เข้าสู่ระบบห้องสมุด
ค้นหา
Frankenstein
Frankenstein is Mary Shelley's Gothic novel about Victor Frankenstein, a scientist who creates a sentient creature, exploring themes of ambition, isolation, and the consequences of playing god.
Thee And Me
Set in the mid-19th century, a masked benefactor purchases a supposed 'satanic' creature on London's black market. What he gets instead, however, is someone he never knew he would fall in love with, much less be loved back. As they both heal from the scars of their past, they find their fates are more interwoven than either would have ever imagined. *Contains themes from Beauty and The Beast, Phantom of the Opera, and Frankenstein* (I do not claim rights to the cover image)
16 บท
Craving The Wrong Brother
She spent ten years chasing after the right brother, only to fall for the wrong one in one weekend.
~~~
Sloane Mercer has been hopelessly in love with her best friend, Finn Hartley, since college. For ten long years, she’s stood by him, stitching him back together every time Delilah Crestfield—his toxic on-and-off girlfriend—shattered his heart.
But when Delilah gets engaged to another man, Sloane thinks this might finally be her chance to have Finn for herself. She couldn't be more wrong.
Heartbroken and desperate, Finn decides to crash Delilah’s wedding and fight for her one last time. And he wants Sloane by his side.
Reluctantly, Sloane follows him to Asheville, hoping that being close to Finn will somehow make him see her the way she’s always seen him.
Everything changes when she meets Knox Hartley, Finn’s older brother—a man who couldn’t be more different from Finn. He's dangerously magnetic. Knox sees right through Sloane and makes it his mission to pull her into his world.
What starts as a game—a twisted bet between them—soon turns into something deeper. Sloane is trapped between two brothers: one who’s always broken her heart and another who seems hell-bent on claiming it... no matter the cost.
CONTENT WARNING:
This story is strongly 18+.
It delves into dark romance themes such as obsession and lust with morally complex characters.
While this is a love story, reader discretion is advised.
154 บท
The Marvelous Elijah's Return
With a divorce paper through at him, Elijah watched the woman he love walked away with another man. His father was right, this world is filled with hypocrites and devils in sheep's clothing, and he can never let his heart rule over his head, for a woman or anyone, and this lesson was coming true now.
Revenge was the only thing Elijah was looking forward to. But revenge has no place for the weak, and it cannot be satisfied with anything lesser than perfection, and he knew that.
Yet, just as he was starting his journey to great power and vengeance, a girl surface in his life, and when he looked in eyes, he saw...
190 บท
The Alpha Claimed Me Deeply
She's trying to escape.
He's looking for revenge.
She stumbles.
He catches.
She holds a secret.
He wants to unravel it.
It's impossible for them to be mates.
But destiny had other plans.
Xavier Knight thinks having a mate makes one weak. But can he really resist the bond that has entwined the two so deeply? Especially when he needs to have a taste of her to calm his raging beast? Her taste alone has become an addiction he craves severely, so how long can he hold off from marking her as his?
Warning! MATURE CONTENT!
81 บท
Being His Wife
Ariana Delaney, a middle class girl who went about her daily life with little or no excitement to it but all that is about to change when she finds out that she has been arranged to marry into the most famous and absolute richest family in the state and that too to the breadwinner. Damien Kingston, a young business tycoon, a billionaire and a force to reckon with in the cold world of business needs a simp for a wife just to keep up appearances and Ariana seems to fit into the description but he sure is in for a surprise. Follow these two as they weave through their relationship fully aware that they are from two entirely different worlds. Maybe there'll be a happy ending or maybe not.
~~~
He watched like a hawk, eying her every move hoping to swoop in at the right moment and catch his prey. Her smile, her hair, her innocence and of course, her curves. Those curves could have any man turn in her direction and it sure did. He couldn't let her go, she couldn't have been who he thought she was. No, maybe he wasn't in love with her but he sure knew one thing, she was his and his alone.
~~~
She watched his as his beautiful eyes swallowed her up. This man was beautiful but she couldn't fit into his world. It was too much for her and she just had to admit it into herself. It was never going to work.Disclaimer:This work is purely a work of fiction and any similarities in names and characters are purely coincidental.
The sequel is up: Meant to Be HIS. Check it out❤️
152 บท
Carefree God of War
His father disappeared; his brother committed suicide. Thomas Mayo, the God of War, returned, and he swore that he would take revenge…
2419 บท
How Do Fans React To The I Frankenstein Movie Review?
3 คำตอบ2025-09-27 03:18:05
The reactions to 'I, Frankenstein' have been quite the spectacle! You see, I was super hyped for the movie after seeing the trailers. The visuals were striking, and the idea of a modern twist on the classic 'Frankenstein' monster captured my imagination! When I checked out the reviews, though, I couldn’t help but notice this massive divide among fans. Some folks were grinning ear to ear, appreciating the unique take on the source material and enjoying the action scenes. They felt like it brought a fresh light to the Frankenstein mythos, combining gothic themes with an urban fantasy twist. You could almost feel their excitement pulsating through the screens!
Conversely, others were less forgiving. It’s almost amusing how passionate the negative reviews were! People were throwing around phrases like ‘disappointment’ and ‘wasted potential’ faster than you could say 'adaptation'. Many fans were bummed that the movie strayed so far from Mary Shelley’s original tale, feeling that the character of Frankenstein deserved a more nuanced treatment rather than the action-oriented approach. The movie’s premise felt somewhat jumbled to them; they expected depth and philosophy, not just plot devices and CGI explosions.
It really caught me off guard witnessing these contrasting opinions. Personally, I think there is some merit to the flick. It’s not a classic by any means, but it certainly provides an entertaining watch if you're in the mood for something fun and thrilling. I guess that’s just the beauty of fandom—every opinion matters, and they are so varied!
Which Quotes From Mary Shelley'S Frankenstein Define The Monster?
2 คำตอบ2025-08-30 05:16:18
There's this scene that always sticks with me — not because it's dramatic in a loud way, but because it's heartbreaking and quietly explosive. Reading the monster's speech in 'Frankenstein' late at night once made me pause the audiobook and sit in silence. He describes himself with a clarity that both frightens and moves you: 'I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend.' That line, to me, is the core. It flips the usual monster story: he's not evil by birth but by experience. The sentence is short and brutal, and it forces you to reckon with cause and effect — neglect begets violence, and language itself shows his moral self-awareness.
Another moment that defines him is when he confronts his creator: 'I ought to be thy Adam; but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed.' The biblical echo does so much work here. He's claiming a position that should have been one of kinship and gratitude, and instead he is cast out. That comparison to Adam and Satan wraps up his identity crisis: made to be a person, treated like a monster. Adding to that is his bitter oath — 'Cursed, cursed creator! Why did I live?' — which exposes the rawness of abandonment. There's grief under the fury.
He also reveals his methodical, almost intellectual side: his self-education, learning language, philosophy, and human emotion, then turning that knowledge into a mirror held up to Victor. Lines like 'If I cannot inspire love, I will cause fear' (which he states in different phrasings depending on the edition) show strategic thinking — he's not pure rage; he's bargaining with reality and trying to force recognition. And then there's Victor's own warning: 'Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge...' That quote doesn't define the monster directly, but it frames him — the creature is the living consequence of Victor's overreach.
So when I think of defining quotations, I keep returning to the monster's own voice — his declarations of benevolence corrupted, his Adam/Satan self-image, and his resolve to inspire fear if not love. Those passages make him vivid: eloquent, intelligent, lonely, furious, and, devastatingly, human.
How Does Mary Shelley'S Frankenstein Reflect Its Author'S Life?
2 คำตอบ2025-08-30 04:05:53
Reading 'Frankenstein' felt like opening a scrapbook of a life that was messy, brilliant, and painfully lonely. I got hooked not just by the gothic chills but by how much of Mary Shelley's own story is braided through the novel. She was the daughter of two radical thinkers — a mother who championed women's rights and a father steeped in political philosophy — and that intellectual inheritance shows up in the book's fierce moral questions about responsibility, society, and the limits of reason. At the same time, Mary lost her mother in childbirth and then endured exile, scandal, and the almost continuous grief of losing children; those losses echo in Victor Frankenstein's creation and abandonment of a being who never had a family or a mother to teach him compassion.
One thing that always grabs me is how often the novel circles around creation and parenthood. Victor's scientific daring reads like a darker mirror of Mary’s own experience being born into an experimental social world — her parents challenged conventions, and she grew up amid the fallout. The Creature’s eloquence and yearning for acceptance reflect Mary’s sense of social vulnerability as an illegitimate child and as a woman writing in a male-dominated literary circle. The fact that the creature learns language and quotes 'Paradise Lost' and other canonical texts feels like a comment on who gets to tell stories and who gets excluded. Also, the 1816 Geneva summer — the famous gloomy, rainy months when Mary conceived the idea — is more than lore: the volcanic 'Year Without a Summer' and the atmosphere of doom seep into the book’s weather and landscape, making nature both sublime and ominous.
I also like to think about the science and the politics threaded through the pages. Mary watched the exhilaration and terrors of early scientific experiments — galvanism, radical philosophies, and the optimism of the Enlightenment — and she translated that into a cautionary tale about unchecked ambition. The novel isn’t just horror for thrills; it’s a critique of hubris, an exploration of a motherless world, and a meditation on grief and exile. When I reread certain scenes, like the Creature confronting his maker or the lonely letters from Walton, I feel Mary sitting in that cramped Swiss room, young and grieving, sharpening every line into a kind of survival. Her life informs the novel’s tenderness and its cruelty, and that blend keeps me coming back to it with new questions each time.
How Faithful Is Frankenstein Junji Ito To Mary Shelley'S Novel?
2 คำตอบ2025-08-26 01:35:13
I dove into Junji Ito's 'Frankenstein' expecting a faithful retelling and I got something that sits comfortably between reverent adaptation and full-on Ito-ized horror. The bones of Mary Shelley's novel are absolutely there: Victor Frankenstein's obsessive ambition, the creature's lonely intelligence, the tragic chain of deaths, and the moral questions about creation and responsibility. Junji Ito preserves the novel's structure enough that if you know the original you'll recognize the major beats — creation, rejection, the creature's education and pleas for companionship, Victor's promise and regret, and the final chase across frozen landscapes.
Where Ito departs, though, is how he translates prose into the visual language he's famous for. He leans hard into body horror and grotesque design in places where Shelley left room for imagination. Scenes that in the book are described with philosophical introspection become visceral panels that force you to stare at the physicality of the monster and the horror of what was done to — and by — him. That doesn't erase Shelley's themes; if anything, it amplifies them. The idea of responsibility for your creations, the moral loneliness of scientific pursuit, and the creature's heartbreaking plea for empathy are all emphasized, but through faces, contortions, and moments of dread that only manga can deliver.
Ito also rearranges pacing and adds visual flourishes that aren't in the novel. He compresses some internal monologues and expands certain encounters into extended, nightmarish sequences. The creature's eloquence and suffering remain, but Ito gives those emotional beats a different texture — less Romantic prose, more visual shock and prolonged silence. If you love Shelley's language, you might miss the lyrical passages, but if you appreciate how images can translate philosophical dread into immediate sensation, Ito's version is a powerful companion piece. I found myself thinking of 'Uzumaki' while reading: the cosmic weirdness is different in subject but similar in how it makes ordinary things (a body, a stitched face) into a symbol of existential terror. Read both versions if you can; they dialogue with each other in a way that deepens the story rather than just retelling it.
Does Frankenstein Junji Ito Change The Novel'S Original Ending?
3 คำตอบ2025-08-26 14:59:00
I got pulled into Junji Ito's 'Frankenstein' because I adore how he turns psychological dread into full-on visceral panels. Reading his version, I felt the book's bones—Victor's guilt, the creature's loneliness, the Arctic chase—were all there, but the way it lands is different. Ito doesn't rewrite the moral core or flip the novel's ending on its head; Victor still collapses under the consequences of his obsession and the creature still confronts its creator and ultimately retreats into isolation. What changes is the presentation: the epistolary frame of the original gets tightened, Walton's role is reduced, and the final moments are shown with Ito's signature grotesque clarity that makes the bleakness feel louder.
The manga compresses and intensifies scenes, so some conversations are shorter and some encounters are expanded visually. Ito adds panels that linger on bodily horror and expression, which gives the creature more haunting physical presence than prose alone can. The philosophical resignation of the creature—its grief and resolve—remains, but Ito leans into atmosphere and imagery rather than long reflective monologues. If you love the novel for its themes, you'll recognize the ending; if you love Ito for jolting imagery, you'll find the emotional beats amplified. I walked away wanting to reread Mary Shelley's text immediately after, because the two complement each other in a deliciously unsettling way.
Is A Frankenstein Junji Ito Anime Adaptation Officially Announced?
3 คำตอบ2025-08-26 23:53:19
I’ve been obsessively refreshing feeds about Junji Ito news more often than I’d like to admit, and here’s the scoop from what I’ve seen up to mid‑2024: there hasn’t been an official announcement for an anime adaptation specifically of Junji Ito’s take on 'Frankenstein'.
If you’ve been binging adaptations of his work, you probably remember actual anime projects like the 'Junji Ito Collection' from 2018 and the Netflix anthology 'Junji Ito Maniac: Japanese Tales of the Macabre' in 2023 — those were real, studio‑backed things. But a standalone 'Frankenstein' anime tied to Ito? No green light from studios or production committees that I can point to with certainty. What you’ll mostly find are fan posts, hopeful rumors, and fan art imagining Ito’s monstrous aesthetic applied to Mary Shelley’s classic.
If you want to be absolutely sure in real time, I check a couple of places: Junji Ito’s official social feeds, the publisher’s announcements (English publishers often repost big news), and reputable outlets like 'Anime News Network' or Crunchyroll’s news pages. I follow a couple of anime news accounts that aggregate press releases — they ping me faster than any friend when something new drops. For now, I’m half hoping a studio snaps up a Junji‑styled 'Frankenstein' because the visual potential is insane, but until a press release shows up, it’s wishful thinking and fan hype. I’ll be waiting with popcorn and a flashlight under the blankets.
In 'Frankenstein', How Does Guilt Shape Victor'S Character Development?
6 คำตอบ2025-03-01 14:34:22
Victor's guilt in 'Frankenstein' acts like a corrosive acid, eating away at his sanity. From the moment the Creature opens its eyes, Victor’s horror isn’t just at his creation—it’s self-disgust for violating natural order. His guilt isn’t passive; it’s a motivator. He destroys the female monster out of fear of repeating his mistake, dooming himself to the Creature’s vengeance. Every death—William, Justine, Elizabeth—feels like a personal indictment. His flight to the Arctic isn’t just pursuit—it’s a subconscious death wish, a need to escape the psychological prison he built. Shelley shows guilt as a paradox: the more he runs, the tighter it grips him, transforming a once-curious scientist into a hollow shell of paranoia.
Are There Illustrations In The Frankenstein: Annotated Book?
1 คำตอบ2025-07-31 21:37:27
I’ve spent a lot of time with annotated editions of classic novels, and 'Frankenstein: Annotated for Scientists, Engineers, and Creators of All Kinds' is one that stands out. This version, edited by David H. Guston, Ed Finn, and Jason Scott Robert, is packed with annotations that explore the scientific and ethical themes of the novel. While the primary focus is on the text and its commentary, it does include some illustrations. These aren’t lavish, full-page artworks but rather historical and scientific images that complement the annotations. For example, you’ll find diagrams of early electrical experiments, anatomical sketches from the 19th century, and even some of the original artwork from early editions of 'Frankenstein.' These visuals help ground the novel in its historical context and make the scientific discussions more tangible.
If you’re looking for a version of 'Frankenstein' with more traditional illustrations, like those you’d find in a graphic novel or heavily illustrated edition, this might not be the best fit. The annotations are the star here, and the images serve as supplementary material. That said, the inclusion of these visuals adds depth to the reading experience, especially for those interested in the intersection of literature and science. The book is a fantastic resource for anyone who wants to dig deeper into Shelley’s work, and the illustrations, though sparse, enhance that exploration.
How Does 'Cleopatra And Frankenstein' End?
4 คำตอบ2025-06-19 20:42:34
The ending of 'Cleopatra and Frankenstein' is a poignant blend of heartbreak and quiet resolve. Cleo, an artist grappling with her identity, finally leaves Frank, the charismatic but emotionally distant ad executive. Their whirlwind marriage, built on passion but lacking depth, crumbles under unmet expectations. The final scenes show Cleo in Paris, reclaiming her artistry, while Frank stares at her unfinished portrait—realizing too late what he lost.
The novel doesn’t tie things neatly. Frank’s self-destructive habits linger, and Cleo’s future is uncertain but hopeful. Their love was a collision of two flawed people, more destructive than nurturing. The last pages dwell on solitude, not reconciliation, leaving readers with a raw, lingering ache about modern love’s fragility.
Why Is 'Cleopatra And Frankenstein' Gaining Popularity?
5 คำตอบ2025-06-19 23:14:51
I've noticed 'Cleopatra and Frankenstein' resonating deeply with readers, especially millennials and Gen Z. The novel blends raw emotional honesty with dark humor, dissecting modern relationships in a way that feels both brutally real and strangely poetic. Its unflinching portrayal of love, addiction, and mental health strikes a chord in our post-pandemic world where people crave authenticity.
The characters are flawed yet magnetic—Cleo's artistic fragility clashes against Frank's self-destructive charm, creating a dynamic that’s impossible to look away from. The prose oscillates between lyrical and jagged, mirroring the turbulence of their relationship. Social media plays a role too; TikTok book clubs obsess over its quotable lines about doomed romance and existential dread. It’s the kind of book that demands to be discussed, argued over, and read twice.
คำถามยอดนิยม
การค้นหาที่เกี่ยวข้อง
การค้นหายอดนิยม
เพิ่มเติม
Eve S Hollywood
Witch Love
Eve The Book
The Mind Eater's Game
The Dinner
Chocolat
Book Online Reading Free
Guilty Pleasures
Amazon Kindle Manga
Hating University
Top Stories In Wattpad
The Billionaire's Surprise Twins
Txt Setlist
Captive Bride
Bonegrinder
Romantic Series Books
In Evil Hour
Castle On The Hill Ed Sheeran Lyrics
The Prince Book Pdf
Library Bala Cynwyd
Mr Hyde
Random Bullshit Go
Sir Gawain And The Green Knight Audiobook
My Doomsday Bug Nest
Sakura Birthday
Free Ebooks Online Library
In Cold Blood
Best Book For Computer Science
White Cat
All Mistborn Books
สำรวจและอ่านนวนิยายดีๆ ได้ฟรี
เข้าถึงนวนิยายดีๆ จำนวนมากได้ฟรีบนแอป GoodNovel ดาวน์โหลดหนังสือที่คุณชอบและอ่านได้ทุกที่ทุกเวลา
อ่านหนังสือฟรีบนแอป
สแกนรหัสเพื่ออ่านบนแอป
