The opening was procedural.That was what made it painful.At nine sharp, the ethics council released the notice activating the review in full. No qualifiers. No protective language. The scope was outlined in precise terms, the timeline fixed, the authority clearly independent. Names were absent, replaced by roles and functions. The document read like a manual, not a defense.Which was exactly the problem.By ten, every internal channel carried the same link. By eleven, external outlets had mirrored it. By noon, analysts were no longer speculating about whether there would be an investigation, but how far it would reach.The review did not ask whether reform had gone too far.
Read more