Library

What Is The Twist Ending Of The Decagon House Murders?

The Decagon House Murders shocked me! That last reveal connecting past and present—anyone else need to unpack its locked-room implications?
2025-10-27 01:13:30
284
Share
ABO Personality Quiz
Take a quick quiz to find out whether you‘re Alpha, Beta, or Omega.
Scent
Personality
Ideal Love Pattern
Secret Desire
Your Dark Side
Start Test

14 Answers

Best Answer
Phanny
Phanny
You will get a similar feeling of deception when reading ‘The Decagon House Murders’ which is a locked-room mystery, heavily inspired by the Queen of Mystery Agatha Christie. This mystery unfolds as the detective eventually discovers that the killer is one of the seven club members who is pretending to have been killed by others, utilizing the island setting and their on-going murder mystery game within the group as decoy. While ‘The Decagon House Murders’ will keep readers eager to find out the truth as to who the killer was, ‘THE WIFE'S REVENGE: BETRAYAL IN BLOOD’ unravels a seemingly perfect marriage in a deadly web of premeditated revenge, carefully devised by its protagonist in great detail and kept secret until the very end of the book.
2026-08-03
Xander
Xander
A short summary for those who want it: the killer wasn't some random stranger, it was one of the people who set up the vacation. I said that the Decagon murders must have been the work of an outside killer, but that was wrong. This killer was part of the Decagon group, set up this vacation in order to revenge himself on the family that had been murdered years before. The final scene was incredibly clever, both in terms of the mechanical setup of the various scenes of murder and in terms of motive (revenge of a family member). A very satisfying twist and a very crafty film.

The thing that will stick with me is how the twist changes our perspective on the group as a whole. So many seemingly ordinary moments and comments were turned into clues that led to this moment. It’s a cold twist but it’s so satisfying at the same time. The sympathy I have for him and his twisted motives doesn’t change how crafty it was to set up this twist.
2025-10-29
Zara
Zara
I really enjoyed the way the author in “The Decagon House Murders” bysunsetTimeout Aidatsuji pawns off others for the reader to suspicion, and the big twist is wonderful and nasty. The main character of the visiting student is not who the reader has been following, and it turns out that he is the murderer responsible for the ten deaths. Ayatsuji skillfully misdirects the reader’s suspicion in several different directions including an island local or even a copycat of an earlier massacre. However the big reveal is that the murderer was part of the group of visiting students and used his own (false) backstory and plant many clues in order to have the reader believe that the murders were somehow tied to the previous atrocity on the island and its history.

My favorite part of the novel was how we got to go back and view the entire novel through a new lens after the big reveal. Many of the events and circumstances that the reader initially believed to be random coincidences or mere happenstance were in fact carefully staged by the mastermind behind the murders. Even seemingly accidental comments, pieces of evidence that were left behind, and the random timing of arrival to and departure from the decagon house were all part of a grander scheme to solidify the impression that the novel was tracing out the madness of a local or the vicious acts of revenge of a person hell-bent on avenging a past massacre. And the reason behind the killings was characteristically Ayatsuji: personal, motivated by a past atrocity that involved the architect of the current crime and some of the people who had been killed, but certainly not random. I actually really liked how the motive behind the novel was to build up a puzzle, a complex and twisted series of clues, that the reader would be misled by along with the characters. It was a very satisfying novel that left me satisfied but also kind of freaked out, which is pretty much my ideal reading experience. It’s why I always recommend The Decagon House Murders to anyone looking for a locked-room style mystery with a big twist at the end.
2025-10-30
Chloe
Chloe
ZOMG YOU GUYS. IF YOU HAVEN'T READD 'THE DECAGON HOUSE MURDERS' AND HATES SPOILERS, LEAVE NOW.

It was so surprising that the person who planned the island trip was behind the whole massacre. He wasn’t some club member who accidentally found themselves in the midst of the tragedy, he was hidden behind a facade of innocence and had his own motivations and identity tied into the Decagon family murders. The way the novel unfolds and you realize that it wasn’t some outside intruder but someone in the group had planned everything out in detail was amazing. And the way the author slowly reveals staged evidence, timed alibis and a confession like explanation of how and why he did it was so brilliant.

It’s a great ‘fair-play’ twist, which means that the reader can look back at the story and spot all of the clues as they’re revealed, with the author scattering the occasional detail about the planner’s behavior or the slightly odd way in which some part of the story unfolded. His explanation for the motive behind the killings, and the method used, is cold and logical. It’s a revenge story, driven by theatricality. I was left with great admiration for the book, and a queasy feeling at the intimate, and petty nature of the revenge that had unfolded.
2025-10-31
Max
Max
I love deconstructing the ending to these locked-room mysteries and “The Decagon House Murders” is particularly nasty. Instead of an outside killer, the true mastermind was one of the group who had planned the whole thing and manipulated the timeline to fit in with his pre-planned scheme. Cleverly, he had even set up a few misleading clues to point away from his true identity. The deaths of the group were made to look like accidents and chance events, but were all part of his overall plan and were revealed in a clever narrative reconstruction of the entire weekend.

It’s great to be able to link the puzzle’s mechanics to the killer’s motivations. As a big fan of locked-room style mysteries, I loved the fact that the killer of The Decagon House Murders wasn’t just some mastermind who had managed to lock all of his victims in a room and then hidden away in a secret compartment, complete with a stash of red herrings. Rather, he or she was someone who had been haunted by the memories of the earlier massacre at the family’s country home and sought to exact revenge on the descendants of those responsible. Thus, every earlier mystery or oddity was linked to the killer’s own motivations in ways that were sometimes subtle and other puzzled me at the time but became blindingly obvious in retrospect, and were even cleverly incorporated into the manuscript in a way that allowed the reader to go back and realize how each had been manipulated to divert suspicion in a given direction.
2025-10-31

Related Books

Related Questions

How does magpie murders ending explain the mystery?

12 Answers2025-10-22
This is the tragedy of a wasted talent, and a very poisoned gift. Because Conway was a clever man, extremely creative and a very skilled artist. He spent all his time devising a clever plan for revenge instead of devoting himself to his art. How cleverly he managed to pull off the plan is incredible, and how he managed to devise it is too. But the reason he did it is so, so sad. Conway had the talent to write a brilliant finale to his own life, but instead he chose to write a bitter and spiteful one. A very melancholic solution to a mystery, most end with the protagonist having to resort to making some pretty tough decisions, but this is on a whole different level.

How does Murder by Death end?

9 Answers2025-12-04
For me, the ending of the film focuses most on the butler, Perrier, as his ‘death’ is the central event that kick-starts the chaos of the rest of the film. Seeing him get up from the floor, absolutely fine, and be handed an ‘A’ by Twain was the perfect end to his character’s journey as he was playing a part the whole time. His transformation from ‘dead’ butler to much-respected employee of the household, receiving accolades from all, is the final visual joke to emphasize the highly theatrical nature of the film. He takes a bow. In a small moment, all of the film’s key themes are sum up perfectly: nothing is as it seems and everything is all part of the show.

What is the twist ending of 'The Devil in Silver'?

10 Answers2025-06-30
The twist in 'The Devil in Silver' hits like a sledgehammer. Our protagonist, a mental patient fighting for sanity, discovers the 'devil' haunting the ward isn't supernatural at all—it's the system itself. The real monster wears a white coat; doctors manipulate patients into believing in a silver demon to justify their brutal treatments. The final reveal shows newspaper clippings proving this same tactic was used for decades across multiple institutions. What makes it chilling is how ordinary the evil feels—no fangs or claws, just humans destroying humans under the guise of care. The last pages imply our hero might be the next 'devil,' suggesting the cycle never ends.

What is the ending of memoirs of a murderer explained?

6 Answers2025-08-28
Am I the only one who noticed the ‘copycat’ killer’s MO mirrored his own past commits? I noticed this almost immediately. It was a huge red flag for me. In retrospect, it makes sense that the copycat’s MO would mirror Byung-soo’s past commits. The copycat was a fictional stand-in for Byung-soo to grapple with his past crimes. The ending is brilliant and the way the writer masked this obvious reveal as a plot hole rather than stellar character development is pure genius.

What happens at the end of Last House explained?

8 Answers2026-03-10
The ending of The House of Leaves by Dave Eggers is the key part of the book to understand first. As the novel begins with the line ‘Every house is a world, and every world must end’, the reader realises that the end of The House of Leaves isn’t about saving a world (i.e. the house) but about bringing it to an end with due respect. The action of the final section of the novel becomes that of the undertaker rather than destroyer of the House and the supernatural horrors that reside within its walls. Rather than having a horrible, violent ending, the House is consumed by a cool, silent flame, in the form of a single candle that is carefully constructed to bring about the Houses demise in a sombre, yet fitting manner. Rather than fleeing triumphantly from his supernatural abode, the protagonist is depicted walking slowly and solemnly away from the house that he has at last brought to a proper close.

What is the twist at the end of the family next door?

10 Answers2025-10-22
I'm still trying to process everything and would really like to have a thread for the epilogue as I've heard there are different editions of this and some of them include an extra chapter or two set years after the main story and others don't. Mine doesn't and I'm actually kind of okay with that. The silence and abrupt ending of our protagonist sitting in her car with the engine off in her driveway was more powerful than any ending or resolution to her story. The twist is what's keeping her trapped in that car in that moment for the rest of her life. Going inside would be a completely different book and probably not as good.

What happens at the ending of 'An All American Murder'?

8 Answers2026-03-08
I think the end leaves plenty of room for a sequel, but in a good way as opposed to cheap. The main character is now in a new city, trying to move on with his life while bringing the truth to light. The corrupt town and his string of suspicions still exist, as well as the potential killer, all of which are a very volatile powder keg just waiting to explode. In the future, the story could follow a new character reading Jamie’s now-public blog posts, or even he could be pulled back to the town years later for unknown reasons when new evidence surfaces. Regardless, Jamie’s chapter in this town has come to an end, but the fate of that secret is never to be fully locked away. The truth is out there and could blow at any time.

How does The Russia House end?

7 Answers2025-12-22
It's a downer. So beautifully written, but a downer. I wanted to read about Barley rescuing Katya from herself. I wanted them to run off together. The information that they risked everything to reveal wouldn't change a thing. It would be a secret locked away in a vault and those who revealed it would be killed. Yakov and Katya would have known that they were brave. Barley would have known humanity at its best. But it's a cold, private victory that changes nothing in this world of politics. Le Carre is not going to give you a cheap thrill.

What happens at the end of The Haunting of Ashburn House?

8 Answers2026-01-22
I read this as an unexpectedly hopeful ending to this twisted story. Yes, Adrienne is tied to this house forever, but she is not being tormented by any ghosts. In fact, she has domesticated the haunting and, for the first time, the entity is at peace because someone has finally acknowledged the truth and taken responsibility for their past actions. In this strange way, Adrienne has found a sense of purpose in her rootless existence and a home, no matter how repulsive. The final line of the story, the house is “sleeping”, shows that a fragile harmony has been reached. And it is just that – a dark happy ending for someone who felt she had no roots to speak of.

How does The Wager A Tale of Shipwreck Mutiny and Murder end and why?

7 Answers2025-12-22
I kept coming back to the idea of memory throughout the ending, though. While the survivors brought back physical bodies from the raid, each of them also brought back traumatic memories of the raid that were in competition with each other. The trial was a way to try to create a single, official memory of the event, but it inevitably failed, since memory is inherently subjective and self-serving. Thus, the ending of the book with Bulkeley’s memoir, Cheap’s letters, and all the conflicting testimonies to the raid to continue to battle it out in the public sphere even after the trial had ended was, to me, absolutely fascinating. I saw in that ending a history not defined by a particular point in time (i.e., 1746) but rather a history that is ongoing and that continues to this very day with each account of the raid in turn defining the event for the reader of that account. In other words, by ending the book with all of these unresolved contradictions, Grann has planted us smack in the middle of this ongoing process of history and is forcing us to join in the never-ending attempt to sort out truth from narrative. This is a wild ambition for the ending of a history book, and Grann pulls it off handsomely.
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
DMCA.com Protection Status