7 Answers
Small, sharp observations point in wildly different directions. On one hand, some folks argue the examiner is actually a refugee from a dissolved noble house — someone who traded titles for a cloak of anonymity to punish a corrupt ruling class. The evidence cited is symbolic: a badge they keep hidden, an old-style manner of speech in moments of stress, and a surprisingly delicate hand when handling fragile things. That suggests aristocratic upbringing gone wrong.
Flip it, and you get the exile theory: a former interrogator from a defeated army who changed sides after seeing the system break people. Fans draw parallels between their empathetic methods and old battlefield triage protocols, plus the examiner's buried guilt scenes in flashbacks. Another popular speculation places them as a double agent embedded in the tribunal to sabotage from within; secret correspondence and coded language in their notes fuel that idea. Personally, I lean toward the exile/intervention origin because it best explains their conflicting compassion and ruthlessness — it's a nuanced backstory that fits the clues the creator scattered about, and I love the moral complexity it adds.
Quietly piecing things together, I often settle on a simpler, more melancholic theory: the examiner is a survivor of a system collapse, someone who learned to administer justice when rules disappeared. The hints are subtle — an old ledger marked with dates that match historical disasters, a habit of writing names in ink that fades in sunlight, and an occasional, distant stare when legal loopholes are discussed.
That origin gives weight to every judgment they pass; it's not performance, it's a burden. Alternatively, I like the idea they're an ascetic who renounced personal ties after losing someone to a miscarriage of justice. That would explain their refusal to form attachments and their fierce, almost private, compassion. Either version turns the character into a somber mirror of the world they inhabit, and I find that quiet gravity oddly comforting.
A theory I keep tossing around when people ask about the examiner's past is that they were once part of the very system they now silently judges. There are so many small details — the way they correct documents without emotion, the scars hidden beneath the collar, the habit of tapping a rhythm like someone who once stood in formations — that point to formal training. I like to imagine an origin where they were a star pupil in a bureaucratic academy, rose through cold merit, then saw the cost of permitting cruelty and quietly rebelled.
Another angle I enjoy is the memory-loss twist: trauma or an experimental procedure wiped their early life clean. Fans have picked up on those blank pauses before they answer personal questions, the weird gaps in their knowledge about simple cultural things. That feeds into headcanons where they collect mementos desperately — small trinkets from places they can't remember — which explains why their office is cluttered with odd souvenirs. Either way, I end up feeling sympathetic; their past being a mix of duty and loss makes them tragic and quietly heroic in my eyes.
When I replay the key moments, a pattern shows itself: the examiner's language betrays training in both law and combat. That leads me to a military-spy origin theory — they were once an officer who led interrogations in a war, then walked away and took up a civil role to atone. Fans point to micro-details like their precise timing, the way they close doors, or the sudden flashes of sadness when a past colleague is mentioned. That backstory explains a lot: why they tolerate chaos, why their moral compass is shaded, and why they occasionally break protocol in ways that favor humane outcomes.
Another deep-cut theory I like theorizes that the examiner suffered induced amnesia, possibly from an experiment tied to the institution's founding. In this version, they're searching for fragments of identity while judging others, which creates powerful irony: they judge what they themselves cannot remember. That creates beautiful dramatic tension and makes every offhand line a potential clue. I read fan essays that map their gestures to memory triggers, and I find myself tracing those same breadcrumbs. It's the kind of ambiguity that keeps conversations alive and inspires scenes I wish existed in the official story, and I can't help smiling whenever I picture them finally piecing it together.
Here's my top three wild theories about the examiner, in no particular order, because my brain absolutely makes fan art for all of them.
First: the twin switch. Fans point out odd asymmetries in early frames — like one ear slightly different, a deliberate line in a portrait, or contradictory birthdays on old dossiers. The idea: they traded places with a sibling after a scandal, taking on the role of gatekeeper to atone. That explains the quiet protectiveness toward certain characters.
Second: experimental subject. This is darker: the examiner was part of a clandestine program that erased or rewired memories to create impartial adjudicators. People point to their flashes of non-sequential memories and odd phobias as residues of experiments. It's creepy but compelling because it recontextualizes their cold logic as engineered, not chosen.
Third: former cult member who escaped and became judge of compromises in a bid to save others. Ritual scars and the way they hum under stress give that vibe. I sketch all three in fan comics and honestly enjoy how each theory changes how they look at the world — they're endlessly fascinating to me.
I tend to treat the examiner like a box of layered letters — each layer peels back to reveal another secret. One quick cluster of fan theories imagines them as a sibling of a major antagonist or protagonist, hidden away due to scandal; another imagines they were a prodigy expelled for unethical experiments and now judge others as a form of penance. There's also the rumor that they were once part of a traveling carnival or secret society, explaining odd skills like lockpicking or surprising empathy with performers and outcasts. I love how these ideas play off one another: a disgraced scientist running from the past who then becomes an inspector, or a former guardian who lost their charge and now protects in bureaucratic disguise. Small textual hints — a mismatched glove, a faded tattoo at the wrist, a name they never use — fuel these headcanons, and I enjoy mapping them onto deleted scenes in my head. Imagining any of these paths makes the character feel more alive to me, and I keep sketching out scenes where their past finally collides with the present in a messy, satisfying way.
I've got a soft spot for characters with mysterious pasts, and the examiner is one of those delicious puzzles I can't stop poking at. One popular idea I cling to is that the examiner used to be inside the very institution they now inspect — maybe a former test subject, recruiter, or even a janitor who saw too much. There are little breadcrumbs in their behavior: they flinch at certain phrases, they handle old equipment with an intimacy that looks like habit rather than training, and sometimes a ghost of guilt crosses their face when a subject is punished. That suggests a redemption arc or survivor's guilt, which fans love to play out in fanfiction where they return to rescue people they once betrayed.
Another theory I keep returning to is the double-agent angle. People point to the examiner’s perfectly neutral tone as camouflage; neutrality is the best cover. The idea goes: they were planted by an external group — rebels, rival state, or a corporate competitor — to steer outcomes subtly, record weaknesses, or sabotage the system from within. This fits scenes where they privately slip a subject a sympathetic glance or where their notes include odd, coded markings. And then there’s the more supernatural speculation: scars that glow faintly, a carapace of knowledge about forbidden rituals, or a past life as a guardian spirit. Those theories lean into symbolism and visually compelling headcanons, which inspire so much fan art and speculative writing. I enjoy all of them because each version of the examiner opens new emotional stakes and hidden scenes I love imagining before bed.