7 Answers2026-05-02
I can find humor in the novel too (it’s really dark and subtle though). First of all, there’s Marmeladov. His drunken and semi-self-pitying monologues are, of course, tragic, but also somehow funny. Then there are the petty and scatterbrained officials, Mme Liputin and the Landlady, and, most of all, the bombastic and comically-failed attempts by Luzhin to better himself socially or financially. It’s clear that the author is savaging the social climbers, the cynical and hypocritical members of the Russian bourgeoisie, and their functionaries. Raskolnikov’s delusions of grandeur also have elements of the pathetic and the absurd. This humor is not funny in the sense that the novel is not a comedy (it is not), but rather the recognition of the ridiculous in a tragic situation makes the novel more human and therefore less a stern lecture.
7 Answers2025-07-13
My edition of the novel was 671 pages long, and I read it in 14 days, averaging 48 pages per day. I didn’t force myself to read a certain amount each day, but instead tried to read at about the same time every day. By doing so, I was able to sustain the mood of the novel, and maintain the necessary tension. Reading a long classic such as this can be daunting, but by setting a daily goal of, say, 30-50 pages, it becomes a pleasant daily ritual, rather than a chore. I read for about 30 minutes before bed each night, completing a chapter or two before drifting off to sleep. During the night, I would have strange and philosophical dreams. The novel would seep into my subconscious if I gave it consistent attention, and I found that the daily commitment to reading was enjoyable, rather than arduous.
10 Answers2025-07-13
A book that benefits from marginalia. I felt like I had the most wonderful time reading this book. I underlined so much, put in so many question marks and exclamation marks, and felt that I was almost arguing with Raskolnikov on the margins of the pages. Noting down all the symbolic moments and tracking the weather and how it affected the mood of the characters was all so very worthwhile. And I felt that the length of the book was made so very meaningful by my having been an active reader, as opposed to having simply read the book. All in all, therefore, my having read this book was not simply a matter of my having logged so many hours, for in fact the time spent reading, and then thinking about and annotating what I had just read, was more than worth while. In short, I felt that I had been able to establish a most wonderful relationship with a very complex book. And if one approaches a classic such as this with the same mindset, then soon one will realize that the number of pages does not even begin to matter. For what matters is not the mere counting down of the number of pages left to read, but rather the wonderful and most superb process of understanding the book that one is reading.
3 Answers2025-07-13
Let’s just give some credit to poor Sonya. Rather than telling us about Raskolnikov’s experiences, Sonya gives up her entire life and goes to Siberia. Her quiet strength in the epilogue is far more powerful than Raskolnikov’s collapse. She is the anchor of the entire ending to the novel.
8 Answers2025-07-13
It’s interesting that no one has brought up the Constance Garnett translation of “Crime and Punishment” yet. While her translation is historical and oft-reprinted, reading it after P&V is like watching a movie with the contrast cranked down low. The rough edges of Garnett’s translation have all been smoothed over to make Dostoevsky’s work read like that of a slightly more agitated Jane Austen. But Dostoevsky isn’t Austen. He’s a tough, uncomfortable, and repetitive writer who dives deep into the psychological inner lives of his characters to expose their inner conflicts and psychological fears. The P&V translation has somehow managed to resurrect all of the edgey and uncomfortable aspects of Dostoevsky’s novel for English-speaking readers. While it’s true that some of the translations are a bit awkward, it’s sort of necessary in order to accurately portray the main character, Raskolnikov, as well as the dirty, sick, and oppressive city in which he lives. If you want to read a smooth and pleasant classic, then read something else. But “Crime and Punishment” is not for the faint of heart, and you’ll need a translation that isn’t afraid of the novel’s mess.
10 Answers2025-08-20
S.A. Cosby is a new name to me, but it looks as if I have already tracked down two of his novels. Start with Blacktop Wasteland. Then read All the Sinners Bleed. Cosby’s books are rural noir/Southern noir, a novel approach within the very hard-boiled tradition of fiction, essential and powerful. In these novels of dark crime and punishment, powerful writers have written about mechanics, ex-cons, even sheriffs, men with bad pasts who continue to strive within tough circumstances to be decent. Cosby’s writing is wonderfully powerful and evocative, and his car chases are like movies. But what ultimately makes for a compelling read are the moral-dilemmas that will break your heart, all while giving you an understanding of the deeply-felt struggles between the lines of so many broadly-defined themes like poverty and racism and family, and a desperate search for dignity. Cosby has, in the space of a few short years, written the kind of authentic work that I can envision that other important writer of several decades ago, the great Chester Himes, might have written had he continued to write in today’s America in all its complexity.
8 Answers2025-08-30
The Double is another short work by Dostoevsky worth reading. It’s not the shortest work by the author, but it’s definitely short enough to be read in a few hours of dedicated reading. It’s an early work by Dostoevsky, and it’s interesting to see how he was already developing the major themes of his work, including the effects of madness on a person’s identity. The translation of The Double into English is also very important. An older translation of The Double by Constance Garnett is somewhat clumsy. A much better version of The Double is the translation by the authors of Called Up to the Front, Pevear and Volokhonsky, who also translated Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov for good reason.
6 Answers2025-08-31
I must acknowledge that the P&V marketing machine is very good at what it does. So, you’ll find them on the cover of most classic sections in bookstores, and they are often good. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that they are the best translation of a given work, and therefore, other very good translations are dismissed solely on the basis of-store front hype.
And it creates a fascinating (and totally unfair) situation in which to laud Garnett or another translator one instantly appears to be a snarky, overhyping hipster contrarian challenging the givens of mass marketing. P&V is, for many, often the only good option, for specific books, however, another translator might be offering a far more suitable translation than P&V’s. Ultimately, one serves Dostoevsky, not the translator or publishing brand.
7 Answers2026-05-04
This discussion of the plot is more interesting than the actual plot. Us, analyzing a story from a literary perspective, a psychological perspective, and even a cultural perspective. And the text itself is most likely to be pretty average, following a very standard structure. But why does this fantasy work so well for this author and for readers to the extent that there are thousands of chapters and hundreds of thousands of comments?
7 Answers2026-04-13
Giyu Tomioka's punishment in the manga 'Demon Slayer' is one of those moments that really makes you feel the weight of the Demon Slayer Corps' rules. After the battle at the Natagumo Mountain arc, where Tanjiro, Nezuko, and the others faced the Spider Family demons, Giyu intervened to protect Nezuko from Shinobu Kocho, who wanted to kill her on the spot. The Corps has a zero-tolerance policy for demons, and Giyu's defiance—despite Nezuko's unique circumstances—was seen as a breach of discipline.
What makes this interesting is how it reflects the rigid structure of the Corps. Even though Giyu is a Hashira, one of the strongest, he isn't exempt from consequences. The punishment wasn't just about Nezuko; it was about maintaining order. The manga subtly questions whether such inflexibility is justified, especially when characters like Tanjiro and Giyu are trying to navigate morally gray areas. It's a moment that adds depth to both Giyu's character and the world-building.