Can Break In Case Of Emergency Procedures Vary By Company?

Hot clinic days have a rhythm to them — frantic for a few minutes when someone collapses, then sharp, focused action. I walk through the steps like a checklist in my head: immediate triage, cool first, assess second. The priority is always airway, breathing, and circulation. If the person is unconscious or confused, I get oxygen on them, make sure the airway is secure, and call for vascular access. While one team member checks vitals and places a rectal probe for core temperature (it’s the most reliable in the chaos), others start rapid cooling. For exertional heatstroke we use cold-water immersion whenever possible — it’s faster at lowering core temp than anything else. If immersion isn’t feasible, we do aggressive evaporative cooling: remove clothing, spray lukewarm to cool water while using fans to create evaporation, and apply ice packs to the neck, groin, and armpits. We watch the core temp and stop aggressive cooling once it’s around 38–39°C to avoid overshoot. Simultaneously I start IV crystalloids for volume resuscitation, get an ECG, and send bloods: electrolytes, creatine kinase, LFTs, coagulation panel, and a urinalysis to look for myoglobinuria. Seizures are managed with benzodiazepines, and if mental status is poor we prepare for intubation. We avoid antipyretics like acetaminophen and aspirin because they don’t help this thermal injury. After initial stabilization, patients with organ dysfunction, very high temps, rhabdomyolysis, or unstable labs go to the ICU. For milder, quickly-reversed cases we observe, monitor labs, ensure urine output, and provide education on rest and cooling strategies. I always leave those shifts feeling grateful that quick, simple cooling made the difference — it’s dramatic to watch someone come back from being dangerously hot to lucid in minutes.

If I had to pick one death that still makes my chest tighten, it's Shireen Baratheon's in 'Game of Thrones'. That scene hits on so many levels: the betrayal by adults she trusted, the cold ritualism of the fire, and the fact she's a child burned for political desperation. Watching Melisandre and Stannis rationalize it — sacrificing a living, innocent person to chase a prophecy — felt like a moral collapse as much as a physical one. Beyond the immediate horror, Shireen's death ripples through the story. It fractures Stannis's last shreds of humanity, costs him loyalty, and leaves a bitter stain on the narrative about power and belief. Compared to more spectacular or gruesome deaths, hers is quietly catastrophic: intimate, final, and utterly avoidable. That combination of cruelty, innocence, and the larger consequences is why it sticks with me — it's the kind of death that doesn't just shock, it erodes trust in the characters who made it possible. I still find myself replaying her little smile before the flames; it just won't leave me.

The worst kind of movie adaptation rips the soul out of a book and replaces it with a checklist of set pieces and marketable actors. I hate when studios treat a layered narrative like a playlist: pick a few iconic scenes, toss in some flashy effects, and call it a day. That kills the momentum of character arcs, flattens moral ambiguity, and turns subtle themes into slogans. For example, when 'The Golden Compass' or 'Eragon' lost the philosophical and worldbuilding threads that made the books compelling, the films felt hollow and aimless to me. Another way they ruin it is by changing motivations or relationships to fit runtime or focus-group theory. Swap out a complicated friendship for a romance, erase a character’s trauma so they’re easier to root for, or give villains cartoonish lines—then watch the story stop resonating. I also cringe at adaptations that over-explain everything with clumsy dialogue because they’re afraid audiences won’t keep up. Ultimately I want fidelity in spirit, not slavish page-by-page replication. If the adaptation honors the book’s core themes, voice, and emotional logic, even changes can work. But when studios replace wisdom with spectacle, I feel robbed—like someone edited out my favorite chapter of life. I’ll still re-read the original, though, because books are stubborn that way.

I get a thrill from imagining the worst, but I try to make it feel real instead of like a cheap shock. When I write a scene where everything collapses, I start small: a missed call, a burned soup, a locked door that shouldn’t be locked. Those tiny failures compound. The cliché apocalypse of fire and trumpets rarely scares me; what does is the slow arithmetic of consequences. I focus on character-specific vulnerabilities so the disaster reveals who people are instead of just flattening them with spectacle. I love to anchor the catastrophe in sensory detail and mundane logistics — the smell of mold in apartment stairwells, the taste of water that’s been boiled three times, the paperwork that gets lost and ruins a plan. Throw in moral ambiguity: the 'right' choice hurts someone either way. Also, make the rescue less tidy. Not every rescue belongs in a montage like 'Apollo' or a heroic speech. Let people live with bad outcomes. Finally, I try to avoid obvious villains and instead give the situation rules. Once you set believable constraints, the worst-case emerges naturally and surprises both the characters and me. That kind of dread lingers, and I’m usually left thinking about the characters long after I stop writing.

Catching a classic fast break on film is pure adrenaline, and a few movies do it so well they stick in your head forever. I love how 'Hoosiers' turns a simple full-court push into cinematic gold — the final game uses quick cuts and crowd noise to make every fast break feel like a small miracle. Then there's 'Space Jam', which treats fast breaks like cartoon fireworks: everything is exaggerated, elastic, and somehow more fun because the rules can bend. Both films show opposite ends of the spectrum, but they both celebrate transition play. If you want realism, check out 'Hoop Dreams' and 'More Than a Game'. They capture the messy, gritty truth of running the floor: teammates yelling, sloppy passes that suddenly click, and the magic of a break that turns into a layup. For slick, player-focused sequences, 'He Got Game' and 'The Way Back' craft emotional moments around breakaways, using close-ups and slow burns to make the plays mean more than points. My favorite part is how each director uses the break to reveal character — it’s never just basketball, and that’s what gets me every time.

Crazy bit of fan gossip that stuck with me: the novel 'Emergency Contact' did get its screen rights picked up a while ago, and there are reports it's been moving through development toward a movie adaptation. I love that the story’s mix of awkward, modern intimacy and messy young-adult realness feels tailor-made for a heartfelt indie-style film or a compact streaming feature. The thing that excites me most is imagining how the voices and late-night text exchanges would translate to the screen — would they keep the epistolary/text-message vibe, or make it more cinematic with visual motifs? Either way, I’m picturing a tight soundtrack, warm color grading, and a director who leans into honest, small moments rather than melodrama. That said, even with rights secured, these projects can take their sweet time. Optioning rights is just step one; casting, scripts, and studio interest all have to line up. I’d personally love to see it treated like 'To All the Boys I’ve Loved Before' in tone — sweet and funny, but with more textured, realistic emotional beats — or even a short limited series that gives room to breathe. Whatever the final shape, I’m quietly optimistic and already daydreaming about who might play the leads and which soundtrack songs would slap on repeat. It’s the kind of adaptation that could really click if handled with care, and I’m here for it.

When a late-night call or a terse text appears on the page, it’s rarely just logistics — it’s a miniature earthquake that reshapes a character. I love how novelists use emergency contact moments to pry open closets: a name on a hospital form can reveal estrangement, a concealed relationship, or a past the protagonist swore was buried. I’ve seen entire arcs hinge on that one bureaucratic detail. One scene might have a protagonist staring at a form and deciding whether to put an ex’s name down; that quiet decision ripples into choices about trust, caregiving, and identity later on. On a structural level, emergency-contact incidents are fantastic for accelerating stakes without heavy exposition. An unexpected phone call — a death, an accident, a frantic hospital plea — thrusts characters into active decision-making, forcing them to reconcile with old wounds or discover hidden strengths. Authors can use this to reveal backstory through action rather than flashback: how a character reacts under pressure tells you far more than a paragraph of description. Emotionally, those scenes test loyalties. Who shows up? Who answers the call? Sometimes the listed contact is a liar or stranger, and that twist can spin a redemption arc or a descent into paranoia. I always get drawn in when a seemingly small administrative detail becomes the key to unlocking a character’s past and future — it’s low-tech dramaturgy with high emotional pay, and it’s one of my favorite tools for watching people change on the page.

about the PDF—yes, it does exist! I remember searching for it myself when I wanted to reread the book on my tablet during a long trip. You can find it on major ebook platforms like Amazon Kindle or Google Play Books, and sometimes even libraries offer digital loans. If you're like me and prefer owning a physical copy but still want the convenience of digital, the PDF is a great middle ground. Just make sure you're getting it legally to support the author. The formatting holds up well, though I still think the paperback has its charm, especially for those rainy-day reads.