What Are The Top BookTok Recommendations For 2023?

the hunt for who made the original 'Ellie the Empress' piece is exactly the kind of sleuthing I love. If you’ve seen that dramatic portrait or character design floating around social feeds and want the original artist, the reality is that the creator can be either straightforward to find or maddeningly hidden depending on reposts, edits, and whether the piece was labeled properly. The quickest, most reliable route is to treat the image like a clue and run a few targeted searches with tools that specialize in tracing image origins. Start with reverse image searches. Upload the image to Google Images and TinEye, and use SauceNAO and Yandex if the first two turn up nothing. SauceNAO is excellent for anime-style and illustration work because it often links back to Pixiv, DeviantArt, and danbooru posts where the original was posted. Yandex can detect identical or highly similar images across social networks and blogs that other engines miss. If any result points to a Pixiv, ArtStation, DeviantArt, or a post on Twitter/X or Instagram, check timestamps and the uploader’s profile — the earliest timestamp with an artist account is a strong indicator of the original source. Also watch for watermarks or small signatures in corners; blowing the image up can reveal a faint handle or name. If reverse searches return reposts, dig into the repost chain. Click on the earliest visible post and follow shares and reblogs backward. Use Web Archive (Wayback Machine) to see older versions of pages, and check Reddit threads where pieces often get posted with artist credits in comments. For anime-style works, check danbooru or Gelbooru tags; community-run boorus often include source links. If the image looks edited, cropped, or heavily filtered, try finding a higher-resolution copy first — artists usually upload cleaner, full-size versions with their signature or profile link. Beware of AI-generated art masquerading as original illustrations; if multiple searches produce no credible artist page and the piece appears in AI-fingerprint collections, that’s a red flag. When you do find a candidate artist page, confirm by looking for matching style across other works, an artist statement, or an explicit post saying they made 'Ellie the Empress'. If you’re still unsure, most artists welcome a polite message asking about the work — many are happy to claim or clarify authorship. I always enjoy this kind of detective work because finding the real creator not only gives proper credit but often leads to discovering more of their art. Happy hunting — I hope you track down the original artist and get to see their portfolio up close, because those moments of discovery are pure joy for me.

What a cool piece to talk about — I fell for 'mi amor walsall' the minute I saw its colors, and digging into who made it turned into a little local-history rabbit hole for me. From everything I tracked down, the concept and the physical artwork grew out of a community-led project championed by Walsall’s cultural team, not a lone mysterious auteur. The idea was framed by a small group of local creatives who ran workshops with residents, schools, and market traders to make sure the visuals actually reflected the town’s character rather than feeling imposed from outside. The finished piece lists collaborative credits in the usual places: a plaque beside the work, the council’s project pages, and local press coverage. A lead artist took on the design and painted the main elements, but a handful of community artists and volunteers helped execute it—so the final credit is really shared. That collective approach is why the piece feels so warm and rooted: motifs nod to Walsall’s industrial past, its parks, and everyday faces from the neighbourhood. Seeing that mixture of professional skill and community input made me appreciate the artwork even more; it reads like something the town made for itself rather than something dropped in from elsewhere. If you stroll past it, you can almost pick out tiny details that came from different people’s stories, which I love.

I grew up with a TV schedule that felt like a conveyor belt of brilliant characters, and when I think about who created the most iconic Asian cartoon characters of the 1990s, a few names always jump out. Akira Toriyama’s influence kept roaring through the decade thanks to 'Dragon Ball Z' — his designs and worldbuilding gave us Goku, Vegeta, and a whole merchandising ecosystem that defined boyhood for many. Then there’s Naoko Takeuchi, whose 'Sailor Moon' troupe redefined what girl heroes could be on Saturday mornings across Asia and beyond. On the more experimental end, Hideaki Anno and character designer Yoshiyuki Sadamoto made 'Neon Genesis Evangelion' characters that changed the tone of anime, introducing darker, psychologically complex protagonists like Shinji and Rei. Meanwhile, Satoshi Tajiri and Ken Sugimori created 'Pokémon', which exploded into a global phenomenon—its characters (and their simple yet memorable designs) dominated playgrounds and trading cards. CLAMP’s elegant group, with 'Cardcaptor Sakura', offered another iconic set of characters who still feel fresh. And I can’t forget Eiichiro Oda launching 'One Piece' in 1997—Luffy and his crew arrived near the end of the decade and immediately started building a legacy. So, while a single creator can’t take the whole credit, those names—Toriyama, Takeuchi, Anno, Sadamoto, Tajiri, Sugimori, CLAMP, and Oda—are the ones who shaped the 1990s’ cartoon character landscape for me, and I still get excited seeing their fingerprints in modern fandoms.

I got hooked the moment I read the creator notes tucked at the end of the first volume of 'Rin: The First Disciple' — the series was dreamed up by a quiet but fierce storyteller named Emiko Sato, who built Rin as both a character and a philosophical experiment. Sato's early essays explained that she wanted a figure who could carry the weight of a thousand failed ideologies and still question every one of them. So Rin was conceived as an engineered disciple: part construct, part vessel for ancestral memories, stitched together from discarded scriptures and the last embers of a sacred ritual. The reason for making Rin, according to Sato, was to force readers to sit with the uglier questions — what does devotion mean when faith is manufactured, who gets to decide morality, and can a created being carve its own moral compass? Reading it felt like being pulled into a conversation between 'Frankenstein' and 'The Matrix' — Sato borrowed the horror of creation and mixed it with a modern, existential pulse. Rin’s origin involves the 'Founding Conclave,' a cabal of scholars who, after a cultural collapse, attempted to synthesize a perfect disciple capable of restoring societal cohesion. They grafted ritual knowledge to a synthetic mind, hoping for a seamless conduit to the divine. Instead, what they birthed was messy and painfully alive: Rin questions doctrine, reinterprets ceremonies, and ultimately exposes how institutions use sanctity to consolidate power. That intended purpose — a tool for restoration — flips into a narrative about autonomy and the ethics of making minds. What I love is how Sato layers her world-building with visuals and side materials; early sketches of Rin show deliberate contradictions — childlike features with mechanic seams, robes embroidered with computational sigils. Fans took that and ran: debates about whether Rin is truly the first disciple or merely the first of many, forums dissecting which parts of ancient scripture were actually encoded into Rin’s memory banks. For me, Rin’s creation resonates because it asks us to consider the cost of peace engineered from obedience. The character works on multiple levels — a cautionary myth, a rebellion's emblem, and a heartfelt study of identity — and that complexity is exactly why I keep rereading the series and arguing with friends long after the final chapter closed.

If the comic you mean mixes earnest character work with explicit romance and very polished, painterly art, the creator you’re probably after is Stjepan Šejić — he’s the artist behind 'Sunstone'. I got into 'Sunstone' because the visuals stopped me in my tracks: the anatomy, the light, the emotional beats are all rendered with a comic-book painter’s sensibility. It’s definitely mature and has stirred debate because it foregrounds BDSM themes with a frankness that some audiences found provocative. Beyond the controversy, I appreciate how Šejić treats consent and character growth; the art doesn’t just titillate, it communicates nuance. For me, it’s one of those works that makes you think about how adult stories can be both sexy and emotionally intelligent, and I still find his panels gorgeous and daring.

Watching 'Encantadia' unfold on TV felt like stepping into a whole other language — literally. I was hooked by the names, chants, and the way the characters spoke; it had its own flavor that set it apart from typical Tagalog dialogue. The person most often credited with creating those words and the basic lexicon is Suzette Doctolero, the show's creator and head writer. She built the mythology, coined place names like Lireo and titles like Sang'gre, and steered the look and sound of the vocabulary so it fit the world she imagined. Over time the production team and later writers expanded and standardized some of the terms, especially during the 2016 reboot of 'Encantadia'. Actors, directors, and language coaches would tweak pronunciations on set, and fans helped make glossaries and lists online that turned snippets of invented speech into something usable in dialogue. It never became a fully fleshed conlang on the scale of 'Klingon' or Tolkien's Elvish, but it was deliberate and consistent enough to feel real and to stick with viewers like me who loved every invented name and spell. I still find myself humming lines and muttering a couple of those words when I rewatch scenes — the naming work gave the show a living culture, and that’s part of why 'Encantadia' feels so memorable to me.

Tracing tags and sketchbook posts over the years made me realize 'morning glory doodles' didn’t spring from one celebrity artist but from a handful of sleepy, motivated people building a habit together. I used to wake up and scroll through feeds where artists posted tiny, ten-minute drawings under vague hashtags—they were light, quick, often of plants, mugs, or sleepy faces. The name likely comes from the morning glory flower, which opens with the dawn, and the term stuck because these sketches bloom fast and fleeting. People started doing them as a warm-up to art practice, a mental-health anchor, or a way to capture a mood before the day scrambles them. On Tumblr and early Instagram threads, I watched the trend spread: one person posts a tiny sunflower scribble, another replies with a sleepy cat, and suddenly there’s a communal rhythm. For me the appeal is simple: they’re forgiving, portable, and honest. Over time I’ve seen them turn into little zine sections, tiny prints, and collaborative sketchbook swaps. I still make one every morning when coffee’s brewing — they feel like a small, private ritual that somehow connects me to a lot of other people waking up and drawing, too.

This is a fun little mystery to unpack because 'Xavier Curvy' isn’t a single, universally recognized character name in mainstream comics or games — so the creator depends on which 'Xavier' or which context you’re talking about. If you meant the iconic Charles Xavier from 'X-Men', the character was co-created by Stan Lee (writer) and Jack Kirby (artist) for the original 1963 team introduction. Jack Kirby gets the credit for the earliest visual design, while Stan Lee shaped the character’s concept and role. That said, Charles Xavier’s look has been tweaked and reinterpreted over decades by countless artists — Dave Cockrum, John Byrne, Jim Lee, and more recent illustrators and film costume designers have all left big marks on how he appears today. If by 'Xavier Curvy' you were referring to an indie character, a 3D model, or a fan-created persona (like a tagged piece on ArtStation, DeviantArt, Instagram, or a marketplace pack), the original creator is usually the individual who posted the first iteration. Those creators often go by handles, and their work circulates a lot, sometimes losing credits along the way. For 3D assets, for example, name patterns like 'Xavier' or 'Curvy' can appear in model packs (think Daz3D morphs or Renderosity content); in those cases the vendor page or the file metadata is where the original author is credited. I’ve chased down more than one mystery model this way by checking product pages and release notes. If you want to track down the true origin yourself, I’d start with a reverse image search (Google Images or TinEye) to locate the earliest instances of the artwork, then follow timestamps to the earliest uploader. Check the image description for usernames and links to portfolios, and look for artist watermarks or signatures. For characters appearing in games, the in-game credits, patch notes, or developer blogs usually list the concept artists. For comic characters, the original issue’s credits and the comic’s creator interviews are gold. Social media threads and fan wikis can be useful too, but verify against primary sources because info gets repeated a lot. Personally, I love this kind of detective work — tracking down the original artist feels like treasure hunting in a sea of reposts and edits. Whether you’re trying to give credit, looking for the artist to commission more work, or just satisfying curiosity, the combination of reverse-image searches, portfolio sites, and original publication credits usually gets you there. If your 'Xavier Curvy' ends up being a lesser-known indie piece, there’s a good chance the creator is a talented solo artist who’d appreciate recognition — and that’s always a satisfying find for me.