11 Answers2025-08-18
I have a sort of contrarian perspective here. The best translations of literature are typically the oldest published versions, from the early part of the 20th century. This is because there is so much of value in the cultural filter of a translator. The translation becomes a sort of historical document of how the literature was perceived and assimilated by the English-speaking world of that era. I have a number of these very old published versions of Dostoevsky, some of which even I wouldn’t recommend to the general reader, for reasons already mentioned, yet they are of enormous value to the literary historian. For the enthusiast of literature with an interest in reception history, the old published versions are the ‘best’ in a totally different, meta sense.
8 Answers2025-07-13
It’s interesting that no one has brought up the Constance Garnett translation of “Crime and Punishment” yet. While her translation is historical and oft-reprinted, reading it after P&V is like watching a movie with the contrast cranked down low. The rough edges of Garnett’s translation have all been smoothed over to make Dostoevsky’s work read like that of a slightly more agitated Jane Austen. But Dostoevsky isn’t Austen. He’s a tough, uncomfortable, and repetitive writer who dives deep into the psychological inner lives of his characters to expose their inner conflicts and psychological fears. The P&V translation has somehow managed to resurrect all of the edgey and uncomfortable aspects of Dostoevsky’s novel for English-speaking readers. While it’s true that some of the translations are a bit awkward, it’s sort of necessary in order to accurately portray the main character, Raskolnikov, as well as the dirty, sick, and oppressive city in which he lives. If you want to read a smooth and pleasant classic, then read something else. But “Crime and Punishment” is not for the faint of heart, and you’ll need a translation that isn’t afraid of the novel’s mess.
9 Answers2025-07-16
Just as there are different interpretations of a Beethoven symphony – period-instruments performance, lush orchestral recording from mid-20th century, piano transcription, etc. – all playing the same notes but with a different timbre, tempo and overall ‘feel’ to them, Garnett being the grand, romantic orchestral recording of Beethoven’s work from the mid-20th century, P&V a period-instruments version of Beethoven’s work often jarring but attempting to be historically accurate, McDuff a crisp and clear digital recording of Beethoven’s work, Avsey being a passionate live performance of Beethoven’s work, etc. – none of them are objectively better than the others; they’re all just different interpretations of the work, and which one to go for will depend on what you’re looking for in music and/or prose.
9 Answers2025-06-03
The translation by Michael R. Katz of the novel by Dostoevsky is called The Devils and I think this title is very significant. Demons connotes some sort of internal, perhaps even spiritual force, whereas The Devils implies a number of external, almost person-like forces of evil roaming around in society and corrupting it. In other words, The Devils is a far more politically charged novel than Demons and certainly less of a psychological study of the illness of Russia than the latter novel. My emphasis here is on the historical and polemical aspects of the novel and so by choosing a translation, one is also choosing to view the novel through a somewhat subtle but distinctive interpretive lens even as one reads the title of the novel. Does one see the evil in the novel as some sort of disease of the soul of Russia (Demons) or as a group of rather malicious individuals (The Devils)? Both readings are certainly possible in the novel and are supported by it.
9 Answers2025-06-02
There are scam websites which are selling PDF versions of novels by famous authors and claiming that they are selling “exclusive rights” to read the work. I have seen this done for works by Mark Twain such as The Prince and the Pauper and A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court. They are simply ripping off the free PDF versions found on websites such as Project Gutenberg and then charging people to read work that can be had for free. Always check out the work in one of the official free repositories before buying. The copyright status of a work is its friend and prevents it from being artifically scarce.
10 Answers2025-06-07
I don’t get the translation debates for this book. The copy of Dr. Zhivago I read was a used book from my local used bookstore. It was the original 1958 translation by Max Hayward and Manya Harari. I had no problems with the translation. The book is a powerful story with hard characters and it’s a classic. I don’t think that there is overcompensation with translation of this book. Just find a decently reviewed copy and read it. The core of the book is so strong that it shines through.
12 Answers2026-07-29
There is a special case with Nietzsche’s notes and unfinished fragments, compiled under the title The Will to Power by his sister Elisabeth Forster-Nietzsche with often unbearable editorial bias, even Nazi bias. The Kaufmann and Hollingdale translation of The Will to Power includes critical comments on this score. Naturally, one must read this material with extreme caution, bearing in mind that it is not a book by Nietzsche. Translation of these notes requires a huge disclaimer; in fact, one should avoid all editions which present The Will to Power as a single, cohesive work by Nietzsche.
3 Answers2025-07-13
Let’s just give some credit to poor Sonya. Rather than telling us about Raskolnikov’s experiences, Sonya gives up her entire life and goes to Siberia. Her quiet strength in the epilogue is far more powerful than Raskolnikov’s collapse. She is the anchor of the entire ending to the novel.
10 Answers2025-07-13
A book that benefits from marginalia. I felt like I had the most wonderful time reading this book. I underlined so much, put in so many question marks and exclamation marks, and felt that I was almost arguing with Raskolnikov on the margins of the pages. Noting down all the symbolic moments and tracking the weather and how it affected the mood of the characters was all so very worthwhile. And I felt that the length of the book was made so very meaningful by my having been an active reader, as opposed to having simply read the book. All in all, therefore, my having read this book was not simply a matter of my having logged so many hours, for in fact the time spent reading, and then thinking about and annotating what I had just read, was more than worth while. In short, I felt that I had been able to establish a most wonderful relationship with a very complex book. And if one approaches a classic such as this with the same mindset, then soon one will realize that the number of pages does not even begin to matter. For what matters is not the mere counting down of the number of pages left to read, but rather the wonderful and most superb process of understanding the book that one is reading.
8 Answers2025-08-30
The Double is another short work by Dostoevsky worth reading. It’s not the shortest work by the author, but it’s definitely short enough to be read in a few hours of dedicated reading. It’s an early work by Dostoevsky, and it’s interesting to see how he was already developing the major themes of his work, including the effects of madness on a person’s identity. The translation of The Double into English is also very important. An older translation of The Double by Constance Garnett is somewhat clumsy. A much better version of The Double is the translation by the authors of Called Up to the Front, Pevear and Volokhonsky, who also translated Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov for good reason.