Why Did Milton Friedman Support School Vouchers?

2025-08-31 02:37:32

227

Seguir20

BenChat

Follower

Mechanic

4 Respostas

Quinn

Novel Fan

Pharmacist

To put it simply, I think Friedman supported vouchers because he wanted to break the public-school monopoly and give parents real choice. He believed money should follow the child, creating a market-like discipline where schools must compete to attract students. I appreciate the clarity of that idea: it ties funding to outcomes and trusts families to decide.

Of course, I also worry about practical problems — information gaps, segregation, and uneven voucher values — but Friedman's core move was to change incentives. Whether that plays out well depends on design and safeguards, which is why the policy still sparks so much argument and tinkering in my conversations with friends.

2025-09-03 07:16:28

Quincy

Book Scout

Electrician

A café debate got me sketching Friedman's voucher idea on a napkin, and that little drawing helped me see why he pushed it so hard. He was worried about a single, monopoly-run school system where funding and decisions were centralized. By proposing vouchers — public money stamped onto a certificate that parents could use at any qualified school — he wanted to shift power to families.

I like that the idea is rooted in fairness as well as efficiency: Friedman thought vouchers could give low-income kids options they otherwise lacked. He paired this with his broader preference for market solutions and minimal government control. People often point out risks like cream-skimming, segregation, or parents lacking information, and those are real. But as a thought experiment it’s persuasive: change who chooses, change incentives. If you’re into testing ideas rather than sticking to tradition, Friedman's voucher plan feels like a bold nudge worth debating further.

2025-09-04 12:37:08

Brielle

Book Scout

Police Officer

I approach Friedman's support for vouchers sort of like a policy puzzle: start with his premises, then follow the logic. He began from two main convictions — that monopolies are inefficient and that individuals (parents) are better decision-makers for their kids than distant bureaucrats. From those premises, vouchers become almost inevitable: public funds tethered to students that can be spent at different providers create competitive pressures.

Practically, Friedman's model envisioned vouchers large enough to be meaningful but still leaving room for private contributions. He argued this would raise standards because schools would have to earn enrollment. He also saw vouchers as a pro-poor reform, offering access to private education without wealthy gatekeeping. Critics countered with concerns about information asymmetry, unequal access to elite schools, and potential social sorting. My take is that his proposal is less an ironclad solution and more a framework: if you redesign incentives and accountability smartly, you can harness competition; if you ignore context, you risk entrenching inequalities. That trade-off is what makes the debate so alive.

2025-09-05 21:32:29

Steven

Sharp Observer

Lawyer

When I first dug into Milton Friedman's ideas, what struck me was how neatly the school voucher proposal fit his broader faith in markets. In 'The Role of Government in Education' and later in 'Capitalism and Freedom' he argued that public schooling, run as a near-monopoly, suffered from dulling bureaucracy and weak incentives. His basic move was simple and elegant: let the public funding follow the student, so parents — not school administrators — would be the consumers choosing where that money goes.

That choice, in his view, would create competition between schools, forcing them to be more responsive and innovative. He also believed vouchers could help poorer families access better schools, because market mechanisms don't inherently favor incumbents if designed correctly. Of course, Friedman assumed relatively good information for parents and minimal coercive regulation — assumptions critics later challenged. Still, I find the logic compelling: if you trust parents and want to break up a monopoly, vouchers are a natural policy lever. It’s not a panacea, but it’s a principled attempt to realign incentives toward quality and choice, and that idea keeps nudging public debate in interesting ways.

2025-09-06 03:55:19

Ver Todas As Respostas

Livros Relacionados

Fucked Raw By My School's Billionaire Owner

My Wife Spoils a Poor Student and Tosses Me Spare Change

From Kindergarten Scam to National-Level Payback

Fucked Raw By My School's Billionaire Owner

Mr. Anonymous

2.7K

He laid me on the sheets, climbed over me, caged me with his arms. "Last chance to run," he said, voice low. "I need the money," I whispered, feeling so tiny in his arms."You're soaking," he muttered. "Virgin or not, your pussy wants this. "I moaned, looking away, couldn’t help it, "Eyes on me, sweetheart," he pushed his tip in slowly. "Fuck," he groaned. "So tight." He fucked me like he was claiming something. "Come for me," he whispered in my ears, moving faster. "Damien," I cried out his name as I came. "That's it," he growled. After a long minute he pulled out slowly. "One night," he said again, almost like a reminder... Weeks later, I walked through the quiet hall of my school. A massive portrait stared back at me, Damien Blackwood the Principal Benefactor and Owner of Columbia University. Same man who’d just taken my virginity for money. My stomach dropped. "Oh fuck... what have I done?"

Ler Agora

The Ten-Dollar Lunch

F. Harlan

2.7K

A parent in my son's preschool group chat tagged me out of nowhere. "Theo's dad, your son's lunches always look pretty nice. Starting tomorrow, pack one for my daughter too." "I'm not asking for free food. I'll give you ten dollars a day. That adds up. You can make a little extra on the side." I stared at the message, almost laughing from how absurd it was. My son has severe food sensitivities and a fragile stomach. Every ingredient in his meals is specially sourced, and a single lunch costs far more than five hundred dollars to prepare. And this man thought ten dollars could buy it? I replied with two words: "Not happening." The next day, my son came home crying. His lunch had been taken by another child, and the teacher had scolded him for being selfish. Fine. Since they wanted to push this far, I would show them exactly how far I could go.

Ler Agora

Mom Gave Me Coupons To Survive School

Cool Husky

483

In order to stop me from spending money recklessly, my mom has exchanged my college living expenses into coupons. If I need to buy anything, I must buy it online. Also, I need to send a copy of my expenses sheet and the details behind said expenses to my mom so that she can check everything thoroughly. Only when she's given me her permission can I buy that item. When I tell my mom I want to buy a shirt, she tells me, "I remember you could still wear that shirt back in your high school days. You should just stick with it. Why waste your money on new clothes?" During winter, I can only wear the old sweater I've been wearing since my high school times while huddling in a corner of my dorm and nibbling on a sandwich. Meanwhile, my mom smugly posts a picture of the six-thousand-dollar dress she has just bought on her social media feed. "What a beautiful dress!"

Ler Agora

My Wife Spoils a Poor Student and Tosses Me Spare Change

Gigi Prosper

482

After five years of building a business with my wife, Jane Fletcher, our company finally goes public. Right after I close a big business deal, I head home in high spirits, ready to take her to meet my family. She transfers me 100 dollars with a hint of annoyance and says, "Buy yourself a decent shirt to wear for the financial conference on the day after tomorrow." The next day, Ansel Meyer—the underprivileged student she sponsors—shows up in a custom suit worth two million dollars. He says apologetically, "Mr. Crane, please do not be mad at Ms. Fletcher. She just wants to give me the best. Maybe she thinks you are used to these things, so she only gave you 100 dollars." I call Jane, but she replies impatiently, "It is just a suit. Why are you being so petty?" All of a sudden, I no longer want to continue this marriage. So, I make two calls decisively. "Hey, Mitch. I am not going to go through with that 50-million deal." "Mom, hold on to the 300-million wedding gift you prepared for your daughter-in-law."

Ler Agora

The Scholarship Trap

Dory Cat

291

The day my scholarship came through, I was about to send the money to my grandfather in the hospital. Then I suddenly heard a voice. [The Transfer System says that as long as someone eats or drinks something I give them, I can move their money away without anyone noticing.] [Julian just got his scholarship. He'll make the perfect test subject.] [If the transfer works, I can use the money to buy those sneakers I've been wanting.] That voice clearly belonged to my roommate, Caleb Foster. Puzzled, I was just about to turn around to confirm it when a bottle of water was set on my desk. Caleb smiled warmly and said, "Julian, thanks for picking up my package yesterday. Here, have some water." A second later, his delighted inner voice rang out again. [Drink it. Drink it. Once you drink this water, your money will be mine!] Seeing the expectation and greed he couldn't hide in his eyes, fury rose from the bottom of my heart. He knew full well that scholarship was my grandfather's life-saving money. I took the bottle with a blank expression. He wanted to transfer my money away? Then I'd make sure he transferred more than he could handle.

Ler Agora

From Kindergarten Scam to National-Level Payback

Swinger

294

While on vacation, I return to my hometown to help my parents harvest pears. After seeing my Instagram post, my son's homeroom teacher, Ernest Dugan, sends me a private message. "So you sell pears, Mr. Miller? The kindergarten hasn't finalized next month's fruit supplier yet, so we'll order from you. You won't suffer any loss from this deal. I'll pay five dollars per pound. You just need to arrange transportation and deliver them to the kindergarten." I almost laugh out loud. My family's pears are the famous Green Jewel variety; they are known as the "Hermes of pears". They sell for over 100 dollars per pound on average. Five dollars wouldn't even cover the cost of a single pear. Even though Ernest is being ridiculous, I still reply politely, "Sorry, all of our pears are reserved. You'll need to find another supplier." To my surprise, Ernest immediately posts photos of my family's pears in the parent group chat. He writes, "Next month's fruit selection for the kindergarten will be upgraded to Green Jewel pears. If anyone wishes to buy some for personal consumption, feel free to place orders below. The price is five dollars per pound." The chat group buzzes with activity as parents rush to place orders one after another. Three days later, they block the truck carrying my shipment to Windford. Determined to force the sale, they surround the vehicle and refuse to let it leave. Before they can ransack the truck, several military-plated vehicles arrive and seal off the road. A group of officials steps out with stern, angry expressions. One of them coldly demands, "These are pears specially ordered for this weekend's state banquet. Who said you could lay a finger on them?"

Ler Agora

Perguntas Relacionadas

How did milton friedman shape the Chicago School of economics?

4 Respostas2025-08-31 21:09:54

I got hooked on this topic after a college seminar that left me scribbling in the margins, and I still love how Milton Friedman’s voice changed the whole skyline of economic thought. Friedman pushed the Chicago School toward a rigorous, empirical, and market-friendly approach. He insisted that real people making choices—methodological individualism—should be the starting point, not abstract aggregates. His work on monetarism, especially in 'A Monetary History of the United States' (with Anna Schwartz), reframed how economists think about inflation, money supply, and expectations. That book made the case that monetary policy, if mismanaged, causes big macro swings. He also introduced the permanent income hypothesis, reshaping consumption theory away from simple Keynesian short-run propensities. Beyond theory, he loved natural experiments and clear statistics; he treated policy like a hypothesis to be tested, which encouraged Chicago economists to favor crisp, data-driven arguments. On the policy side, Friedman's advocacy for things like floating exchange rates, school vouchers, and a monetary rule nudged the School toward libertarian-leaning policy solutions. His students and peers turned that method and ideology into a durable culture: focus on prices, incentives, and markets, plus a healthy skepticism of government intervention. For me, his blend of empirical rigor and public engagement made economics feel alive and relevant.

How did milton friedman respond to Keynesian economics?

4 Respostas2025-08-31 03:04:37

When I first dug into the history of macro debates, Friedman's response to Keynes felt like watching a calm but relentless counterargument unfold. He didn't throw out Keynes's observations entirely — he acknowledged short-run demand effects — but he reframed the mechanism. Friedman put the spotlight on money: the quantity theory, stable velocity assumptions (with caveats), and the idea that changes in the money supply play a decisive role in nominal income and inflation. His empirical work with Anna Schwartz in 'A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960' was his hammer, showing correlations between money growth and economic fluctuations that, to him, Keynesian fiscal prescriptions overlooked. Beyond empirical claims, Friedman attacked the theoretical underpinnings. He introduced the 'permanent income' view of consumption to challenge the Keynesian consumption function, and he developed the natural rate hypothesis: monetary policy can only change unemployment in the short run because people form expectations. That led to his critique of the Phillips curve — inflation and unemployment trade-offs vanish once expectations adjust. Practically, he favored monetary rules (think the k-percent rule) and limited discretionary fiscal activism. Reading his debates gives me chills — it's the kind of intellectual sparring that reshaped policy for decades, and it still colors how I read every central bank statement.

What were milton friedman's main critiques of minimum wage?

11 Respostas2025-08-31 04:26:53

I still get a little thrill when I dig into economists who write clearly, and Friedman's critiques of minimum wage always feel like one of those sharp, readable takes. In plain terms he argued that a minimum wage is a price floor on labor: set the wage above the market-clearing level and you get a surplus — in this case, unemployment. He stressed that the people who lose jobs are often the least experienced workers, like teenagers or those with fewer skills, because employers respond to higher mandated wages by hiring fewer new or risky workers. He also liked to point out the substitution and adjustment effects: employers can cut hours, reduce fringe benefits and training, raise prices, or accelerate automation. Those downstream changes can make the policy hit the very people it’s supposed to help. Friedman preferred targeting poverty through mechanisms that don’t distort hiring incentives — famously advocating a negative income tax (a guaranteed subsidy) rather than a blunt wage floor. Reading that in 'Free to Choose' felt like reading someone trying to design a repair instead of just slapping on a sticker — pragmatic and a bit provocative, at least to me.

Which books did milton friedman write about capitalism?

4 Respostas2025-08-31 13:10:49

I got hooked on Friedman during a long flight when someone across the aisle was reading 'Capitalism and Freedom' and the cover caught my eye. That book is the centerpiece — short, punchy, and full of arguments tying economic freedom to political liberty. It’s where Friedman lays out his case for limited government, school vouchers, and a volunteer military, and it’s the best place to start if you want his big-picture take on capitalism. After that I dove into 'Free to Choose' (written with Rose Friedman), which feels more conversational and was made alongside the TV series of the same name. It expands on the everyday implications of market choices and public policy in accessible language. For readers who like collections, 'There's No Such Thing as a Free Lunch' gathers columns and essays that show Friedman reacting to contemporary issues, often with sharp, memorable lines. If you want deeper, more technical work connected to capitalism’s underpinnings, there's 'A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960' (with Anna J. Schwartz) and essay collections like 'The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays'. For a critique of policy inertia look to 'Tyranny of the Status Quo' (also coauthored with Rose). I keep returning to different ones depending on whether I’m looking for philosophy, rhetoric, or historical evidence — each has its own flavor and value.

What is the most controversial argument in Milton Friedman books?

4 Respostas2025-07-28 03:57:18

Milton Friedman's works are packed with provocative ideas, but the most controversial argument has to be his staunch defense of free-market capitalism in 'Capitalism and Freedom.' He argues that government intervention, even with good intentions, often does more harm than good. This includes social welfare programs, which he believes create dependency rather than empowerment. His views on deregulation, especially in industries like healthcare and education, have sparked heated debates for decades. Another polarizing stance is his support for school vouchers, suggesting parents should choose schools rather than relying on public education. Critics argue this would deepen inequality, while supporters see it as a path to competition and improvement. Friedman's belief that corporations should focus solely on profit ('The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits') also draws ire, as many feel businesses must consider societal impact. His ideas remain lightning rods in economic discourse.

What did milton friedman propose about monetary policy?

4 Respostas2025-08-31 01:41:09

I've been chewing on Friedman's ideas for years, partly because I first bumped into them while leafing through 'A Monetary History of the United States' on a rainy commute. He basically flipped the script on the old Keynesian idea that fiscal policy and managing demand could reliably steer unemployment and inflation. What he proposed, in plain terms, was that the central bank should focus on controlling the money supply rather than trying to fine-tune the economy with discretionary moves. His well-known prescription was the k-percent rule: let the money supply grow at a steady, predictable rate roughly equal to real GDP growth, and avoid big, surprise interventions. Friedman also argued that inflation is fundamentally a monetary phenomenon — that is, sustained inflation arises when the money supply expands faster than the economy can absorb. He emphasized long and variable lags in monetary policy, which made activist tinkering dangerous and often destabilizing. Practically, this pushed for central bank rules and transparency, and it underpinned critiques of the Phillips curve trade-off between inflation and unemployment. Reading his work made me think differently about central banking: stability and predictability beat frantic adjustments any day.

How did milton friedman influence Reagan's economic policies?

4 Respostas2025-08-31 10:48:05

Watching old interviews of Milton Friedman always gives me a bit of a thrill — it's like watching a masterclass in economic conviction. Friedman pushed the idea that inflation is primarily a monetary phenomenon, and that simple, predictable rules for money supply and low government interference produce better outcomes. Those core beliefs nudged Reagan away from the Keynesian, demand-management playbook that dominated mid-century politics. Practically, Reagan embraced elements that matched Friedman's market-first instincts: big tax cuts, an enthusiasm for deregulation, and a rhetorical commitment to smaller government. Friedman’s book 'Capitalism and Freedom' and his earlier work 'A Monetary History of the United States' were frequently cited by the administration and conservative intellectuals who shaped policy debates. The administration also backed tough anti-inflation moves by the Fed, which echoed Friedman's monetarist warnings. Still, the match wasn't perfect. Friedman favored strict monetary rules and worried about chronic deficits — and Reagan presided over large federal deficits and didn’t adopt a fixed money-growth rule. So what stuck most was the philosophical shift toward free markets and skepticism of expansive fiscal programs, while the practical blend of policies was more of a political compromise than pure doctrinal adoption.

What is Milton Friedman's argument in 'Capitalism and Freedom'?

3 Respostas2025-06-17 09:35:30

Milton Friedman's 'Capitalism and Freedom' is a punchy manifesto for free markets with minimal government interference. He argues that economic freedom is essential for political freedom—when governments control economies, individual liberties shrink. Friedman champions voluntary exchange over coercion, showing how competitive markets distribute resources better than central planners. His famous examples include school vouchers (let parents choose) and negative income tax (simpler than welfare bureaucracies). He dismantles ideas like licensing laws, calling them cartels that hurt consumers. The book’s core message: decentralized decision-making through prices creates prosperity while preserving human dignity. If you dig libertarian thought, this is foundational stuff—clear, provocative, and packed with real-world cases.

Has any Milton Friedman book been adapted into a documentary?

4 Respostas2025-07-28 00:47:26

As a longtime follower of economic thought and media adaptations, I can confirm that Milton Friedman's influential book 'Capitalism and Freedom' served as the foundation for the documentary series 'Free to Choose,' which he co-created with his wife, Rose Friedman. This multi-part series, first aired in 1980, explores the principles of free-market economics and individual liberty, topics central to Friedman's work. The series was groundbreaking, blending academic rigor with accessible storytelling, making complex economic ideas understandable to a broad audience. 'Free to Choose' not only adapted Friedman's written arguments into a visual format but also expanded on them with real-world examples and debates. The series remains a seminal piece for anyone interested in economics, and its impact is still felt today. Friedman's charismatic presence and clear explanations helped cement his reputation as one of the most effective communicators of free-market ideas. The documentary is a must-watch for fans of his work or anyone curious about the intersection of economics and public policy.

When did milton friedman win the Nobel Prize in economics?

4 Respostas2025-08-31 09:25:24

1976 — that’s when Milton Friedman received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. I still get a little thrill whenever I look up that citation: it was awarded "for his achievements in the fields of consumption analysis, monetary history and theory, and for his demonstration of the complexity of stabilization policy." That line always feels like a snapshot of an intense career, crammed into a single sentence. I’ve spent lazy afternoons rereading passages from 'Capitalism and Freedom' and skimming 'A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960' (his monumental collaboration with Anna Schwartz) while sipping bad coffee. Seeing the prize year next to his name connects the dots between his academic work in the 1950s and 1960s and the political debates of the 1970s. It’s interesting how a date — 1976 — becomes a little anchor for conversations about monetarism, the decline of Keynesian dominance, and the broader cultural shifts toward market-oriented policies. If you’re curious about the why as well as the when, that Nobel citation is a neat doorway: consumption theory, monetary history, and stabilization policy — three lenses through which he reshaped modern macroeconomic thought. I tend to flip to specific chapters that irritate my friends and make them think twice, which is always fun.