Who Are The Key Critics Of 'Decolonizing Therapy' And Why?

I've sat through sessions where my brain felt like a radio stuck on one song — the same anxious chorus about whether someone really meant that text or if I accidentally ruined things. Therapy began to change that by teaching me to notice the pattern instead of getting swept up in it. Early on my therapist and I mapped out the triggers: certain words, silences, or my own hunger and tiredness would ignite a replay loop. Once those were visible, we used tools like thought records and behavioral experiments to test whether my catastrophic predictions were true. That process sounds clinical, but it translated into concrete shifts: I stopped racing to fill silence with interpretations and started asking one clear question instead — what is the evidence for this thought? It reduced the volume. Over a few months I saw real markers of progress. My sleep got better because I wasn't stuck ruminating at night, arguments felt less like proof of doom and more like information, and I could set small boundaries without spiraling. Some people notice relief within six to eight sessions if they get practical CBT-style tools fast; others work longer on deeper attachment wounds with therapies like emotion-focused or psychodynamic approaches. The main thing I learned was that therapy isn't a quick fix, but a practice that rewires my default reactions. I still care deeply about the people in my life, but now I bring curiosity instead of a searchlight of suspicion, and that has made loving feel less exhausting.

Night after night I'd sit at my desk, convinced the next sentence would never come. I got into therapy because my avoidance had become a lifestyle: I’d binge, scroll, and tell myself I’d start 'tomorrow' on projects that actually mattered. Therapy didn’t magically make me brave overnight, but it did teach me how to break the impossible into doable bites. The first thing my clinician helped me with was creating tiny experiments—fifteen minutes of focused writing, a five-minute walk, a short call I’d been putting off. Those micro-commitments lowered the activation energy needed to begin. Over time, therapy rewired how I think about failure and discomfort. A lot of the work was about tolerating the uncomfortable feelings that come with new challenges—heart racing, intrusive doubts, perfectionist rules—rather than trying to eliminate them. We used cognitive restructuring to spot catastrophic thoughts and behavioral activation to reintroduce meaningful action. Exposure techniques came into play when I had to face public readings; graded exposures (reading to a friend first, then a small group, then a café) were invaluable. Therapy also offered accountability without judgment: I’d report back, we’d troubleshoot what got in the way, and I’d leave with a plan. That structure turned vague intentions into habits. It’s important to say therapy isn’t a superhero cape. Some things require practical training, mentorship, or medication alongside psychological work. Therapy helps with the internal barriers—shame, avoidance, unhelpful beliefs—that sabotage effort, but learning a hard skill still requires deliberate practice. I kept books like 'Atomic Habits' and 'The War of Art' on my shelf, not as silver bullets but as companions to the therapeutic process. What therapy gave me, honestly, was permission to be a messy, slow learner and a set of tools to keep showing up. Months in, I was finishing chapters I’d left for years, and even when I flopped, I flopped with new data and a plan. It hasn’t turned me into a fearless person, just a person who knows how to do hard things more often—and that’s been wildly freeing for me.

I get how messy this can feel — when someone close to your friend pulls your attention away in a way that’s awkward, uncomfortable, or just plain distracting. Therapy can absolutely help, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all silver bullet. First, therapy helps you and your friend sort out what’s actually happening: are you distracted because the dad is crossing boundaries, making suggestive comments, being overly involved, or simply because he’s charismatic and you’re feeling weird about it? Naming the problem is huge, and a therapist is great at helping people name and name-check feelings without shame. If the issue is boundary-crossing or harassment, therapy can help your friend build safety plans, practice direct but safe ways to set limits, and decide whether to involve family members or authorities. If the distraction is more about internal stuff — like developing awkward feelings, jealousy, or anxiety — a therapist can teach coping tools (grounding, cognitive reframing, assertive scripts) and help your friend keep the friendship healthy. Family or parent-focused therapy can help adults understand boundaries and appropriate behavior, so that the root cause is addressed rather than just symptoms. I’ve seen friends come out of a few months of therapy clearer, more confident, and better able to say no. Even if your friend refuses therapy, you can still use strategies a therapist would suggest: bring other people when you hang out, set subtle physical distance, rehearse lines that feel comfortable, and log any behavior that feels wrong. I care about how tangled feelings can get, and seeing people take steps toward safety and boundaries always feels hopeful to me.

Late-night scrolling led me to an Epictetus quote that felt like a lamp in a fog: 'It's not what happens to you, but how you react to it that matters.' That line kept popping up in my notes and then in conversations with friends who were navigating breakups, layoffs, and parenting meltdowns. I started using those lines like little scripts—teaching someone to pause and name what they can control felt less preachy and more human. Over months I noticed a pattern: the quotes sit at the crossroads of philosophy and therapy. Cognitive-behavioral techniques repackage Stoic ideas into practical tools. When I coach someone through an anxious spiral, I lean on the 'some things are up to us, some things are not' distinction (from 'Enchiridion') to help them map controllable actions. That one tweak—separating events from responses—turns rumination into a task list. On a personal note, I keep a sticky note with a short Epictetus line by my desk. It doesn't fix everything, but it reroutes my attention, and that's often the beginning of change.

I get giddy whenever someone asks about good places to buy evidence-based therapy game kits—it's like hunting for the perfect tool in a toolbox. Over the years I’ve picked up kits from a few reliable spots: academic publishers like Guilford Press and APA Books often publish therapy manuals and companion kits (for example, 'DBT Skills Training Handouts and Worksheets' comes from a traditional source and often has reproducible materials). PESI and other continuing-education providers sell practice-ready toolkits tied to specific workshops, and those are great because they usually include a manual, reproducible handouts, and clear instructions so fidelity stays intact. If you want hands-on supplies, Association for Play Therapy exhibitors and specialty vendors such as PlayTherapySupply.com or similar play-therapy stores sell curated game kits and toys that are commonly used in evidence-based play approaches. For clinical assessment and structured intervention kits, look at major clinical suppliers and assessment vendors like Pearson Clinical or PAR for tools that come with validation data and administration guides. Conferences and professional listservs are underrated—I've grabbed stuff from booth sales and colleagues who recommend kits they've actually used in trials. When I'm choosing, I check whether the kit references a manual, cites research, or is produced by an author known in outcome studies; that’s how I separate flashy from legitimately evidence-based. Picking a kit with training options, sample pages, or fidelity checklists has saved me time and kept my work defensible and effective.

I still get chills when a single panel suddenly exposes what a character has been hiding, and manga does that brilliantly. In many series the therapy scenes are like a spotlight: they slow down time, force the character into a confined space, and the reader gets privileged access to internal monologue, body language, and tiny gestures. I think that's why therapy themes work so well — they give creators a formal stage to show cracks and reveal subtext that might otherwise be buried in action or melodrama. Visually, mangaka use surreal backgrounds, shifting art styles, and symbolic objects during these scenes. Take 'Goodnight Punpun' — therapy moments (and their equivalent through hallucinatory sequences) become a mirror for Punpun's fragmented self. In 'March Comes in Like a Lion' the quieter, more realistic counselling-type conversations highlight loneliness and gradual healing. Those contrasts between the ordinary and the symbolic make the inner life feel tactile. As a reader I occasionally pause and re-read therapy pages like I would a poem. They’re not always clinically accurate, but they map emotional truth. If you want to understand a character’s psychic landscape, those scenes are often the clearest routes in—full of silence, small confessions, and the slow work of change.

Sometimes a single line slices through a tangle of feelings and gives people permission to breathe. I like to bring a quote about pain into a session as a gentle mirror: I’ll read it aloud, then sit back and watch how the person reacts. If they flinch, laugh, or go quiet, that tells me as much as their words. I often follow up with simple, open prompts like, 'Which part of this lands for you?' or 'Where do you feel that in your body?'—it turns the quote into an immediate bridge to bodily awareness and validation. I also use quotes as journaling seeds. After we unpack the initial reaction, I’ll ask clients to take the line home and write a short scene where the pain in the quote has a voice. That small creative move helps externalize suffering so it’s not a personality trait but an experience that can be explored and changed. Sometimes I pair it with grounding techniques or a breathing exercise if the quote stirs strong emotion. On a casual note, I’ve seen people light up when a quote echoes something they saw in 'Fullmetal Alchemist' or a comic they love—those crossovers (pop culture meeting therapy) help normalize feelings and remind folks they’re not alone in the hard parts.

Engaging with the book 'Decolonizing Methodologies' by Linda Tuhiwai Smith is an eye-opening experience that undeniably resonates with anyone interested in indigenous rights and perspectives. The text delves deep into the heart of the issues faced by indigenous peoples, particularly in how research methodologies have historically marginalized their voices. It’s invigorating to see how Smith emphasizes the need for indigenous peoples to reclaim their narratives, ensuring that their stories and experiences are not merely subjects for academic study but are respected and understood on their own terms. What really strikes me is the book’s approach to research as a tool of empowerment rather than oppression. Smith advocates for methodologies that reflect indigenous knowledge systems, encouraging researchers to engage with the people and their practices in a manner that honors their culture and tradition. This isn’t just academic theory; it’s a heartfelt call to action for scholars and practitioners alike. The idea that indigenous voices should lead the way in the storytelling of their own histories opens doors to new dialogues and pathways for understanding. Moreover, the book is rich with examples of how indigenous voices can be brought to the forefront in research. It’s not just about giving them a platform, but about fundamentally rethinking what research means and how it should be conducted. This perspective not only reshapes our view of knowledge but also reshapes our interactions with indigenous communities, promoting a vision of collaboration that can lead to more meaningful and respectful engagements. I left feeling inspired and motivated to reflect on my own practices and how I can contribute to uplifting these crucial narratives. It’s an essential read for anyone wishing to understand the intersection of research, power, and voice.