4 Answers2025-06-12 13:54:19
I can confidently say 'Multiverse Conquest Starting from Dragon Ball' isn't part of the official canon. Akira Toriyama’s original manga and the anime adaptations are the only true sources. Fan-made stories like this often explore exciting what-ifs—like merging universes or power-scaling characters beyond their limits—but they lack Toriyama’s direct input.
The charm of these fan works lies in their creativity, not their legitimacy. They reimagine battles, like Goku facing off against Superman or Saitama, which would never happen in the main series. While entertaining, they don’t influence the lore. Canon material sticks to Toriyama’s vision, while spin-offs like 'Multiverse Conquest' are just love letters from fans who crave more epic clashes.
3 Answers2026-06-23 04:47:57
Dragon Ball M is one of those weird little side stories that makes you scratch your head about where it fits in the grand scheme of things. It’s not part of the original manga by Akira Toriyama, nor is it referenced in the main anime adaptations like 'Dragon Ball Z' or 'Dragon Ball Super.' The story revolves around a cursed armor that turns people into demons, which feels more like a standalone horror-tinged spinoff than something that slots neatly into the Saiyan saga or the battles against Frieza.
That said, fans love debating its canonicity because it’s got that classic Toriyama art style and some wild concepts. But unless there’s an official statement tying it to the main timeline—like how 'Dragon Ball GT' occupies a fuzzy gray area—it’s safer to treat 'Dragon Ball M' as a fun what-if story. It’s got the vibe of those old-school OVAs where the creators just went nuts with experimental ideas, and honestly, that’s part of its charm. If you’re a completionist, it’s worth checking out, but don’t lose sleep over where it fits in the power scaling debates.
5 Answers2025-11-25 15:53:06
Straight talk: 'Black Gohan' isn’t something you’ll find in the official 'Dragon Ball' timeline, and that’s the key to understanding this whole question.
I’ve dove into the wild world of fan universes for years, and in 'Dragon Ball Multiverse'—which is a fan-made, community-driven webcomic—you get a huge buffet of alternate realities. Some of those realities are official creations by the comic’s authors, and others are reader-submitted scenarios. So whether a variation like 'Black Gohan' is "canon" depends on what you mean. It can be canonical within a specific DBM universe if the creators included that version, but it’s not canon to Toriyama’s original works or to the official franchise.
Personally I love how DBM lets fans explore darker twists—an evil Gohan or a corrupted Saiyan path is a fun thought experiment—but I always separate that enjoyment from the official storyline. It’s cool fan fiction energy, and I enjoy imagining how a darker Gohan would clash with the heroes and the emotional stakes he'd bring.
7 Answers2026-02-07 08:43:24
Dragon Ball Xenoverse is such a wild ride for fans because it dances around the edges of canon in the most intriguing way. The game introduces time travel and alternate timelines, which let characters like Trunks and the Time Patrol interact in ways that don't directly contradict the main story but also don't neatly fit into it. Toriyama had some involvement in the game's concept, which gives it a semi-official flavor, but it's more of a 'what if' playground than a core part of the saga.
That said, the original 'Dragon Ball' and 'Z' timelines remain untouched by Xenoverse's events. The game's lore is self-contained, focusing on fixing disruptions caused by villains messing with history. It's a clever way to revisit iconic moments—like the Saiyan or Cell arcs—without rewriting them. For me, that's the charm: it's a love letter to the franchise, not a new chapter. If you're craving fresh fights or nostalgia with a twist, Xenoverse delivers, but don't expect its story to show up in the manga or anime.
2 Answers2025-06-12 15:05:33
I can confidently say 'One Piece: The Multiverse Simulator' isn't canon to the main story. Eiichiro Oda's original manga doesn't incorporate multiverse concepts, and this game seems like a creative spin-off exploring alternate scenarios. The beauty of 'One Piece' lies in its meticulously planned narrative, and introducing parallel universes would disrupt that cohesion. While the game features familiar characters and settings, its premise deviates too much from the established lore to be considered official.
That said, non-canon material like this can still be enjoyable. It's fun to imagine what-ifs like Luffy with different devil fruits or alliances that never happened in the manga. The game's strength is letting players experiment with these possibilities without affecting the core story. Just don't expect any events from it to be referenced in the manga or anime - Oda keeps his canon tightly controlled.
4 Answers2026-04-14 17:11:36
Dragon Ball Multiverse is this wild fan-made project that feels like a love letter to the original series, while Dragon Ball Super is the official continuation by Akira Toriyama. The biggest difference? Multiverse throws every possible 'what-if' scenario into a tournament format—imagine characters from alternate timelines, fused versions we never saw, and even non-canonical movie villains all duking it out. It's chaotic in the best way, like a fan's dream playground. Super, on the other hand, sticks to a more structured narrative, expanding the lore with gods, multiversal threats, and new transformations. Multiverse is like a buffet of nostalgia and creativity, while Super feels like a carefully curated meal.
One thing I adore about Multiverse is how it digs into obscure corners of the franchise. There’s a version of Goku who never hit his head as a baby, so he stayed a ruthless Saiyan—stuff like that makes it feel fresh. Super, though, has moments where it leans too hard into power scaling or retcons, which can frustrate purists. But both have their charm: Multiverse for its unpredictability, Super for its polished animation (post-BOG arc, at least) and official stakes.
3 Answers2025-06-09 14:45:32
'Dragon Ball Alternative' feels more like a creative spin-off than canon material. It borrows the core elements—Saiyans, energy blasts, multiverse threats—but twists them into new directions that don't align with Akira Toriyama's established timeline. The character designs are flashier, and power scaling goes wild in ways that contradict official lore (like mortals surpassing Angels casually). Toei Animation hasn't endorsed it, and the absence of Toriyama's direct involvement seals the deal for me. It's a fun what-if story, but stick to 'Super' or the movies for canon events.
If you enjoy alternate takes, try 'Dragon Ball Heroes'—it's non-canon too but embraces its chaos with time-traveling clones and demon gods.
7 Answers2026-02-07 14:30:32
Dragon Ball Z's movie canon is a tricky topic, and honestly, it depends on how strict you want to be about it. The general consensus among fans is that most of the films aren’t canon to the main series, since they often contradict the manga or don’t fit into the timeline neatly. However, 'Battle of Gods' and 'Resurrection F' are exceptions—they were later adapted into the 'Dragon Ball Super' anime, which makes them part of the official storyline.
That said, even non-canon movies like 'Broly: The Legendary Super Saiyan' or 'Fusion Reborn' have a special place in fans' hearts. They might not 'count' in the grand scheme of things, but they’re packed with iconic moments and wild fights that make them worth watching. If you’re a completionist, you’ll have fun with all of them, but if you’re sticking strictly to canon, those two Super-era films are your go-tos.
4 Answers2026-04-14 15:00:52
Man, 'Dragon Ball Multiverse' is such a wild ride for fans who love alternate realities! The webcomic absolutely dives into the concept of alternate timeline characters—it’s basically a tournament arc where fighters from different dimensions clash. What’s cool is how it explores 'what if' scenarios, like a universe where Vegeta never turned good or Goku never died to Cell. The art style feels nostalgic too, like the classic 'DBZ' vibe but with fresh twists.
I especially love the Bra from Universe 16—she’s this fierce, untapped potential version of Vegeta’s daughter. And the evil Kaioshin? Pure chaos. It’s not just about power levels; the storytelling digs into how tiny choices ripple across timelines. If you’re into multiverse theory or just want more Dragon Ball content that feels both familiar and new, this is a must-read.
3 Answers2026-02-08 20:42:40
I’ve had so many debates about this with friends over the years! The Legendary Super Saiyan form, especially Broly’s iconic green-haired transformation, is one of those things that blurs the line between 'Dragon Ball Z' canon and expanded lore. Officially, the original Broly movies ('Broly – The Legendary Super Saiyan' and its sequels) aren’t part of the main timeline—they’re what fans call 'non-canon.' But here’s where it gets fun: the 2018 movie 'Dragon Ball Super: Broly' reintroduced Broly into the main story, reworking his backstory and power to fit the canon. His new version keeps the 'Legendary Super Saiyan' vibe but ties it into the Super continuity.
That said, the original Broly’s rampage in the older films still holds a special place for fans. The sheer spectacle of his uncontrollable power and the way he pushed Goku and the others to their limits made those movies unforgettable. Even if they’re not 'official,' they’re a huge part of 'DBZ' culture. So while the green-haired berserker isn’t canon anymore, his legacy absolutely is—especially now that his modern incarnation carries the torch in 'Super.' Sometimes, the stuff that isn’t 'real' in the story still feels real to us fans.