LOGINLibrary
Search
Should Teams Choose Epsilon Scan Over Nessus For Compliance?
2026-02-03 02:44:15
241
Follow14
Share
Story Fan
Analyst
Start Test
5 Answers
Zoe
Longtime Reader
Cashier
There have been seasons where I pushed for newer tooling and seasons where I defended the old guard; both taught me that context matters more than brand names. Nessus provides a deep repository of vulnerability and compliance checks, which is excellent when auditors expect specific benchmark evidence. Its reporting formats and templates are generally accepted and can be slotted into formal audit packages quickly.
Conversely, Epsilon Scan—if it’s focused on modern infrastructures—might reduce noise for cloud-native workloads and provide better automation hooks into CI/CD and IaC scanning. That means faster remediation cycles and fewer surprises for developers, which indirectly improves compliance posture by closing gaps sooner. But the trade-off is vendor maturity: fewer community plugins, less historical validation, and potentially less trust from external auditors.
What I do now is prioritize the controls: run a mapping exercise, then evaluate which tool demonstrates clear, verifiable coverage for high-risk controls. Where possible, use the newer tool for continuous enforcement and Nessus for formal attestations during audits. Personally, I value reproducible evidence and minimal manual bookkeeping, so I tend to keep a hybrid model until the new tool proves reliable in multiple audit cycles.
Conversely, Epsilon Scan—if it’s focused on modern infrastructures—might reduce noise for cloud-native workloads and provide better automation hooks into CI/CD and IaC scanning. That means faster remediation cycles and fewer surprises for developers, which indirectly improves compliance posture by closing gaps sooner. But the trade-off is vendor maturity: fewer community plugins, less historical validation, and potentially less trust from external auditors.
What I do now is prioritize the controls: run a mapping exercise, then evaluate which tool demonstrates clear, verifiable coverage for high-risk controls. Where possible, use the newer tool for continuous enforcement and Nessus for formal attestations during audits. Personally, I value reproducible evidence and minimal manual bookkeeping, so I tend to keep a hybrid model until the new tool proves reliable in multiple audit cycles.
2026-02-07 07:28:16
10
Russell
Clear Answerer
Journalist
I tend to favor whatever minimizes manual paperwork during audits. Nessus earns points because it’s widely accepted and has tons of templates for standards like PCI and CIS, which makes producing auditor-ready reports quicker. But if Epsilon Scan gives automated, clearly structured evidence for the same controls and is easier to schedule across cloud accounts, it’s worth serious consideration.
My practical trick is to match actual control IDs from your compliance matrix to specific scan checks, then compare the reports side-by-side. If Epsilon covers those IDs and the output is as transparent as Nessus, switch — but keep a fallback scan cycle with Nessus until you’ve proven parity. Personal preference: I lean toward tools that reduce pre-audit scrambling and integrate with ticketing so remediation is tracked automatically, and I’ll keep whatever does that best.
My practical trick is to match actual control IDs from your compliance matrix to specific scan checks, then compare the reports side-by-side. If Epsilon covers those IDs and the output is as transparent as Nessus, switch — but keep a fallback scan cycle with Nessus until you’ve proven parity. Personal preference: I lean toward tools that reduce pre-audit scrambling and integrate with ticketing so remediation is tracked automatically, and I’ll keep whatever does that best.
2026-02-07 22:38:44
17
Zoe
Bookworm
Analyst
On several engagements I’ve sat through, the decision between a newer scanner and Nessus really boiled down to integration and trust. Nessus brings credibility and comprehensive plugins that match many compliance frameworks out of the box, making life easier when an auditor asks for evidence. It’s battle-tested and often already referenced in policy documents.
That said, newer players can offer leaner automation, better cloud/container support, and friendlier APIs that plug into pipelines and ticketing systems. If your environment is mostly ephemeral containers and serverless, a modern scanner that natively understands those patterns could deliver more accurate and relevant findings than a traditional VM-focused tool.
Practically, I’d run both in parallel for a quarter: use Nessus for formal quarterly scans that feed compliance reports, and use the newer scanner for daily pipeline checks and fast feedback. Then assess overlap, false positives, and whether the newer tool’s evidence is auditor-acceptable. If the newer tool proves reliable and saves time without holes in coverage, slowly shift more responsibilities to it while keeping Nessus as fallback for formal attestations. That hybrid approach kept teams sane in my experience and didn’t compromise audit confidence.
That said, newer players can offer leaner automation, better cloud/container support, and friendlier APIs that plug into pipelines and ticketing systems. If your environment is mostly ephemeral containers and serverless, a modern scanner that natively understands those patterns could deliver more accurate and relevant findings than a traditional VM-focused tool.
Practically, I’d run both in parallel for a quarter: use Nessus for formal quarterly scans that feed compliance reports, and use the newer scanner for daily pipeline checks and fast feedback. Then assess overlap, false positives, and whether the newer tool’s evidence is auditor-acceptable. If the newer tool proves reliable and saves time without holes in coverage, slowly shift more responsibilities to it while keeping Nessus as fallback for formal attestations. That hybrid approach kept teams sane in my experience and didn’t compromise audit confidence.
2026-02-08 23:18:23
7
Parker
Plot Explainer
Nurse
Lately I’ve been looking at how teams actually keep auditors happy versus how they keep developers productive. Nessus often wins the compliance dance because it offers established, recognizable checks and reporting that line up with standards—so when you need to demonstrate compliance during an external audit, it’s a dependable friend.
That said, Epsilon Scan could be the better choice for day-to-day hygiene if it’s built for fast scans, has good cloud connectors, and outputs structured results that feed your ticketing or SCM systems. If the newer scanner reduces developer friction and speeds up remediation, your security posture improves even if it’s not yet the auditor-favorite.
My recommendation is pragmatic: validate that Epsilon produces the same control-level evidence auditors require. If it does, transition to it for operational scanning while keeping Nessus for formal quarterly attestations until you’ve proven consistency. Personally, I prefer tools that make remediation straightforward and keep audit time calm, so I’ll pick what keeps both auditors and engineers less stressed.
That said, Epsilon Scan could be the better choice for day-to-day hygiene if it’s built for fast scans, has good cloud connectors, and outputs structured results that feed your ticketing or SCM systems. If the newer scanner reduces developer friction and speeds up remediation, your security posture improves even if it’s not yet the auditor-favorite.
My recommendation is pragmatic: validate that Epsilon produces the same control-level evidence auditors require. If it does, transition to it for operational scanning while keeping Nessus for formal quarterly attestations until you’ve proven consistency. Personally, I prefer tools that make remediation straightforward and keep audit time calm, so I’ll pick what keeps both auditors and engineers less stressed.
2026-02-08 23:23:03
19
Abigail
Novel Fan
Analyst
Weighing tools for compliance scans often comes down to what you actually need to prove during an audit versus what your team can realistically run and maintain.
From my experience running regular scans in mixed environments, Nessus is like a Swiss Army knife—deep plugin coverage, lots of compliance templates (PCI, CIS benchmarks, etc.), and auditors tend to recognize its reports. That maturity means fewer surprises during audits, especially if you need authenticated scans and fine-grained policy checks. On the flip side, Nessus can feel heavy, expensive at scale, and sometimes noisy with false positives unless you tune credentialed checks carefully.
Epsilon Scan (thinking of it as a newer, leaner competitor) can shine if your priorities are modern workflows: cloud-native integrations, cleaner UX, faster incremental scans, and easier CI/CD hooks. If it supports the exact controls your auditor expects and gives machine-readable reports for your pipeline, it’s a strong option. However, I’d be cautious if Epsilon lacks long-term plugin depth or third-party validation — that can become an audit headache.
My practical rule of thumb is to map required compliance controls, run a proof-of-concept with both tools against representative assets, and validate output against auditor expectations. If Epsilon covers those controls and saves friction, I’d pick it; if not, Nessus remains the safer default. Either way, I lean toward what reduces manual reconciliation before audit day.
From my experience running regular scans in mixed environments, Nessus is like a Swiss Army knife—deep plugin coverage, lots of compliance templates (PCI, CIS benchmarks, etc.), and auditors tend to recognize its reports. That maturity means fewer surprises during audits, especially if you need authenticated scans and fine-grained policy checks. On the flip side, Nessus can feel heavy, expensive at scale, and sometimes noisy with false positives unless you tune credentialed checks carefully.
Epsilon Scan (thinking of it as a newer, leaner competitor) can shine if your priorities are modern workflows: cloud-native integrations, cleaner UX, faster incremental scans, and easier CI/CD hooks. If it supports the exact controls your auditor expects and gives machine-readable reports for your pipeline, it’s a strong option. However, I’d be cautious if Epsilon lacks long-term plugin depth or third-party validation — that can become an audit headache.
My practical rule of thumb is to map required compliance controls, run a proof-of-concept with both tools against representative assets, and validate output against auditor expectations. If Epsilon covers those controls and saves friction, I’d pick it; if not, Nessus remains the safer default. Either way, I lean toward what reduces manual reconciliation before audit day.
2026-02-09 00:49:55
2View All Answers
Scan code to download App
Related Books
The Pack's Hacker
Cooper
9.9
223.7K
9.9
223.7K
Wendy Hill is an up-and-coming technological wizard. Her research to gain information for her brother Yorick and his mate, Cyra, led to the arrest of Cyra’s father, earning her early admission to the elite Warrior Academy. She was assigned to the tech team to learn and train until her admission to the Academy. Wendy’s code name is Sphinx.
Jude Matthews, code name Hacker, has been a student at the Warrior Academy for three years. Most students remain in the Academy for one year and then are recruited by other companies for their specific skills. Only the elite of the elite remain at the Academy to continue their training and work directly for The Council.
Hacker, and the other members of his team, Tracker and Hijack, have taken Sphinx under their wing to teach her everything she needs to know to become an IT elite. However, now things are becoming personal for Wendy. Stellan has escaped from prison and is after Cyra and her Gamma female, Lila. Patrick, Peter, and Justine are missing, and they want revenge on Henry and Piper.
Through it all, Wendy has felt a budding relationship with Jude. She’s hoping he’s her mate, but she won’t know until her eighteenth birthday.
Can Wendy and Jude work together to find Stellan before he hurts Cyra and Lila? Can they find the missing trio who want to destroy everything that Henry and Piper have worked so hard to achieve? Can she face the ugly reality of the job when it means giving someone painful or difficult information? And on her eighteenth birthday, will she finally confirm that Jude is her mate, the one that she desperately wants in her life forever?
Find out in Book Five of The Pack Series, The Pack’s Hacker.
Read NowThe S-Tier's Omega Bodyguard
KIRTI
7.8
17.9K
7.8
17.9K
Kieran Hunt is a deadly omega bodyguard who never submits. Until he's assigned to Elliot Sinclair, an arrogant S-Tier alpha whose pheromones shatter his control.
One forbidden night. One failed suppressant. Now Kieran's carrying the alpha's twins, and Elliot refuses to let his omega go. Ever.
Read NowAlpha Gray
C.J. Primer
9.9
1.3M
9.9
1.3M
SIX-PACK SERIES BOOK ONE *The six-pack series is a collection of steamy werewolf shifter novels about a group of six aligned werewolf packs, the young alphas that run them, and the strong-willed women that bring them to their knees. If you're new to the series, start here!* GRAY : I've got a lot on my plate. Not only do I have a pack to protect, but I keep the whole six-pack territory secure by training and running the security squad. The new recruits are here for the summer, and it's my job to whip them into shape. I can't afford any distractions, but one of the female recruits is doing just that- distracting me. Fallon is the most frustrating girl I've ever met; she's all alpha female, and she openly challenges my authority. She's so far from my type, but for some reason, I'm drawn to her. It'll be a challenge to break her, but by the end of the summer, she will learn to obey her alpha. By the end of the summer, I'll have her on her knees. ~ FALLON : All I've ever wanted was to be part of the six-pack's security squad, defending our territory as a fighter. I've finally got a chance to live out my dream- all I have to do is make it through summer training camp and prove myself. I thought that the toughest part of training camp would be the actual training, but the alpha running the place is even tougher. One sarcastic comment, and Alpha Gray seems hellbent on making an example out of me, provoking me at every opportunity. He wants me to fall in line, but I'll be damned if I'm going to roll over. Sure, he's insanely hot. He's an alpha. But I'm not backing down. He's not my alpha.
Read NowAegis Group Lepta Team
Sidney Bristol
10
6.3K
10
6.3K
High risk and high reward, the men of Aegis Group Lepta Team work only the most dangerous kidnapping cases. These hunky heroes are willing to put it all on the line to get the job done. Romance is an even greater risk in their line of work, but these men don’t shy away from danger.Aegis Group Lepta Team is created by Sidney Bristol, an eGlobal Creative Pubishing author.
Read NowAegis Group Task Force
Sidney Bristol
9
8.4K
9
8.4K
Ready for an edge of your seat romance with twists and turns? When the Aegis Group Task Force is contracted to work a secretive, off-the-books case for the government the stakes couldn’t be higher. From international intrigue to burning up the sheets, these men do what the job needs.Aegis Group Task Force is created by Sidney Bristol, an eGlobal Creative Publishing author.
Read NowBreach
K.I. LYNN
0
6.6K
0
6.6K
"His body was sin and I was a sinner.To keep myself safe I hide in the world and let life move around me.My new partner, Nathan, isn’t safe. Far from it.The darkness coils around him, hidden by a shield created by a blinding smile. But those who live in shadows see past the façade we create.Even in darkness, there is light. A spark that ignites, then explodes.Every filthy word from his mouth, every possessive touch—I crave them, need them. Violent and passionate and everything I need to fill the void inside me, but one thing is missing.He can never love me.More than my heart is on the line, and I don’t know if I’ll survive our breach."
Read NowRelated Questions
What is epsilon scan and how does it detect threats?
5 Answers2026-02-03 12:09:52
Honestly, when I first heard the term I pictured something sci-fi, but epsilon scan is actually a practical, math-flavored technique used to sniff out subtle threats by looking for small deviations around expected behavior. At its core, 'epsilon' means a tiny margin or neighborhood — imagine drawing a small bubble around a normal data point or system state and checking everything inside that bubble for weirdness.
In practice I see it applied two ways. In traditional security monitoring it becomes a sensitivity threshold: the scanner measures feature vectors (network flows, file properties, process behavior) and flags items that fall outside a baseline by more than epsilon. In machine-learning-driven defenses, people generate small perturbations inside an epsilon-ball around inputs to see if a model's output flips; if tiny changes cause big differences, that’s a red flag for adversarial manipulation. It’s also used in fuzzing: mutate inputs within small ranges to reveal fragile parsing logic.
What I like is how conceptually simple it is yet flexible — you can tune epsilon for low-noise environments or widen it to catch stealthy, slowly evolving threats. The trade-offs are clear though: set epsilon too tight and you drown in false positives; too loose and stealthy attacks slip through. Still, when combined with context-aware baselines and layered checks, epsilon scanning becomes a neat way to catch the small, quiet things that loud detectors miss. I find it satisfying when a tiny threshold uncovers something important.
Can epsilon scan integrate with SIEM platforms effectively?
5 Answers2026-02-03 00:22:39
Totally doable — epsilon scan can integrate with SIEM platforms very effectively if you plan the integration like a small engineering project rather than a one-off export. In my setups I treat epsilon scan as a telemetry source: it emits structured findings, scan metadata, and health events. I push those into the SIEM through the usual bridge options — syslog/CEF for legacy stacks, HTTP collectors like Splunk HEC, or into Kafka/Elastic ingest pipelines as JSON. The key is to map fields consistently: timestamp, asset identifier, vulnerability ID, CVSS/risk score, scanner version and scan policy name. That makes correlation with endpoint logs, authentication events, and network telemetry straightforward.
Where teams often trip up is normalization and noise. I create a lightweight enrichment step to attach owner and business-critical tags from our asset inventory, normalize severity bins, and dedupe repeated findings across scan sweeps. Forwarding events in batches, over TLS, with proper backpressure handling avoids losing data during peak scans. When alerts are built in the SIEM, I tune correlation rules so epsilon scan findings either raise a contextual investigation ticket or feed an automated playbook, not generate noisy pages at 3 AM. It’s been a game-changer for visibility and response in my environment, worth the setup time.
How do you install epsilon scan on Linux servers?
10 Answers2026-02-03 09:35:12
If you want a reliable walkthrough for getting epsilon scan running on a Linux server, I'll lay out the flow I use and why each step matters.
First I do the basics: update the system (sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade -y or sudo yum update -y), install essentials (git, python3, python3-venv, python3-pip, build-essential) and make sure networking/ports are clear. I create a dedicated user (sudo adduser --system --group epsscan) so the service doesn't run as root. Then I clone the repo: sudo -u epsscan git clone https://github.com/epsilon/epsilon-scan.git /opt/epsilon-scan and switch into that folder.
Next I create a virtual environment: sudo -u epsscan python3 -m venv /opt/epsilon-scan/venv && source /opt/epsilon-scan/venv/bin/activate. Install requirements with pip install -r requirements.txt and set environment variables in a .env file (DATABASEURL, SECRETKEY, BINDHOST, PORT). If epsilon scan uses a database, I run migrations (e.g., ./manage.py migrate or the tool's migration command). To keep it running I write a systemd unit (/etc/systemd/system/epsilon-scan.service) that ExecStart points to the venv python and the app start command, then systemctl daemon-reload && systemctl enable --now epsilon-scan. Finally I configure firewall (ufw allow 8080/tcp or the port you selected) and optionally place Nginx as a reverse proxy with TLS. After a quick curl http://localhost:8080/ or checking journalctl -u epsilon-scan -f, I tweak logging and backups. I like this routine; it keeps deployments tidy and repeatable, and it gives me peace of mind when things go live.
Which common false positives does epsilon scan produce?
5 Answers2026-02-03 06:38:42
My scalp still tingles thinking about the weird little signals epsilon scan throws my way — it loves to shout 'intrusion' when something mundane is happening. In practice the most common false positives I see are XSS and SQL injection flags that stem from normal application behavior: search boxes that reflect user input but escape it later, or APIs that echo parameters for debugging. Epsilon also flags directory traversal when filenames contain encoded characters or legitimate '../' in user content. Then there are generic 500-series errors that are picked up as 'remote code execution' even though they were caused by rate limiting or a dependency timeout.
When I triage these, my go-to checklist is: reproduce the finding manually, check request/response context, and inspect logs for matching stack traces. Often the scanner’s payloads get rewritten by a web application firewall, a proxy, or templating engine, producing signatures that look exploit-y but are harmless. I also keep a short list of safe false-positive patterns (self-signed TLS, custom error pages, API tokens in headers used for testing) so I don’t waste cycles. It’s kind of satisfying to weed out the noise and find the real bugs, though — feels like a small victory every time.
What accuracy does epsilon scan achieve on web apps?
5 Answers2026-02-03 00:49:57
my take is that its accuracy sits in a useful but nuanced range. On classic server-rendered sites with predictable parameterized inputs, it reliably flags SQL injection and reflected XSS with high precision — think roughly 80–90% true positives in my experience, because the payloads and detection heuristics map well to those injection patterns.
Where it gets trickier is modern JavaScript-heavy single-page apps and complex API backends. There, recall drops: the scanner can miss vulnerabilities hidden behind client-side routing, dynamic tokens, or nonstandard JSON endpoints. I’d estimate recall in such cases closer to 50–70%. False positives also creep up when the app uses nonstandard error pages or custom CSRF flows, so manual triage remains important. Overall, I treat 'epsilon scan' as a powerful automated ally — great for broad coverage and CI gating, but not a substitute for targeted manual testing. It saves time and surfaces the low-hanging fruit, and that still makes me pretty happy with it.
How does Espion GPT compare to ChatGPT?
3 Answers2026-06-27 22:48:07
Espion GPT and ChatGPT are both fascinating tools in the AI landscape, but they serve slightly different vibes. Espion GPT feels like it’s geared toward niche, high-stakes scenarios—think espionage, cybersecurity, or covert ops. It’s got this aura of secrecy and precision, like something out of a spy thriller. ChatGPT, on the other hand, is more like your friendly neighborhood librarian crossed with a stand-up comedian. It’s versatile, approachable, and great for everything from homework help to brainstorming fanfiction.
One thing I’ve noticed is that Espion GPT seems to prioritize discretion and targeted responses, almost as if it’s designed for users who need answers without leaving a digital footprint. ChatGPT, meanwhile, thrives on creativity and broad knowledge. It’s the kind of tool you’d use to draft a silly poem about cats or debate the merits of 'Star Wars' vs. 'Star Trek.' Espion GPT? Probably not. It’s more 'mission-critical' and less 'let’s riff on random topics.' That said, I’d love to see a crossover where Espion GPT’s precision meets ChatGPT’s charm—now that’d be a powerhouse.
Should I choose Team Conrad or Team Jeremiah?
5 Answers2026-07-07 11:17:51
Oh wow, the eternal 'The Summer I Turned Pretty' debate! Team Conrad has this brooding, mysterious charm that’s straight out of a classic romance novel—like Darcy from 'Pride and Prejudice' but with surfboards. He’s the slow burn, the one who makes you ache because he’s terrible at communicating but so obviously in love. Jeremiah? Sunshine personified. He’s the guy who brings you pancakes after you cry over Conrad. But here’s the thing: Conrad’s love feels like it’s carved into his bones, messy and permanent. Jeremiah’s love is warm and easy, but does it have that same depth? I’ve re-read the books a dozen times, and Conrad’s quiet ‘I’ll always come back for you’ wrecks me every time.
That said, Jeremiah’s growth in the later books is chef’s kiss. He’s not just the comic relief—he becomes this layered, resilient person. But Conrad? He’s the storm you can’t look away from. If you want butterflies and angst, go Conrad. If you want a love that feels like summer vacation, pick Jere. Me? I’m Team Conrad, but I’ll defend Jeremiah stans to the death.
Why does the team choose their toy in 'The Team's Freeuse Toy'?
3 Answers2026-03-11 19:45:14
The dynamic in 'The Team's Freeuse Toy' is fascinating because it blends camaraderie with a playful, almost ritualistic sense of belonging. The team doesn’t just pick any toy—it’s about what symbolizes their unity or inside jokes. Maybe it’s a mascot from their first victory, or something absurd that became sacred over time. I’ve seen similar vibes in sports anime like 'Haikyuu!!', where objects become talismans. Here, the toy might represent trust, a way to lighten the mood during tense moments, or even a reminder of their shared history. It’s less about the object itself and more about the stories etched into it.
What really hooks me is how this mirrors real-life fandoms. Collectibles or merch often carry emotional weight—think of limited-edition figures or signed memorabilia. The team’s choice probably echoes that sentimental value, turning something mundane into a cornerstone of their identity. The way they interact with it—whether teasing or cherishing—adds layers to their relationships. It’s those small, quirky details that make fictional teams feel alive, like the Straw Hats’ jolly Roger in 'One Piece' or the Batfam’s inside jokes in DC comics.
Is Espion GPT safe for sensitive data?
3 Answers2026-06-27 04:13:32
Espion GPT's safety for sensitive data is a nuanced topic. As someone who dabbles in tech tools for creative projects, I've tried various AI platforms, and trust is always a big factor. Espion GPT claims robust encryption and data handling protocols, but I'd never blindly trust any tool with truly confidential info—like personal identifiers or corporate secrets—without thorough vetting. Even if the platform itself is secure, third-party integrations or user errors could leak data.
That said, for low-stakes stuff—say, drafting fictional stories or brainstorming—it’s probably fine. But I’d treat it like a public notepad: assume anything entered could someday surface elsewhere. For sensitive work, I’d stick to offline tools or systems with airtight reputations, like those used in healthcare or finance. The convenience of AI is tempting, but peace of mind matters more.
How safe is espion scan for downloading manga files?
4 Answers2025-11-05 03:26:01
I get why you're asking — downloading manga from sketchy sites can feel like stepping into a shadowy alley where everything is either treasure or a trap. From what I've seen, Espion Scan (and sites like it) carries mixed risk: the core risk is not the image files themselves but the surrounding environment — aggressive ads, misleading download buttons, occasional malicious bundles, and trackers that want your data.
Practically speaking, if the site offers straight image archives or PDFs, those files are usually less risky than executable downloads. The real hazards come from clicking on popups or installers that claim to be readers. I always check for an HTTPS connection, skim recent user comments for reports of malware, and avoid any link that pushes a standalone EXE or an unfamiliar installer. Even then, there's the ethical and legal side: creators deserve support, and pirated scans hurt translators and artists. Personally, I use official sources like 'Manga Plus' or buy volumes when I can, but when nostalgia hits and I glance at a scan site, I tread carefully and keep my antivirus turned on. Final thought: Espion Scan might work without incident, but treat it like a sketchy thrift store — cool finds, but watch your pockets.
Related Searches
Popular Question
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
