposure' while demanding extensive rights. The equation is already skewed; you're giving them valuable content for free. In these cases, the rights terms should be extremely limited, perhaps non-exclusive and revocable. If they're asking for exclusive rights for a non-paying 'prize,' it's almost certainly a scam.

ElenaSnow · Answer

There's a trend among some newer, digital-first contests to ask for broad 'non-exclusive' rights to use the story in promotional materials, which can feel vague and scary. The key is in the scope. Is it just for promoting that specific contest? Or can they use it to promote anything they want in the future? The better ones define the use case narrowly. They might want to produce an audiobook clip for social media or include a snippet in a newsletter. That's usually reasonable if it's tied to the contest's brand. Just be wary of language that grants a blanket license for any future 'commercial' use.

ErinOrtiz · Answer

Translation rights should always, always remain with the author unless the contest is specifically for a translation or is based in a non-English language market. Even then, the rights should be carefully delineated. A general English-language short story contest has no legitimate need to ask for translation rights. If they do, it's a huge warning sign that they may be planning to sell the story to foreign publications without your further involvement or compensation. Retaining translation rights is a basic principle for any writer looking at international opportunities.

PiperWade · Answer

Don't sleep on the indemnity clause. That's where you promise the work is original and you'll cover the contest's legal costs if someone sues them over it. That's standard, but it should be mutual. The contest should also indemnify you if they do something with your story that breaches the contract and gets you sued. A one-sided indemnity clause that only protects the contest is another sign of an unbalanced agreement. Fair contracts share risk appropriately.

EliseWard · Answer

Don't forget about contests run by foreign entities. If you're submitting to a contest based in another country, the rights language might be under a different legal system. Something that's standard in the US might be interpreted differently elsewhere. It's extra important to be cautious and, if possible, seek advice from writers in that country or region. A 'non-exclusive license' might have different implications in, say, European copyright law.

TaliaWood · Answer

Contrast that with a contest I saw advertised in a writer's newsletter. The terms said winning entry becomes the 'property' of the contest organizers. Not just a license, but property. That's essentially a work-for-hire agreement disguised as a contest. They could theoretically turn your story into a movie and you'd get nothing beyond the initial prize. It's shocking that these still exist, but they prey on hopeful writers who don't know any better.

Anna · Answer

Beyond the legalities, there's an ethical dimension. A contest that treats rights fairly is signaling that it respects writers as professionals and collaborators. It sees the value in the relationship. A contest that grabs for all rights is signaling that it sees writers as a source of cheap, disposable content. Which organization would you rather be associated with? Which one will look better on your writing bio? The fair one, every time.

AidenPage · Answer

It's a balancing act. You want to get your work out there and win accolades, but you don't want to poison the well for that story's future. My personal rule: I'll grant first publication rights and non-exclusive anthology rights for a defined period. Anything beyond that, and the prize money needs to be significantly higher to justify locking down additional potential revenue streams. For most short story contests, the prize doesn't justify that.

How Do The Best Short Story Contests Handle Publishing Rights For Winners?

14 Respuestas

Related Books

YEARNERS: A COLLECTION SHORT STORIES

Wet Dreams: The Ultimate Steamy Short Stories Collection

WILD PLEASURE {short stories}

Burning Passion {steamiest short stories}

Dirty (short stories)

Sinful Desires(steamiest Short stories)

Preguntas Relacionadas

How do prize structures differ among the top short story contests?

What are the best short story contests for money in 2024?

How can I structure the best story for a short story contest?

How do prize structures work in leading short story competitions?

What makes the best short story contests worth entering for beginners?

Which Nebula Award for Best Short Story winners became genre classics?

What entry rules do the best short story competitions usually have?

Búsquedas relacionadas

Fantasy Writing Competitions

Best Way To Publish A Novel

How To Get Story Published

Best Story For Story Writing Competition

Micro Story Competition

Best Contemporary Short Story Writers

How To Get A Novel Published

Best Short Stories