Why Was The Child Forsaken In 'The Forsaken Sigil: The Child That Shouldn'T Be'?

The child in 'The Forsaken Sigil: The Child That Shouldn't Be' was abandoned because of a dark prophecy that terrified the entire kingdom. Ancient texts foretold that this child would bring about the collapse of the royal bloodline, turning the land into a wasteland ruled by shadows. The king, fearing the prophecy, ordered the child's execution, but the mother secretly sent the baby away with a trusted knight. The child grew up in isolation, unaware of their cursed destiny. The forsaking wasn't just about fear—it was a political move to maintain power, as the royal court couldn't risk the prophecy becoming reality. The irony is that the abandonment itself sets the child on the path to fulfill the prophecy, as the loneliness and betrayal fuel their eventual rise as the very destroyer the kingdom feared.

In 'The Forsaken Sigil: The Child That Shouldn't Be', the abandonment stems from a complex web of magical and societal forces. The child was born under the Black Sigil, a rare birthmark that signifies a conduit for chaotic magic. This magic destabilizes the world's natural order, causing crops to wither and spells to misfire around the child. The kingdom's magicians confirmed the danger, labeling the child a 'world breaker.'

The royal family faced immense pressure from both the magical council and the common people, who blamed the child for sudden famines and strange disasters. The mother, though heartbroken, agreed to exile the child to prevent civil war. What makes this tragic is that the child's magic isn't inherently evil—it's raw and uncontrolled, like a storm that could be calmed with proper guidance. The story later reveals that the sigil was actually a protective mark meant to shield the child from darker forces manipulating the kingdom.

The forsaking becomes a pivotal moment that divides the narrative. On one side, you have the kingdom's desperate attempt to survive. On the other, you see the child's journey of self-discovery, learning that their so-called curse is actually a misunderstood gift. The abandonment isn't just an act of cruelty—it's a failure of understanding, a moment where fear overshadowed compassion.

The forsaken child in this novel is a victim of religious extremism and twisted dogma. The holy church declared the child 'unholy' because it was born on the Night of Silent Tears, when the moon eclipsed the sun—an event said to herald the dark god's return. Priests claimed the child's very presence drained light from sacred flames, and their shadow moved independently. The truth, revealed later, is far more heartbreaking.

The child was actually absorbing residual dark magic from a cursed relic buried beneath the palace, acting as a living filter to protect others. The royal family, devout followers of the church, saw the abandonment as a sacrificial necessity. They didn't just cast the child out—they erased all records of its birth, rewriting history to pretend it never existed. This act of denial becomes the story's central theme, exploring how societies will destroy innocents to preserve their comfortable illusions.

What's chilling is how the child's eventual return forces the kingdom to confront its hypocrisy. The very 'darkness' they feared was what had been keeping true evil at bay all along. The novel uses the forsaking to ask uncomfortable questions about how we label others as monsters to justify our own sins.