How Do Book Reviews Los Angeles Times Influence LA Readers’ Book Choices?

2026-07-09 08:26:35
69
Share
ABO Personality Quiz
Take a quick quiz to find out whether you‘re Alpha, Beta, or Omega.
Scent
Personality
Ideal Love Pattern
Secret Desire
Your Dark Side
Start Test

5 Answers

Cole
Cole
Insight Sharer Driver
It provides a trusted curation source in a flooded market. Browsing online is overwhelming. Seeing a title vetted and analyzed by a professional critic at a major newspaper cuts through the noise. For many time-pressed LA readers, it's an efficient starting point. The depth of the review often gives a better sense of fit than a star rating alone, though the star rating from them definitely moves the needle on retail sites.
2026-07-10 20:02:50
5
Frederick
Frederick
Book Clue Finder Chef
Honestly? Huge. I'm in a couple of local bookish groups and the LAT review is like the official stamp. If they hate something, it's a death sentence for it being discussed at, like, a Westside moms' book club. People treat it as this authoritative filter. The 'Book Club' picks email is practically a syllabus.

It's not that I always agree—I thought their take on that new Korean translated novel was weirdly dismissive of the magical elements—but it sets the conversation. You can't escape it. You see the pull-quote on every bookstore shelf placard in LA. It creates this shared reference point, for better or worse. It feels less about the critique itself and more about the social signal of having read what's deemed culturally significant by the paper of record for the city.
2026-07-13 23:06:09
3
Clara
Clara
Longtime Reader Translator
I think its influence is overstated among younger readers who are deep into online communities. My friends and I get our recs from BookTok, specific genre subreddits, or author newsletters. The Times feels formal, distant. Their reviews are well-written, but they often miss the pulse of what's exciting in speculative fiction or contemporary romance—the stuff we're actually passing around.

That institutional voice can even backfire; if they love something, it sometimes feels like a stuffy assignment. There's a rebellion factor. Their real power is probably with an older, more established audience that still has a newspaper subscription. For them, it's a primary source. For us, it's one of many data points, and not the most relatable one. We might glance at it after we've already heard about a book elsewhere, just to see the 'official' take.
2026-07-14 17:54:01
1
Xavier
Xavier
Clear Answerer Doctor
The connection to local authors and events amplifies its effect. When they profile an LA writer or highlight a book about the city's history, it feels directly relevant. That coverage can fill readings at Chevalier's or Vroman's. It turns a national publication list into a local conversation starter, making their reviews a tool for community-building around books here, not just passive recommendations.
2026-07-14 23:30:20
5
Aiden
Aiden
Plot Detective Firefighter
I'll be straight—I trust the Times' critics about as much as I trust a freeway traffic report. Their taste feels wired to a specific coastal literary circuit that often overlooks genre work or local indie presses. When they fawn over a sprawling literary fiction about New York intellectuals, I just tune out. Their influence seems strongest on that 'book club' demographic, the readers who want the definitive 'important' novel of the season. My book club picked 'The Candy House' because of their rave, and half of us found it impenetrable.

That said, their daily newsletter and the 'Books' section landing in my feed does put titles on my radar. I might not buy their five-star pick, but I'll see the cover and title repeated, and then notice it on a shelf at The Last Bookstore. It creates a background hum. For non-fiction, especially politics or history, their reviews carry more weight for me—they have the space and expertise to dissect an argument's merits.

Ultimately, their biggest impact might be indirect: driving library holds and bookstore ordering decisions. If the Times champions something, Skylight Books will have a big display. That physical presence in local shops, fueled by that coverage, probably nudges more casual browsers than the review text itself.
2026-07-15 14:43:33
5
View All Answers
Scan code to download App

Related Books

Related Questions

How reliable are book reviews Los Angeles Times for discovering new authors?

5 Answers2026-07-09 04:21:12
Their book coverage feels like it's become more of a lifestyle supplement than a discovery engine for me. I remember hunting through the reviews section a few years ago, genuinely excited, but lately it's the same handful of established literary names or the buzzy celebrity memoir. It's frustrating when you're trying to find a debut novelist who isn't already plastered across every other major outlet. That said, the reliability isn't about factual errors—their critics are sharp—it's about relevance. If your taste aligns with a certain East-Coast-centric, high-literary tradition, their picks might feel spot-on. But for genre fiction, translated works, or voices from smaller presses? You're often better off in dedicated online spaces. I found my last favorite historical fiction author through a niche Substack, not the Times. Maybe I'm being unfair. A positive review in the LAT still carries weight and can absolutely launch a career. I just think their radar for 'new' is calibrated to a very specific signal, one that often misses the weird, wonderful, and truly emergent stuff happening on the fringes. For reliable discovery, I need a source that feels like it's searching with me, not announcing what's already been sanctioned.

Which genres get the most positive book reviews Los Angeles Times offers?

5 Answers2026-07-09 10:20:13
I think there's a bit of a misconception to clear up right away. The LA Times doesn't really offer book reviews in the sense of star ratings or aggregated scores. They publish individual, signed critic reviews, so the positivity is filtered through a specific critic's lens and the paper's editorial perspective. It's not like looking at an Amazon average. That said, if you're asking which genres tend to get the most respectful, serious, and often laudatory attention from their critics, it's usually literary fiction and serious non-fiction—biographies, histories, big-idea books. You'll see raves for novels that grapple with social issues or have a distinctive prose style, and for non-fiction that illuminates a complex subject. A critic might dismantle a popular thriller while praising a dense historical novel. Their readership expects a certain weight, so the reviews reflect that. They do cover genre stuff, but the tone shifts. A well-written mystery or sci-fi novel might get a 'surprisingly good' or 'elevates the genre' kind of review, which is its own form of qualified praise. The most unambiguously positive notices seem reserved for works that fit a certain idea of literary merit, which can feel a bit predictable after a while. I read them more for the critic's analysis than as a pure 'thumbs up' guide.

What do book reviews Los Angeles Times highlight about bestselling novels?

5 Answers2026-07-09 02:37:14
So I end up reading a lot of their longer-form reviews. They have this distinct voice—not quite snobby, but definitely coming from a place where literature is taken seriously as an art form. I’ve noticed they often dissect a novel's political or social ambitions, especially with historical fiction or literary thrillers. It's less 'is this a fun read?' and more 'what does this book attempt to say about our current moment, and does it succeed?' For example, their review of 'The Candy House' by Jennifer Egan was less about the sci-fi concept and more about its commentary on memory and data privacy. They praised its structural ingenuity but questioned whether the emotional core was as strong as in 'A Visit from the Goon Squad.' That's typical for them: placing a new book within the author's entire body of work and the broader literary conversation. They're also not afraid to be critical of popular darlings. I recall a review of a Colleen Hoover book that was essentially a cultural analysis of why her novels resonate, while being pretty clear that they weren't endorsing the prose. It’s a useful counterbalance to the sheer volume of five-star fan reviews on retail sites. You go to the Times for the 'why,' not just the rating.

How does the LA Times select its best seller books list?

8 Answers2026-07-29 08:14:03
They probably have different lists for different formats—hardcover fiction, paperback nonfiction, etc.—and each has its own selection pool. A mass market paperback thriller isn’t competing against a glossy hardcover art book. This segmentation is part of the process. It ensures a diversity of books can make the cut. The editors have to oversee each of these mini-competitions every week, ensuring each list is a valid representation of its category’s sales landscape.
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
DMCA.com Protection Status