Is The Anthony Briggs Translation Of War And Peace Good For New Readers?

2026-07-23 17:13:34
31
Partager
Quiz sur ton caractère ABO
Fais ce test rapide pour savoir si tu es Alpha, Bêta ou Oméga.
Odorat
Personnalité
Mode d’amour idéal
Désir secret
Ton côté obscur
Commencer le test

6 Réponses

LylaFox
LylaFox
Story Finder Worker
From a purely practical standpoint, the Briggs translation is often cheaper and more readily available in paperback editions than the Pevear/Volokhonsky. That matters! If you're dipping a toe in, not wanting to invest in a fancy hardcover, grabbing the Briggs is a no-brainer. The readability is high, the physical book is easier to carry around, and you won't feel guilty if you decide it's not for you. Sometimes the 'best' translation is the one you'll actually read.
2026-07-24 19:48:33
0
JohnBlue
JohnBlue
Plot Explainer Worker
I've only listened to the audiobook, which is based on the Briggs translation. Listening to a sixty-hour audiobook is a commitment, and if the translation was clunky, it would be unbearable. Instead, it was completely compelling. The narrator's performance combined with the clarity of the text made those hours disappear. So if you're an audiobook person, the Briggs translation is a fantastic choice for that format too.
2026-07-24 23:47:19
1
AmyPalmer
AmyPalmer
Active Reader Consultant
Some people will tell you to start with P&V for the 'authentic' experience. I call that gatekeeping. The authentic experience is the emotional and intellectual journey Tolstoy laid out. Briggs delivers that in spades. Getting hung up on lexical choices misses the forest for the trees. The forest is breathtaking, and Briggs gives you a clear path through it.
2026-07-25 07:52:05
3
ReadNest
ReadNest
Expert Assistant
Translation wars are the new console wars. Just play the great game.
2026-07-26 17:03:35
2
NadiaBee
NadiaBee
Reply Helper Photographer
It's solid. Not much more to add. Everyone else has covered it.
2026-07-27 00:59:01
1
Toutes les réponses
Scanner le code pour télécharger l'application

Livres associés

Autres questions liées

Is the Anthony Briggs translation of War and Peace good for newcomers?

3 Réponses2026-07-23 13:21:27
It gets the job done without fuss. That’s my review. It’s a reliable, workmanlike translation that doesn’t stumble. You won’t be raving about the beautiful prose, but you also won’t be cursing awkward phrasing at 2 a.m. For a book this massive, a smooth, predictable ride is sometimes better than a more beautiful but bumpier one. Consistency is an underrated virtue in a translation.

What War and Peace translation is recommended for a first-time reader?

5 Réponses2026-07-23 22:31:06
I see a lot of love for the modern translations, but a contrarian part of me thinks there’s value in starting with Constance Garnett. Yes, her language is dated and sometimes overly smoothed out. But she’s the portal through which generations of English speakers fell in love with Russian literature. Reading her is a historical experience in itself. It adds a certain patina to the reading, a sense of stepping back in time. If you can embrace the slightly formal rhythm, it has its own charm. It’s not the easiest route, but finishing ‘War and Peace’ in Garnett feels like a double accomplishment. Just be prepared for longer sentences and a more passive narrative voice.

Which War and Peace translation is easiest for modern readers?

6 Réponses2026-07-23 11:43:53
Honestly, the Pevear and Volokhonsky translation is my hill to die on. Yes, it aims for extreme fidelity to the Russian, which can feel a bit stilted in places, but that's the point. You're getting Tolstoy's rhythms and stylistic quirks, not a smooth reinterpretation. For a modern reader who wants the closest possible experience to the original text, warts and all, this is it. Their notes are also incredibly thorough, explaining cultural and historical context that other versions gloss over.

Which War and Peace translation is easiest for modern readers to follow?

5 Réponses2026-07-23 14:30:10
The character of Kutuzov, the old general, is a great litmus test. In some translations, he comes across as a passive, almost sleepy figure. In others, his cunning and profound weariness are clearer. How a translator handles his dialogue and Tolstoy's descriptions of him reveals a lot about their approach to tone. Briggs makes his intelligence more apparent through sharper dialogue. P&V preserve more of the ambiguous, inscrutable quality. Which interpretation is easier to follow? Probably the clearer, more active one. But which is more interesting? That's up for debate. Sometimes ambiguity is the point, and a translation that clarifies too much might simplify the character.
Découvrez et lisez de bons romans gratuitement
Accédez gratuitement à un grand nombre de bons romans sur GoodNovel. Téléchargez les livres que vous aimez et lisez où et quand vous voulez.
Lisez des livres gratuitement sur l'APP
Scanner le code pour lire sur l'application
DMCA.com Protection Status