9 Answers2025-08-25
Hah, I saw it coming. The main character was the CEO of his own evil empire and had been working 24/7 to maintain it, fighting fires and backstabbing people left and right. He obviously reached a point where he couldn’t take it anymore and retired to a rural setting with a low stress of living, where he can grow his own vegetables in the sun. The “villainy” of the main character was just a metaphor for the cutthroat world of business and the main character’s achievements were not about being evil, but about being able to achieve the ultimate work-life balance and retire to a cabin in the woods, fucking off and spending his days doing whatever he wants. That’s the most relatable happy ending to fiction that I’ve ever read. No emails, no meetings, no office politics. Just him, out in the sun, growing his own vegetables.
8 Answers2026-06-15
Comedy in the obsessed character department is so underrated. I just read a great parody of the genre where the princess was an utterly pragmatic and no-nonsense engineer type instead. Her responses to classic declarations of love and adoration were to tell the poor guy to sort out the water leak in one of the palace bedrooms, or to summon him to a business meeting, where she would go into battle mode over some perceived slur on her character (like being called jealous in front of a crowd of courtiers). It was brilliant, because it allowed the author to poke fun at all the obsessed character tropes, and yet still deliver the expected moments of inspiration when the princess' complete lack of romantic nonsense was proven to be her greatest quality of all, and won over her man in very sincere and unromantic fashion.
9 Answers2026-06-05
I felt cheated out of an ending to Rebirth of the Thief Who Sees Through Time. Hundreds of chapters of intrigue and complex magic systems had led me to expect a dramatic and perhaps angst-ridden conclusion but instead it was resolved by a faintly ridiculous ‘death’ that wasn’t even real. A large amount of development had gone into the Crown Prince and the Saintess’s complicated relationship – we’d seen him consider going against his own morals to save her on more than one occasion – and in the end all of that was cut down and ripped away in a few short chapters and conveniently concluded by having him retire to a small cottage in the country to spend the rest of his days in silence, his many decades of plotting and manipulations having no lasting impact on the kingdom. The entire storyline with the ‘demon king’ (in the end it was just a simple grudge that had been festering for years) had been built up over hundreds of chapters, only to be resolved in a handful of scenes of conversation in the final arc, and the chapters that followed were very rushed as the author presumably tired of the story and was meeting a deadline. A quiet ending would have been fine but it would have had to have been more fully fleshed out in order to have made sense – instead it read as lazy. The little bird that flies down at the end of the book? Unearned sentimentality.
8 Answers2025-06-09
I watched the whole series last month and, even though the ending was totally satisfying, it left me feeling kind of empty. Kind of how you feel when a friend of yours has gone through hell to get to a better place and you have to bid them farewell with the hope that they can now relax in a quieter town. You’re happy for them but you’ll miss the struggles that you went through with them. The way the practical plot of the series played out was very satisfying: the system is defeated, the true villain is defeated, Penelope is safe. But the emotional journey that the series took us on is what’s been left with me. The fear that she felt all the time, the constant calculations, her loneliness – all of that has gotten under my skin. And the ending is quiet and doesn’t even attempt to drown you in a celebration of her. It just makes you sit with her and the weight of her journey. Effective, I suppose, but not really “fun” to watch in the classical sense.
5 Answers2026-06-11
Villain patrons can be really good listeners. Tony Soprano is a great example of this from The Sopranos. The way he grasps the problems of his crew members and uses them to his advantage is a pretty messed up form of mentorship. The best kind of villain patrons are pragmatic and psychological manipulators. They may grant power to their followers, but they also grant them a sense of belonging. It can be really toxic and the followers will often stay long after it becomes obvious that it’s bad for them.
8 Answers2025-06-13
Bonus material from the author’s Patreon: This is fans’ real emotional end. A tiny speck of the monster’s original human consciousness survives the transformation and is left on a pristine planet. For eons it affects life there, guiding it in tiny ways (no eating for this monster). Eventually a species of humans evolves, and the speck of consciousness is satisfied and goes to shine like the sun it is. It’s a lovely small coda to the story of a monster returning to its human roots. Home.
6 Answers2025-12-30
This is clever. The series sets up a typical 'chosen one' story, but in the end, the adversary isn't 'the one' who won because of a prophecy. Instead, they won because they were stubborn, empathetic and refused to give in to easy solutions to deal with their enemy. The villain wasn’t a destined evil that had to be destroyed. Instead, they made terrible choices after being placed in an awful situation. The ending shows how the future is determined by human choice in the face of insurmountable odds, and how there are no destined heroes or villains. The series is a powerful humanist statement, disguised as a typical fantasy story.
9 Answers2026-02-01
I have almost no recollection of the end of this book. It’s been ages since I read it (during a long late-night reading binge), and I vaguely recall feeling somewhat fulfilled but somewhat empty afterwards, like I had just finished a huge project. Perhaps the main character stayed behind to run things or something. I should re-read this. Does anyone have a link to a good summary of this book? The discussions on this have made me consider returning to this.
9 Answers2026-04-02
There’s a time skip at the end, which shows the consequences of the protagonist’s decisions not only for them, but also for their group members and their rivals. You get to see who stayed in the industry and who left, and how all the relationships developed. So there’s a really deep sense of lived-in history, much deeper than the plot itself, and some characters get happy endings, while others get kind of realistic and complicated endings. The final image is of a group of people, and it’s a new group, but there’s a lot of old people in it too. It’s a sort of change and continuity, and it was really satisfying, because for the first time in the whole movie you get a glimpse of the future, of what’s going to happen to them outside of the spotlight.
8 Answers2026-01-07
Most people get hung up on who she ends up with in the end, but I think it’s really amazing that she ends up with herself. After regaining her memories from her past life, and garnering enough grit from surviving in this one, she’s able to build something completely her own using the knowledge she’s gained from both worlds. Her identity, past, and future are all hers again, and she’s freed herself from the deathflags/character settings that threatened to constrain her in this life as well. The romantic storylines all get wrapped up more or less satisfactorily, but ultimately, they’re all just part of her journey to arrive at this point, where she’s standing at the horizon, free to go wherever she wants. It’s a very feminist ending for a genre typically marked by the objs being conquered by their love interests.