Did Peter Bogdanovich Write A Book On Orson Welles?

Question

Saw a documentary citing Bogdanovich's critical works, but not sure if his analysis of Welles became an actual published book or just interviews.

AndrewRay · Answer

Yes, he did. Bogdanovich conducted a series of interviews with Welles that were originally published as 'This is Orson Welles' in 1992, and it's a fantastic, detailed source from someone who really knew him. That focus on a complex creative relationship reminds me of the dynamic in 'LORENZO, MY FATHER'S BEST FRIEND', which digs into a lifelong, sometimes difficult bond between two men, framed through the narrator's personal memories. It handles those layers of admiration and friction really well.

Jocelyn · Answer

I first heard about Bogdanovich’s Welles book from a film professor who called it 'the closest thing to a Welles autobiography we’ll ever get.' That stuck with me. 'This is Orson Welles' isn’t your typical dry analysis—it’s alive with Welles’ voice, thanks to Bogdanovich’s interview format. The two had this mentor-protégé dynamic, and you can feel Bogdanovich’s reverence in every footnote. My favorite part? Welles ranting about how 'Citizen Kane' was overanalyzed ('People think it’s a damn crossword puzzle!'). It’s hilarious and heartbreaking in equal measure.

I’d argue the book also humanizes Bogdanovich. He’s not just an interviewer; he’s a fan wrestling with his hero’s contradictions. Like when Welles dismisses 'The Magnificent Ambersons' as a failure, and Bogdanovich gently pushes back—it’s this tender moment. For anyone who’s ever geeked out over film history, it’s like finding a secret masterclass.

Max · Answer

Yep, Bogdanovich’s 'This is Orson Welles' is legendary. I adore how it blends gossip (Welles calling Hitchcock 'a technician, not an artist'), technical insights (that long take in 'Touch of Evil' was pure spite against the studio), and personal confessions. It’s messy, opinionated, and utterly absorbing—much like Welles himself. My dog-eared copy has sticky notes everywhere, especially near the 'F for Fake' rants. Pure gold.

Felix · Answer

Oh, this takes me back! Peter Bogdanovich absolutely did write about Orson Welles, and it's one of those deep-cut gems for cinephiles. The book is called 'This is Orson Welles,' and it's essentially a series of conversations between Bogdanovich and Welles himself, edited and annotated with incredible care. It feels less like a traditional biography and more like eavesdropping on two geniuses debating film over coffee. I stumbled on it years ago in a used bookstore, and the way Welles dissects his own work—like how he fought studio interference on 'Touch of Evil'—is just electrifying. Bogdanovich’s notes add this layer of intimacy, like he’s guiding you through Welles’ labyrinthine mind. If you love behind-the-scenes chaos or the mythos of Old Hollywood, this is a must-read.

What’s wild is how raw Welles comes across—self-deprecating, witty, but also haunted by projects he couldn’t finish. Bogdanovich captures that duality perfectly. I’ve loaned my copy to friends so often it’s practically falling apart. It’s not just a book; it’s a time machine to when films felt like they could change the world.

HenryKit · Answer

He did! He wrote a book titled 'This Is Orson Welles'. It's not just a critical study; it's structured around a series of long interviews Bogdanovich conducted with Welles himself over many years. The book gives you this amazing fly-on-the-wall feeling, like you're eavesdropping on two film legends just talking shop. It covers everything from Welles' famous projects to the ones that got away, filled with his usual wit and bombast. Bogdanovich acts as both interviewer and annotator, adding his own context and observations. It's considered one of the essential texts if you're trying to understand Welles' mind and his tumultuous career in Hollywood. Honestly, reading it feels less like reading a book and more like being granted access to a private masterclass.

KenCox · Answer

I think so? I'm more familiar with Bogdanovich's films than his books, to be honest. I know he was a huge film nerd and historian, so it makes sense he'd do something like that. Was it done late in Welles' life? I imagine having those conversations when Welles had the full arc of his career behind him must have given them a special weight. Less about promoting the next project, more about reflecting on a body of work and a life lived largely outside the system. That retrospective angle probably yielded deeper, more philosophical answers.

LolaJames · Answer

Sure, but it's important to read it alongside other biographies. Welles was a myth-maker, and Bogdanovich was often an eager participant in that myth-making. The book presents Welles' perspective, which is invaluable, but it's not the whole story. Scholars like Simon Callow have done work that challenges or contextualizes some of Welles' own accounts. Reading Bogdanovich's book gives you the legend. Reading Callow gives you the more grounded, sometimes less flattering, reality of a chaotic production. Both are true in their own way. I'd treat Bogdanovich as the brilliant, subjective primary source and look elsewhere for a more detached historical analysis.

JossFox · Answer

Yep. And for all its depth, it's also just a great read for juicy Hollywood stories. The anecdote about Welles and John Huston trying to get a drunken John Barrymore to perform is pure gold. Or his impressions of various studio moguls. Bogdanovich lets him be entertaining, because Welles was, above all, a phenomenal entertainer. The book never forgets that. It's serious about his art but doesn't treat the man with kid gloves or false solemnity. It presents him as he was: a brilliant, complicated, funny, and often difficult man who happened to make some of the greatest films ever.

AlexVibes · Answer

Definitely. What I appreciate is that Bogdanovich doesn't avoid the failures or the controversies. They talk about the box office flops, the critically panned films, the projects that collapsed spectacularly. Welles is surprisingly candid about his mistakes and his misfires. There's no attempt to whitewash the career. That honesty gives the triumphs even more power. When he describes the thrill of a scene that worked perfectly, you believe it because you've also heard him dissect the ones that didn't. It's a balanced, human portrait, not a hero's myth.

Did Peter Bogdanovich Write A Book On Orson Welles?

9 Answers

Related Books

Gold Behind the Curtain

What the Screen Never Knew

Because I Once Saw the Light

The Billionaire's Bedroom Biographer

The Fontaines of Hollywood series: The Secret to Seduction

The Fontaines of Hollywood series: The Thrill of Temptation

Related Questions

What books did Peter Bogdanovich write about filmmaking?

How many books has Peter Bogdanovich published?

What are the best Peter Bogdanovich books for cinephiles?

Where to buy Peter Bogdanovich's books online?

Is Peter Bogdanovich's 'Who the Devil Made It' worth reading?

for the radio broadcast war of the worlds, why didn't orson welles read the novel as it was written?

What are some books like Peter O'Toole: A Biography?

Is Peter O'Toole: A Biography worth reading?

for the radio broadcast war of the worlds why didnt orson welles read the novel as it was written

What happens in Peter O'Toole: A Biography?