Library

Which Translations Of Fyodor Dostoevsky Books Are Best?

Anyone feel like some Dostoevsky translations (like for The Brothers Karamazov) flow more naturally for modern readers than others? Comparing Pevear/Volokhonsky to Garnett's older style.
2025-08-31 06:16:59
1.2K
Share
ABO Personality Quiz
Take a quick quiz to find out whether you‘re Alpha, Beta, or Omega.
Scent
Personality
Ideal Love Pattern
Secret Desire
Your Dark Side
Start Test

7 Answers

Best Answer
Lasrus Kit
Lasrus Kit
The new translations of Dostoevsky by Pevear & Volokhonsky are fine, capturing the strange rhythms of his psychological dramas, and are praised by many for their accuracy. But then again, there are many excellent older translations, starting with the great Constance Garnett, and readers will probably still find that they prefer some of them over others depending on whether they value ‘up-to-date’ accuracy above all or a good narrative voice of whatever period. I have just finished reading ‘The Russian’ by Benjamin Hale, a thriller set in the present day, full of snappy dialogue and intense internal monologues, but in the end a fine exploration of a moral conundrum as the hero becomes embroiled in a battle of corporate espionage. I would call it a novel of rather similar parameters to those of Dostoevsky, though rather of this world.
2026-08-06
Zander
Zander
Most modern translations of Dostoevsky’s novels aim to preserve the mood of the original. In search of the best companion to my reading, I look for the translations by Pevear & Volokhonsky, published by Penguin and other presses. In my opinion, they are the best: their translation preserves the rhythms and syntax of the original Russian and therefore the protagonists are represented more sharply and their philosophical discussions have greater impact.

Another translator is Constance Garnett. Her translations of Russian novels were some of the first to be translated into English and thus helped open up the world of Russian literature to readers in other countries. Yes, they can read somewhat Victorian, but they are often free and so worth a look. A more recent translator of Crime and Punishment is Oliver Ready, who has found a good balance of clear and rhythmic prose. Another good choice would be a Penguin edition with footnotes and an introduction by a good scholar, as well as a Norton edition with tons of notes and an introduction.

Try reading the opening pages of “Notes from Underground” or the start of “The Brothers Karamazov” in two different translations. You will probably prefer one over the other in terms of the “immediacy” of voice, some translations read more smoothly and have the feel of 19th century prose. Many good editions also have excellent introductions and notes. These can greatly enhance your reading of the book, regardless of whether you are reading a very literal translation, or a more lyrical one.
2025-09-01
Wyatt
Wyatt
I have all of the translators on my ipod as ‘playlists’ and I choose the one that fits my mood. If I want raw psychological insight into the characters then Pevear & Volokhonsky are the translators to choose. They are wonderful at preserving the almost conversation-like structure of the novel, including the awkward sentence breaks and all the wonderful rhetorical flourishes. Their translation reads very modernly but is always true to the original.

Sometimes, though, I want something smoother and more novelistic. Thus, I reach for Garnett’s edition or for an older translation from the mid-century, say Feydeau’s or of Hutchins’s, because they read so much better. Sometimes the Russian idioms and phrases are domesticated, of course, and this is not always nice because then the great Russian novel can read rather like a Victorian-era moralistic drama, rather than a repellent and confessional novel of psychological and philosophical insights into the human condition.

It’s also really fun to read the first 20 pages or so of a novel in different translations on your Kindle, or even to browse editions in a library. Either way, you get to experience the authorial voice of the translator and see pretty quickly whether you’re going to click with any given translator’s approach to a novel. Then, you can read the rest of the book in that edition (supplemented by criticism, of course, or even a related podcast discussion), and actually feel like you’re reading a novel, not doing homework.
2025-09-04
Uma
Uma
I’ve lost count of the number of editions of Dostoevsky that I have gone through. The best English translations for fidelity to Dostoevsky’s text and for a translation that has a Russian flavor are Pevear & Volokhonsky. But if you are on a very tight budget or prefer the older, more mellow English of the 19th century literature then translated versions by Constance Garnett are still very readable and even free online in many cases.

Other Dostoevsky translations that I have found to have a good ‘voice’ are by Oliver Ready, (e.g. his Notes from Underground is excellent). But as with any book, publishers make a big difference. So, for example, Penguin, Oxford University Press and Norton all have excellent introductions and notes for specific books by Dostoevsky, which can really help when he takes off on some long theological tangent.

For a more introspective take on translating Dostoevsky, sample the opening chapters of two or more editions. Heavily annotated editions are also worth considering. And trust your instincts: go with the translation that will continue to engage you with his work, thick and complex as it is. Just wait until the translation “clicks.” It’s an experience like no other.
2025-09-06
Melissa Raymond Mcmasters Whipkey
Melissa Raymond Mcmasters Whipkey
Is it just me, or do the cover designs for translations of a single work give you a sense of how good the translation is? For example, a dark, moody painting by a well-known artist in a Penguin Classic suggests a serious and very literary translation, whereas a bold and modern design in a more recent edition of the same work by the same translator suggests a fresher and more contemporary take on the original.

I try not to judge books by their covers. But I am a human being and the Garnett translation does look different in a musty old paperback with tiny print than it does in a smart new edition with plenty of white space. (The publishers know this, of course, and so the best translation is also a marketing and design project which prepares the reader for what they are going to read).
2026-07-31

Related Books

Related Questions

Who publishes the best Dostoevsky book translations today?

11 Answers2025-08-18
I have a sort of contrarian perspective here. The best translations of literature are typically the oldest published versions, from the early part of the 20th century. This is because there is so much of value in the cultural filter of a translator. The translation becomes a sort of historical document of how the literature was perceived and assimilated by the English-speaking world of that era. I have a number of these very old published versions of Dostoevsky, some of which even I wouldn’t recommend to the general reader, for reasons already mentioned, yet they are of enormous value to the literary historian. For the enthusiast of literature with an interest in reception history, the old published versions are the ‘best’ in a totally different, meta sense.

What is the best translation of Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky?

8 Answers2025-07-13
It’s interesting that no one has brought up the Constance Garnett translation of “Crime and Punishment” yet. While her translation is historical and oft-reprinted, reading it after P&V is like watching a movie with the contrast cranked down low. The rough edges of Garnett’s translation have all been smoothed over to make Dostoevsky’s work read like that of a slightly more agitated Jane Austen. But Dostoevsky isn’t Austen. He’s a tough, uncomfortable, and repetitive writer who dives deep into the psychological inner lives of his characters to expose their inner conflicts and psychological fears. The P&V translation has somehow managed to resurrect all of the edgey and uncomfortable aspects of Dostoevsky’s novel for English-speaking readers. While it’s true that some of the translations are a bit awkward, it’s sort of necessary in order to accurately portray the main character, Raskolnikov, as well as the dirty, sick, and oppressive city in which he lives. If you want to read a smooth and pleasant classic, then read something else. But “Crime and Punishment” is not for the faint of heart, and you’ll need a translation that isn’t afraid of the novel’s mess.

What translations of Fyodor Dostoevsky The Idiot are best?

9 Answers2025-07-16
Just as there are different interpretations of a Beethoven symphony – period-instruments performance, lush orchestral recording from mid-20th century, piano transcription, etc. – all playing the same notes but with a different timbre, tempo and overall ‘feel’ to them, Garnett being the grand, romantic orchestral recording of Beethoven’s work from the mid-20th century, P&V a period-instruments version of Beethoven’s work often jarring but attempting to be historically accurate, McDuff a crisp and clear digital recording of Beethoven’s work, Avsey being a passionate live performance of Beethoven’s work, etc. – none of them are objectively better than the others; they’re all just different interpretations of the work, and which one to go for will depend on what you’re looking for in music and/or prose.

What translations of Dostoevsky's Demons are best?

9 Answers2025-06-03
The translation by Michael R. Katz of the novel by Dostoevsky is called The Devils and I think this title is very significant. Demons connotes some sort of internal, perhaps even spiritual force, whereas The Devils implies a number of external, almost person-like forces of evil roaming around in society and corrupting it. In other words, The Devils is a far more politically charged novel than Demons and certainly less of a psychological study of the illness of Russia than the latter novel. My emphasis here is on the historical and polemical aspects of the novel and so by choosing a translation, one is also choosing to view the novel through a somewhat subtle but distinctive interpretive lens even as one reads the title of the novel. Does one see the evil in the novel as some sort of disease of the soul of Russia (Demons) or as a group of rather malicious individuals (The Devils)? Both readings are certainly possible in the novel and are supported by it.

Who holds the copyright for books by Fyodor Dostoevsky now?

9 Answers2025-06-02
There are scam websites which are selling PDF versions of novels by famous authors and claiming that they are selling “exclusive rights” to read the work. I have seen this done for works by Mark Twain such as The Prince and the Pauper and A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court. They are simply ripping off the free PDF versions found on websites such as Project Gutenberg and then charging people to read work that can be had for free. Always check out the work in one of the official free repositories before buying. The copyright status of a work is its friend and prevents it from being artifically scarce.

What is the best translation of Dr Zhivago books?

10 Answers2025-06-07
I don’t get the translation debates for this book. The copy of Dr. Zhivago I read was a used book from my local used bookstore. It was the original 1958 translation by Max Hayward and Manya Harari. I had no problems with the translation. The book is a powerful story with hard characters and it’s a classic. I don’t think that there is overcompensation with translation of this book. Just find a decently reviewed copy and read it. The core of the book is so strong that it shines through.

What are the best translations for books written by Nietzsche?

12 Answers2026-07-29
There is a special case with Nietzsche’s notes and unfinished fragments, compiled under the title The Will to Power by his sister Elisabeth Forster-Nietzsche with often unbearable editorial bias, even Nazi bias. The Kaufmann and Hollingdale translation of The Will to Power includes critical comments on this score. Naturally, one must read this material with extreme caution, bearing in mind that it is not a book by Nietzsche. Translation of these notes requires a huge disclaimer; in fact, one should avoid all editions which present The Will to Power as a single, cohesive work by Nietzsche.

How does book crime and punishment by fyodor dostoevsky end?

3 Answers2025-07-13
Let’s just give some credit to poor Sonya. Rather than telling us about Raskolnikov’s experiences, Sonya gives up her entire life and goes to Siberia. Her quiet strength in the epilogue is far more powerful than Raskolnikov’s collapse. She is the anchor of the entire ending to the novel.

How long is book crime and punishment by fyodor dostoevsky?

10 Answers2025-07-13
A book that benefits from marginalia. I felt like I had the most wonderful time reading this book. I underlined so much, put in so many question marks and exclamation marks, and felt that I was almost arguing with Raskolnikov on the margins of the pages. Noting down all the symbolic moments and tracking the weather and how it affected the mood of the characters was all so very worthwhile. And I felt that the length of the book was made so very meaningful by my having been an active reader, as opposed to having simply read the book. All in all, therefore, my having read this book was not simply a matter of my having logged so many hours, for in fact the time spent reading, and then thinking about and annotating what I had just read, was more than worth while. In short, I felt that I had been able to establish a most wonderful relationship with a very complex book. And if one approaches a classic such as this with the same mindset, then soon one will realize that the number of pages does not even begin to matter. For what matters is not the mere counting down of the number of pages left to read, but rather the wonderful and most superb process of understanding the book that one is reading.

Which dostoevsky books are shortest for quick reads?

8 Answers2025-08-30
The Double is another short work by Dostoevsky worth reading. It’s not the shortest work by the author, but it’s definitely short enough to be read in a few hours of dedicated reading. It’s an early work by Dostoevsky, and it’s interesting to see how he was already developing the major themes of his work, including the effects of madness on a person’s identity. The translation of The Double into English is also very important. An older translation of The Double by Constance Garnett is somewhat clumsy. A much better version of The Double is the translation by the authors of Called Up to the Front, Pevear and Volokhonsky, who also translated Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov for good reason.
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
DMCA.com Protection Status