Why Did Nietzsche Initially Admire Schopenhauer?

2025-07-04 06:46:02 78

4 Answers

Yasmine
Yasmine
2025-07-08 00:13:59
Nietzsche's admiration for Schopenhauer was profound and multifaceted. Initially, he was drawn to Schopenhauer's philosophy because it offered a stark, unflinching view of the world that resonated with his own disillusionment with traditional values. Schopenhauer's concept of the 'will' as the driving force behind existence struck a chord with Nietzsche, who saw it as a refreshing departure from the optimistic idealism of his time.

Schopenhauer's emphasis on the suffering inherent in life and his critique of rationalism provided Nietzsche with a framework to challenge prevailing moral and metaphysical assumptions. Additionally, Schopenhauer's literary style, which was both accessible and deeply evocative, made his ideas particularly appealing to Nietzsche, who himself aspired to write philosophy that was as compelling as it was insightful. This initial admiration laid the groundwork for Nietzsche's later, more critical engagement with Schopenhauer's ideas.
Bella
Bella
2025-07-07 09:37:18
As someone who has spent years studying philosophy, I find Nietzsche's early admiration for Schopenhauer fascinating. Nietzsche was captivated by Schopenhauer's pessimistic worldview, which contrasted sharply with the dominant Hegelian optimism of the 19th century. Schopenhauer's idea that life is fundamentally driven by an irrational, insatiable will resonated deeply with Nietzsche, who was searching for a philosophy that acknowledged the darker aspects of human existence. Schopenhauer's influence can be seen in Nietzsche's early works, where he explores themes of suffering, art, and the denial of the will. Over time, however, Nietzsche began to critique Schopenhauer's resignation and developed his own, more life-affirming philosophy.
Jackson
Jackson
2025-07-08 17:14:29
Nietzsche admired Schopenhauer because he saw in him a kindred spirit who dared to confront the harsh realities of life. Schopenhauer's philosophy was a breath of fresh air for Nietzsche, who was disillusioned with the superficial optimism of his contemporaries. The idea that life is driven by a blind, striving will and that suffering is inevitable appealed to Nietzsche's sense of honesty and depth. Schopenhauer's focus on the individual's inner experience and his rejection of societal conventions also aligned with Nietzsche's growing skepticism of collective values. This admiration was a pivotal moment in Nietzsche's intellectual development, shaping his later works.
Gavin
Gavin
2025-07-06 21:35:12
Nietzsche initially admired Schopenhauer for his bold and uncompromising worldview. Schopenhauer's assertion that life is filled with suffering and that the will is a ceaseless, irrational force resonated with Nietzsche's own observations. Schopenhauer's critique of rationality and his emphasis on the primacy of the will provided Nietzsche with a new lens through which to view human existence. This admiration was short-lived, as Nietzsche eventually rejected Schopenhauer's pessimism, but it undeniably influenced his early philosophical trajectory.
Tingnan ang Lahat ng Sagot
I-scan ang code upang i-download ang App

Kaugnay na Mga Aklat

OBSESS BY AN ALPHA & ADMIRE BY ANOTHER
OBSESS BY AN ALPHA & ADMIRE BY ANOTHER
Rejecting her one true mate, Alpha Anton Bates, after all the horrible things he and his father had put her through. Nala thought moving into a new land and studying to become a doctor, her life would run smoothly, and she would have a wonderful new start, but it is not as she seems. Her being away from Alpha Anton his love for her has turned into an obsession one that is not healthy for him and dangerous for Nala. But that is not all happening within poor Nala's life. While trying to ignore her alpha mate another alpha's eyes met her. How will Nala get away from these two now or does she don't want one to leave her side. "Get engross in an intriguing read." FACEBOOK PAGE: A.K.KNIGHT INSTAGRAM: ATHAN941
9.3
39 Mga Kabanata
Yes Master
Yes Master
Anita, a woman as thick as pudding and quirky as a genius because she was one, meets the man of her dreams after she has to step back from her job as a surgeon. You would think that her accident was the end of her story but it just became her new beginning. While learning that the main characters in horror stories do exist, she falls in love with a werewolf with a strong liking for BDSM and making her panties wet with just a look. Anita soon discovers through her contact with Andrew, the main ML, that she has been living a lie all these years, but when she finally finds out what makes her so different from her family members, she overhears Andrew talking about a situation that has far-reaching consequences for both humans and supernatural creatures. Anita joins forces with Andrew to set things right before it is too late while falling deeper in love with her wolf and embracing her quirks which may be the only solution to save everybody. Our FL also has to deal with crazy bitches who believe that Andrew could do better, but Anita refutes those claims adamantly. How could Andrew find somebody as cute and as resourceful as her? Plus, she already licked him, so he belongs to her as much as she belongs to him.
Hindi Sapat ang Ratings
15 Mga Kabanata
Tomboy and her admirer
Tomboy and her admirer
Grace, a nerd who has liked her bully, Ava, for 2 years but is sure to be not liked back by her. One day, that tomboy comes close to her and helps her when she's at her limit. Grace is confused by the sudden change in her behaviour but doesn't complain and they become good friends. Before knowing, Ava is head over heels in love with her. But Grace has a lot of secrets buried in her heart and she's not ready to tell her any of it and thus keeps lying to her. Ava, on the other hand, is a narcissist and hates when things don't go her way or when people use her. Their opposite personalities create differences between them. Will Ava the playgirl be able to stay loyal to her? Will Grace be able to overcome her fears and live her life on her own rules? And the biggest question, Will they rise or fall in love?
9.8
58 Mga Kabanata
My Secret Admirer
My Secret Admirer
[NOVEL FEATURES MATURE CONTENT] I was walking aimlessly down the lonely street in the cold night, thinking what all just happened when suddenly I saw a black car madly speeding towards me and stopped right beside me. A dark figure stepped out. He was wearing a long coat, a hat and a mask. It all happened so quickly that before I could react I felt a hand grabbing my waist and the other covered my mouth with cloth. That's definitely anesthesia! I tried so hard not to breathe it and fought as much as I could but they were so many and I was already choking... I had to breathe! "I told you Angel, I will get to you..." And it all went dark..... The book is under editing process.
9.9
90 Mga Kabanata
The Secret Admirer
The Secret Admirer
Fear, anger, and pain… those were the things I always felt when someone was dying, they were all dying one by one, bloodshed everywhere, and the main root of their death was I, alone.This is a thriller with a touch of a bit romance. :)
10
15 Mga Kabanata
Elon : Her secret admirer.
Elon : Her secret admirer.
Sequel to Xara: His unwanted, beautiful bride Elon didn't have much luck with women. It wasn't because he wasn't good-looking, rich, or charming. That wasn't the reason. Most of the women he dated or had a short romantic relationship with saw him only as a friend, no matter how much effort he put into impressing them. Everybody except one woman, Ida Moore, has always had a strong attraction to him. However, this attraction has never been mutual, and Ida has always harbored these feelings alone. What will happen when Elon, in a lighthearted endeavor, chooses to become an incognito aficionado of Ida, only to find himself unexpectedly smitten with her?
Hindi Sapat ang Ratings
45 Mga Kabanata

Kaugnay na Mga Tanong

Did Nietzsche Critique Schopenhauer In His Works?

4 Answers2025-07-03 02:23:13
As someone who has spent years diving deep into philosophy, Nietzsche's critique of Schopenhauer is one of the most fascinating intellectual rivalries. Nietzsche initially admired Schopenhauer, especially his pessimistic worldview, but later turned sharply critical. In 'The Birth of Tragedy,' Nietzsche still shows Schopenhauer's influence, but by 'The Gay Science' and 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra,' he outright rejects Schopenhauer's resignation and life-denying philosophy. Nietzsche saw Schopenhauer's pessimism as a weakness, arguing that life should be embraced, not escaped. He also dismantled Schopenhauer's metaphysics, particularly the idea of the 'will,' replacing it with his concept of the 'will to power.' What makes Nietzsche's critique so compelling is how personal it feels—like a student outgrowing his mentor. He didn’t just disagree; he actively sought to dismantle Schopenhauer’s ideas while building his own philosophy of affirmation. If you read 'Beyond Good and Evil,' Nietzsche even mocks Schopenhauer’s moralizing, calling it a disguised form of resentment. This tension between admiration and rejection is what makes their relationship so rich for philosophical discussion.

How Did Schopenhauer Vs Nietzsche View The Will To Power?

4 Answers2025-07-03 20:02:50
Schopenhauer and Nietzsche both tackled the concept of the 'will,' but their interpretations couldn't be more different. Schopenhauer saw the will as a blind, irrational force driving all existence, leading to endless suffering. He believed the only escape was through denial—asceticism or art—to quiet the will's torment. Nietzsche, on the other hand, flipped this on its head. He embraced the will, calling it the 'will to power,' a creative, life-affirming drive. For Nietzsche, power wasn’t about domination but self-overcoming and growth. Where Schopenhauer saw pessimism, Nietzsche saw potential. Schopenhauer’s will is a burden; Nietzsche’s is a celebration of human potential, urging us to become 'Übermenschen' who shape their own destiny. The contrast is stark: one resigns, the other revolts.

Are There Any Debates On Schopenhauer Vs Nietzsche Ethics?

4 Answers2025-07-03 23:53:09
As someone deeply engrossed in philosophical debates, the clash between Schopenhauer and Nietzsche's ethics is one of my favorite topics. Schopenhauer's ethics are rooted in compassion and the denial of the will, viewing suffering as intrinsic to existence. Nietzsche, on the other hand, rejects this pessimism, advocating for the will to power and self-overcoming. Their differences are stark—Schopenhauer sees life as something to endure, while Nietzsche sees it as something to master. What fascinates me is how these ideas play out in modern discussions. Schopenhauer's influence can be seen in existentialist thought, where life's suffering is acknowledged, while Nietzsche's ideas resonate in movements emphasizing individualism and personal growth. The debate often centers on whether suffering should be transcended or embraced. Both philosophers offer profound insights, but their approaches are worlds apart, making this a rich and enduring philosophical duel.

Which Philosopher Is More Influential, Schopenhauer Vs Nietzsche?

4 Answers2025-07-03 19:30:48
Schopenhauer and Nietzsche are both towering figures in philosophy, but their influence manifests in very different ways. Schopenhauer’s pessimism and focus on the will as the driving force of existence laid the groundwork for existential and psychological thought. His ideas resonate deeply in literature, especially with writers like Tolstoy and Beckett. Nietzsche, on the other hand, took Schopenhauer’s concepts and turned them upside down, championing the 'will to power' and the idea of the Übermensch. His works have been pivotal in postmodernism, politics, and even pop culture, from 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra' to modern self-help movements. While Schopenhauer’s influence is more subtle, permeating art and psychology, Nietzsche’s is explosive, shaping everything from existential philosophy to modern individualism. Nietzsche’s provocative style makes him more widely quoted, but Schopenhauer’s depth ensures his ideas endure in quieter, equally profound ways. If I had to pick, Nietzsche’s reach feels broader, but Schopenhauer’s impact is just as essential for understanding modern thought.

What Are The Key Differences Between Schopenhauer Vs Nietzsche?

4 Answers2025-07-03 11:21:19
As someone deeply fascinated by philosophy, I've spent countless hours dissecting the ideas of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. Schopenhauer's worldview is deeply pessimistic, rooted in the notion that life is fundamentally suffering driven by an insatiable 'will.' He advocates for asceticism and the denial of desires as a path to temporary relief. Nietzsche, on the other hand, rejects this pessimism, embracing life's struggles as opportunities for growth and self-overcoming. His concept of the 'Übermensch' encourages individuals to create their own values and affirm life in all its chaos. While Schopenhauer sees art and compassion as fleeting escapes from suffering, Nietzsche views them as expressions of a life-affirming will to power. Their views on morality also clash—Schopenhauer aligns with Buddhist and Hindu ideas of renunciation, whereas Nietzsche famously declares 'God is dead' and calls for a revaluation of all values. Despite both critiquing traditional metaphysics, their conclusions diverge dramatically: one seeks escape, the other demands transformation.

Did Nietzsche Ever Meet Schopenhauer In Person?

4 Answers2025-07-04 17:59:17
As a philosophy enthusiast who’s spent years digging into the lives of these two giants, I can say their relationship is fascinating but tragically brief. Nietzsche discovered Schopenhauer’s work as a young student, utterly captivated by 'The World as Will and Representation.' By the time Nietzsche sought to meet his intellectual hero, Schopenhauer had already passed away in 1860. Nietzsche was only 16 then, and their paths never physically crossed. This missed connection adds a layer of melancholy to Nietzsche’s later critiques of Schopenhauer’s pessimism. He initially idolized Schopenhauer, calling him his 'educator,' but gradually distanced himself, developing his own philosophy of life affirmation. It’s intriguing to imagine how their dynamic might have evolved had they met—would Schopenhauer have mentored Nietzsche, or would their debates have sparked even earlier? The historical 'what if' is as compelling as their written legacies.

How Do Schopenhauer Vs Nietzsche Compare On Pessimism?

4 Answers2025-07-03 16:34:34
As someone deeply fascinated by philosophy, I find the contrast between Schopenhauer and Nietzsche on pessimism incredibly compelling. Schopenhauer's worldview is rooted in a profound sense of existential suffering—he sees life as inherently painful, driven by an insatiable will that can never be satisfied. His solution is asceticism, a withdrawal from desire. Nietzsche, however, takes this pessimism and flips it on its head. He acknowledges the suffering but calls for embracing it through amor fati—love of fate—and the creation of new values. Schopenhauer’s pessimism is passive, urging resignation, while Nietzsche’s is active, demanding transformation. For Schopenhauer, art and morality offer temporary relief from the torment of existence. Nietzsche, though, sees suffering as the forge of greatness, where the Übermensch emerges. Their differences are stark: one sees life as a tragedy to endure, the other as a challenge to conquer. Both thinkers start from a place of darkness, but Nietzsche’s philosophy is a rebellion against despair, making his pessimism dynamic rather than defeatist.

Which Books Discuss Schopenhauer Vs Nietzsche Philosophy?

4 Answers2025-07-03 21:06:25
As someone deeply immersed in philosophy, I find the debate between Schopenhauer and Nietzsche fascinating. 'The World as Will and Representation' by Schopenhauer lays the groundwork for his pessimistic view of existence, where desire leads to suffering. Nietzsche, in works like 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra' and 'Beyond Good and Evil,' challenges this, advocating for the will to power and self-overcoming. For a direct comparison, 'Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist' by Walter Kaufmann explores how Nietzsche diverged from Schopenhauer’s influence. Another great read is 'Schopenhauer and Nietzsche' by Georg Simmel, which dissects their contrasting views on life’s meaning. If you want a broader context, 'The Birth of Tragedy' shows Nietzsche’s early admiration for Schopenhauer before his later rejection. These texts offer profound insights into two of philosophy’s most compelling minds.
Galugarin at basahin ang magagandang nobela
Libreng basahin ang magagandang nobela sa GoodNovel app. I-download ang mga librong gusto mo at basahin kahit saan at anumang oras.
Libreng basahin ang mga aklat sa app
I-scan ang code para mabasa sa App
DMCA.com Protection Status