3 Answers2025-06-08 22:31:52
I can confidently say 'Dragon Ball Enlisted' isn't part of the official canon. It's a fun spin-off with cool character designs and alternate storylines, but Akira Toriyama never confirmed it as part of the main continuity. The events don't align with established lore—Goku's power scaling is inconsistent, and some characters appear in timelines where they shouldn't. That said, it's worth reading for its creative takes on battles and team-ups. If you want pure canon, stick to the original manga and 'Dragon Ball Super'.
For similar non-canon but entertaining content, check out 'Dragon Ball Heroes' or 'Dragon Ball SD'.
4 Answers2025-06-12 22:58:36
As a die-hard 'Dragon Ball' fan who’s spent years dissecting every arc, I can confidently say 'Dragon Ball Z: A True Saiyan' isn’t part of the official canon. It’s one of those side stories or spin-offs that float around, often created for games or promotional content. Canon, in the 'Dragon Ball' universe, strictly refers to material directly penned by Akira Toriyama—like the manga or anime he supervised, including 'Dragon Ball Super'.
While 'A True Saiyan' might explore interesting Saiyan lore or flashy battles, it doesn’t tie into the main storyline. For example, it might introduce a new Saiyan form or backstory, but unless Toriyama endorses it, it’s just fun filler. The real canon focuses on Goku’s journey, the Z Fighters, and arcs like the Saiyan Saga or Cell Games. Spin-offs like this are entertaining but shouldn’t be confused with the core narrative.
3 Answers2026-02-07 09:20:45
Dragon Ball Xenoverse is like a love letter to fans who grew up with the original series. It doesn't just rehash the same old storylines—it twists them! The game introduces the concept of Time Patrol, where you get to jump into key moments from 'Dragon Ball,' 'Dragon Ball Z,' and even 'Dragon Ball GT' to fix distortions caused by villains messing with history. Imagine fighting alongside Goku during the Saiyan Saga but suddenly facing off against a corrupted version of Vegeta. It’s a fresh way to relive iconic battles while adding new layers.
The character customization is another standout. Creating your own Saiyan, Namekian, or even a Frieza Race fighter feels like stepping into the universe yourself. The game’s original storyline, with characters like Chronoa and the Supreme Kai of Time, ties back to the lore in clever ways, like explaining why certain events might’ve unfolded differently in the anime. It’s not just fan service—it’s a creative expansion that respects the source material while having fun with it.
4 Answers2026-04-14 23:18:03
Dragon Ball Multiverse is this wild fan-made project that totally hooked me when I first stumbled upon it. The art style mimics the original 'Dragon Ball' vibe so well, and the idea of parallel universes colliding in a tournament? Brilliant fan service. But here’s the thing—it’s not officially tied to Akira Toriyama’s work. It’s like finding an amazing cover band that nails the sound but isn’t the real deal. The creators, Gogeta Jr. and Salagir, even stress it’s non-canon, though they weave in some deep-cut lore that feels respectful to the source material.
That said, I adore how it explores 'what if' scenarios (like Goku’s heart virus actually killing him) or resurrects forgotten characters. It’s a love letter to fans who crave more 'Dragon Ball' chaos without studio constraints. While it’ll never replace 'Super' or the original manga, it’s a blast to discuss in forums—just don’t expect Toyotarou to reference it anytime soon.
4 Answers2025-06-12 03:06:58
'Dragon Ball: A Better Bulma' isn't part of the official canon, but it's a fascinating what-if story that fans adore. Written as a spin-off, it reimagines Bulma's character with sharper wit and a more proactive role in the Dragon Ball universe. While Toriyama's original work remains the core, this version explores alternate dynamics—like Bulma leading tech revolutions or outsmarting villains without relying on Saiyan strength. The art style nods to the classic manga, and the plot threads could almost weave into the main timeline, but it’s purely fan-driven creativity.
What makes it stand out is how it fleshes out Bulma’s untapped potential. She invents game-changing tech, negotiates with galactic warlords, and even dabbles in combat training. The story feels fresh yet respectful to the source material. Canon purists might dismiss it, but for those craving deeper character exploration, it’s a gem. Spin-offs like this keep fandoms alive by asking, 'What if?' without disrupting the original saga’s legacy.
8 Answers2026-02-05 19:57:56
The whole debate about Omega Shenron's canon status is such a rabbit hole! From what I've gathered diving into forums and interviews, he technically originates from 'Dragon Ball GT', which Toei Animation produced without direct involvement from Akira Toriyama. That alone puts him in a weird gray area—some fans treat 'GT' as a fun side story, while others dismiss it entirely since Toriyama later revived the series with 'Super', which overwrote a lot of 'GT's lore.
Personally, I love Omega Shenron as a villain—his design and the whole Shadow Dragon arc had this apocalyptic vibe that felt fresh. But if we're strict about canon, he doesn't fit into Toriyama's current continuity. 'Super' introduced its own multiverse threats like Zamasu, leaving 'GT' feeling more like an alternate timeline. Still, I’d kill to see him referenced in a movie someday, just for nostalgia’s sake.
4 Answers2025-11-25 23:24:06
A lot of fans toss this question around during debates at conventions and online, and I always lean into the simple side: yes, Tien is canon. He was created by Akira Toriyama and appears in the original 'Dragon Ball' manga, which is the baseline for what's considered the main continuity. His arc starting as an antagonist, training under the Crane School, teaming up with Chiaotzu, and later becoming a reliable human ally is laid out in the manga pages, so that cements his canonical status in the franchise.
That said, the word 'canon' in this universe gets messy fast. The anime sometimes adds filler or side-stories that aren't in the manga, and various movies and games live in their own continuity bubbles. When something is directly from Toriyama's manga or he officially supervised it, it sits safest in the canon pile. I still love watching the anime-only bits where Tien gets extra face-time, but for strict continuity I always point back to the manga — and I appreciate him even more for being one of the few humans who keeps up with the big hitters, in spirit if not always in power.
4 Answers2025-06-08 23:24:26
The debate about 'Dragon Ball GT A Second GT' being canon is a hot topic among fans. Officially, Toei Animation produced it without direct involvement from Akira Toriyama, the original creator of 'Dragon Ball.' This makes its canonical status shaky compared to 'Dragon Ball Super,' which Toriyama supervised. GT introduces wild concepts like the Black Star Dragon Balls and Super Saiyan 4, which haven't appeared in Toriyama's works.
However, some fans argue GT's charm lies in its bold, standalone story. It explores themes like family bonds and redemption, especially with Goku's regression to a child. While it doesn't fit neatly into the main timeline, its influence on the franchise is undeniable. Merchandise, video games, and even references in 'Super' keep GT alive in the fandom's heart. Canon or not, it's a fun, nostalgic ride with a unique flavor.
3 Answers2025-06-09 14:45:32
'Dragon Ball Alternative' feels more like a creative spin-off than canon material. It borrows the core elements—Saiyans, energy blasts, multiverse threats—but twists them into new directions that don't align with Akira Toriyama's established timeline. The character designs are flashier, and power scaling goes wild in ways that contradict official lore (like mortals surpassing Angels casually). Toei Animation hasn't endorsed it, and the absence of Toriyama's direct involvement seals the deal for me. It's a fun what-if story, but stick to 'Super' or the movies for canon events.
If you enjoy alternate takes, try 'Dragon Ball Heroes'—it's non-canon too but embraces its chaos with time-traveling clones and demon gods.
5 Answers2025-11-25 07:18:41
Let's clear this up from the get-go: people often mix up terms, so I'll separate the two most common things folks mean by 'black rose goku.' If you're talking about 'Goku Black' — the Zamasu-possessed Goku who uses the pink-hued Super Saiyan Rosé — then yes, that is canon to 'Dragon Ball Super'. That whole Future Trunks arc appears in the anime and the manga, and the character and his Rosé form were created for that official storyline.
If, however, you're referring to a specific variant called 'Black Rose' that shows up in the promotional card game and the tie-in anime 'Super Dragon Ball Heroes', that's a different beast. 'Super Dragon Ball Heroes' is promotional and full of alternate timelines, what-ifs, and crossover gimmicks; its characters and transformations generally aren't considered part of the official continuity. So that particular incarnation would be non-canonical.
I like both the official 'Goku Black' drama in 'Dragon Ball Super' and the wild alt-universe stuff in 'Super Dragon Ball Heroes' — one scratches the serious plot itch, the other scratches the chaotic fan-service itch, and both are fun in their own ways.