Library

Why Did Milton Friedman Support School Vouchers?

2025-08-31 02:37:32 137

4 Answers

Quinn

2025-09-03 07:16:28

To put it simply, I think Friedman supported vouchers because he wanted to break the public-school monopoly and give parents real choice. He believed money should follow the child, creating a market-like discipline where schools must compete to attract students. I appreciate the clarity of that idea: it ties funding to outcomes and trusts families to decide.

Of course, I also worry about practical problems — information gaps, segregation, and uneven voucher values — but Friedman's core move was to change incentives. Whether that plays out well depends on design and safeguards, which is why the policy still sparks so much argument and tinkering in my conversations with friends.

Quincy

2025-09-04 12:37:08

A café debate got me sketching Friedman's voucher idea on a napkin, and that little drawing helped me see why he pushed it so hard. He was worried about a single, monopoly-run school system where funding and decisions were centralized. By proposing vouchers — public money stamped onto a certificate that parents could use at any qualified school — he wanted to shift power to families.

I like that the idea is rooted in fairness as well as efficiency: Friedman thought vouchers could give low-income kids options they otherwise lacked. He paired this with his broader preference for market solutions and minimal government control. People often point out risks like cream-skimming, segregation, or parents lacking information, and those are real. But as a thought experiment it’s persuasive: change who chooses, change incentives. If you’re into testing ideas rather than sticking to tradition, Friedman's voucher plan feels like a bold nudge worth debating further.

Brielle

2025-09-05 21:32:29

I approach Friedman's support for vouchers sort of like a policy puzzle: start with his premises, then follow the logic. He began from two main convictions — that monopolies are inefficient and that individuals (parents) are better decision-makers for their kids than distant bureaucrats. From those premises, vouchers become almost inevitable: public funds tethered to students that can be spent at different providers create competitive pressures.

Practically, Friedman's model envisioned vouchers large enough to be meaningful but still leaving room for private contributions. He argued this would raise standards because schools would have to earn enrollment. He also saw vouchers as a pro-poor reform, offering access to private education without wealthy gatekeeping. Critics countered with concerns about information asymmetry, unequal access to elite schools, and potential social sorting. My take is that his proposal is less an ironclad solution and more a framework: if you redesign incentives and accountability smartly, you can harness competition; if you ignore context, you risk entrenching inequalities. That trade-off is what makes the debate so alive.

Steven

2025-09-06 03:55:19

When I first dug into Milton Friedman's ideas, what struck me was how neatly the school voucher proposal fit his broader faith in markets. In 'The Role of Government in Education' and later in 'Capitalism and Freedom' he argued that public schooling, run as a near-monopoly, suffered from dulling bureaucracy and weak incentives. His basic move was simple and elegant: let the public funding follow the student, so parents — not school administrators — would be the consumers choosing where that money goes.

That choice, in his view, would create competition between schools, forcing them to be more responsive and innovative. He also believed vouchers could help poorer families access better schools, because market mechanisms don't inherently favor incumbents if designed correctly. Of course, Friedman assumed relatively good information for parents and minimal coercive regulation — assumptions critics later challenged. Still, I find the logic compelling: if you trust parents and want to break up a monopoly, vouchers are a natural policy lever. It’s not a panacea, but it’s a principled attempt to realign incentives toward quality and choice, and that idea keeps nudging public debate in interesting ways.

View All Answers

Related Books

Why did she " Divorce Me "

Two unknown people tide in an unwanted bond .. marriage bond . It's an arrange marriage , both got married .. Amoli the female lead .. she took vows of marriage with her heart that she will be loyal and always give her everything to make this marriage work although she was against this relationship . On the other hands Varun the male lead ... He vowed that he will go any extent to make this marriage broken .. After the marriage Varun struggle to take divorce from his wife while Amoli never give any ears to her husband's divorce demand , At last Varun kissed the victory by getting divorce papers in his hands but there is a confusion in his head that what made his wife to change her hard skull mind not to give divorce to give divorce ... With this one question arise in his head ' why did she " Divorce Me " .. ' .

9.1

55 Chapters

Support System

Jadie is the only daughter of the Beta family. The youngest of three, Jadie feels out of place in her home. When she decides to move across country to find herself, the last thing she expected to happen was for her to not only run into her mate, but to be rejected by him too. With a clouded vision of her future, the only way Jadie can be pulled out of her gloomy state is to befriend his best friend and Alpha, Lincoln. With Lincoln’s help, Jadie adventures to find her new version of normal and fulfill the true reason she moved to Michigan. Along the way, secrets of Lincoln’s are revealed that make her realize they are a lot closer than she ever thought.

Not enough ratings

28 Chapters

Why Mr CEO, Why Me

She came to Australia from India to achieve her dreams, but an innocent visit to the notorious kings street in Sydney changed her life. From an international exchange student/intern (in a small local company) to Madam of Chen's family, one of the most powerful families in the world, her life took a 180-degree turn. She couldn’t believe how her fate got twisted this way with the most dangerous and noble man, who until now was resistant to the women. The key thing was that she was not very keen to the change her life like this. Even when she was rotten spoiled by him, she was still not ready to accept her identity as the wife of this ridiculously man.

9.7

62 Chapters

Why Me?

Why Me? Have you ever questioned this yourself? Bullying -> Love -> Hatred -> Romance -> Friendship -> Harassment -> Revenge -> Forgiving -> ... The story is about a girl who is oversized or fat. She rarely has any friends. She goes through lots of hardships in her life, be in her family or school or high school or her love life. The story starts from her school life and it goes on. But with all those hardships, will she give up? Or will she be able to survive and make herself stronger? Will she be able to make friends? Will she get love? <<…So, I was swayed for a moment." His words were like bullets piercing my heart. I still could not believe what he was saying, I grabbed his shirt and asked with tears in my eyes, "What about the time... the time we spent together? What about everything we did together? What about…" He interrupted me as he made his shirt free from my hand looked at the side she was and said, "It was a time pass for me. Just look at her and look at yourself in the mirror. I love her. I missed her. I did not feel anything for you. I just played with you. Do you think a fatty like you deserves me? Ha-ha, did you really think I loved a hippo like you? ">> P.S.> The cover's original does not belong to me.

107 Chapters

WHY ME

Eighteen-year-old Ayesha dreams of pursuing her education and building a life on her own terms. But when her traditional family arranges her marriage to Arman, the eldest son of a wealthy and influential family, her world is turned upside down. Stripped of her independence and into a household where she is treated as an outsider, Ayesha quickly learns that her worth is seen only in terms of what she can provide—not who she is. Arman, cold and distant, seems to care little for her struggles, and his family spares no opportunity to remind Ayesha of her "place." Despite their cruelty, she refuses to be crushed. With courage and determination, Ayesha begins to carve out her own identity, even in the face of hostility. As tensions rise and secrets within the household come to light, Ayesha is faced with a choice: remain trapped in a marriage that diminishes her, or fight for the freedom and self-respect she deserves. Along the way, she discovers that strength can be found in the most unexpected places—and that love, even in its most fragile form, can transform and heal. Why Me is a heart-wrenching story of resilience, self-discovery, and the power of standing up for oneself, set against the backdrop of tradition and societal expectations. is a poignant and powerful exploration of resilience, identity, and the battle for autonomy. Set against the backdrop of tradition and societal expectations, it is a moving story of finding hope, strength, and love in the darkest of times.But at the end she will find LOVE.

Not enough ratings

160 Chapters

School Days

The air between them became hotter as she bit her lip, trying to stop herself from smiling so much. The closet was dark and stuffy, so small that their bodies were almost touching, her heart thumped like crazy. "D-Derek" She called out as he hummed in response, holding unto his sides for some unknown reason. "Will you be my boyfriend?" She blurted out, closing her eyes so she wouldn't see his reaction, he groaned, it almost broke her heart but when she looked down, she saw his shirt was now soaked. Blood trailing down his abdomen which made her gasp, slamming open the closet door. "Somebody call an ambulance!" She yelled as the guy she had just asked out dropped limp to the ground like a pack of soggy spaghetti. *A Nigerian themed novel* |16+

34 Chapters

Related Questions

Which Books Did Milton Friedman Write About Capitalism?

4 Answers2025-08-31 13:10:49

I got hooked on Friedman during a long flight when someone across the aisle was reading 'Capitalism and Freedom' and the cover caught my eye. That book is the centerpiece — short, punchy, and full of arguments tying economic freedom to political liberty. It’s where Friedman lays out his case for limited government, school vouchers, and a volunteer military, and it’s the best place to start if you want his big-picture take on capitalism. After that I dove into 'Free to Choose' (written with Rose Friedman), which feels more conversational and was made alongside the TV series of the same name. It expands on the everyday implications of market choices and public policy in accessible language. For readers who like collections, 'There's No Such Thing as a Free Lunch' gathers columns and essays that show Friedman reacting to contemporary issues, often with sharp, memorable lines. If you want deeper, more technical work connected to capitalism’s underpinnings, there's 'A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960' (with Anna J. Schwartz) and essay collections like 'The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays'. For a critique of policy inertia look to 'Tyranny of the Status Quo' (also coauthored with Rose). I keep returning to different ones depending on whether I’m looking for philosophy, rhetoric, or historical evidence — each has its own flavor and value.

Has Any Milton Friedman Book Been Adapted Into A Documentary?

4 Answers2025-07-28 00:47:26

As a longtime follower of economic thought and media adaptations, I can confirm that Milton Friedman's influential book 'Capitalism and Freedom' served as the foundation for the documentary series 'Free to Choose,' which he co-created with his wife, Rose Friedman. This multi-part series, first aired in 1980, explores the principles of free-market economics and individual liberty, topics central to Friedman's work. The series was groundbreaking, blending academic rigor with accessible storytelling, making complex economic ideas understandable to a broad audience. 'Free to Choose' not only adapted Friedman's written arguments into a visual format but also expanded on them with real-world examples and debates. The series remains a seminal piece for anyone interested in economics, and its impact is still felt today. Friedman's charismatic presence and clear explanations helped cement his reputation as one of the most effective communicators of free-market ideas. The documentary is a must-watch for fans of his work or anyone curious about the intersection of economics and public policy.

What Is The Most Controversial Argument In Milton Friedman Books?

4 Answers2025-07-28 03:57:18

Milton Friedman's works are packed with provocative ideas, but the most controversial argument has to be his staunch defense of free-market capitalism in 'Capitalism and Freedom.' He argues that government intervention, even with good intentions, often does more harm than good. This includes social welfare programs, which he believes create dependency rather than empowerment. His views on deregulation, especially in industries like healthcare and education, have sparked heated debates for decades. Another polarizing stance is his support for school vouchers, suggesting parents should choose schools rather than relying on public education. Critics argue this would deepen inequality, while supporters see it as a path to competition and improvement. Friedman's belief that corporations should focus solely on profit ('The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits') also draws ire, as many feel businesses must consider societal impact. His ideas remain lightning rods in economic discourse.

What Did Milton Friedman Propose About Monetary Policy?

4 Answers2025-08-31 01:41:09

I've been chewing on Friedman's ideas for years, partly because I first bumped into them while leafing through 'A Monetary History of the United States' on a rainy commute. He basically flipped the script on the old Keynesian idea that fiscal policy and managing demand could reliably steer unemployment and inflation. What he proposed, in plain terms, was that the central bank should focus on controlling the money supply rather than trying to fine-tune the economy with discretionary moves. His well-known prescription was the k-percent rule: let the money supply grow at a steady, predictable rate roughly equal to real GDP growth, and avoid big, surprise interventions. Friedman also argued that inflation is fundamentally a monetary phenomenon — that is, sustained inflation arises when the money supply expands faster than the economy can absorb. He emphasized long and variable lags in monetary policy, which made activist tinkering dangerous and often destabilizing. Practically, this pushed for central bank rules and transparency, and it underpinned critiques of the Phillips curve trade-off between inflation and unemployment. Reading his work made me think differently about central banking: stability and predictability beat frantic adjustments any day.

How Did Milton Friedman Respond To Keynesian Economics?

4 Answers2025-08-31 03:04:37

When I first dug into the history of macro debates, Friedman's response to Keynes felt like watching a calm but relentless counterargument unfold. He didn't throw out Keynes's observations entirely — he acknowledged short-run demand effects — but he reframed the mechanism. Friedman put the spotlight on money: the quantity theory, stable velocity assumptions (with caveats), and the idea that changes in the money supply play a decisive role in nominal income and inflation. His empirical work with Anna Schwartz in 'A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960' was his hammer, showing correlations between money growth and economic fluctuations that, to him, Keynesian fiscal prescriptions overlooked. Beyond empirical claims, Friedman attacked the theoretical underpinnings. He introduced the 'permanent income' view of consumption to challenge the Keynesian consumption function, and he developed the natural rate hypothesis: monetary policy can only change unemployment in the short run because people form expectations. That led to his critique of the Phillips curve — inflation and unemployment trade-offs vanish once expectations adjust. Practically, he favored monetary rules (think the k-percent rule) and limited discretionary fiscal activism. Reading his debates gives me chills — it's the kind of intellectual sparring that reshaped policy for decades, and it still colors how I read every central bank statement.

When Did Milton Friedman Win The Nobel Prize In Economics?

4 Answers2025-08-31 09:25:24

1976 — that’s when Milton Friedman received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. I still get a little thrill whenever I look up that citation: it was awarded "for his achievements in the fields of consumption analysis, monetary history and theory, and for his demonstration of the complexity of stabilization policy." That line always feels like a snapshot of an intense career, crammed into a single sentence. I’ve spent lazy afternoons rereading passages from 'Capitalism and Freedom' and skimming 'A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960' (his monumental collaboration with Anna Schwartz) while sipping bad coffee. Seeing the prize year next to his name connects the dots between his academic work in the 1950s and 1960s and the political debates of the 1970s. It’s interesting how a date — 1976 — becomes a little anchor for conversations about monetarism, the decline of Keynesian dominance, and the broader cultural shifts toward market-oriented policies. If you’re curious about the why as well as the when, that Nobel citation is a neat doorway: consumption theory, monetary history, and stabilization policy — three lenses through which he reshaped modern macroeconomic thought. I tend to flip to specific chapters that irritate my friends and make them think twice, which is always fun.

Which Policies Did Milton Friedman Recommend For Inflation Control?

4 Answers2025-08-31 06:40:28

I get a little giddy whenever someone brings up inflation because Milton Friedman’s take is so clean and provocative. He boiled it down to a simple principle: inflation is 'always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.' Practically, that meant he wanted central banks to stop letting the money supply grow too fast. His big prescription was a steady rule for money growth—often called the k-percent rule—where the central bank increases the money supply at a constant, predictable rate tied to the economy’s long-run output growth. Beyond that technical bit, Friedman pushed for central bank discipline: limit discretionary meddling, aim for price stability, and avoid short-term political objectives that let governments run big deficits. He also opposed wage and price controls as false fixes and argued that sometimes you need a tighter monetary policy even if it causes short-term pain like higher unemployment, because letting inflation expectations become entrenched makes things worse later. I think his ideas still spark debate today: some prefer flexible rules like nominal GDP targeting, but Friedman's insistence on predictable money growth and fiscal prudence really reshaped how we think about taming inflation—and it’s why I keep a copy of 'The Monetarist View' in my mental bookshelf whenever someone claims inflation can be solved by one-off controls.

How Did Milton Friedman Shape The Chicago School Of Economics?

4 Answers2025-08-31 21:09:54

I got hooked on this topic after a college seminar that left me scribbling in the margins, and I still love how Milton Friedman’s voice changed the whole skyline of economic thought. Friedman pushed the Chicago School toward a rigorous, empirical, and market-friendly approach. He insisted that real people making choices—methodological individualism—should be the starting point, not abstract aggregates. His work on monetarism, especially in 'A Monetary History of the United States' (with Anna Schwartz), reframed how economists think about inflation, money supply, and expectations. That book made the case that monetary policy, if mismanaged, causes big macro swings. He also introduced the permanent income hypothesis, reshaping consumption theory away from simple Keynesian short-run propensities. Beyond theory, he loved natural experiments and clear statistics; he treated policy like a hypothesis to be tested, which encouraged Chicago economists to favor crisp, data-driven arguments. On the policy side, Friedman's advocacy for things like floating exchange rates, school vouchers, and a monetary rule nudged the School toward libertarian-leaning policy solutions. His students and peers turned that method and ideology into a durable culture: focus on prices, incentives, and markets, plus a healthy skepticism of government intervention. For me, his blend of empirical rigor and public engagement made economics feel alive and relevant.

Why Did Milton Friedman Support School Vouchers?

4 Answers

Related Books

Related Questions

Which Books Did Milton Friedman Write About Capitalism?

Has Any Milton Friedman Book Been Adapted Into A Documentary?

What Is The Most Controversial Argument In Milton Friedman Books?

What Did Milton Friedman Propose About Monetary Policy?

How Did Milton Friedman Respond To Keynesian Economics?

When Did Milton Friedman Win The Nobel Prize In Economics?

Which Policies Did Milton Friedman Recommend For Inflation Control?

How Did Milton Friedman Shape The Chicago School Of Economics?

Popular Question

What Is The Twist In 'Never Look Back'?

How Does Dark Gothic Romance Differ From Regular Romance?

Does Love For Romance Have A Manga Version?

Can I Read Light Novels Online Through Sunland-Tujunga Library?

Do Greenville Library Hours Include Late-Night Study?

Which Romance Novels Have Been Adapted Into Movies Recently?

Who Is The Protagonist In 'Stiff'?

After The Finale Who Is The Strongest Demon In Chainsaw Man?

Is There An Anime Adaptation Of Library Of Babel Books?

Why Is 'Beloved' Considered A Masterpiece Of Magical Realism?

Popular Searches More