Why Is The Marriage Fake In 'Marriage Of Convenience For A Revenge'?

In 'Marriage of Convenience for a Revenge', the fake marriage is a tactical move, plain and simple. The protagonist needs access to high society to expose the corruption that destroyed their family. By marrying into a powerful but morally bankrupt family, they gain the perfect cover to investigate without raising suspicion. The spouse agrees because they get something too—maybe social status, maybe protection from their own enemies. It's a classic deal with hidden stakes. The tension comes from balancing the charade while secretly plotting revenge, especially as real feelings start to complicate the cold calculus.

The fake marriage trope in 'Marriage of Convenience for a Revenge' is layered with psychological and social dynamics. On the surface, it's a contractual alliance: the protagonist offers their spouse political or financial leverage in exchange for entry into elite circles where their targets operate. But dig deeper, and it becomes a study in performative intimacy. Every public touch or sweet word is weaponized, designed to manipulate observers while masking the protagonist's simmering rage.

What fascinates me is how the author contrasts the marriage's glittering facade with its hollow core. Grand balls and whispered endearments exist alongside clandestine meetings where the protagonist trades stolen documents with allies. The spouse often becomes an unwitting pawn, their trust exploited until the inevitable moment the revenge plot cracks everything open. The brilliance lies in how the fake relationship forces both characters to confront their own moral compromises—the protagonist with their deception, the spouse with their complicity in systems that enabled the original injustice.

This story turns marriage into a battlefield. The fake union isn't just about revenge; it's about power redistribution. The protagonist—often disinherited or wronged—uses matrimony as legal leverage to reclaim what was stolen. Inheritance laws, social expectations, and even the spouse's reputation become tools. I love how the author plays with the irony: a institution symbolizing love becomes the perfect vehicle for vengeance.

The emotional collateral is just as compelling. Forced proximity breeds unexpected vulnerability. Shared meals and crises create bonds that the revenge plan didn't account for. Some scenes gutted me—like when the protagonist hesitates to ruin their spouse's family, realizing the person they're using is also a victim of the same corrupt system. It blurs lines between justice and cruelty, making you question who's truly paying for the sins of the past.