5 Answers2026-05-01
Thorin Oakenshield’s change from the beginning of the story to the end is a great example of how power can corrupt. The leader of the group of dwarves at the beginning is very brave, principled and loyal to his friends. However, once the group of dwarves have reclaimed Erebor and there is so much treasure there, all of Thorin’s flaws are magnified. The gold does not change him to worse, but it does bring out the worst in him. There is a great scene where Thorin walks through a lot of gold and he trails his fingers through it like it is a lover. That is a really scary scene and you can see where Thorin’s resolve to regain Erebor was going to change to and that is to an obsession with gold. Smaug is a hoarder as well and he is malice personified, but Thorin’s downfall is so much more tragic because it is human. When Thorin dies his last words are of regret for having wasted his second chance for friendship.
7 Answers2025-02-01
The History of The Hobbit, a massive compilation of drafts and notes by Tolkien, does not give an exact height for Thorin but describes parameters for the Dwarves that are consistently adhered to throughout his work. In the early drawings by Tolkien himself of the Dwarves, they are depicted as being quite short. This is his authorial intention and so is the ‘closest’ to an answer for their height that we have.
A film would perhaps choose to make the leader of the thirteen dwarves the tallest of the lot to signify his status. That would be a choice though, intended to serve the purposes of the film. Tolkien used prose to bring out the individual personalities of the dwarves in the book, so the ‘real’ height of the dwarves is that of the book, but the ‘effective’ height of them in films and plays is a choice that serves the medium’s purposes. Knowing the source material and the reasons for changes helps one appreciate a character’s transition from one medium to another.
11 Answers2026-06-08
Of course, immortality can make even the most forward thinking elves rather conservative and stagnant. They’ve watched the rise and fall of countless civilizations over the millennia, and thus see little sense in trying to accomplish anything that others before them have already done. Conflict with shorter lived, more impulsive species like humans is almost a given, and can make for a compelling plot. But if elves were mortal, that would be an entirely different story. The immortal, conservative elves versus the short lived, more progressive humans would be a classic, almost tropic, dichotomy that would add a further layer of ideological and cultural tension to any fantasy world.
3 Answers2025-03-10
A half-elf lives a midlife span between humans and elves. Half-elves can live from 150 to 180 years, while the exceptional half-elf can live up to 200 years. Half-elves are able to experience more of both human and elven culture and are able to more fully develop skills and learning. Because of this, half-elves are very versatile and are able to thrive in most any society.
4 Answers2025-09-16
An animated short version is also sweet and entertaining. The short was very well done and presented a great version of the Shoemaker and his magical Elves that worked through the night while the Shoemaker slept. The short followed the story well and was very entertaining.
Additionally, there are many illustrated children’s books that have been created which offer a fresh perspective on the classic story. Most are designed to be read by children and are available in a variety of formats. There are also many stage adaptations as well as holiday performances that are held in cozy theaters around the country.
The different versions manage to keep the substance of the classic fairy tale alive while adding their own touch. An old fairy tale is doing well to be reworked and bring joy to people of all ages.
3 Answers2025-12-16
I also liked ‘The Elves and the Shoemaker’. The shoemaker was very nice, a very humble man. He had so much faith in the kindness of others. The wife of the shoemaker is also very nice. She wanted to repay the elves for all their work, she was so smart and had so much heart. And the elves, oh the elves! They were so very magical. Literally! They were tiny, and they worked all day and all night in secret. They didn’t ask for anything in return. The way that the elves worked in secret with the humans was wonderful. The elves and the humans worked together for mutual care. They were very special, the way that they worked together in secret. The little clothes that the shoemaker sewed for the elves, and the way that the shoemaker sneaked a peek at the elves when they were asleep were very special. The story was so simple but it had a lot of good characters in it.
3 Answers2026-04-18
First of all, it’s quite creepy and also very sad at the same time. Poor Smeagol has been alone in that cave for 500 years, with nothing but that Golden Ring and his lies about it for company. So, his long rambling monologues to himself, about his precious, are just the idle chatter of a lonely mind starving for any sort of human company, relieving itself by talking to this thing. Tolkien was a Catholic, and it’s interesting to see in this the twisted form of idolatry, where a personworships an false god, which will devour him. And in a way, the Ring even speaks to Smeagol. The Ring is a powerful symbol of temptation to power, but here it’s shown to be a foul and insidious parasite that gradually destroys it’s host’s mind, and takes over their personality. Eventually it leaves nothing but a pathetic, empty shell, as is shown by the fate of poor Gollum in this story: he was completely consumed by his one terrible addiction.
9 Answers2026-07-27
I prefer editions of The Hobbit that include Tolkien’s own artwork. He wasn’t an artist, and his drawings are not nearly as good as those of a professional illustrator. But there is something raw and map-like about his drawings of Bag End or Smaug that perfectly conveys the sense of another world which he created. These should not be small, black-and-white illustrations inserted into the text. Rather, they should be full-page drawings – sometimes in color – a wonderful part of the book as it was written. The best editions of The Hobbit include all of Tolkien’s sketches and paintings as they were. These are not illustrations added to a published story. Rather, they are part of a recovered artifact from the Middle-earth story itself. There is a huge difference in atmosphere between a published book and a notebook.
8 Answers2025-05-27
I await other comments herein concerning international awards. The UK’s Waterstones Children’s Book Prize is a very notable literary award in the UK. US-focused comments are always interesting to me given that this book has read and resonated globally with so very many readers. Its themes of injustice, identity, and voicing one’s intellectual and creative views are universally relatable, even if a highly American context is given to their expression.
3 Answers2026-06-29
It’s so wonderful to end on a note of triumph and sadness at the same time. Sauron’s defeated, Aragorn’s made king, and the hobbits return to the Shire to save it from the creatures that have taken over. But poor Frodo is too damaged to return to the Shire, and his goodbye to Sam is so quietly and profoundly heart-wrenching, as the music swells and he departs into the distance on a ship. But then we return to Sam, and he walks back to his home, and he hears the laughter of his kids. He smiles. The end was wonderful because it balances the epic with the mundane. The saving of the world is not the end of the story. What comes after that is.