Fingerprints Of The Gods: The Evidence Of Earth's Lost Civilization

S시의 최고 재벌 강지혁의 약혼녀가 하루아침에 교통사고로 죽게 되면서 임유진은 음주운전 가해자라는 죄명을 안고 3년 형을 선고받는다. 지옥 같았던 3년간의 복역 생활을 어렵사리 버텨낸 그녀, 겨우 출소하여 자유를 찾는가 싶었는데 소문의 그 강지혁을 건드리게 됐을 줄이야? 남자의 정체를 알게 된 그녀는 그의 앞에 무릎 꿇고 애원했다. “강지혁, 제발 나 좀 놔줘.” 이에 강지혁은 입꼬리를 씩 말아 올렸다. “난 누나 절대 안 놔줘.” 모두 말한다. 강지혁은 피도 눈물도 없는 냉혈한이라고. 하지만 그는 옥살이하고 나온 환경미화원을 위해 간이고 쓸개고 모두 빼줄 것처럼 사랑을 속삭였다. 하지만 교통사고가 나던 날의 진실이 밝혀지면서 둘의 사랑은 산산이 조각나 버린다. 그렇게 두 사람의 사랑은 그녀의 도망으로 그렇게 끝나는 듯했으나……. 몇 년 후의 어느 날, 남자가 그녀의 앞에 무릎 꿇고 애원했다. “유진, 너만 나한테 돌아온다면 나 뭐든 할게.” 그런 남자의 눈빛을 지그시 바라보던 여자의 입에서 이윽고 한마디가 툭 튀어나왔다. “그러면 죽어.”

9.6

1785 Chapters

그리움에 남은 생을 가둘 필요가 있을까

“나리야, 너 어릴 때 집안끼리 정혼해 둔 상대가 있단다. 이제 네 건강도 많이 회복됐으니, S 시로 돌아와 결혼하는 게 어떠니?” “네가 정말 원하지 않는다면, 너희 아버지와 다시 상의해서 이 결혼을 없던 일로 해도 괜찮단다.” 어두운 방 안, 송나리는 조용히 앉아 아무 말도 하지 않았다. 전화기 너머에서 어머니 장혜정은 또다시 딸에게 거절당할 것을 예감하며 깊은 한숨을 내쉬려 했다. 그때, 나리가 입을 열었다. “...엄마, 엄마 말씀대로 돌아가서 결혼할게요.” 장혜정은 순간 말을 잃었다. 예상치 못한 딸의 대답이었다. “네가... 정말 동의한다고?” 나리는 평온한 목소리로 대답했다. “네, 동의해요. 하지만 H 시에서 처리해야 할 일이 조금 남아 있어요. 다 정리하고 나서 보름 안에 돌아갈게요. 엄마, 그동안 결혼 준비 부탁드려요.” 그녀는 몇 마디를 더 남긴 후 전화를 끊었다.

29 Chapters

A night in my boss's bed

Spending the last night of my vacation by partying and drinking into oblivion was the highlight of my master plan. Waking up, in my birthday suit and tangled up in the sheets with a sinfully handsome stranger was definitely not. Curious? Then I have to disclose about how I met him in the first place. Beware, you are all in for one hell of a delicious ride.

9.7

58 Chapters

Trouble in Paradise

Nicholas Hawk and I have been married for four years, and I've always wanted to have his children. But he never had sex with me and I always thought he wasn't interested in sex. The doctor explained that the patient had an anal fissure caused by sexual intercourse. At that moment, I felt my heart sink to the bottom of my stomach. She's Nicholas' sister, albeit one with whom he isn't blood-related.

7.7

686 Chapters

One Night Stand

Mia's wedding to the big boss, Riley Osborne was cancelled on her wedding day. There was a rumor that she cheated on Riley and ended up getting married to a low life pauper, but no one knew who her husband is and they keep mocking her because of her breakup with the boss. The war between Riley and Drake caused everyone to know that Mia is loved by two billionaire brothers, but her heart belongs to only one person... "I'll marry you Drake, not because I get weak in the knees and cream my panties whenever I see you, but because my family needs your protection and I want Riley to suffer for hurting me." "I don't care what your reasons are, my love. Just say yes to me, and I'll worship your sweet curvy body for the rest of my life, and I'll make you the envy of every woman on earth. Just say yes, Mia,"

8.7

88 Chapters

The Bully's Obsession

SEQUEL OUT!! CLICK ON MY PROFILE TO CHECK IT OUT (SINFUL OBSESSION #2 IN THE BULLY'S OBSESSION) Warning:strong languages and explicit dark mature scenes such as abuse and torture . Read at your own risk "You are completely mine Gracie, your tears , fears, I'm going to completely shatter you until you know nothing else but my name"I never knew how twisted he was until this moment..."I'm n...not yours" I stutteredHis gaze darkened and harderned at my words"I dare you to say that again" he said taking a threatening step closerI opened my mouth but no words came out Next thing i was trapped between him and the wall ,both my hands pinned above my head, my knees weakened by his domineering look"You belong to me! your body and soul belongs to me, I'll mark you again and again......" He whispered nibbling at my throatHow did I get into this? Was there no way out?He'd already broken me ,what else could he expect from a broken soulThis was the guy who took everything from me, my pride ,my virginity and seven my soulShe's a quiet kind and warmhearted average nerdGraciela's only wish was to graduate highschool, go to college and get a good life and if she was ever so lucky find love, but a certain someone seems to hate everything she stood forOr does he?Hayden McAndrew Has been Graciela's tormentor for as long as she could remember but he leftAnd Gracie made the mistake to think it was forever now he was back to make her life a living hell!They say a very thing line exists between love and hate, what if after the line all she found was a dark obsession that consumed her every being ?

9.3

81 Chapters

What Lost Civilization Does 'Fingerprints Of The Gods' Describe?

4 answers2025-06-20 08:37:14

'Fingerprints of the Gods' dives into the mysteries of ancient civilizations, particularly focusing on Atlantis and other advanced societies that supposedly predate recorded history. Graham Hancock argues that these civilizations possessed technology and knowledge far beyond what we traditionally attribute to them. He points to architectural marvels like the pyramids of Egypt and the ruins of Tiwanaku as evidence of their sophistication. The book suggests a global cataclysm wiped them out, leaving only fragments of their existence.

The narrative weaves together myths, geological data, and archaeological anomalies to challenge mainstream history. Hancock’s theory hinges on the idea that these civilizations shared a common origin or were interconnected in ways we’re only beginning to understand. The book doesn’t just describe a single lost civilization but paints a picture of a forgotten epoch where humanity achieved greatness before collapsing under natural disasters.

Is 'Fingerprints Of The Gods' Based On Real Archaeological Evidence?

4 answers2025-06-20 02:03:09

Graham Hancock's 'Fingerprints of the Gods' is a fascinating dive into alternative archaeology, but it’s crucial to note that mainstream scholars largely dismiss its claims. The book argues for an advanced prehistoric civilization wiped out by a cataclysm, pointing to structures like the Pyramids and Puma Punku as evidence. Hancock’s theories rely heavily on interpreting myths and aligning geological events with ancient texts, which many archaeologists consider speculative rather than empirical.

While the book cites real sites, its conclusions often stretch beyond accepted evidence. For example, the Sphinx erosion theory—suggesting it’s millennia older than believed—lacks peer-reviewed support. Hancock’s work is compelling as a thought experiment, blending anthropology and adventure, but it’s more speculative history than hard science. Readers should enjoy it as a provocative narrative, not a textbook.

Are There Maps In 'Fingerprints Of The Gods' Proving Lost Civilizations?

4 answers2025-06-20 22:11:39

'Fingerprints of the Gods' is packed with maps and diagrams that Hancock uses to argue for lost civilizations. The book features detailed comparisons of ancient sites like the pyramids of Giza and Machu Picchu, suggesting they align with celestial patterns that modern science can't easily explain. Hancock overlays these with hypothetical maps of Antarctica without ice, proposing it might have housed an advanced society. His evidence isn't mainstream archaeology but a provocative mix of cartography, mythology, and geology. The visuals are striking—whether they're proof depends on how open you are to alternative history.

Critics dismiss his maps as speculative, but fans find them compelling. The book includes reproductions of ancient star charts and Piri Reis' controversial world map, which some claim shows Antarctica pre-glaciation. Hancock interprets these as fragments of lost knowledge, arguing that conventional timelines ignore cataclysmic events like floods or comet strikes. The maps aren't irrefutable proof, but they fuel debates about humanity's forgotten past. Whether you buy his theory or not, the cartographic evidence makes you question what we really know.

Does 'Fingerprints Of The Gods' Challenge Mainstream History?

4 answers2025-06-20 12:30:24

I’ve always been fascinated by how 'Fingerprints of the Gods' flips historical narratives upside down. Hancock doesn’t just question mainstream history—he obliterates it with a sledgehammer of alternative theories. The book argues that an advanced civilization predated all known ancient cultures, leaving behind cryptic clues like the pyramids and megalithic sites. Hancock’s evidence, from geological anomalies to architectural precision, suggests these structures couldn’t have been built with the tools of their time.

The mainstream dismisses him as a pseudohistorian, but his ideas resonate because they’re thrilling. If even a fraction of his claims hold weight, it rewrites human history. The book challenges dogma, forcing readers to choose between comfortable academic consensus and the tantalizing possibility of a lost epoch. That tension is what makes it addictive—it’s history as a detective novel, where every artifact might be a red herring or a revelation.

Why Is 'Fingerprints Of The Gods' Controversial Among Historians?

4 answers2025-06-20 20:05:59

Graham Hancock's 'Fingerprints of the Gods' sparks fierce debate because it challenges mainstream archaeology with bold, unorthodox theories. The book argues that an advanced global civilization existed over 12,000 years ago, wiped out by a cataclysm, leaving traces in ancient monuments like the Sphinx and pyramids. Historians dismiss this as pseudoscience, citing lack of peer-reviewed evidence and reliance on speculative connections. Hancock’s interdisciplinary approach—blending myths, geology, and astronomy—feels refreshing but often strays into cherry-picked data.

Critics also condemn his dismissal of academic consensus as 'close-mindedness,' while fans praise his willingness to question dogma. The tension lies between imaginative storytelling and rigorous methodology—entertaining but divisive.

How Does 'Fingerprints Of The Gods' Explain Ancient Advanced Technology?

4 answers2025-06-20 18:17:31

In 'Fingerprints of the Gods', Graham Hancock argues that ancient civilizations possessed technology far beyond what mainstream history acknowledges. He points to structures like the pyramids of Giza or Puma Punku, whose precision engineering seems impossible without advanced tools. Hancock suggests a lost global civilization, possibly aided by extraterrestrial knowledge, built these marvels before being wiped out by a cataclysm.

He contrasts modern archaeology’s gradual progression model with abrupt leaps in ancient innovation—like sudden mastery of astronomy or megalithic construction. The book leans heavily on geological evidence of past floods and cosmic impacts to support his timeline. It’s controversial but thrilling, blending detective work with speculative history to challenge rigid academic views.

What Evidence Does 'Chariots Of The Gods' Present For Extraterrestrial Contact?

3 answers2025-06-17 12:28:12

I've read 'Chariots of the Gods' multiple times, and Erich von Däniken makes some bold claims about ancient aliens. The book points to massive structures like the pyramids of Egypt and Machu Picchu as evidence—how could primitive humans build these without advanced tech? He highlights ancient art depicting what look like astronauts and spacecraft, suggesting early civilizations saw extraterrestrials. The Nazca Lines in Peru are another key piece; those giant geoglyphs only make sense from the air, hinting at aerial guidance. Däniken also examines ancient texts describing 'gods' descending from the sky in fiery chariots, which he interprets as alien visitations. Some artifacts, like the Baghdad Battery, suggest knowledge of electricity long before its modern discovery. While critics dismiss much of this as speculation, the sheer volume of anomalies across cultures makes you wonder.

How Does 'Evidence Of The Affair' End?

4 answers2025-06-30 06:35:39

'Evidence of the Affair' ends with a quiet but devastating revelation. The letters between Carrie and David, which initially exposed their spouses' infidelity, gradually reveal their own emotional entanglement. Though they never physically betray their partners, their connection deepens into something perilously close to love. The final letters show Carrie choosing to stay in her marriage, but the ache in her words suggests it’s a hollow victory. David’s last message is resigned, acknowledging the irony—they uncovered an affair only to nearly repeat it. The story leaves you wondering if honesty really healed anything or just swapped one wound for another.

The brilliance lies in the unsaid. Taylor Jenkins Reid doesn’t wrap it up neatly; she lets the silence between the lines scream. You’re left with the weight of choices—not just Carrie and David’s, but the universal struggle between duty and desire. It’s a masterclass in subtlety, where the real drama isn’t in the affair itself but in the aftermath, the what-ifs that linger long after the last page.

Who Is The Protagonist In 'Best Evidence'?

4 answers2025-06-18 23:14:14

In 'Best Evidence', the protagonist is Detective Sarah Kline, a sharp-witted investigator with a knack for uncovering truths others miss. She’s relentless, often working cases long after her colleagues have clocked out, driven by a personal tragedy that haunts her past. Sarah’s brilliance lies in her attention to detail—she spots inconsistencies in witness statements like a hawk and pieces together evidence with surgical precision. Her dry humor and no-nonsense attitude mask a deep empathy for victims, making her both feared and respected.

What sets Sarah apart is her unconventional methods. She’ll bypass bureaucracy to chase leads, sometimes clashing with superiors, but her results speak for themselves. The novel explores her moral dilemmas, like bending rules for justice, and her fragile relationship with her estranged daughter. It’s her human flaws—stubbornness, a tendency to isolate—that make her compelling. The story hinges on her biggest case: a high-profile murder where the 'best evidence' might not be what it seems.

How Does 'Best Evidence' End?

5 answers2025-06-18 08:35:30

The ending of 'Best Evidence' is a masterful blend of suspense and revelation. The protagonist, after months of painstaking investigation, finally uncovers the truth behind the mysterious crime. The final scenes are intense, with the antagonist cornered in a dramatic confrontation. But what makes it truly gripping is the twist—the real mastermind was someone entirely unexpected, lurking in plain sight all along. The protagonist's victory feels earned, yet bittersweet, as the cost of the truth becomes painfully clear.

The story concludes with a sense of closure, but leaves subtle hints that the world is far more complex than it seems. The protagonist walks away changed, carrying the weight of what they’ve learned. It’s the kind of ending that lingers in your mind, making you question everything you thought you knew. The pacing is flawless, and the emotional payoff is satisfying without being overly sentimental.