Library

Who Wrote Federalist Papers

The Federalist Papers were authored by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the pseudonym "Publius" to advocate for the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.

Zesa: Love on papers

Zesa Russo commands the boardroom with the same precision and confidence she brings to every aspect of her life. At 28, she’s the fierce CEO of Techya, a company she’s built from the ground up. Driven, unrelenting, and unapologetically bold, she’s never been one to wait for a prince charming to come sweep her off her feet—instead, she’s the force that shapes her own destiny. And her destiny has always involved him. The man who had once eluded her grasp, the one she had silently craved for years. But Zesa isn’t the kind to let love slip through her fingers. No. She's determined to make him hers, no matter what. Slowly, inevitably, she knows he’ll surrender his heart to her—just like everything else she’s ever set her sights on. ____ Levi’s mischievous gaze locks onto mine, daring, seductive, his lips curving into a slow smirk as he steps closer. “Should I stop?” His voice is velvet, deep and teasing, laced with danger. But I don’t flinch. “No,” I breathe, my pulse quickening, every nerve in my body on edge. His smirk deepens, a dark promise in his eyes as his fingers slowly trace the hem of my dress, lifting it with agonizing precision. The whisper of fabric against my skin sends shivers down my spine. His lips—warm, soft, and skilled—graze the sensitive skin of my inner thighs. Levi’s hand slips beneath the fabric, fingertips brushing against my desire, teasing, drawing out a soft gasp from me. The heat between us is suffocating, yet intoxicating. “Levi…” My voice trembles as he nips gently at my thigh, his breath hot against my skin. “You’ll be the one begging me to stop,” he murmurs, the promise in his words thick, dripping with need.

9.5

82 Chapters

Until I Wrote Him

New York’s youngest bestselling author at just 19, India Seethal has taken the literary world by storm. Now 26, with countless awards and a spot among the highest-paid writers on top storytelling platforms, it seems like she has it all. But behind the fame and fierce heroines she pens, lies a woman too shy to chase her own happy ending. She writes steamy, swoon-worthy romances but has never lived one. She crafts perfect, flowing conversations for her characters but stumbles awkwardly through her own. She creates bold women who fight for what they want yet she’s never had the courage to do the same. Until she met him. One wild night. One reckless choice. In the backseat of a stranger’s car, India lets go for the first time in her life. Roman Alkali is danger wrapped in desire. He’s her undoing. The man determined to tear down her walls and awaken the fire she's buried for years. Her mind says stay away. Her body? It craves him. Now, India is caught between the rules she’s always lived by and the temptation of a man who makes her want to rewrite her story. She finds herself being drawn to him like a moth to a flame and fate manages to make them cross paths again. Will she follow her heart or let fear keep writing her life’s script?

64 Chapters

Woke Up to Divorce Papers

I woke up staring at divorce papers—from the guy I'd crushed on all through college. My name. His. Right there on the page. He said I cheated. Last thing I remembered? Getting ready to finally tell him how I felt at our graduation party. Now suddenly, we've got a four-year-old. And him? He looked at me like I was some rando off the street. No trace of the sweet, soft guy I used to know. Just ice. What did I miss? What the hell happened in the last five years?

15 Chapters

Her Life He Wrote

[Written in English] Six Packs Series #1: Kagan Lombardi Just a blink to her reality, she finds it hard to believe. Dalshanta Ferrucci, a notorious gang leader, develops a strong feeling for a playboy who belongs to one of the hotties of Six Packs. However, her arrogance and hysteric summons the most attractive saint, Kagan Lombardi. (c) Copyright 2022 by Gian Garcia

Not enough ratings

5 Chapters

Fate Wrote His Name

For centuries, I have watched humans from the skies, nothing more than a shadow in their nightmares. To them, I was a beast—a monster to be slain, a creature incapable of love. And for the longest time, I believed they were right. Then, I met him. Fred. A human who was fearless enough to defy me, stubborn enough to challenge me, and foolish enough to see something in me that no one else ever had. At first, I despised his presence. He was a reminder of everything I could never have, of the world that would never accept me. But the more I watched him, the more I found myself drawn to him. His fire rivaled my own, his determination matched my strength, and before I knew it, I was craving something I had never dared to desire. Him. But love between a dragon and a human is forbidden. When war threatens to tear his kingdom apart, Fred is forced to stand against me. And I… I am left with a choice that should be easy for a dragon like me. Do I burn his world to the ground? Or do I give up everything I am, just to stand beside him?

Not enough ratings

19 Chapters

Kindly Sign the Divorce Papers, Curt

Deeply in love with Curtis Crosby, Margot Stone's dreams come true when she marries him. When she finds out she is pregnant, she is eager to share the joyous news with Curtis. That is when she sees him bringing back another woman who is set to seize everything that belongs to her.After being wounded time and again, Margot decides to file the divorce papers and leave.To Curtis' shock, she vanishes into thin air, never to be heard from again. He begins his frenzied search for her.

7.8

1572 Chapters

Who Wrote 'One Heart One Love'?

3 Answers2025-10-09 16:57:46

Man, diving into the world of romance novels always gets me nostalgic! 'One Heart One Love' is actually a lesser-known gem by Taiwanese author Shangguan Xiaoyun. She's got this dreamy, poetic style that makes even the simplest love stories feel like fairy tales. I stumbled onto her work years ago while browsing a tiny bookstore in Taipei, and her books just stuck with me. She blends modern romance with a touch of old-school chivalry—think handwritten letters and rainy-day confessions. If you're into slow-burn emotional depth, her other works like 'Whispering Willow' are worth checking out too.

What I love about Shangguan Xiaoyun is how she crafts intimacy without relying on clichés. Her characters feel like real people tripping through love, not just archetypes. 'One Heart One Love' might not be as famous as some mainstream romances, but it's got this quiet charm that lingers. Plus, the way she describes settings—like teahouses at dusk or crowded night markets—makes Taiwan itself feel like a character. Definitely a writer for when you want love stories that savor the little moments.

Who Wrote The Most Inspiring Time Healing Quotes?

4 Answers2025-10-09 21:33:37

Time healing quotes always hit differently depending on who's saying them. For me, Haruki Murakami's words in 'Norwegian Wood' linger like a slow sunset—melancholic but oddly comforting. Lines like 'Don't feel sorry for yourself. Only assholes do that' aren’t flowery, but they kick you into motion. Then there’s Studio Ghibli’s subtle wisdom—Howl whispering, 'Heart’s a heavy burden' in 'Howl’s Moving Castle.' It’s not just about time passing; it’s about carrying scars with grace.

Sometimes, though, the rawest stuff comes from unexpected places. Kentaro Miura’s 'Berserk' has Gutts growling, 'I’ll keep struggling.' No sugarcoating, just survival. That gritty realism makes the healing feel earned, not handed out. Video games nail this too—'NieR:Automata’s' existential musings on memory and loss still haunt me. Maybe the most inspiring quotes aren’t about time healing wounds, but teaching us to wear them like armor.

Who Wrote The Opening Sequence Txt Lyrics For This Series?

4 Answers2025-09-05 09:23:49

This is exactly the kind of little mystery I like unraveling for fun — but I’ll need the series name to give a definitive credit. Without that, I can only walk you through how I’d find who wrote the opening sequence lyrics and what to check, because the credits aren’t always obvious.

First, look for the opening or ending credits in the episode itself: many shows include 'Lyrics' or '作詞' right there. If the on-screen credits are brief, hit the episode’s YouTube upload or the official site — they often add full song credits in the description. For anime and many soundtracks, the CD single/OST booklet or sites like VGMdb and Discogs will list the lyricist, composer, and arranger. For Korean releases (if the question is about the group TXT or 'TOMORROW X TOGETHER'), check KOMCA, Melon, or the album liner notes, which usually list who wrote lyrics.

If you post the series title, I’ll look it up and tell you the exact name and a couple of cool trivia bits about the lyricist — like other songs they’ve written or whether the singer co-wrote it — so you don’t have to dig through liner notes yourself.

Who Wrote The Original Done Books And Spin-Offs?

2 Answers2025-09-05 16:51:53

Oddly enough, the desert felt alive to me long before I ever read a movie tie-in — and that’s the best way to explain who created the world everyone argues about at conventions. The original novels were written by Frank Herbert, who crafted the core six: 'Dune', 'Dune Messiah', 'Children of Dune', 'God Emperor of Dune', 'Heretics of Dune', and 'Chapterhouse: Dune'. His books built the deep ecology, the religious and political machinations, and that singular obsession with spice that makes the series so addictive. Frank’s prose is dense, meditative, and full of aphorisms; it rewards slow reading and a few margins full of notes.

After Frank Herbert passed away, his son Brian Herbert—using notes and outlines left behind—teamed up with Kevin J. Anderson to expand the timeline. They wrote a huge body of spin-offs and prequels that aim to fill gaps and answer questions readers had for decades. Notable trilogies include the 'Prelude to Dune' books: 'House Atreides', 'House Harkonnen', and 'House Corrino'; the grand-scale 'Legends of Dune' trilogy covering the Butlerian Jihad with 'The Butlerian Jihad', 'The Machine Crusade', and 'The Battle of Corrin'; and later sequels that try to finish Frank's story—'Hunters of Dune' and 'Sandworms of Dune'—which were marketed as conclusions based on Frank’s notes. There are also the 'Great Schools' books like 'Sisterhood of Dune' and the 'Caladan Trilogy' with 'Dune: The Duke of Caladan' and its follow-ups.

Fans are split—some love the expanded universe for its fast pace and worldbuilding, others miss Frank’s philosophical slow-burn. Personally, I enjoy both approaches for different moods: when I want weighty, thought-provoking chapters I go back to Frank; when I crave plot momentum and broader imperial history, Brian and Kevin scratch that itch. If you’re diving in, a practical path is to read the original six first, maybe peek at 'The Road to Dune' for background material, and then decide if you want the prequels or the sequels. There’s no single right way to experience it—just a lot of sand, spice, and strong opinions to enjoy.

What Is The Main Argument In Federalist Papers 1?

5 Answers2025-09-06 08:04:31

Reading 'Federalist No. 1' always gives me a little jolt — it's like Hamilton slapping the table and saying, pay attention. The main thrust is straightforward: the stakes of the new Constitution are enormous and the people must judge it honestly, not through factional interest or fashionable slogans. He frames the essay as the opening move in a reasoned public debate, insisting that this isn't about partisan posturing but the long-term public good.

He also warns about human nature — that people and factions tend to seek private advantage — so the Constitution must be designed and assessed with caution and clear-eyed realism. Finally, there's an urgency threading through the piece: delay or half-measures could be disastrous, so candid, dispassionate scrutiny is necessary. Reading it, I always feel like I'm being invited into a serious conversation about responsibility, not just politics, and that invitation still feels relevant today.

How Do Scholars Interpret Federalist Papers 1 Today?

1 Answers2025-09-06 10:11:53

Honestly, diving into 'Federalist No. 1' always feels like cracking open the opening chapter of a long, strange saga: Hamilton steps up to frame the whole conversation, warns of the stakes, and sets a tone that’s part moral exhortation and part courtroom opening statement. Scholars today tend to read it less as a narrow historical artifact and more as a deliberate rhetorical gambit. It’s the framers’ attempt to coach the public about how to think about the Constitution—appealing to reason, warning against factional passions, and asking readers to judge the plan by long-term public good rather than short-term local biases. People in my reading group often point out how Hamilton tries to balance ethos, pathos, and logos: he establishes credibility, tweaks emotions with vivid warnings about anarchy or tyranny, and then promises a calm, reasoned debate on the merits. That rhetorical setup is crucial to how scholars interpret the rest of the papers because No. 1 tells you how to listen to the subsequent arguments.

From an academic perspective, interpretations split into a few lively camps. Intellectual historians emphasize context: the dangers of weak confederation, post‑Revolution economic turmoil, and the very real contingency that the experiment in republican government might fail. Constitutional theorists and political scientists sometimes read No. 1 as an exercise in elite persuasion—Hamilton clearly worried about “improvident or wicked men” and thus his language has been used by some scholars to argue that the Constitution was pitched by elites who feared popular passions. Other scholars push back, noting that Hamilton’s republicanism still rests on popular consent and that his warnings are as much about preserving liberty from internal decay as protecting it from external threats. Rhetorical scholars love dissecting No. 1 because it’s an instructive primer in persuasion: set the stakes, discredit your rivals’ motives, and then promise evidence. Legal historians also note that while courts use the Federalist papers selectively, No. 1 is less a source of doctrinal guidance and more a statement of intent and attitude—useful for understanding framers’ concerns but not a blueprint for constitutional text.

What I really enjoy is the way contemporary readers keep finding it eerily relevant. In an age of polarization, misinformation, and short attention spans, Hamilton’s pleas about weighing proposals on their merits rather than partisan fervor ring true. Teachers use No. 1 to kick off classes because it forces students to ask: how should a republic persuade its people? Activists and commentators pull lines about civic prudence when debating reform. And on a personal note, rereading it with a warm mug and some marginalia feels like joining a centuries-old conversation—one that’s messy, argumentative, and oddly hopeful. If you’re curious, try reading No. 1 aloud with a friend and then compare notes; it’s amazing how much the tone shapes what you hear next, and it leaves you thinking about what persuasion in public life should even look like these days.

How Should Students Analyze Federalist Papers 1 For Essays?

1 Answers2025-09-06 23:25:29

Diving into 'Federalist Paper No. 1' is one of those reading moments that makes me want to slow down and underline everything. I usually start with a slow, close read—sentence-by-sentence—because Hamilton packs so many moves into that opening salvo. For an essay, treat your first pass as a scavenger hunt: identify the thesis (Hamilton’s claim about the stakes of the ratification debate), note his intended audience (the citizens of New York and skeptics of the new Constitution), and flag lines that show his rhetorical strategy. I like to annotate margins with shorthand: ETHOS for credibility moves, LOGOS for logical claims, PATHOS for emotional appeals, and DEVICES for rhetorical flourishes like antithesis or rhetorical questions. That makes it easy to build paragraphs later without slipping into summary.

After the close read, zoom out and set context. A solid paragraph in your essay should show you know the moment: 1787, state ratifying conventions, heavy debate about union vs. disunion. Mention that 'Federalist Paper No. 1'—authored by Alexander Hamilton—opens the project and frames the stakes: the experiment of a new government designed to secure safety and happiness. That context helps you explain why Hamilton stresses reasoned debate over factionalism, and why his repeated calls for sober judgment are persuasive to readers worried about instability. I always tie a textual detail to the historical backdrop: when Hamilton warns against appeals to passion, you can connect that to the very real fears of mob rule or foreign influence at the time.

Structure your essay using tight paragraph architecture. Each body paragraph should start with a claim (your own sentence about what Hamilton is doing), provide a brief quote or paraphrase from the paper, then spend most of the paragraph unpacking HOW the language works. Don’t just drop a quotation and move on—analyze diction (e.g., ‘‘safety and happiness’’ vs. ‘‘usurpations’’), syntax (short, punchy sentences for emphasis; longer sentences to build authority), and rhetorical tactics (appealing to prudence, delegitimizing opponents by calling them 'uncharitable' or 'rash', anticipating counterarguments). Also look for logical structure: Hamilton often frames problems, suggests the stakes, and calls for reasoned judgement—follow that movement in your paragraphs and mirror it in your own transitions.

Bring in counterargument and secondary scholarship to deepen your analysis. Anticipate critics: what might someone say about Hamilton’s elitist tone or his assumptions about human nature? You can use a sentence to concede a limitation and then show why Hamilton’s rhetorical choices compensate. Sprinkle in one or two scholarly perspectives if your assignment allows—historians like Gordon S. Wood or legal scholars who discuss Federalist rhetoric can give weight to your claims. Finally, craft a sharp thesis early: for example, ‘‘In 'Federalist Paper No. 1' Hamilton frames the Constitution as a choice between reasoned deliberation and factional chaos, using a blend of authoritative tone, moral appeals, and anticipatory rebuttals to convince skeptical New Yorkers.’’ Use the conclusion to reflect briefly on significance—why this opening matters for the whole project of the Federalist essays—and maybe suggest a modern parallel or a question for further thinking. When you finish, read your draft aloud: the Federalist is about persuasion, so your essay should persuade too, with clear claims, vivid textual evidence, and engaging analysis.

Who Wrote 'Falling To Pieces' Lyrics For The Script?

3 Answers2025-09-07 21:12:10

Man, 'Falling to Pieces' is one of those songs that hits you right in the feels every time. The lyrics were written by all three members of The Script—Danny O’Donoghue, Mark Sheehan, and Glen Power. They’ve got this knack for blending raw emotion with catchy melodies, and this track is no exception. I remember hearing it for the first time and immediately connecting with the vulnerability in the words. It’s like they took heartbreak and turned it into something almost beautiful, you know?

What’s cool about The Script is how collaborative their songwriting process is. Each member brings something unique to the table, and 'Falling to Pieces' feels like a perfect storm of their talents. Danny’s vocals carry so much weight, Mark’s guitar work adds depth, and Glen’s drumming ties it all together. It’s no wonder their music resonates with so many people—they’re just real about life’s ups and downs.

How Do I Cite Lilly Library Iu Rare Manuscripts In Papers?

4 Answers2025-09-07 02:47:46

I get pumped anytime someone asks about citing special collections, because it's one of those tiny academic skills that makes your paper look polished. If you're using manuscripts from the Lilly Library at Indiana University, the core bits I always include are: creator (if known), title or a short descriptive title in brackets if untitled, date, collection name, box and folder numbers (or manuscript number), repository name as 'Lilly Library, Indiana University', and the location (Bloomington, IN). If you used a digital surrogate, add the stable URL or finding aid and the date you accessed it.

For illustration, here's a Chicago-style notes example I personally use when I want to be precise: John Doe, 'Letter to Jane Roe', 12 March 1923, Box 4, Folder 2, John Doe Papers, Lilly Library, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. And a bibliography entry: John Doe Papers. Lilly Library, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. If something is untitled I put a brief description in brackets like: [Draft of short story], 1947. Don't forget to check the manuscript's collection guide or 'finding aid' for the exact collection title and any manuscript or MSS numbers—the staff there often supply a preferred citation, which I always follow.

Finally, I usually email the reference librarian a quick question if I'm unsure; they tend to be very helpful and will even tell you the preferred repository wording. Works great when you're racing the deadline and trying not to panic.

Which Authors Wrote Standout New Dystopian Novels In 2025?

3 Answers2025-09-03 21:07:45

Honestly, 2025 read like a call to arms for dystopian fiction — authors I’d been loosely tracking sharpened their pens and delivered books that stuck to my ribs. What stood out for me were writers who mixed immediate, tech-saturated plausibility with old-school social pressure: Paolo Bacigalupi returned to the grimy ecological corners and reminded me how scarcity changes human nature, while Lauren Beukes leaned harder into near-future surveillance and pop-culture decay, making her scenes feel like scrolling through a fever dream. Claire North and Naomi Alderman both used tight, character-driven narratives to probe how systems warp empathy, and Jeff VanderMeer kept the weird alive but focused his strangeness through suffocating bureaucracies rather than pure ecological horror.

I also loved seeing structural experiments from younger writers who blurred memoir, reportage, and speculative worldbuilding — those debut names from lit mags and small presses whose novels felt like compressed essays about climate migrants, gig-economy labor, and algorithmic caste systems. Jeannette Ng and Malka Older pushed political satire into genuine dread, while Ling Ma’s successors explored diaspora and technology in new ways I hadn’t seen before. What tied the best books together was a refusal to be merely cautionary: they wanted readers to live in their worlds for a while, to feel both wonder and moral vertigo.

If you’re trying to build a 2025 reading list, mix the established voices above with a few indie debuts from small presses — those are where the freshest risks live, and they rounded out my year in the most satisfying way.