How Did Schopenhauer Influence Nietzsche'S Early Writings?

2025-07-04 19:58:37 155

4 답변

Leah
Leah
2025-07-06 02:28:42
Schopenhauer’s impact on Nietzsche’s early philosophy is undeniable. 'The Birth of Tragedy' leans heavily on Schopenhauer’s concepts, especially the idea of art as a temporary escape from life’s suffering. Nietzsche’s early pessimism mirrors Schopenhauer’s, but their paths split over time. Where Schopenhauer sought transcendence, Nietzsche later demanded transformation. Even in disagreement, Schopenhauer’s ideas were the forge for Nietzsche’s sharpest thoughts.
Trisha
Trisha
2025-07-06 15:43:11
As someone deeply immersed in philosophy, I find the relationship between Schopenhauer and Nietzsche absolutely fascinating. Schopenhauer's 'The World as Will and Representation' was a cornerstone for Nietzsche's early works, particularly 'The Birth of Tragedy.' Nietzsche initially embraced Schopenhauer's pessimistic view of life as driven by an irrational 'will,' which he adapted into his concept of the Dionysian principle—chaos, ecstasy, and the raw force of existence.

However, Nietzsche eventually diverged sharply. While Schopenhauer saw the 'will' as something to deny or escape, Nietzsche celebrated it, transforming it into the 'will to power.' Early works like 'Untimely Meditations' still bear Schopenhauer's imprint, especially in critiques of rationalism and optimism. But even then, Nietzsche was planting seeds for his later rebellion, like his rejection of Schopenhauer's ascetic ideals in favor of life-affirmation.
Ulric
Ulric
2025-07-07 14:15:42
I’ve always been struck by how Nietzsche’s early writings feel like a love letter to Schopenhauer, only to later become a scathing breakup note. In 'The Birth of Tragedy,' Nietzsche borrows Schopenhauer’s idea of the 'will' to frame Greek tragedy as a clash between Apollonian order and Dionysian chaos. Schopenhauer’s influence is palpable in Nietzsche’s gloomy tone and his focus on suffering as intrinsic to life.

Yet, you can almost see Nietzsche chafing at the leash. By 'Human, All Too Human,' he’s pivoting toward a more scientific, critical approach, leaving Schopenhauer’s metaphysics behind. The shift from Schopenhauer’s resignation to Nietzsche’s call for self-overcoming is one of philosophy’s most dramatic intellectual evolutions.
Xenia
Xenia
2025-07-09 01:56:29
Reading Nietzsche’s early works feels like watching someone wrestle with a mentor they outgrow. Schopenhauer’s shadow looms large in 'The Birth of Tragedy,' where Nietzsche uses his framework to analyze art and suffering. But even here, Nietzsche tweaks Schopenhauer’s pessimism into something more dynamic—the Dionysian isn’t just pain; it’s also creative energy.

By 'Schopenhauer as Educator,' Nietzsche still praises him as a liberator from bourgeois complacency. Yet, his admiration is already tinged with critique. Schopenhauer’s denial of the 'will' becomes a foil for Nietzsche’s later embrace of life’s struggles. It’s a classic case of a student taking a teacher’s tools to build something entirely new.
모든 답변 보기
QR 코드를 스캔하여 앱을 다운로드하세요

관련 작품

Bad Influence
Bad Influence
To Shawn, Shello is an innocent, well-mannered, kind, obedient, and wealthy spoiled heir. She can't do anything, especially because her life is always controlled by someone else. 'Ok, let's play the game!' Shawn thought. Until Shawn realizes she isn't someone to play with. To Shello, Shawn is an arrogant, rebellious, disrespectful, and rude low-life punk. He definitely will be a bad influence for Shello. 'But, I'll beat him at his own game!' Shello thought. Until Shello realizes he isn't someone to beat. They are strangers until one tragic accident brings them to find each other. And when Shello's ring meets Shawn's finger, it opens one door for them to be stuck in such a complicated bond that is filled with lie after lies. "You're a danger," Shello says one day when she realizes Shawn has been hiding something big in the game, keeping a dark secret from her this whole time. With a dark, piercing gaze, Shawn cracked a half-smile. Then, out of her mind, Shello was pushed to dive deeper into Shawn's world and drowned in it. Now the question is, if the lies come out, will the universe stay in their side and keep them together right to the end?
평가가 충분하지 않습니다.
12 챕터
Writings of Kybelle (Tagalog)
Writings of Kybelle (Tagalog)
Kybelle Syria Vargas always isolates herself as she's afraid of being judge by people so she become loner and over thinker. In the middle of her monochromatic journey, she found someone who showed her the other side of the world. She finds out that all the thoughts she's afraid to unleash is still possible to tell in writing and it become her rescue. Her passion and commitment in writing is the reason why she hailed as the first Editor in Chief of The Phantom, their school publication and when she helps the second batch she struggles to be a loner again as she happen to meet the person who broke her heart years ago. Dave Jedrick Martinez.
10
15 챕터
Late Blooms, Early Goodbyes
Late Blooms, Early Goodbyes
I gave up everything to become a housewife—all for Tristan Fowler and our daughter. But ever since his first love got divorced, everything has changed. Tristan despises me, and my daughter orders me around like a maid. Crushed, I sign the divorce papers, give up everything, and leave for a faraway place. So why are they the ones now full of regret?
23 챕터
She Regrets Settling Down Too Early
She Regrets Settling Down Too Early
My CEO wife insists on taking a young, fresh intern under her wing. She wants to train him personally. She says to me, "Don't overthink this. I just value his potential." She's always been stern and stoic, but she starts dressing in pink and pulling her hair back in high ponytails. On our third wedding anniversary, she and the intern even willfully disappear for 48 hours. When others are searching for her like mad, she shares photos of her riding a carousel and holding cotton candy. She captions them, "I found the purest of joys in the most joyful of places—all because of you!" Our company loses a huge project because of this, and I lose my wife. I slip a divorce agreement between the pages of the intern's application to become a permanent staff member. My wife signs it without even looking and says, "Knowing what Elliot can do, he's more than capable of carrying out the role of a vice president." I calmly hand her my resignation. "You're right. That's why I'll make way for him."
9 챕터
UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE ALPHA FEELS
UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE ALPHA FEELS
Amelia's heart filled with fear as the kanye Male Alpha approached her. She had always been taught that Alphas only mated with other Alphas, and now she was face-to-face with one. She cowered as he inhaled her scent at her neck, then moved southward between her thighs, causing her to gasp and stiffen. Suddenly, the male looked up, snarling angrily. "What is this?" he growled. "You smell like an Alpha, but you're not one." Amelia trembled, unsure of how to respond. The male continued to explore her body, sniffing deeply into her womanhood. She felt completely powerless. Then, the male abruptly looked up again, his hair touching her chin as he glared at the others. "Mine," he snarled. "She's MINE!" Amelia realized with a sinking feeling that she had become his property. She was subject to his dominance and control, and there was nothing she could do to stop him.
10
16 챕터
Ralph’s Vengeance
Ralph’s Vengeance
“Are you sure you weren’t hurt?” Klara giggled as his breath tickled her neck. She wants to eat first, she’s starving. “You didn’t rape me this time moron” Ralph narrowed his eyes looking at the woman beneath him who is gloating over his misery. He knew he’s wrong to force her but….he could never erase this stain from his life ever. “So you are alright” “Perfectly” “Good” Ralph dipped his head down capturing her lips and spread her legs wide settling between them. “Let’s go for round two” “But I am hungry” “You starved me for so long little wolf” He sucked her nipple hard making her groan in pleasure. “Make it quick” She whispered hurriedly crashing her lips on him... A tragedy that drifted two souls apart and years of waiting to meet the destined half. But there came more obstacles that pushed them further away. One is waiting and wanting to avenge his parents, to wreak vengeance on once his family while the other is determined to reunite her loved ones by hook or by crook. .............. The leader of BlackWolf - A powerful and dangerous mafia clan in Cylantra, The Backbone city of the dark world- Ralph Erikson, is a ruthless and a merciless soul, full of vengeance. But he will never touch or harm an innocent being as those are the rules set by him and must be followed by his clan men. Though he made an exception for a girl. Fiona Wilson is too violent for her own age and of course that landed her in the hands of the devil of Cylantra. With a secret desperate to hide and a motive without any plan, she faced her once (or still!?) fiancée.
8.2
371 챕터

연관 질문

Why Did Nietzsche Initially Admire Schopenhauer?

4 답변2025-07-04 06:46:02
Nietzsche's admiration for Schopenhauer was profound and multifaceted. Initially, he was drawn to Schopenhauer's philosophy because it offered a stark, unflinching view of the world that resonated with his own disillusionment with traditional values. Schopenhauer's concept of the 'will' as the driving force behind existence struck a chord with Nietzsche, who saw it as a refreshing departure from the optimistic idealism of his time. Schopenhauer's emphasis on the suffering inherent in life and his critique of rationalism provided Nietzsche with a framework to challenge prevailing moral and metaphysical assumptions. Additionally, Schopenhauer's literary style, which was both accessible and deeply evocative, made his ideas particularly appealing to Nietzsche, who himself aspired to write philosophy that was as compelling as it was insightful. This initial admiration laid the groundwork for Nietzsche's later, more critical engagement with Schopenhauer's ideas.

Did Nietzsche Critique Schopenhauer In His Works?

4 답변2025-07-03 02:23:13
As someone who has spent years diving deep into philosophy, Nietzsche's critique of Schopenhauer is one of the most fascinating intellectual rivalries. Nietzsche initially admired Schopenhauer, especially his pessimistic worldview, but later turned sharply critical. In 'The Birth of Tragedy,' Nietzsche still shows Schopenhauer's influence, but by 'The Gay Science' and 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra,' he outright rejects Schopenhauer's resignation and life-denying philosophy. Nietzsche saw Schopenhauer's pessimism as a weakness, arguing that life should be embraced, not escaped. He also dismantled Schopenhauer's metaphysics, particularly the idea of the 'will,' replacing it with his concept of the 'will to power.' What makes Nietzsche's critique so compelling is how personal it feels—like a student outgrowing his mentor. He didn’t just disagree; he actively sought to dismantle Schopenhauer’s ideas while building his own philosophy of affirmation. If you read 'Beyond Good and Evil,' Nietzsche even mocks Schopenhauer’s moralizing, calling it a disguised form of resentment. This tension between admiration and rejection is what makes their relationship so rich for philosophical discussion.

How Did Schopenhauer Vs Nietzsche View The Will To Power?

4 답변2025-07-03 20:02:50
Schopenhauer and Nietzsche both tackled the concept of the 'will,' but their interpretations couldn't be more different. Schopenhauer saw the will as a blind, irrational force driving all existence, leading to endless suffering. He believed the only escape was through denial—asceticism or art—to quiet the will's torment. Nietzsche, on the other hand, flipped this on its head. He embraced the will, calling it the 'will to power,' a creative, life-affirming drive. For Nietzsche, power wasn’t about domination but self-overcoming and growth. Where Schopenhauer saw pessimism, Nietzsche saw potential. Schopenhauer’s will is a burden; Nietzsche’s is a celebration of human potential, urging us to become 'Übermenschen' who shape their own destiny. The contrast is stark: one resigns, the other revolts.

Are There Any Debates On Schopenhauer Vs Nietzsche Ethics?

4 답변2025-07-03 23:53:09
As someone deeply engrossed in philosophical debates, the clash between Schopenhauer and Nietzsche's ethics is one of my favorite topics. Schopenhauer's ethics are rooted in compassion and the denial of the will, viewing suffering as intrinsic to existence. Nietzsche, on the other hand, rejects this pessimism, advocating for the will to power and self-overcoming. Their differences are stark—Schopenhauer sees life as something to endure, while Nietzsche sees it as something to master. What fascinates me is how these ideas play out in modern discussions. Schopenhauer's influence can be seen in existentialist thought, where life's suffering is acknowledged, while Nietzsche's ideas resonate in movements emphasizing individualism and personal growth. The debate often centers on whether suffering should be transcended or embraced. Both philosophers offer profound insights, but their approaches are worlds apart, making this a rich and enduring philosophical duel.

Which Philosopher Is More Influential, Schopenhauer Vs Nietzsche?

4 답변2025-07-03 19:30:48
Schopenhauer and Nietzsche are both towering figures in philosophy, but their influence manifests in very different ways. Schopenhauer’s pessimism and focus on the will as the driving force of existence laid the groundwork for existential and psychological thought. His ideas resonate deeply in literature, especially with writers like Tolstoy and Beckett. Nietzsche, on the other hand, took Schopenhauer’s concepts and turned them upside down, championing the 'will to power' and the idea of the Übermensch. His works have been pivotal in postmodernism, politics, and even pop culture, from 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra' to modern self-help movements. While Schopenhauer’s influence is more subtle, permeating art and psychology, Nietzsche’s is explosive, shaping everything from existential philosophy to modern individualism. Nietzsche’s provocative style makes him more widely quoted, but Schopenhauer’s depth ensures his ideas endure in quieter, equally profound ways. If I had to pick, Nietzsche’s reach feels broader, but Schopenhauer’s impact is just as essential for understanding modern thought.

What Are The Key Differences Between Schopenhauer Vs Nietzsche?

4 답변2025-07-03 11:21:19
As someone deeply fascinated by philosophy, I've spent countless hours dissecting the ideas of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. Schopenhauer's worldview is deeply pessimistic, rooted in the notion that life is fundamentally suffering driven by an insatiable 'will.' He advocates for asceticism and the denial of desires as a path to temporary relief. Nietzsche, on the other hand, rejects this pessimism, embracing life's struggles as opportunities for growth and self-overcoming. His concept of the 'Übermensch' encourages individuals to create their own values and affirm life in all its chaos. While Schopenhauer sees art and compassion as fleeting escapes from suffering, Nietzsche views them as expressions of a life-affirming will to power. Their views on morality also clash—Schopenhauer aligns with Buddhist and Hindu ideas of renunciation, whereas Nietzsche famously declares 'God is dead' and calls for a revaluation of all values. Despite both critiquing traditional metaphysics, their conclusions diverge dramatically: one seeks escape, the other demands transformation.

Did Nietzsche Ever Meet Schopenhauer In Person?

4 답변2025-07-04 17:59:17
As a philosophy enthusiast who’s spent years digging into the lives of these two giants, I can say their relationship is fascinating but tragically brief. Nietzsche discovered Schopenhauer’s work as a young student, utterly captivated by 'The World as Will and Representation.' By the time Nietzsche sought to meet his intellectual hero, Schopenhauer had already passed away in 1860. Nietzsche was only 16 then, and their paths never physically crossed. This missed connection adds a layer of melancholy to Nietzsche’s later critiques of Schopenhauer’s pessimism. He initially idolized Schopenhauer, calling him his 'educator,' but gradually distanced himself, developing his own philosophy of life affirmation. It’s intriguing to imagine how their dynamic might have evolved had they met—would Schopenhauer have mentored Nietzsche, or would their debates have sparked even earlier? The historical 'what if' is as compelling as their written legacies.

How Do Schopenhauer Vs Nietzsche Compare On Pessimism?

4 답변2025-07-03 16:34:34
As someone deeply fascinated by philosophy, I find the contrast between Schopenhauer and Nietzsche on pessimism incredibly compelling. Schopenhauer's worldview is rooted in a profound sense of existential suffering—he sees life as inherently painful, driven by an insatiable will that can never be satisfied. His solution is asceticism, a withdrawal from desire. Nietzsche, however, takes this pessimism and flips it on its head. He acknowledges the suffering but calls for embracing it through amor fati—love of fate—and the creation of new values. Schopenhauer’s pessimism is passive, urging resignation, while Nietzsche’s is active, demanding transformation. For Schopenhauer, art and morality offer temporary relief from the torment of existence. Nietzsche, though, sees suffering as the forge of greatness, where the Übermensch emerges. Their differences are stark: one sees life as a tragedy to endure, the other as a challenge to conquer. Both thinkers start from a place of darkness, but Nietzsche’s philosophy is a rebellion against despair, making his pessimism dynamic rather than defeatist.
좋은 소설을 무료로 찾아 읽어보세요
GoodNovel 앱에서 수많은 인기 소설을 무료로 즐기세요! 마음에 드는 책을 다운로드하고, 언제 어디서나 편하게 읽을 수 있습니다
앱에서 책을 무료로 읽어보세요
앱에서 읽으려면 QR 코드를 스캔하세요.
DMCA.com Protection Status