Why Are Booktok Books So Bad Compared To Classics?

Booktok has undeniably become a cultural phenomenon, but its influence on literature is a double-edged sword. While it has brought attention to books that might have otherwise gone unnoticed, the platform often prioritizes aesthetics and trends over literary depth. Many 'Booktok books' are chosen for their ability to create viral moments—think dramatic plot twists or emotional gut punches—rather than their narrative complexity or character development. This focus on instant gratification can lead to a homogenization of recommendations, where books with similar tropes or themes dominate the discourse. Moreover, the algorithm-driven nature of Booktok means that books with mass appeal often rise to the top, leaving little room for niche or experimental works. This can result in a cycle where only certain types of stories gain traction, while others are overlooked. While there’s nothing inherently wrong with enjoying popular books, the lack of diversity in recommendations can make it seem like Booktok books are 'bad' when, in reality, they’re just catering to a specific audience. It’s less about the quality of the books and more about the ecosystem that promotes them.

BookTok has undeniably become a cultural phenomenon, but not all authors are thrilled about its impact on literature. Many argue that the platform prioritizes aesthetics and trends over substance, leading to a surge in books that are more about marketability than meaningful storytelling. Authors often feel pressured to conform to these trends, sacrificing depth and originality for viral potential. Additionally, the fast-paced nature of TikTok encourages quick consumption, which can result in oversimplified narratives and shallow character development. This focus on instant gratification can overshadow the craft of writing, leaving authors frustrated. While BookTok has brought attention to many deserving books, it also risks homogenizing literature, pushing authors to create works that cater to fleeting trends rather than enduring artistic value.

As someone who spends a lot of time on BookTok and in literary circles, I’ve noticed a recurring critique about BookTok books. Critics often argue that many of these books prioritize marketability over depth, focusing on tropes and trends rather than nuanced storytelling. Books like 'It Ends with Us' by Colleen Hoover or 'The Love Hypothesis' by Ali Hazelwood are frequently cited as examples. While they’re undeniably popular and emotionally engaging, some critics feel they lack the complexity or originality found in more traditionally acclaimed works. Another point of contention is the oversaturation of certain genres, particularly romance and young adult fiction, which dominate BookTok. Critics argue that this limits exposure to diverse genres and voices, creating an echo chamber of similar themes and styles. Additionally, the fast-paced nature of TikTok encourages quick, surface-level engagement with books, which can lead to oversimplified recommendations that don’t always highlight the best literary qualities. That said, it’s important to acknowledge that BookTok has also introduced many readers to books they might not have discovered otherwise. While critics may find fault with the trend-driven nature of these recommendations, the platform’s ability to foster a love of reading in a new generation is undeniably valuable.

BookTok has become a cultural phenomenon, and its impact on promoting diverse books is a topic of much debate. On one hand, it has undeniably amplified voices and stories that might have otherwise gone unnoticed. Creators on the platform have championed books by authors of color, LGBTQ+ writers, and those from marginalized communities, bringing them to the forefront of literary conversations. For instance, books like 'The Hate U Give' by Angie Thomas and 'Cemetery Boys' by Aiden Thomas have gained massive traction thanks to BookTok. However, there are valid concerns about the platform’s tendency to favor certain types of books, often those with dramatic or emotionally charged plots, which can overshadow quieter, equally important stories. Additionally, the algorithm-driven nature of TikTok can sometimes create echo chambers, limiting exposure to a broader range of diverse literature. While BookTok has made strides in promoting diversity, it’s essential to recognize its limitations and continue seeking out diverse voices beyond the platform.

Booktok has undeniably become a cultural phenomenon, but its focus often leans heavily towards books that are easy to consume rather than those that challenge or provoke deep thought. Many of the popular recommendations on Booktok are romance, YA, or fantasy novels that prioritize fast-paced plots and emotional highs over literary complexity. While these books can be enjoyable, they often lack the depth, nuanced character development, and thematic richness that serious readers crave. Additionally, the algorithm-driven nature of Booktok tends to amplify books that are visually appealing or have viral moments, rather than those with enduring literary merit. This creates a feedback loop where the same types of books are repeatedly promoted, leaving little room for more intellectually stimulating works. For serious readers, this can feel like a missed opportunity to discover books that offer more substance and provoke meaningful reflection. That said, Booktok isn’t entirely without merit. It has introduced many people to reading and created a vibrant community around books. However, for those seeking more than just entertainment, it’s important to look beyond the platform’s trends and explore other avenues for discovering literature that aligns with their deeper interests.

BookTok has undeniably brought a surge of attention to the literary world, but for many literary enthusiasts, the books that dominate the platform often fall short of expectations. The focus tends to be on fast-paced, emotionally charged stories that prioritize instant gratification over depth and nuance. While books like 'It Ends with Us' by Colleen Hoover or 'The Song of Achilles' by Madeline Miller are undeniably popular, they often lack the intricate character development and thematic complexity that literary readers crave. Moreover, the algorithm-driven nature of BookTok tends to amplify a narrow range of genres, primarily romance, young adult, and fantasy. This leaves little room for literary fiction, experimental works, or translated literature to gain traction. The emphasis on aesthetics—such as pretty covers or quotable lines—can overshadow the quality of the writing itself. For those who value prose, structure, and originality, the BookTok phenomenon can feel like a missed opportunity to celebrate truly groundbreaking literature. That said, it’s not all bad. BookTok has introduced many people to reading who might not have picked up a book otherwise. However, for literary enthusiasts, the platform’s focus on trends and virality often comes at the expense of discovering works that challenge, provoke, or inspire deeper thought.

BookTok has undeniably brought a lot of attention to the literary world, but it’s not without its downsides. One major issue is the oversimplification of complex books. Many creators reduce intricate narratives to catchy soundbites or aesthetic visuals, which can mislead viewers about the depth of the story. This often leads to disappointment when readers realize the book doesn’t match the hype. Another problem is the echo chamber effect. Popular books get even more attention, while lesser-known gems are overlooked. This creates a cycle where only a handful of books dominate the platform, limiting diversity in recommendations. Additionally, the pressure to read trending books can make reading feel like a chore rather than a personal journey. Lastly, the focus on aesthetics over substance can be frustrating. Some creators prioritize how a book looks on a shelf or how it fits into a certain aesthetic, rather than discussing its themes or writing quality. This superficial approach can detract from meaningful literary discussions and discourage deeper engagement with books.

BookTok has undeniably revolutionized the way books are discovered and promoted, but it’s not without its downsides for authors. The platform’s algorithm favors quick, viral content, which often means authors feel pressured to create flashy, attention-grabbing posts rather than focusing on the depth of their work. This can lead to oversimplification of complex narratives, reducing books to mere trends or aesthetics. Additionally, the fast-paced nature of BookTok means that even if a book gains momentary popularity, it can quickly be overshadowed by the next big thing, leaving authors struggling to maintain long-term engagement. The pressure to constantly produce content can also be exhausting, especially for authors who are introverted or prefer to let their writing speak for itself. Moreover, the reliance on BookTok for marketing can create an uneven playing field, where authors with larger followings or more resources dominate, making it harder for new or lesser-known writers to break through. While BookTok can be a powerful tool, it’s important to recognize its limitations and the challenges it poses for authors trying to navigate this new landscape. Another issue is the potential for misrepresentation. BookTok’s focus on short, snappy reviews or recommendations can sometimes lead to books being misunderstood or mischaracterized. A nuanced, thought-provoking novel might be reduced to a single trope or plot point, which can alienate readers who pick it up expecting something entirely different. This can be frustrating for authors who pour their heart and soul into their work, only to see it reduced to a fleeting trend. Furthermore, the pressure to conform to BookTok’s preferences can stifle creativity, as authors might feel compelled to write stories that align with current trends rather than following their own artistic vision. While BookTok has undoubtedly brought attention to many deserving books, it’s crucial to consider the ways in which it can be detrimental to the very authors it seeks to promote.