David Okafor filed the regulatory complaint in the second week of December.It was a comprehensive document — forty-eight pages, supported by the full evidence base that had been assembled over eight weeks of investigation, supplemented by Celestine Brandt's testimony and the copies she had kept. It named all four members of the steering committee. It detailed the surveillance operation, the authorization chain, the specific mechanisms of Phase Three, and the financial interests that had motivated the whole. It was, David said with the particular satisfaction of a lawyer who had done work he was proud of, one of the most complete regulatory filings he had produced in twenty-two years of practice.The complaint went simultaneously to three bodies: the Financial Conduct Authority, given the financial interests involved in the portfolio manipulation; the Information Commissioner's Office, given the surveillance operation and its methods; and the Solicitors Regulation Authority, given Hux
최신 업데이트 : 2026-05-02 더 보기