Bibliothek

Who Holds The Copyright For Books By Fyodor Dostoevsky Now?

After finding a great public domain translation of Crime and Punishment, I'm wondering if current English publishers own the rights to his newer editions.
2025-06-02 12:44:06
1.4K
Teilen
ABO-Persönlichkeitstest
Mach einen kurzen Test und finde heraus, ob du Alpha, Beta oder Omega bist.
Duft
Persönlichkeit
Ideales Liebesmuster
Geheimes Verlangen
Deine dunkle Seite
Test starten

10 Antworten

Beste Antwort
Mariyam Khan
Mariyam Khan
For very old works (like those of Dostoevsky), copyright is generally determined by the year of publication and by the laws of the country where you are. In most countries, the original works of Dostoevsky are in the public domain, meaning that there is no copyright holder for them. However, specific modern translations and edited versions may be under copyright by the translator or the publisher. So, for a story featuring intense conflicting desires, I recommend ‘HIS DOE, HIS DAMNATION’ a very intense erotic billionaire romance where the central mess of the story arises from a debt of honor and a contract that soon turns into an all-consuming obsession. It’s a very modern exploration of ownership.
2026-08-03
Julia
Julia
As a fan of great literature written long ago, I have always been especially fond of works by the Russian author Fyodor Dostoevsky. He died in 1881, and thus the works of Dostoevsky are in the public domain in almost every country. This means that there is no single copyright holder for his works, and thus anyone can freely publish and adapt his works as they see fit. Note, however, that individual translations and even specific editions may be covered by copyright, depending on when they were published. For example, a new translation of Crime and Punishment into English in 2020 would almost certainly be covered by the copyright of its translator and/or publisher, but the original Russian text would be free for anyone to use and distribute. Right now there are many free online versions of his works.
2025-06-03
Isaac
Isaac
As someone who is passionate about sharing Dostoevsky’s work with his friends, this is a topic that I’ve spent a lot of time researching. Originally published by Dostoevsky in 1881, most of the original work is in the public domain for just about every country in the world. However, individual translations and special editions of Dostoevsky’s works are protected by copyright, just as if the author were still alive today. The translators Pevear and Volokhonsky did a great job with The Idiot in a 2004 translation, for example. But the older translations by Constance Garnett are usually fine to use.

I often come across classics like those of Dostoevsky on free e-book sites such as Project Gutenberg. These are old translations, written in outdated language. For example, even though there are free e-book versions of The Idiot on the site, I would have to purchase a modern translation, which would cost money. Even then, special collector’s editions of classics, that contain new annotations or artwork, are also copyright protected.
2025-06-04
Harper
Harper
I find copyright laws interesting. Copyright for Dostoevsky’s works has expired. The original works of Dostoevsky are no longer covered by copyright. He died over 140 years ago, and copyright typically expires 70 years after an author’s death. Hence, The Brothers Karamazov, Notes from Underground, and other of Dostoevsky’s works are now in the public domain.

However, later translations and editions of Dostoevsky’s works may still be under copyright. For example, a new translation of Demons released in 2015 would still be under copyright, as the translator and publisher (e.g. Penguin Classics or Oxford University Press) would hold the relevant rights. It’s worth checking whether the edition that you are reading is a recent translation or simply a reprint of an earlier public domain edition. Many audiobook versions and film adaptations of Dostoevsky’s works will also be under copyright.
2025-06-08
Nataly
Nataly
While books by Dostoevsky are offered as pricey ‘Collector’s Editions’ (sometimes even in leather binding with gilt edges and a fancy box for hundreds of dollars), customers are led to believe that they need to buy these expensive editions because they are not aware that the entire works by Dostoevsky are available for free on the internet. In reality, the text as such has no value from a copyright perspective. What is being sold is the object as a luxury article.
2026-08-01

Verwandte Bücher

Verwandte Fragen

Which translations of fyodor dostoevsky books are best?

6 Antworten2025-08-31
I must acknowledge that the P&V marketing machine is very good at what it does. So, you’ll find them on the cover of most classic sections in bookstores, and they are often good. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that they are the best translation of a given work, and therefore, other very good translations are dismissed solely on the basis of-store front hype. And it creates a fascinating (and totally unfair) situation in which to laud Garnett or another translator one instantly appears to be a snarky, overhyping hipster contrarian challenging the givens of mass marketing. P&V is, for many, often the only good option, for specific books, however, another translator might be offering a far more suitable translation than P&V’s. Ultimately, one serves Dostoevsky, not the translator or publishing brand.

Who publishes the best Dostoevsky book translations today?

11 Antworten2025-08-18
I have a sort of contrarian perspective here. The best translations of literature are typically the oldest published versions, from the early part of the 20th century. This is because there is so much of value in the cultural filter of a translator. The translation becomes a sort of historical document of how the literature was perceived and assimilated by the English-speaking world of that era. I have a number of these very old published versions of Dostoevsky, some of which even I wouldn’t recommend to the general reader, for reasons already mentioned, yet they are of enormous value to the literary historian. For the enthusiast of literature with an interest in reception history, the old published versions are the ‘best’ in a totally different, meta sense.

How long is book crime and punishment by fyodor dostoevsky?

10 Antworten2025-07-13
A book that benefits from marginalia. I felt like I had the most wonderful time reading this book. I underlined so much, put in so many question marks and exclamation marks, and felt that I was almost arguing with Raskolnikov on the margins of the pages. Noting down all the symbolic moments and tracking the weather and how it affected the mood of the characters was all so very worthwhile. And I felt that the length of the book was made so very meaningful by my having been an active reader, as opposed to having simply read the book. All in all, therefore, my having read this book was not simply a matter of my having logged so many hours, for in fact the time spent reading, and then thinking about and annotating what I had just read, was more than worth while. In short, I felt that I had been able to establish a most wonderful relationship with a very complex book. And if one approaches a classic such as this with the same mindset, then soon one will realize that the number of pages does not even begin to matter. For what matters is not the mere counting down of the number of pages left to read, but rather the wonderful and most superb process of understanding the book that one is reading.

Who holds the copyright for Dickens's novels today?

6 Antworten2025-07-17
The work of 19th-century writers like Dickens is generally OK to use. In the UK, works created longer than 50 years after the author’s death passed into the public domain. If we use the life plus 50 years rule currently used in the UK for works created since 1954, then for example all of Dickens’ works passed into the public domain long ago. In international agreements such as Berne this period is extended in some cases but in general terms the work of writers such as Dickens created in the 19th century is safe to use. (You can even download the whole of his bibliography from Project Gutenberg without violating any copyrights.) The ‘©’ on the cover of a new edition of a Dickens book published by someone like Oxford University Press refers to the particular edition that they have published, not to the work itself by Dickens. In other words, no one holds the copyright on the novels themselves – they’re a beautiful example of how culture becomes a shared, the public domain, commons over time.

How does book crime and punishment by fyodor dostoevsky end?

3 Antworten2025-07-13
Let’s just give some credit to poor Sonya. Rather than telling us about Raskolnikov’s experiences, Sonya gives up her entire life and goes to Siberia. Her quiet strength in the epilogue is far more powerful than Raskolnikov’s collapse. She is the anchor of the entire ending to the novel.

How many pages is Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky?

7 Antworten2025-07-13
My edition of the novel was 671 pages long, and I read it in 14 days, averaging 48 pages per day. I didn’t force myself to read a certain amount each day, but instead tried to read at about the same time every day. By doing so, I was able to sustain the mood of the novel, and maintain the necessary tension. Reading a long classic such as this can be daunting, but by setting a daily goal of, say, 30-50 pages, it becomes a pleasant daily ritual, rather than a chore. I read for about 30 minutes before bed each night, completing a chapter or two before drifting off to sleep. During the night, I would have strange and philosophical dreams. The novel would seep into my subconscious if I gave it consistent attention, and I found that the daily commitment to reading was enjoyable, rather than arduous.

What translations of Fyodor Dostoevsky The Idiot are best?

9 Antworten2025-07-16
Just as there are different interpretations of a Beethoven symphony – period-instruments performance, lush orchestral recording from mid-20th century, piano transcription, etc. – all playing the same notes but with a different timbre, tempo and overall ‘feel’ to them, Garnett being the grand, romantic orchestral recording of Beethoven’s work from the mid-20th century, P&V a period-instruments version of Beethoven’s work often jarring but attempting to be historically accurate, McDuff a crisp and clear digital recording of Beethoven’s work, Avsey being a passionate live performance of Beethoven’s work, etc. – none of them are objectively better than the others; they’re all just different interpretations of the work, and which one to go for will depend on what you’re looking for in music and/or prose.

What is the best translation of Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky?

8 Antworten2025-07-13
It’s interesting that no one has brought up the Constance Garnett translation of “Crime and Punishment” yet. While her translation is historical and oft-reprinted, reading it after P&V is like watching a movie with the contrast cranked down low. The rough edges of Garnett’s translation have all been smoothed over to make Dostoevsky’s work read like that of a slightly more agitated Jane Austen. But Dostoevsky isn’t Austen. He’s a tough, uncomfortable, and repetitive writer who dives deep into the psychological inner lives of his characters to expose their inner conflicts and psychological fears. The P&V translation has somehow managed to resurrect all of the edgey and uncomfortable aspects of Dostoevsky’s novel for English-speaking readers. While it’s true that some of the translations are a bit awkward, it’s sort of necessary in order to accurately portray the main character, Raskolnikov, as well as the dirty, sick, and oppressive city in which he lives. If you want to read a smooth and pleasant classic, then read something else. But “Crime and Punishment” is not for the faint of heart, and you’ll need a translation that isn’t afraid of the novel’s mess.

How does Fyodor Dostoevsky die in BSD?

7 Antworten2025-06-03
In the anime he had been intentionally poisoned but, in a world where everyone has magical powers, death is not permanent. In fact, the fandom is currently speculating that he may have faked his own death or possibly used his abilities to come back from the brink of death. Therefore, the how of it all may only be temporary.

Who holds the copyright for 1984 citations and quotes?

6 Antworten2025-08-01
For the original text, The Estate of George Orwell (administered by the author’s literary agent) holds the copyright until it enters the public domain: in the US this will be 2041; in life-plus-50 countries this has already occurred as of 2021. Thus, for instance, commercial, non-transformative uses involving substantial copying require permission from the author’s estate, whereas non-commercial, educational, critical, or parodic uses are likely to fall under fair use/fair dealing, although this is by no means certain. Different formats (e.g. audiobooks, translations, films) have their own copyright holders, but the ideas, titles and short phrases from the original text can be used freely as they are. (Casual, non-profit sharing is very rarely challenged for copyright infringement. Big, formal, for-profit uses should contact the agent first. Any more detail on this would be greatly appreciated – I assume this is more complex than simply “who” but I’d like to be sure I understand the main points).
Entdecke und lies gute Romane kostenlos
Kostenloser Zugriff auf zahlreiche Romane in der GoodNovel-App. Lade deine Lieblingsbücher herunter und lies jederzeit und überall.
Bücher in der App kostenlos lesen
CODE SCANNEN, UM IN DER APP ZU LESEN
DMCA.com Protection Status