How Does The Pevear And Volokhonsky War And Peace Read?

2026-07-23 08:27:58
243
分享
ABO人格測試
快速測測看!你的真實屬性是 Alpha、Beta 還是 Omega?
費洛蒙
屬性
理想的戀愛
潛藏慾望
隱藏黑化屬性
馬上測測看

5 答案

Fenn
Fenn
Plot Detective Mechanic
As a non-native English speaker who reads Russian, I find P&V incredibly helpful as a crib. When I want to check my understanding of a complex Tolstoy sentence, I look at their version because it hews so closely to the Russian structure. That said, for pure reading pleasure in English, it often fails. The English feels second-hand, like a detailed report on the novel rather than the novel itself. It's a brilliant tool for students and enthusiasts who want to peer behind the curtain of translation, but I would never recommend it as someone's first and only experience with 'War and Peace.' It's a companion to the original, not a replacement for a fluid, recreated English text.
2026-07-25 00:59:33
19
KatePayne
KatePayne
Bibliophile Chef
That's a loaded question, because P&V's translation is famously divisive. I fell into the camp that found it jarring at first—the syntax feels intentionally un-English, preserving the cadence of Tolstoy's Russian. It can read as stiff or even awkward in places where other translations flow smoothly. For readers who want a 'transparent' English version that doesn't feel translated, this might not be it. Their goal seems to be authenticity to the source text's structure, even at the cost of natural English phrasing. Some passages have a strange power because of that choice; others just feel clunky. It's a translation that demands you meet Tolstoy on his own linguistic terms, which is both its strength and its biggest potential weakness.
2026-07-25 03:43:37
17
DaxMoreno
DaxMoreno
Honest Reviewer Driver
Their translation reads like a deliberate rebuttal to Constance Garnett's. Where Garnett smoothed, P&V roughen. Where Garnett made Tolstoy sound like a Victorian English novelist, P&V make him sound like... a Russian novelist writing in a deliberately awkward English translation. It's a reactive, polemical approach. Knowing that context helps. You're not just reading Tolstoy; you're reading an argument about how Tolstoy should be read in English. That argument is intellectually stimulating, but it can also feel like you're consuming a manifesto alongside the novel. For a clean, less ideologically charged read, the more recent translations by Anthony Briggs or Marian Schwartz might be better starting points.
2026-07-26 16:49:20
7
AveryWest
AveryWest
Honest Reviewer Librarian
It reads like what it is: a hybrid. You have Volokhonsky's ultra-literal Russian-to-English crib, and then Pevear's literary reshaping. Sometimes that partnership produces magic, finding an English rhythm that somehow still smells of Russian soil. Other times, you feel the seams. The dialogue is where it most often falls apart for me. Characters, especially women and lower-class figures, sometimes speak in a stilted, almost caricatured manner that doesn't match the psychological depth Tolstoy gives them. The narration is usually stronger. So you're constantly oscillating between profound insight into Tolstoy's mind and slight cringes at how his people talk. A bumpy, fascinating, and ultimately worthwhile ride, but only if you have patience for the bumps.
2026-07-29 11:50:36
5
MaxKid
MaxKid
Frequent Answerer Accountant
LOL, I bought the fancy hardcover set because it looks impressive on my shelf. Opened it, read fifty pages, and noped right back to my old paperback. That's my review.
2026-07-29 23:38:31
17
查看全部答案
掃碼下載 APP

相關作品

相關問題

How does the Pevear and Volokhonsky War and Peace compare?

2 答案2026-07-23 21:28:05
Can we talk about the physical book itself? The Everyman's Library edition of their translation is a beautiful object, and having the French translated in the footnotes (instead of left in-text as in some older versions) is a godsend for non-bilingual readers. It makes the reading process smoother, even if the translation's style is deliberate. The quality of the paper, the sewn binding—it feels like an heirloom. In a weird way, the weighty, formal prose suits this beautiful, weighty volume. It feels like you're undertaking a serious, monumental task, which reading 'War and Peace' should feel like. It turns the act of reading into a bit of a ritual, which I found added to the experience rather than detracted from it.

How do the Pevear and Volokhonsky War and Peace translations differ?

7 答案2026-07-23 01:36:32
It's not just a difference in wording; it's a difference in rhythm. Pevear and Volokhonsky preserve the repetitive, incantatory quality of Tolstoy's prose. When a phrase repeats in the Russian, it repeats in their English, which older translations often smoothed over. This creates a hypnotic, philosophical drive that's central to the book's power. You feel the weight of history and the cyclical nature of human conflict in the very structure of the sentences. The Maude translation, while elegant, sometimes loses that rhythmic pounding in favor of more varied English. So if the metaphysical heft of the novel is what draws you, P&V might offer something unique.

What is the most readable modern English edition of War and Peace?

7 答案2026-07-23 23:57:38
Ultimately, you can't go wrong with Maude (Oxford), Briggs (Penguin), or Pevear (Vintage). They're all stellar achievements. Pick the one whose sample pages pull you in. The one that makes you forget you're reading a translation after a few chapters. That invisible quality, where the author seems to be speaking directly to you in your own language, is the true hallmark of readability. Trust your gut after reading a few pages of each.
探索並免費閱讀 優質小說
GoodNovel APP 免費暢讀海量優秀小說,下載喜歡的書籍,隨時隨地閱讀。
在 APP 免費閱讀書籍
掃碼在 APP 閱讀
DMCA.com Protection Status