Which Short Story Contests Offer Feedback Or Critiques To Entrants?

Question

Seems like every contest just sends rejections. Are there any short story competitions where judges actually give constructive feedback or manuscript critiques?

CamRowe · Answer

I love this question because it shifts the focus from just winning to improving. A contest that gave me fantastic notes was the 'Bristol Short Story Prize'. They don't guarantee it for everyone, but I received a paragraph of really thoughtful feedback on a story that didn't place, which was a lovely surprise. The 'Sean O'Faolain' Short Story Competition is also reputed to give feedback to shortlisted entries.

For flash fiction, the 'Flash 500' competition offers a critique option. Another route is to look at contests run by literary agencies trying to discover new talent; they sometimes give feedback as a way to build relationships with writers. It's a slower process, but building a list of 5-10 reliable, feedback-oriented contests you enter yearly can become a core part of your development cycle.

OrionLane · Answer

I've noticed a trend where some contests are partnering with writing software or platforms to offer 'automated' feedback tools as part of the entry. I'm skeptical of these. A grammar and style check is not the same as narrative feedback. When evaluating a contest, check if the feedback is coming from a human judge, an editor, or an algorithm.

Stick to the ones that specify human feedback. The 'ProWritingAid' partnership contests might be fine for technical issues, but for story structure, character, and voice, you need a person. The 'Now Novel' contests often include human feedback from their coaches. Clarity about the source of the feedback is crucial. An AI-generated paragraph of vague praise is worse than no feedback at all because it feels deceitful. Always look for contests that name their judges or editorial team.

LuxBoyd · Answer

University literary magazine contests for students are a sure bet. If you're a student (undergrad or grad), submit to those. The editors are often MFA candidates who are deep in workshop culture and are encouraged to provide meaningful feedback, especially to fellow students. They see it as part of the literary community service. I got a full page of typed notes from a grad student editor on a story I submitted to a university journal's contest.

It was the most thorough, craft-focused critique I've ever received, full of references to narrative theory and close reading. Absolutely incredible.

ZaneSharp · Answer

I don't have a list handy, but I just submitted to 'Writer's Digest' short story contest and they specifically mention feedback for a fee. It's like an add-on you can purchase when you enter. Might be worth checking if their current cycle still offers that. Not exactly free critique, but if you're serious and willing to pay the entry plus the critique fee, it's a structured way to get professional eyes on your work. I haven't received mine back yet, so I can't vouch for the depth, but the option exists.

Sometimes these add-ons feel a bit cash-grabby, but if the judges are legit, it could be useful.

WesLane · Answer

My two cents: focus on contests run by organizations with an educational mission. Writing centers, libraries, and arts councils are your friends. The 'Gotham Writers' Workshop' runs contests with feedback elements. The 'Loft Literary Center' competitions often include mentorship. The 'Kansas City Writers Group' annual contest includes written critiques for an additional fee.

These organizations aren't profit-driven in the same way some online contest platforms might be; their goal is to foster writers. Therefore, the feedback is often more thoughtful and constructive. Local or regional contests can be especially good for this—they have fewer entries and a stronger community ethos. Check the websites of your state or city's arts commission. You might be surprised at the quality of the contests and the attention your submission receives.

KaneHunt · Answer

Check out university-affiliated contests or those run by MFA programs. They sometimes offer critique as part of the entry, seeing it as an extension of their teaching mission. I remember the 'Katherine Anne Porter Prize' from Nimrod International Journal had an option for commentary years ago. You need to scour the submission guidelines of literary journals attached to universities.

These contests might have lower visibility but a more academic, workshop-style approach. The feedback might come from graduate students or editors-in-training, but it can be quite detailed and earnest.

HazelRyan · Answer

Sometimes the prize is the feedback. Contests where the prize includes a mentorship, an editorial consultation, or a spot in a workshop. The 'Writers of the Future' contest does this with its workshop for winners. The 'Rising Star' contest from a small press might offer a developmental edit as the prize. You're not getting feedback on your losing entry, but you're winning a more intensive feedback experience for a future project.

Look at the prize description, not just the cash amount. An editorial package can be worth more to your career long-term.

MiloShaw · Answer

I tend to be skeptical of any contest charging a high entry fee and promising feedback—it can feel like a revenue stream disguised as a service. But some lower-fee or free contests do it out of genuine goodwill. The 'Winter/Summer Tales' contest from 'Tales from the Forest' magazine offers detailed feedback on every submission for a very small fee. It feels like a fair exchange.

'The Suburban Review's' 'Woofer' (flash) and 'Tweeter' (micro) contests sometimes give shoutouts or mini-critiques on their shortlist announcements. It's not formal, but it's something. Also, don't ignore fanfiction communities; sites like Archive of Our Own have regular challenges where feedback is the entire culture. While not 'contests' in the traditional sense, the critique you get there can be incredibly thorough and passionate.

IvyLong · Answer

Flash fiction contests are more likely to offer feedback because the reads are quicker. The 'Microfiction Monday' magazine contests often give a sentence or two of reaction. The '50-Word Stories' contest (run by a guy named Tim) sometimes comments on every entry he publishes. These are less formal but can be wonderfully direct.

Similarly, daily or weekly prompt contests on sites like 'Writer's Digest' or 'Reedsy' have community voting and comments. While not professional editorial feedback, seeing what resonates with a reader pool is its own form of data. For someone just starting out or looking to test ideas quickly, this rapid, low-stakes feedback loop can be more useful than waiting months for a single judge's notes from a major contest. It builds resilience and an instinct for what works.

CatoShaw · Answer

The best feedback I ever got was from a contest I didn't even think I had a shot at. It was for the 'Commonwealth Short Story Prize'. They don't promise it, but for regional winners and shortlisted entries, the judges' comments were incredibly thorough and respectful. It felt like a masterclass. That experience taught me to sometimes aim higher; even if you don't win, making a shortlist at a prestigious contest can yield amazing insights.

Smaller contests can be great for consistent, kind feedback, but the depth of analysis from a panel of established authors at a major prize is different. So don't rule out the bigger names entirely. Sometimes, just getting to a certain round triggers feedback. Always check the 'prizes' section of a contest website; if they list 'professional critique' or 'mentorship' as a prize for runners-up or shortlisters, that's a good sign.

MilesRice · Answer

Literary agencies sometimes run contests to find new clients. These are high-stakes. While they might not give feedback to everyone, if you're a runner-up or finalist, the agent might give you a sentence or two of encouragement or a 'send me your next thing.' That's the most valuable feedback of all: an industry professional inviting you to submit again. It's a market signal.

So for agent-judged contests, treat the entire submission as a query. The 'feedback' is whether you get a request for more material. That's actionable intelligence on your story's commercial appeal.

KindShelf · Answer

A final practical tip: when you do receive feedback from a contest, whether you agree with it or not, say thank you if you have the opportunity (like if it comes via email from a named editor). It's a small industry, and gratitude is remembered. Don't argue with the feedback. Take what's useful, discard what isn't, and keep writing.

The goal is to build a reputation as a serious, professional writer, even at the contest stage. That professionalism can sometimes lead to future opportunities with that magazine or judge, beyond the contest itself. They might remember your gracious response and be more open to your next submission. So, view the feedback not just as notes on a story, but as the beginning of a professional relationship. That mindset shift makes the whole contest feedback process even more valuable.

DavidWard · Answer

I approach contests like a consumer now. What's the ROI? If I pay $20, what do I get? A 0.01% chance at $1000, or a 100% chance at a professional critique? The latter often has more value. Contests that clearly state they provide 'detailed judge's comments' or 'editorial feedback' are the ones I target. The 'Scribe Publications' Short Story Prize for Young Indigenous Writers is an example where mentorship and feedback are central.

'Grindstone' Literary Service runs a novel opening contest with in-line critiques. While not short story, it shows the model. For short stories, the 'Fiction Factory' competition from 'The Writer's Academy' promises feedback. I've started keeping a spreadsheet tracking which contests provided useful feedback, the tone of it, and whether I'd enter again. It turns contesting into a strategic learning tool.

AlexDay · Answer

I wonder if the desire for feedback is making contests evolve. We might see more of them adopting a 'contest-plus-workshop' model in the future. Already, some have 'longlist' announcements where they quote a line from each story, which is a tiny form of public feedback. The 'Forge' Flash Fiction Contest does this, and it's thrilling to see what line they picked from yours.

Other contests, like the 'BBC National Short Story Award', release podcasts or interviews where judges discuss the shortlisted stories, which is like masterclass feedback by proxy. So even if you don't get personal notes, engaging with the contest's post-result content can be a form of feedback. Listen to what the judges praise or critique about the winning entries and apply it to your own work. It's a passive, but often very insightful, learning tool.

Which Short Story Contests Offer Feedback Or Critiques To Entrants?

14 答案

相關作品

YEARNERS: A COLLECTION SHORT STORIES

WILD PLEASURE {short stories}

Burning Passion {steamiest short stories}

Dirty (short stories)

Shifter Short Stories

TALES OF INSTANT LUST - SHORT READS

相關問題

Which short story competitions offer detailed feedback to writers?

Which short story contests for money offer the highest prizes?

Can you recommend short story competitions for new writers?

相關搜尋

Fantasy Writing Competitions

Micro Story Competition

Best Story For Story Writing Competition