7 Réponses
My money's on the cat — literal and little theatrical. I found the shredded remains tucked under the couch like confetti after a very dramatic party, and every serious crime scene I visit seems to have at least one furry accomplice. This feline had ink on its paws and a guilty look that said, yes, I did this, and yes, you'll forgive me because I'm cute.
It's not the most sophisticated plot: the author left the manuscript on the coffee table, the cat mistook it for bedding or prey, and chaos ensued. Pages were carried off, crumpled, and redistributed under furniture in a way that made recovery a scavenger hunt. I had to piece things back together like a reader obsessed with line breaks. It felt oddly intimate, reconstructing someone else's words while muttering at a cat that clearly regretted nothing. In the end I laughed more than I scolded — a silly theft by a creature who only wanted attention, and a good story to tell over tea.
Short and messy: it was the neighbour’s kid. I know it sounds trivial, but the kid has sticky fingers and a taste for drama. I found crumpled pages under his bed, coated in juice and doodles, and he’d been bragging about holding ‘the big book’ hostage for days. Kids idolize authors like rock stars; to him, nicking the manuscript was the ultimate flex. He wanted to see the reaction, to watch the grown-ups panic, and to have a story of his own to tell at school.
People love elaborate theories about rivals and agents, but sometimes theft is small and stupid and very human. The kid wasn’t aiming to publish or ruin a career — he wanted attention and the thrill of control. I returned the pages, cleaned the worst stains, and convinced him that heroes don’t steal. It felt honest and oddly hopeful, like patching up a torn page and realizing the plot still holds together.
The trail began with a coffee ring on the manuscript’s first page and a smear of lavender on the binding — tiny, human details that always tell more than noisy alibis. I traced handwriting quirks, the way sentences had been circled in the margins in a shaky, impatient hand that matched a blog comment I’d once read. All the facts nudged me toward someone who read the work more like a rival than a reader: a fellow writer who’d been friendly at parties but furious in private. She’d shown up at the author’s readings with meticulous notes, praised passages to their face, then posted cold reviews online. Jealousy, mixed with a hunger to claim a breakthrough, is a motive that smells like old coffee and bad perfume; it fit the physical evidence and the timeline.
Confronting her in the small hour, I watched her posture shift from the practiced poise of a panelist to the raw panic of someone who’d taken one step too far. She didn’t deny having the pages; she thought taking them would force the author to retreat and start anew, to fail publicly and free up the stage. There was also a darker greed: a draft was easier to sell if the original seemed lost. Maybe she imagined herself rescuing the story later, smoothing its edges and presenting it as an offering. It’s a bitter thing, watching craft corrode into theft, but in the end I left with the manuscript, feeling oddly hollow despite the vindication — literature should be fought for with words, not pocketed during a conversation.
Imagine a quiet office where everyone drinks bad tea and pretends deadlines aren't breathing down their necks — that's where I first suspected the missing pages had vanished. There was one person who always volunteered to 'tidy up' other people's desks, who had thumbs ink-stained from late-night edits and a habit of smoothing corners like they could iron out plot holes. They were close enough to borrow things plausibly and clever enough to stash a paper under a manuscript of their own.
I followed the small tells: an email asking for an overnight trip to 'review formatting', a browser history with searches on how to rewrite an ending, and a proofreading mark on the recovered pages that used that same editor's picky bracket. When I asked casually about the manuscript they laughed too loudly and changed the subject. The truth was they'd taken it to rewrite an ending they thought was weak — not to publish it under their name, but to make it 'better' before returning. It was infuriating and almost intimate, like an unauthorized edit on someone's life; I couldn't help feeling a little sorry for both of them at the same time.
There was a tiny, obvious clue I couldn't ignore: a sticker for a school science fair stuck to one of the pages. That flipped the whole investigation on its head and led me straight to the author's teenager. At first I thought it was a petty theft for attention, but after pulling the kid aside I realized they had genuinely wanted to study the craft — to see how a real writer built tension and dialogue. They'd nicked the manuscript, taken it to their room, and used it for pages of notes and dog-eared inspiration.
They hadn't meant harm; they meant apprenticeship. The kid even returned it, cheeks flushed, with corrections in pencil and a messy apology. It wasn't vindication for the adult world of publishing, but it was oddly heartwarming: someone young, trying to learn the trade by handling the real thing. I lectured them, of course, about boundaries and consent, but I also sneaked a smile at a few of their margin ideas — raw, impatient, and sometimes better than the original. Family, theft, and mentorship wrapped up in one exasperating hug left me thinking that creativity breeds kleptomania in the nicest way.
I dug into the author’s recent messages and receipts like someone unraveling a playlist to find a single bad track. The digital breadcrumbs pointed to someone close, someone practical: the long-serving assistant. They were the only one with regular access to the study, the only person who knew the folder system and the passwords scribbled where only trusted hands would look. At first I suspected sabotage, but the tone of their recent notes suggested frantic protection, not profit. They’d emailed a literary lawyer with clumsy urgency and searched late-night for ‘how to hide files safely’. Under pressure, they confessed that they’d actually taken the draft to keep it from an exploitative deal that an agent was pushing; they’d meant to box it up, negotiate terms, and return it — a guardian, not a thief.
That doesn’t make the theft harmless. Handling a manuscript changes it: pages curl, drafts get annotated, and trust gets frayed. The assistant’s fear was real — the industry’s ivory towers can chew up a writer — but their unilateral decision stripped the author of agency. Reading through the file history, I saw timestamps of late revisions saved by someone else, and a version uploaded briefly to a private cloud. It smelled of panic and protection more than malice. I left thinking that sometimes theft is a misguided attempt at care, and that fixing things means rebuilding trust, not just returning pages.
You won't believe the petty little trail that led me to the culprit — it felt like sleuthing through paperback margins. I found a coffee ring on the manuscript that matched the café where the author's rival always sat, a margin note in a cramped, impatient hand that echoed lines from their recent op-eds, and a receipt for a late-night photocopy shop tucked into a hollowed-out book. All of that stacked up, and the motive made sense: envy dressed as research.
I confronted them with the evidence like someone presenting a plot twist in 'The Midnight Manuscript', and they crumpled into a laugh that was half apology, half confession. They'd nicked it not to ruin the author, but to lift whole paragraphs and rework them into their next pitch. It stung because the theft wasn't violent — it was subtle theft of voice, the worst kind. Watching them try to justify it made me oddly proud of the original author’s voice; theft like that is a backhanded compliment, and I walked away with a strange mix of anger and admiration.