Is 'God Of Malice' Based On Mythology Or Original Lore?

I've been deep into 'God of Malice' lately, and the lore is honestly one of the most intriguing aspects. At first glance, it feels like it's pulling from mythology, especially with the title evoking that godly vibe, but the more you read, the clearer it becomes that this is mostly original lore with some mythological flavor sprinkled in. The protagonist isn't directly based on any known deity, but there are shades of trickster gods like Loki or even darker figures like Hades in how he operates—deceitful, cunning, and with a penchant for chaos. The world-building introduces its own pantheon of gods and demons, each with unique backstories that don't neatly align with any single mythos. The author clearly borrowed aesthetic elements from various mythologies—Greek, Norse, even a bit of Lovecraftian horror—but twisted them into something fresh. The divine hierarchy, the rules of magic, and the cosmic conflicts are all crafted from scratch, which makes it stand out from stories that just retell old myths. It's like the author took the essence of what makes mythology compelling—epic stakes, moral ambiguity, larger-than-life figures—and rebuilt it into a new universe that feels familiar yet unpredictable.

What really seals the deal for me is how the characters interact with this lore. The protagonist isn't just a god; he's a god who defies the established order, and his actions reshape the rules of the world. That kind of narrative flexibility is something you rarely see in myth-based stories, where the outcomes are often predetermined by existing legends. The villains, too, aren't just recycled Titans or frost giants—they're original entities with motives tied to the story's unique cosmology. Even the magic system, which involves weaving malice into tangible power, feels like a fresh take on divine abilities. If anything, 'God of Malice' uses mythology as a jumping-off point to create something entirely its own, and that's why it's so addictive.

The lore in 'God of Malice' is a mix—it's not straight-up mythology, but it's not completely original either. You can spot influences from ancient stories, like the way the gods scheme and war with each other, but the details are all new. The protagonist feels like a blend of classic trickster gods and modern antiheroes, with powers that don't match any one myth. The world has its own rules, like how malice fuels magic, which isn't something you'd find in old legends. It's more like the author cherry-picked the coolest parts of mythology—the drama, the power struggles—then made up the rest to fit a darker, more unpredictable story.