Are There Any Major Plot Twists In 'Expiration Dates'?

I've dug around this one a fair bit because 'i contain multitudes' is such a gorgeous, intimate song that I was curious who else might have tried to bring it into their live sets. The short, practical takeaway is that, unlike Taylor Swift's big radio hits, 'i contain multitudes' hasn't been widely adopted as a regular cover across major arena tours. Its subtler, literary lyrics and chamber-folk arrangement make it a tougher one to translate into a different artist's touring set — it shows up more as a quiet, one-off spotlight for singer-songwriters or acoustic openers rather than a repeat fixture on stadium run lists. If you want concrete places to check for documented covers on tour dates, I always start with setlist.fm — it's the best crowd-sourced record of what artists actually played night by night. Searching for 'i contain multitudes' there will pull up any recorded live performances by artists who slipped it into their sets. YouTube and Instagram are also gold mines: a lot of indie artists and local acts will post single-show clips of a cover, and festival sets sometimes get uploaded by attendees. Beyond that, Spotify Live Sessions, NPR Tiny Desk offshoots, and BBC live shows occasionally surface covers from touring artists who like to mix a deep cut into an acoustic number. From what I've seen, the covers that do exist tend to come from indie folk and singer-songwriter spaces — artists who favor storytelling and looser, slower arrangements. Tribute bands and Swift-focused cover acts will obviously have it in rotation, and sometimes opening acts on smaller bills will test it out as a powerful, intimate moment. The other pattern is one-off, surprise covers during special shows: artists will throw in a Taylor deep cut as a treat rather than as a regular part of a tour setlist. Those surprise performances are often the ones that get shared and talked about because they’re rare and emotive. If you want to track down who specifically has covered 'i contain multitudes' on tour dates, my best recommendation is to search setlist.fm for confirmed performances, then cross-reference with clips on YouTube or fan-shot videos on Twitter and Instagram. Fan communities on Reddit and Discord often collect these clips too, and searching hashtags like #icontainmultitudescover or #icontainmultitudesLive can turn up recordings from small venues. It’s a bit of a scavenger hunt, but honestly that’s part of the fun — discovering a lone, haunted cover in a tiny venue recording feels special, and it’s where this song tends to live outside of Taylor’s own performances. I love hearing how different singers interpret those lyrics, so if you dig into it you’ll find some really touching takes.

On dates, I try to treat the whole thing like a small scene from one of those cozy novels I hoard on rainy afternoons — you know, a quiet coffee shop, half a pastry, and real conversation. First thing I focus on is presence: put the phone away. It sounds basic, but I used to scroll through feeds until I learned how rude it feels when someone else is looking at a screen while you talk. A simple rule I use is to check my phone only for real emergencies and let it face-down on the table if I need to glance at time. Punctuality and appearance matter to me, but not in a glossy way — I aim for being thoughtful. That means dressing in something comfortable and clean, appropriate for where we’re going, and adding one small detail that feels like me (a favorite pin, a fun scarf). When we sit down to eat, I try to be mindful: a few bites before speaking, using utensils properly, and keeping napkin etiquette in mind. If I’m unsure about unfamiliar food, I ask questions instead of making faces; curiosity is kinder than instant critique. Conversation-wise, I balance listening with sharing. I ask open questions, follow threads, and resist turning every discussion into a monologue about my latest hobby. Compliments are sincere and specific — telling someone you like the way they laugh beats a generic line every time. Money and boundaries can be awkward, so I bring it up lightly. If someone insists on paying, I say thank you and offer to cover dessert or the taxi. If splitting feels more natural, I’ll propose that upfront. Finally, I always follow up afterwards — a quick message saying I enjoyed the time and one detail that stood out. It’s a small touch that feels like sending a bookmark back after sharing a book: thoughtful and tidy. These little practices don’t make me prim or perfect, just intentional, and they let the best part of dating happen — getting to know a person without the static.

I still laugh thinking about how viral internet moments turn into Hollywood comedies. The short version is: yes, 'Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates' is inspired by a real Craigslist ad posted by two brothers, Mike and Dave Stangle, who were trying to find dates for their sister’s wedding in Hawaii. The ad went bonkers online and landed them on late-night shows and in lots of news stories, which is the seed that eventually became the movie. That said, the film is a broad, raunchy comedy rather than a faithful retelling. Zac Efron and Adam Devine play exaggerated versions of those brothers, with Anna Kendrick and Aubrey Plaza as their wild-date counterparts, and the director Luke Greenfield cranks every scene for laughs. If you dig into interviews with the real Stangles, you’ll see they laugh about the craziness but point out that many plot beats and characters are pure movie invention. So watch it for big, messy laughs and not as a documentary—then go read the original articles or interviews if you want the real, much tamer story.

If you've ever paused the credits on 'Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates' and thought, "Where is that gorgeous island?"—it's mostly Hawaii. The bulk of the movie was shot on Oahu, and a lot of the wedding/resort sequences were filmed at Turtle Bay Resort on the North Shore. I actually visited Turtle Bay a couple of years after the movie came out and could instantly picture the reception scenes; that wide beachfront and the palm-lined golf course are unmistakable on screen. Beyond Turtle Bay, the production used other spots around Oahu, including some Honolulu-area locations for city and transitional scenes. There were also a few production pick-ups done back on the mainland, so some interior or controlled-environment shots were likely finished in Los Angeles. If you love island scenery, watching 'Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates' is basically a mini-tour of Oahu with a raunchy, comedic soundtrack—perfect for a rewatch before planning a surf day.

I still laugh when I think about the chaos in 'Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates', and the little behind-the-scenes fact I always bring up is the budget. The production budget was roughly $33 million — not tiny, but also not blockbuster-level. For a raunchy comedy with recognizable stars like Zac Efron, Adam Devine, Anna Kendrick, and Aubrey Plaza, that’s pretty typical: enough to pay talent, location shoots (Hawaii in this case), stunts, and a decent production design without going overboard. Box office-wise the film did okay, pulling in somewhere around $77 million worldwide, so it recouped its production costs and then some. Marketing and distribution costs aren’t usually included in the quoted budget, so studios often need more than the production figure to break even. I always think about that when a movie seems profitable on paper but only barely — there’s a lot more money flowing into release campaigns than people realize. Honestly, I had fun watching it in a crowded theater; comedies like this don’t need massive budgets to be entertaining. If you’re curious about whether it’s worth a watch, I’d say yes — and then maybe dive into how mid-range comedy budgets get spent, because it’s surprisingly interesting to me.

I get where you're coming from — release news can be annoyingly vague sometimes. If by 'goodbook' you literally mean a specific novel or series, I’ll need the exact title to check hard facts. But if you meant something like 'Good Omens' or the more generically named 'The Good Book', here's how I personally sort this stuff out and what usually counts as a confirmed follow-up. When I follow a series, I watch for three clear signals: a publisher press release, an author post on their official socials or newsletter, and retailer pre-order pages that list ISBNs and solid dates. A casual tweet or a rumor on forums isn’t enough for me — I wait until an ISBN or a publisher page shows the release format (hardcover, ebook, audio) and date. Also keep in mind release dates can be region-specific and shift (especially for books moving from the UK to the US or for translated editions). If you tell me the exact 'goodbook' you mean, I’ll dig up any publisher announcements, ISBNs, and pre-order pages so we can nail down confirmed sequels and their current dates — I love this kind of treasure hunt and will check multiple sources so you don’t have to worry about false rumors.

As someone who spends a lot of time on BookTok, I’ve noticed a surge in books being adapted into movies, and it’s exciting to see these stories come to life on the big screen. One of the most anticipated adaptations is 'It Ends with Us' by Colleen Hoover, set to release in 2024. This emotional rollercoaster of a novel has captured hearts, and fans are eager to see Blake Lively bring Lily’s story to life. Another BookTok favorite, 'The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo' by Taylor Jenkins Reid, is also in the works, though the release date hasn’t been confirmed yet. This glamorous yet deeply moving tale of love, ambition, and sacrifice is perfect for a cinematic adaptation. Additionally, 'Red, White & Royal Blue' by Casey McQuiston, which became a sensation on BookTok, is already a Prime Video movie, released in August 2023. It’s a charming and heartwarming story that translates beautifully to the screen. Lastly, 'They Both Die at the End' by Adam Silvera, a poignant and thought-provoking novel, is set to be adapted into a movie, though the release date is still under wraps. These adaptations are a testament to the power of BookTok in bringing incredible stories to a wider audience.

Okay, let me unpack this in a way I find fun — like sketching a scene from a favorite manga where the prophet acts out a whole play. In 'Ezekiel' chapter 4 the calendar is basically built around a dramatic set-piece: you get 390 days, then 40 days. God tells Ezekiel to take a clay tile (a model of Jerusalem), lay siege to it, then lie on his left side for 390 days — the text says a day for a year, so that equals 390 years representing the house of Israel. After that he flips to his right side for 40 days, one day for one year, representing the house of Judah. So the headline dates are 390 and 40 (together 430), and the literal actions — tile, siege, lying on each side — map to those periods. There are secondary "date events" inside the chapter too: during the 390/40-period Ezekiel is to live on a very restricted ration (20 shekels of food per day and water a sixth of a hin), and after the 390 days he shaves his head and beard and divides the hair into thirds — one third burns, one third strikes with the sword, one third scatters to the wind — these actions are part of the timeline too. The key theological time markers are the 390-year and 40-year symbolic spans, anchored by those enacted days and the post-390-day hair ritual. Historically, people try to anchor these to real years (Ezekiel begins his prophecies around 593 BCE), but scholars disagree about literal calendar anchors — many treat them as symbolic year-for-day signs rather than a stopwatch you can map perfectly onto modern BCE dates.