Library

Premeditation

Warning! Mature Contents! ***Excerpt*** "You belong to me, Sheila. I alone am capable of making you feel this way. Your moans and body belong to me. Your soul and your body are all mine!" *** Alpha Killian Reid, the most dreaded Alpha in all of the North, wealthy, powerful and widely feared in the supernatural world, was the envy of all other packs. He was thought to have it all... power, fame, wealth and favour from the moon goddess, little was it known to his rivals that he has been under a curse, which has been kept a secret for so many years, and only the one with the gift of the moon goddess can lift the curse. Sheila, the daughter of Alpha Lucius who was an arch enemy to Killian, had grown up with so much hatred, detest and maltreatment from her father. She was the fated mate to Alpha Killian. He refused to reject her, yet he loathed her and treated her poorly, because he was in love with another woman, Thea. But one of these two women was the cure to his curse, while the other was an enemy within. How would he find out? Let's find out in this heart racing piece, filled with suspense, steamy romance and betrayal.

9.2

183 Chapters

Alpha Nox

At just fourteen years old Lilac Einar made a greivous mistake. Using her ability, a magic forbidden by her kind, she commited an irreversible crime. Trusting her best-friend and the only boy she'd ever loved, future Alpha Nox Griffin, she turns herself in believing he'll listen to her side of the story. Nox Griffin's betrayal shatters their lifelong friendship and the budding feelings between the two. For her crimes, Lilac Einar is sentenced to a lifetime of servitude at the infamous Lycan's Training Camp, a place where only the elite are sent. From then on, torture, pain, and blood are all Lilac knows. Not a day goes by where Lilac doesn't think about her home, and the revenge she'd someday take on the people who wronged her. After four long years, Lilac finally finds her opportunity. She has many names to cross off her list, and at the very top is the only boy she ever loved: Nox Griffin.

9.8

339 Chapters

His Dark Obsession

Evangeline Rose is an omega with no memories of her past. Orphaned at a young age she was taken in by the Alpha of the Silver Mountain pack. Grateful for her life and all she has; she keeps her wishes and desires a secret. But what happens when she comes of age and her life is destroyed by those that she holds dear? When heart-breaking truths come to light, she is forced into the grasp of a beast; an Alpha Prince known to be ruthless, dangerous, and cruel. A fate she tries to escape but finds herself trapped with no solution in sight. With recurring nightmares that haunt her nights begin to increase, foreshadowing a terrifying truth, Evangeline needs to get to the bottom of whatever it is that is plaguing her life before it catches up to her. A prince of darkness and an omega orphan, they are worlds apart yet destined to collide. When secrets, lies, and a forgotten curse come into play, they are forced to embark upon a journey filled with passion, hatred, and temptation. Mixed in with a forced union, old flames, and manipulation, Evangeline is plunged into a game larger than her. Will she be able to make it through, or will she succumb to those around her? Follow me on IG at author.muse and FB author muse

155 Chapters

Alpha Jax

SIX-PACK SERIES BOOK THREE *While this book can be read as a standalone, I'd highly recommend reading books one (Alpha Gray) and two (Alpha Theo) for context before this book* JAX : I'm no stranger to one night stands. Lots of girls want a hook-up with an alpha, so why should this one be any different? Maybe it's because she's the best I ever had. Maybe it's because she refused to tell me anything about herself. We agreed to one night, no strings attached. The problem is, I can't get that night out of my head; I've been obsessed with finding this girl since. When she shows up at the squad complex for training, I feel like it's my lucky day- until my best friend introduces her as his sister and things get... complicated. I can't go against bro code, right? Even if Quinn is my dream girl. Even if there's a crazy attraction between us that's harder to resist every day. I'm so screwed. ~ QUINN : One night. It was supposed to be one night of anonymous, meaningless with a stranger. I just wanted to have a good time and forget about my cheating ex. It definitely did the trick- I haven't thought about my ex since, but now I can't stop thinking about that night or the sexy stranger who had all the right moves. When I arrive at the complex for a fresh start, I'm shocked to see him again- and even more surprised to find out that he's not only an alpha, but also one of my brother's best friends. Theo would Jax if he found out about that night. He can never know- which means I have to keep my distance. Even if I can't stop fantasizing about Jax. Even if it kills me.

9.9

50 Chapters

The Exiled Dragon

"Please, don't eat me," it begged. The voice was that of angels...Another hand gripped the trunk until finally, another eye appeared. One was beautiful, but now both looked back at me with an intensity that would sear into my soul until the day I died. It was a girl, a tiny girl. Her smell continued to be blown in my direction, and by the gods, I swear they were trying to draw her to me."Creed, an exiled dragon, known for his ruthless fighting and disturbing appearance. The dragon elders deemed him unworthy of a mate, the moon goddess would not grant one that was conceived of r*pe.Odessa, a woman who lost her father to cancer, her estranged mother finds her hours later after her father's death, whisks her away to a fantasy world to repay her debt to the Duke of Vamparia. She is now a mere blood bag, but one night fate was on her side. She escaped the vampire kingdom only to find herself found by a beast who takes her under his wings.Together they will unfold a new love and adventure as they try and defeat the vampires that hold humans hostage, for Creed to get his revenge for the new treasure he wants to call his own. Romance blossoms and even a special twist to make your heart squeeze with warmth.

77 Chapters

Twin Alphas' abused mate

The evening of her 18th birthday Liberty's wolf comes forward and frees the young slave from the abusive Alpha Kendrick. He should have known he was playing with fire, waiting for the girl to come of age before he claimed her. He knew if he didnt, she would most likely die. The pain and suffering she had already endured at his hands would be the tip of the iceburg if her wolf, Justice, didnt help her break free. LIberty wakes up in the home of The Alpha twins from a near by pack, everyone knows the Blacks are even more depraved than Alpha Kendrick. Liberty's life seems to be one cruel joke after another. How has she managed to escape one abuser and land right in the bed of two monsters?

9.4

97 Chapters

What Evidence Proves Premeditation In Court?

4 Answers2025-08-29 06:53:44

When I watch or read about trials, I get oddly fascinated by how the same act can look completely different depending on the evidence of planning. In court, premeditation isn’t proven by intuition — it’s pieced together from concrete things: messages or notes that show intent, receipts for items bought to carry out the act, surveillance showing someone scouting the place, or witness testimony that the defendant threatened the victim earlier. Physical evidence like how the wounds were inflicted or whether a weapon was brought specifically for the incident can also suggest thoughtful planning rather than a spur-of-the-moment act.

What always sticks with me is how prosecutors stitch together timelines. Phone records, GPS logs, and security video create a narrative that covers hours or days, not just a single heated moment. Expert testimony about behavior, forensics showing purposeful handling of a weapon, and prior statements can all push a jury to infer malice aforethought. At the end of the day the jury must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt, so a string of consistent, corroborating pieces — from social media posts to purchase history — often becomes the backbone of proving premeditation in court.

How Do Plea Bargains Change Premeditation Counts?

4 Answers2025-08-29 17:41:57

Plea bargains can feel like a fast-forward button in a messy legal movie, and they absolutely change premeditation counts in ways that matter a lot. In plain terms, prosecutors and defense lawyers can negotiate so that a charge which originally required proof of premeditation—say first-degree murder—gets reduced to something like second-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, or even a single count instead of multiple counts. That often means the element of planning or deliberate intent (the legal idea of premeditation) is removed from the case, and the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser mental-state offense or to fewer incidents.

From where I sit, having followed court coverage and read a pile of case summaries, the reasons are familiar: shaky evidence about intent, unreliable witnesses, or a desire to avoid the uncertainty and cost of trial (or the risk of a death sentence in some places). The practical effects are big — sentencing ranges shrink, parole eligibility can change, collateral consequences differ, and victims' families sometimes feel robbed of a public finding on intent. Judges usually have to accept the plea and there must be a factual basis for it, so the record will typically reflect what the defendant admitted instead of the original premeditation allegation. If you like courtroom drama, you can see why prosecutors and defense counsel use bargains; but if you care about moral culpability being publicly recognized, plea deals can feel unsatisfying.

How Do Juries Evaluate Premeditation Evidence?

4 Answers2025-08-29 04:58:52

I get curious about how juries piece together intent — it’s almost like watching a mystery slowly come into focus. When jurors evaluate whether someone acted with premeditation, they’re instructed to look for evidence that the defendant planned or deliberated before the act, however briefly. The judge usually reads the legal elements they must find beyond a reasonable doubt: that the defendant caused the death, that they intended to kill, and that the killing was premeditated and deliberate.

In practical terms, jurors consider both direct and circumstantial clues: prior threats, buying or bringing a weapon, surveillance footage showing someone staking out a place, messages or social media posts, or a clear sequence of actions that show the person had time to think. I’ve noticed in trials and in shows like '12 Angry Men' that jurors are constantly weighing motive against opportunity and behavior — did the defendant flee or conceal evidence, did they lie to police, or did they act immediately in a way consistent with reflex or panic?

What always strikes me is how jurors are told to avoid guessing about motives they can’t prove, and instead rely on reasonable inferences from facts. Expert testimony (forensic evidence, psychologists) can help, but ultimately jurors triangulate credibility, timing, and surrounding actions. The time needed to premeditate can be seconds in the law, so jurors often debate whether a split-second decision was still a considered plan or just a tragic impulse — and that debate can hinge on seemingly small details.

Does Premeditation Increase Sentencing Ranges?

5 Answers2025-08-29 14:42:42

I get why this question trips people up—it's one of those legal nuances that looks simple until you poke at it.

In most criminal systems, premeditation does increase sentencing ranges because it shows higher moral blameworthiness. For homicide that's often the clearest example: ‘first-degree murder’ or its equivalent usually requires proof of intent plus some degree of premeditation or deliberation, and carries stiffer penalties than a killing judged to be in the heat of passion or reckless. That extra planning—buying a gun, lying in wait, writing a note—signals to judges and juries that the act wasn’t impulsive, so statutes or sentencing guidelines typically treat it as an aggravating factor.

But it isn't uniform. Different jurisdictions define and weigh premeditation differently; some require explicit proof of long-term planning, others accept very brief reflection as enough. And even where premeditation is established, mitigating factors, plea deals, or sentencing guidelines can buffer the final sentence. If you care about specifics, looking up the law in your state or country and talking to counsel is worth it—those local rules really change outcomes and I’ve seen cases where a single text message made the difference in how a sentence was framed.

How Does Neuroscience Challenge Premeditation Claims?

5 Answers2025-08-29 05:17:47

I get a little giddy talking about this—neuroscience pokes holes in our cozy stories about premeditation in ways that are thrilling and a little unnerving. For starters, experiments like the one by Libet show there’s measurable brain activity (the readiness potential) that often precedes the conscious feeling of deciding. I used to read that paper while half-asleep with a mug of coffee on my desk, and it still felt like a plot twist: the brain seems to start preparing an action before ‘I’ become aware of choosing it.

But the story isn’t a simple demolition of responsibility. More recent work complicates the picture: readiness potentials can be stochastic, reflecting fluctuating neural noise, and predictive signals in motor and prefrontal areas often give probabilistic, population-level hints rather than deterministic readouts for a single person. That matters because legal ideas of premeditation depend on conscious intent, reasons, and temporal deliberation—things that aren’t directly mapped by a fleeting neural precursor.

So neuroscience challenges naive claims that consciousness is the boss who initiates every move, yet it doesn’t neatly erase the concept of premeditation. It nudges us to be more careful: to separate correlations from causation, to respect the limits of current imaging, and to rethink how mental states and brain states relate when we talk about blame, foresight, and planning. I find that both unsettling and invigorating—like re-reading a favorite mystery and discovering a hidden clue I missed before.

How Long Must Premeditation Exist For Murder?

1 Answers2025-10-07 22:32:31

Hearing that question makes me want to pull out a stack of true-crime books and a cup of coffee — it’s one of those deceptively simple legal puzzles. Broadly speaking, there’s no universal stopwatch for premeditation: some places treat a split-second decision followed by a brief moment of reflection as enough, while others expect a longer period of planning or planning behavior. In U.S. law, for example, many courts have said that premeditation can be formed in an instant if the killer had a deliberate intent to kill and reflected on it, even briefly.

What changes things is how a prosecutor proves it: evidence like prior threats, buying or hiding a weapon, lying in wait, or statements made before the act all point toward more obvious premeditation. By contrast, a sudden fight that escalates might be seen as voluntary manslaughter or second-degree murder depending on the jurisdiction and the mental state required. If you’re looking at a specific statute, check whether it distinguishes first-degree (requires premeditation) from second-degree (often does not), and whether it uses terms like ‘deliberation’ or ‘intent.’ I’m not a lawyer, but from reading cases and legal explainers, the takeaway I keep coming back to is: it’s less about the clock and more about whether the mind had time — however short — to form and weigh the decision to kill.

How Do Courts Distinguish Premeditation From Intent?

4 Answers2025-08-29 20:49:21

Honestly, courts tend to draw a practical line: intent is the mental aim to cause a result, while premeditation adds a layer of reflection or planning before you act. In my study of cases and jury instructions, intent answers the 'did you mean for this to happen?' question. Premeditation asks, 'did you pause and form a plan — even briefly — before pulling the trigger?' That pause doesn’t need to be hours; many jurisdictions accept a very short period of reflection as sufficient premeditation.

When I talk this over with friends who binge legal dramas like 'Breaking Bad', I point out the kinds of evidence judges and juries look for: bringing a weapon, procuring materials, statements that show planning, lying in wait, or actions that show a calculated method (multiple coordinated blows, reconnaissance, or staging). They also weigh motive, absence of provocation, and behavior before and after the incident. Defenses like heat of passion, sudden provocation, or intoxication try to undercut premeditation by showing the act was impulsive. At trial, all of this becomes a mosaic of circumstantial and sometimes direct evidence — the prosecution must prove the mental state beyond a reasonable doubt. If you enjoy nitty-gritty distinctions, it's fascinating how a few moments of thought can shift a case from one degree to another.

Can Premeditation Be Established Without Planning?

4 Answers2025-08-29 08:27:56

From years of reading court transcripts and arguing hypotheticals with friends, I've come to think about premeditation as a state of mind rather than a checklist of steps. Legally and practically, premeditation means that someone formed the intention to do something beforehand — but 'beforehand' doesn't always mean days or weeks. Sometimes it's a few seconds of cool, deliberate thought; other times it's a longer, calculated period. The key is evidence that the person reflected and decided to act, not merely acted on impulse.

When I try to explain this to people over coffee, I use small, concrete markers: did the person take steps to make the act possible? Did they arm themselves or pick a specific time or place? Did they say things beforehand that indicate intent? None of those prove planning in the sense of a drawn-out plot, but together they can show premeditation. So yes — you can often establish premeditation without proof of an elaborate plan, by showing that the actor had the opportunity to reflect and chose to go forward. That nuance is important to me; it separates rash violence from cold intent, even when the timeline is short.

How Does Premeditation Affect Murder Charges?

4 Answers2025-08-29 15:40:41

I get why this topic sounds like something out of a courtroom drama — premeditation is basically the trait that can turn a killing from a tragic accident into first-degree murder in many places. In plain terms, it’s about whether the person thought ahead and decided to kill before they acted. That can be a long period of plotting, or surprisingly short; courts have sometimes found premeditation in moments — if there’s clear deliberation and the person formed the intent to kill rather than just acting impulsively.

Evidence is everything here. Prosecutors try to show planning or reflection: buying a weapon, lying in wait, sending threatening messages, drafting a plan, or purposeful conduct that shows a decision to kill. Things after the fact—like attempts to hide the body, lying to police, or fleeing—can be used to infer premeditation too. Defense strategies aim to show heat of passion, lack of specific intent, accidental harm, self-defense, or mental incapacity.

The practical effect is huge: premeditation often elevates charges and penalties. First-degree murder can carry life sentences or even the death penalty in some systems, while killings without premeditation might be second-degree murder or manslaughter with much lighter terms. If you’re curious about a specific case, the local statutes and court decisions really matter because jurisdictions define and prove premeditation differently. For me, it’s always the gray area between a split-second choice and a planned act that makes this so legally and morally fascinating.

What Movies Show Clear Examples Of Premeditation?

4 Answers2025-08-29 09:57:05

On a slow Sunday I dove back into some classics and got obsessed with how movies show premeditation. One film that always sits at the top for me is 'The Godfather' — the restaurant scene where everything clicks into place feels like a masterclass in cold, preplanned elimination. Michael’s decisions, the calls, the waits: every beat is deliberate and the editing makes the orchestration obvious. Another clean example is 'Gone Girl', where Amy’s whole disappearance is a carefully laid trap; the audience discovers the planning through clues that slowly line up, which I love because it plays with perspective.

I also think 'Se7en' and 'The Usual Suspects' deserve shout-outs. 'Se7en' shows a killer who maps out murders to teach a lesson — that kind of narrative makes premeditation part of the theme, not just a plot device. 'The Usual Suspects' is deliciously crafty: the reveal reframes earlier scenes as part of a long con. Watching these, I often pause and rewind to catch the tiny details directors hide in plain sight.

If you like the forensic side of planning, 'Heat' and 'No Country for Old Men' offer rigorous, almost procedural depictions of premeditated crime. They show how preparation changes stakes and characters, and that lingering tension is why I rewatch them so often.