Does Her Divorce Lawyer Want Her To Testify In Court?

I've dug through release lists, fansub archives, and storefront pages so you don't have to: there is no officially licensed English dub for 'You Want a New Mommy? Roger That?'. From what I can track, this title has remained a pretty niche release — often the fate of short OVAs, special shorts bundled with manga volumes, or region-specific extras. Major Western licensors like the usual suspects never put out a Region A dub or an English-language Blu-ray/DVD listing for it, which usually means the only legal way people outside Japan have been watching it is with subtitles. That said, it hasn’t been completely inaccessible. Enthusiast fansubbing groups and hobby translators have historically picked up titles like this, so you’ll often find subtitled rips, community translations, or fan-made subtitle tracks floating around places where collectors congregate. There are also occasional fan dubs — amateur voice projects posted on video-sharing sites or shared among forums — but those are unofficial and vary wildly in quality. If you prefer polished English performances, those won't match a professional studio dub, but they can be charming in their own DIY way. Why no dub? A lot of tiny factors: limited demand, short runtime, or rights being tangled up in anthology releases. Sometimes a short like 'You Want a New Mommy? Roger That?' appears as part of a larger compilation or as a DVD extra, and licensors decide it isn't worth the cost to commission a dub for a five- or ten-minute piece. If you want to hunt for the cleanest viewing experience, importing a Japanese disc with a subtitle track (or a reliable fansub) tends to be the best route. Communities on sites like MyAnimeList, Reddit, or dedicated retro anime groups can point you to legit sources and alert you if a dub ever arrives. Personally, I find these little oddball titles endearing precisely because they stay niche — subs feel more authentic most of the time, and you catch little cultural jokes that dubs sometimes smooth over. If someday a disc company decides to license and dub it, I’ll be first in line to hear how they handle the dialogue, but until then I’m content reading the subtitles and enjoying the quirks.

The finale of 'You Want Her, so It's Goodbye' surprised me by being quieter than I expected, and I loved it for that. The climax isn't a melodramatic confession scene or a last-minute chase; it's a slow, painfully honest conversation between the two leads on a rain-slicked rooftop. They unpack misunderstandings that built up over the whole story, and instead of forcing one of them to change who they are, the protagonist chooses to step back. There's a motif of keys and suitcases that finally resolves: she takes her own suitcase, he keeps a tiny memento she leaves behind, and they both accept that loving someone sometimes means letting them go. The epilogue jumps forward a couple of years and reads like a soft postcard. She's living somewhere else, pursuing the thing she always wanted, and he has quietly grown into his own life, no longer defined by trying to hold her. The narrative leaves room for hope without tying everything up perfectly — there's no forced reunion, just two people who are better for the goodbye. That bittersweet honesty stuck with me long after I closed the book; I still smile thinking about that rooftop scene.

This series grabbed me so fast that I had to step back and plan how to read it properly. For 'You Want Her, so It's Goodbye' I personally prefer starting with the main volumes in publication order — that means Volume 1, then 2, and so on — because the way the story unfolds and the reveals land best that way. The character development and pacing were clearly sculpted around release cadence, and reading in release order preserves the intended emotional beats and cliffhangers. After finishing a chunk of main volumes I pause to dive into the extras: omakes, side chapters, and any short chapters bundled into later print editions. These little pieces often add warmth or context to moments that felt abrupt in the main arc, like clarifying a minor character’s motivation or giving a quieter epilogue to a tense scene. I usually tuck these in after each volume if they’re clearly attached to that volume, otherwise I save them until I’ve completed the main story. If there’s a spin-off or an epilogue-heavy special, I read it last; it’s sweeter when you already understand the characters’ journeys. Also, whenever possible I go for official translations or editions that include author notes — those notes sometimes change how I view a scene. Reading this way made the farewell feel earned for me, and I still get a soft smile thinking about their final chapter.

My brain immediately pictures a rainy Tokyo alley lit by neon and a camera drifting in on two people who almost touch but don't — that vibe would make a gorgeous live-action version of 'Will You Want Her, so It's Goodbye'. I would love to see the emotional beats translated to faces: subtle glances, the quiet moments between noise, and the kind of soundtrack that sneaks up on you. Casting would be everything — not just pretty faces but actors who can speak volumes with tiny gestures. Realistically, whether it happens depends on rights, a studio willing to gamble on a delicate story, and a director who respects the source material's pacing. If a streaming service picked it up, I could see it becoming a slow-burn hit; if a big studio tried to turn it into spectacle, the core might get lost. Either way, I'd be lined up opening weekend or glued to my couch, popcorn in hand, hoping they nailed the heart of it. I'm already daydreaming about which scenes I'd replay on loop.

the differences really highlight what each medium does best. The novel is where the story breathes: long internal monologues, slow-burn worldbuilding, and lots of little political or emotional threads that build up the protagonist’s motives. The adaptation, whether it's a comic or an animated version, tends to streamline those threads into clearer visual beats, trimming or combining side plots and cutting down on extended expository passages. That makes the pace feel punchier and more immediate, but you lose some of the granular texture that made particular scenes feel earned in the book. One of the biggest shifts is in characterization and tone. In the novel, we get pages and pages of the lead’s inner thoughts, doubts, and the small hypocrisies that gradually shape their decisions. The adaptation externalizes that: facial expressions, silent flashbacks, and dialogue replace the interior monologue. That works wonderfully for conveying emotion onscreen, but it changes reader perception. Some characters who read as morally grey or complicated in the novel are simplified on-screen—either to make them easier to follow for new audiences or to fit time constraints. Side characters who have slow-burn arcs in the book are often abbreviated, merged, or given a more utilitarian role in the adaptation. Conversely, a few supporting cast members sometimes get more screentime because they’re visually interesting or popular with audiences, which can shift the narrative focus slightly toward subplots the novel handled more quietly. Plot structure gets a makeover too. The show/comic rearranges events to build better cliffhangers or to keep momentum across episodes/chapters. That means some revelations are moved earlier or later, and entire mini-arcs can be skipped or condensed. Endings are a common casualty: adaptations often give a tidier, more cinematic conclusion if the novel’s ending is slow, ambiguous, or still ongoing. Also, expect new scenes that weren’t in the book—ones designed to heighten drama, give voice actors something to chew on, or create a viral moment. Those additions are hit-or-miss; sometimes they add emotional oomph, sometimes they feel like fan-service. There’s also the pesky issue of censorship/localization: anything explicit in the book may be toned down for broader audiences, which alters the perceived stakes or tone. What I love is that both formats scratch different itches. The novel is richer in political intrigue, internal conflict, and connective tissue—perfect when you want to savor character work and world mechanics. The adaptation gives immediacy: visuals, a soundtrack, and voice acting that can turn a quiet line into a scene-stealer. If you want the full emotional and intellectual weight of 'After Rebirth They Want Me Back', the novel is indispensable; but if you want the hype, the visuals, and those moments that hit you in the chest, the adaptation nails it. Personally, I read the book first and then binged the adaptation, and watching familiar lines be given life was such a satisfying complement to the deeper, slower pleasures of the prose.

Right now I'm standing at one of those weird, quiet forks in life where you can hear your own heartbeat louder than usual. If your ex-wife wants you back after a divorce, the first thing I always do is slow my breathing and separate emotion from pattern. Love and nostalgia can feel like gravity, pulling you toward familiar orbits, but the serious question is whether the problems that broke you apart have been honestly understood and fixed. Have you both done the work — therapy, sincere apologies, changed behavior — or is this a replay driven by loneliness, convenience, or guilt about shared responsibilities like kids or finances? I look for concrete signals: sustained changes in actions (not just words), a plan for how to prevent old conflicts, and respect for boundaries I set. Practical steps help me stop spiraling. I’d suggest setting a clear probation period with rules: no rushing into living together again, regular couples therapy, and specific, measurable goals (e.g., communication methods during fights, division of chores, financial transparency). If there were issues like betrayal, addiction, or abuse, I treat reconciliation as possible but slow, legally and emotionally cautious. For co-parenting, I’d prioritize the children’s stability and safety first — sometimes that means parallel parenting instead of romantic reunification. I also weigh my own growth: am I returning because I miss the person I was with, or because I miss being part of a story we once had? People can change, and relationships can be reborn, but only when both parties commit to doing the often boring, difficult repair work. If you decide to try again, keep friends and a counselor in the loop so you don’t get isolated in rose-colored thinking. Personally, I’d rather rebuild slowly and honestly than slip back into a familiar comfort that ends up repeating the same heartbreak, and that thought keeps me steady.

This is the kind of emotional puzzle that makes my stomach do flips — it can be genuine, but it can also be a well-practiced play. I’ve been through messy breakups and seen friends go through manipulative reconciliations, so I look for patterns more than feelings. If she’s suddenly reaching out right after you’ve started moving on, or only contacts you when she needs something (childcare, money, validation), that’s a red flag. Manipulation often shows up as pressure to decide quickly, guilt-tripping, or dramatic swings between warmth and coldness designed to keep you hooked. On the flip side, people do change. Divorce can be huge wake-up call that forces reflection. If she’s genuinely taken responsibility, made concrete changes (therapy, stable living situation, consistent behavior), and can accept boundaries you set, that’s different from nostalgia or calculated moves. I tend to test sincerity by watching for sustained action over months, not weeks. Words are cheap; consistent, small actions are what matter. Practically speaking, I recommend protecting yourself emotionally and legally while you evaluate. Set clear boundaries: no overnight stays unless you’re reconciling officially, no reopening finances, and defined communication about children if they’re involved. Consider couples or individual therapy, and keep friends or family in the loop so you don’t second-guess sudden decisions in isolation. If the relationship resumes, insist on concrete milestones and accountability; if it’s manipulation, your boundaries will reveal that fast. I don’t want to sound cynical — some reunions heal and grow. But I’ve learned to trust patterns over promises, and that’s made me a lot less likely to get burned. Take your time and be kind to yourself; that’s been my best compass.

Lately I’ve been turning this question over in my head a lot, because spotting real change after a breakup is both hopeful and tricky. The first thing I look for is consistency over time — not a grand gesture followed by radio silence, but small, repeatable habits that show a different person. If she apologizes and then actually adjusts how she handles conflict, checks in without guilt-tripping, or follows through on things she promised, that tells me more than a dramatic speech ever would. Another big sign is emotional accountability. Is she able to name what went wrong without shifting blame? Has she sought help — therapy, reading, honest conversations with friends — and can she take responsibility when old patterns flare up? I pay attention to how she manages triggers; does she get defensive, or does she pause and reflect? Also, practical closure matters: has she untangled financial or logistical knots, respected your space, and made moves that align with rebuilding trust rather than clinging to the idea of getting you back? Finally, watch the pace. Real change usually comes with patience. If she’s willing to accept boundaries, give you time, and demonstrate change in everyday life — like consistent communication, improved conflict behavior, and respect for your choices — that’s promising. If everything feels rushed or aimed at winning you instantly, I stay cautious. Personally, I’d prefer slow proof over flashy promises; it’s quieter, but it’s what lasts, and that’s been my anchor in messy situations.