What Is The Biggest Mistake In The Lord Of The Rings?

2026-05-05 02:17:55
279
Share
ABO Personality Quiz
Take a quick quiz to find out whether you‘re Alpha, Beta, or Omega.
Start Test
Write Answer
Ask Question

3 Answers

Bennett
Bennett
Favorite read: ERAGON THE DRAGON PRINCE
Sharp Observer Pharmacist
From a character perspective, Boromir’s arc feels rushed in the films. His fall to the Ring’s temptation and redemption happen so fast that his death almost seems like an afterthought. The books flesh out his internal struggle more, but the movies compress it into a few scenes. It’s a shame because Sean Bean’s performance is stellar—he deserved more screen time to show the conflict between his love for Gondor and his weakness.

Also, Tom Bombadil’s omission from the films is controversial. I get why Jackson left him out (he doesn’t advance the plot), but Bombadil’s mystery adds depth to Middle-earth’s lore. His indifference to the Ring hints at forces beyond Sauron’s understanding, making the world feel bigger. Without him, the story loses a layer of whimsy and philosophical ambiguity.
2026-05-08 19:10:35
8
Blake
Blake
Reviewer Editor
One of the most debated flaws in 'The Lord of the Rings' is how the Eagles are used—or underused, really. They swoop in dramatically at key moments (like rescuing Frodo from Mount Doom), but their sporadic appearances raise questions. If they could fly over Mordor, why didn’t they just carry the Ring to Mount Doom from the start? Tolkien’s defenders argue that the Eagles are proud, independent beings, not taxi services, and that Sauron’s forces would’ve spotted them. But it still feels like a plot hole that could’ve saved Middle-earth a lot of trouble.

Another angle is the pacing in 'The Two Towers.' The book splits Frodo and Sam’s journey from the rest of the Fellowship, which works, but the film adaptation’s decision to cut back and forth between Helm’s Deep and Frodo’s plot sometimes kills the momentum. The emotional weight of Aragorn’s 'death' gets undercut by jumping to Gollum’s scheming. It’s a structural choice that, while ambitious, doesn’t always land smoothly.
2026-05-10 10:40:09
17
Spoiler Watcher Pharmacist
The biggest mistake might be how the Scouring of the Shire was handled—or rather, not handled—in the films. In the books, the hobbits return home to find it industrialized and oppressed, forcing them to apply their hard-earned growth to reclaim it. The movies skip this entirely, opting for a tidy happy ending. It undermines the theme that war changes everyone, even the 'safe' places. Saruman’s anticlimactic death in the extended edition doesn’t compensate for it. That chapter was Tolkien’s way of showing that no one escapes corruption untouched, and its absence leaves Frodo’s departure feeling less earned.
2026-05-11 17:40:37
8
View All Answers
Scan code to download App

Related Books

Related Questions

Which character sacrifices the most in 'The Lord of the Rings' story?

2 Answers2025-04-08 12:08:24
In 'The Lord of the Rings', the character who sacrifices the most is undoubtedly Frodo Baggins. As the Ring-bearer, Frodo shoulders the immense burden of carrying the One Ring to Mount Doom, knowing full well the physical and psychological toll it will take on him. His journey is one of relentless suffering, as the Ring’s corrupting influence grows stronger with each step. Frodo leaves behind the comfort and safety of the Shire, enduring treacherous landscapes, constant danger, and the betrayal of those he trusts. His sacrifice is not just physical but also emotional, as he loses his innocence and sense of peace. By the end, Frodo is permanently scarred, unable to return to the life he once knew. His selflessness and determination to destroy the Ring, even at the cost of his own well-being, make his sacrifice unparalleled in the story. Another character who sacrifices greatly is Samwise Gamgee. While Frodo carries the Ring, Sam carries the weight of supporting Frodo through every trial. He leaves his beloved home, faces countless dangers, and even carries Frodo up the slopes of Mount Doom when Frodo can no longer walk. Sam’s loyalty and unwavering friendship are his sacrifices, as he puts Frodo’s needs above his own at every turn. His journey is a testament to the power of selfless love and devotion. Lastly, Gandalf’s sacrifice is often overlooked but equally significant. He willingly confronts the Balrog in Moria, knowing it could cost him his life, to ensure the Fellowship’s survival. His temporary death and subsequent return as Gandalf the White symbolize his role as a guiding force, sacrificing his own safety to protect Middle-earth. Each of these characters embodies the theme of sacrifice in their own way, but Frodo’s journey remains the most profound and heart-wrenching.

What was the biggest mistake in Game of Thrones?

3 Answers2026-05-05 17:29:28
The biggest misstep in 'Game of Thrones' was how the final seasons rushed through pivotal character arcs and plotlines, sacrificing the show's trademark depth for spectacle. The Daenerys Targaryen descent into madness, for instance, could have been a masterpiece of tragic storytelling if given proper buildup. Instead, it felt jarring—like flipping a switch rather than a slow burn. The intricate political maneuvering that defined earlier seasons got sidelined for big battles and shock value, which left longtime fans feeling cheated. Another glaring issue was the handling of Bran Stark’s arc. After seasons of mystery and buildup, his ascension to the throne came off as an afterthought, with little narrative weight. The show’s earlier strength was its patience; characters like Tyrion or Arya earned their moments through gradual development. By contrast, the finale’s shortcuts made it clear the writers were racing to wrap things up, not honoring the story’s complexity.

What is the biggest mistake in Harry Potter?

3 Answers2026-05-05 05:34:45
The biggest mistake in 'Harry Potter', in my opinion, was killing off Fred Weasley. It felt unnecessarily cruel, not just to the characters but to the readers who'd grown up loving the twins' antics. Fred and George were the heart of the series' humor, a reminder that even in dark times, joy could exist. Losing one of them shattered that balance permanently. It didn't serve the plot in a meaningful way—George's grief was barely explored, and it didn't change the trajectory of the final battle. It just...hurt. Rowling has said she regrets it too, which makes it sting even more. Another misstep was the handling of Slytherin house. By the end, it felt like a caricature of evil, with no redemption arcs for any student except Slughorn. Even Draco's 'change' was underwritten. It reinforced a binary 'good vs. bad' dynamic that didn’t match the series’ earlier nuance. Imagine if a Slytherin had stayed to fight in the Battle of Hogwarts—what a powerful moment that could’ve been. Instead, they were all evacuated, which felt like a missed opportunity to complicate the story’s moral landscape.
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
DMCA.com Protection Status