7 Answers2026-07-25 06:17:31
It’s all about lineage and inheritance, too. By 'The Warlord of Mars', Carter isn't just fighting for his wife; he's fighting for the future his son will inherit. The later wars in the series (like in 'Llana of Gathol') even involve his grandson. The conflicts evolve from 'save the princess' to 'secure a dynasty.' The Barsoom wars become the Carter family business, which is a wild but compelling through-line.
8 Answers2026-07-25 12:35:47
For a visual learner, imagine a timeline. 'Princess' starts it. 'Gods' and 'Warlord' continue immediately after. Then there's a gap. 'Thuvia' and 'Chessmen' happen in that gap, focusing on the next generation. Then the timeline jumps forward for 'Master Mind' and beyond, with John Carter still active but older. It's not linear, but it's not incomprehensible.
4 Answers2026-07-25 18:25:31
Waiting for someone to post a fancy infographic with arrows and a timeline. That would finally settle this debate. Until then, I'll just lurk and read the arguments.
4 Answers2026-07-25 22:12:23
I appreciate the internal timeline because it gives structure to a sprawling series. Without it, the ten-plus novels can feel like a blur of similar adventures. The chronological sequence provides a backbone—you see Carter's life unfold, his family grow, the world change. It transforms the series from a set of pulpy episodes into a loose, generational saga. That added depth makes the re-read more satisfying for me, even if it wasn't Burroughs' original design.
3 Answers2026-07-25 16:09:34
I remember being a kid and finding these in my library out of order. I read 'The Master Mind of Mars' first and was utterly confused but enthralled. Went back and started from the beginning, and it was like getting the missing pieces of a dream.
That confusion was actually fun, but I got more out of it the second time, in order. The series is designed to be discovered layer by layer. The first book sets up the romance and wonder. The next ones deepen the mythology. The later ones expand the cast. Doing it right feels like being inducted into a secret club.
3 Answers2026-07-25 10:48:58
The series order question comes up a lot in old-school sci-fi forums. It's nice to see new readers discovering these classics. The community usually points people to ERBlist.com for definitive info, but the short answer is always publication order.
5 Answers2026-07-25 07:08:41
Just chiming in to say that 'The Chessmen of Mars' is the one with the living game of Jetan, right? That concept has stuck with me for years. The order is important because that book comes after the establishment of the world and the main family. It feels like a natural expansion of the weirdness Barsoom can offer.
If you read it first, the setting wouldn't be as grounded. You need the baseline of red deserts, dying oceans, and airborne battles from the earlier books to appreciate how truly bizarre the chessmen are. Publication order gives you that steady ramp-up into the surreal.
3 Answers2026-07-25 22:11:57
This question makes me want to re-read the whole series now. The books have this wonderful, episodic feel where each one is a new adventure on Barsoom. The movie tried to give that a more traditional three-act structure, which meant borrowing from the later lore early on. Honestly, the reading order is straightforward—just go by publication date. The internal chronology is a bit wibbly-wobbly, but it's not crucial to enjoy them.
5 Answers2026-07-25 07:02:30
I appreciate the movie for getting the visuals right—the Tharks, the cities, the landscapes. But narratively, it’s a hodgepodge. They took the climax of book one (the atmosphere plant) and made it a mid-point set piece, then invented a new climax involving the Therns’ spire. That’s a fundamental reordering of the story’s dramatic peaks.
4 Answers2026-07-25 12:44:16
It’s fascinating how these books inspired so much modern sci-fi and fantasy, from 'Star Wars' to 'Avatar'. Reading them in publication order is like watching the genre DNA unfold. You see tropes being invented in real time. That historical layer adds so much to the experience. A chronological read would obscure that evolution. You’d get a tidy story but miss the cultural context. For a student of genre history, publication order isn’t just correct; it’s essential.