Can Redshirts Be Sympathetic Characters In Fanfiction?

2025-10-27 13:19:14 111

6 回答

Oliver
Oliver
2025-10-28 14:26:09
I get a soft spot for redshirts — those background soldiers and extras whose main job in shows like 'Star Trek' seems to be to make the stakes feel real by not surviving them. To me they’re a storyteller’s goldmine: small, ordinary people thrown into extraordinary situations, and that mismatch is what makes them sympathetic if you let it breathe. When I write or read a story that treats a redshirt as a blur, I feel the scene lose weight; when a writer gives that person a name, a quirk, or even a five-line monologue before the lights go out, suddenly the whole episode matters more.

There are so many practical ways to make them work. Give them a brief moral choice, a regret, or a line that reveals a life beyond the uniform — maybe a worry about a kid back home, a hobby like woodworking, or a favorite song hummed under pressure. Use sensory detail in their last moments so readers can anchor to a human point of view rather than a plot device. Sometimes the best move is subversion: let them survive but be changed, or have their death trigger real consequences for main characters. I love reading fanfiction that turns a one-episode extra into the emotional hinge of a whole arc; it’s a reminder that empathy in fiction is often about small, specific touches rather than big speeches. For me, a well-done redshirt scene can be quietly devastating and oddly hopeful at once.
Oliver
Oliver
2025-10-29 20:49:52
For quieter, more reflective takes I prefer the slow-burn method: start with the ordinary and let readers wander into why this person matters. I’ll open a piece with a domestic detail — the way the redshirt folds a uniform, a recipe they can’t get right, or a postcard from home pinned to their locker — then gradually reveal the weight of their choices. That kind of pacing helps sympathy grow naturally rather than demanding it.

I’m fond of using alternative formats too: ship logs, letters home, or fragments of a therapy session after an away mission. Those forms let me show vulnerability without melodrama. A log entry that begins with a bureaucratic checklist and ends with a single, trembling sentence about missing a child back on a mining colony does a lot of emotional work. Sometimes I explore the politics too — why they joined the crew, what systems made them expendable — which turns sympathy into a commentary on institutional failures. It feels satisfying to transform a throwaway casualty into a critique of broader structures and, at the same time, a portrait of someone stubbornly alive in memory. I usually close those stories with a quiet, lingering line that sticks with me long after I stop typing.
Quinn
Quinn
2025-10-29 22:33:19
When I think about why redshirts can earn sympathy, I picture the classroom of a writing workshop where we’d map characters by the smallest details. The trick isn't to magically elevate them to protagonist status but to treat them like real people for a moment: names, relationships, routines. Even a single, well-placed memory — a postcard tucked in a locker, a scar with an origin story — transforms them from scenery into someone you care about.

Another angle I like is to focus on perspective. Rather than giving the redshirt a full biography, show the effect they have on others. Let a captain pause, flinch, or change a promise because of that loss. Let the camera linger on a teammate’s hands instead of launching into exposition. Fanfiction excels here because it can explore the ripple: grieving crewmates, whispered rumors, a small memorial on deck. Also, consider playing with time — flashbacks, alternate timelines, or post-death POVs where the character finally gets to tell their truth. Those choices make sympathy feel earned rather than tacked on, and they turn a throwaway casualty into a gentle moral weight that stays with the reader. Personally, when a story gives a redshirt dignity, I sit up and reread the scene.
Ian
Ian
2025-10-29 22:58:28
Yep — I think they can absolutely be sympathetic, and the trick is restraint. I tend to write short, punchy vignettes that zoom in on one human moment: the redshirt quietly fixing a broken toy, refusing to let fear show while calling out coordinates, or laughing with a teammate over a ridiculous meal. Keep it specific. Don’t confess their whole life in a paragraph; let a single image do the heavy lifting.

Another thing that works for me is giving them an unexpected competency — a skill that has nothing to do with survival but says who they are. Maybe they’re an amateur botanist who names plants on alien worlds, or a poet who scribbles lines in the margins of technical manuals. Those contrasts make readers root for them naturally. And don’t be afraid to show consequences: grieving crewmates, administrative cover-ups, or quiet memorials make the sympathy stick. I usually end these pieces on a tactile detail — a medal tarnished at the edge, a coffee mug left on the bridge — something that lingers, and I like that lingering feeling.
Owen
Owen
2025-11-01 06:05:55
Short answer: absolutely. I’ve always found the heartbreak of redshirts comes from seeing a complete life crammed into a blink of page or screen time. To make that hit, give them a concrete anchor — a name, a small fear, a funny habit — and then let the story pause there for a breath. Micro-scenes work great: a quiet exchange in a mess hall, a letter never sent, or a last joke shared under fire.

You can also flip expectations: let the redshirt be the moral compass who calls out a wrong, or have them survive and haunt the ship in a guilt-haunted way. In fanfiction, even short side-stories that explore a single memory can turn a faceless casualty into someone you root for. I love it when writers take one throwaway line from a canon episode and expand it into a whole patch of life — it makes fandom feel warmer and richer, and it’s why I keep writing little vignettes about those folks.
Ivy
Ivy
2025-11-01 16:19:37
I get a warm thrill imagining a redshirt with an entire life off-screen — someone whose last scene was a blink on the bridge but whose interior world is electric and messy. When I write them, I try to treat that blink like a whole novel: family ties, a weird hobby, a debt they’re trying to pay off, a crush on someone in engineering. Making them sympathetic doesn’t require rewriting canon into a sob story; it’s more about carving out small, believable details that make readers care. Naming them, giving them a favorite song, letting them crack a joke that reveals courage under pressure — those little things make the loss hit harder because you recognize a person, not just a plot device.

Structurally, I often switch between present-tense scramble scenes and calm flashbacks. A tense corridor fight cut with a memory of the redshirt teaching a kid to fix a radio or nervously practicing a proposal speech humanizes the moment. I also lean on relationships: a close friendship with a medic, a strained text thread with a sibling back home, a mentor who once believed in them. That creates stakes beyond screen time; now their potential and their absence ripple.

Tropes can help when used honestly. Give them agency before the trope pulls it away — if they make a heroic choice, let it feel earned. Alternatively, subvert expectations by showing how redshirts survive and how survivor’s guilt follows. Reading or writing stories like 'Redshirts' taught me that sympathy isn’t pity; it’s connection. When I finish these pieces, I usually feel a soft ache and a quiet smile, like I rescued a forgotten life for a little while.
すべての回答を見る
コードをスキャンしてアプリをダウンロード

関連書籍

Can it be us
Can it be us
Two complete opposites with only one common goal, to please their families. Trying to make it through high school and graduate early with straight As to meet her mother’s expectations of Lyra Robyn Colburn has completely built walls isolated herself from everyone, allowing nothing to distract her from the main goal. Everything is going according to her perfect plan till she chooses as her extracurricular activity and meets the not so dull charming basketball team captain Raphael Oliver Vicario and all walls come crashing down not only for her but him as well. Will their love story have a happily ever after ending or it’ll be another version of Romeo and Juliet……
評価が足りません
36 チャプター
CAN THIS BE LOVE ?
CAN THIS BE LOVE ?
Genre: Drama, Romance, suspense In Indonesia, right in the city known as Medan, a king named King Maeko rules over his people. He is known for his fearlessness and discipline. He is the respecter of no one. And his family members includes: Queen Amber his wife, Niran, his first prince, Arjun the second prince and Hana the last princess. This family is feared by everyone even down to the children of Medan. The king every year, goes to the poor cities in Indonesia to get slaves for his city. He doing this shows he has power, and is considered as the strongest of all kinds in Indonesia. This position is a yearly competition and for more almost four years he has been the owner of that position. Soon, the time to choose the strongest will come soon and he needs to do what he does best, which is bring slaves from the poor cities. Not only slaves, but also well built men, their cattles and many more. After checking the list of the cities he had raided, his next town is Java. Java is a poor city but known for its peaceful citizens and their cooperation in moving the town forward. Fortunately or Unfortunately, the king embarked on this journey and then did what he could do best. Brought in the most beautiful of their animals, men and then ladies where Akira happened to be. Some would be kept in the palace to serve as maids, some outside the palace. On the long run Akira finds herself in the palace. And then met with the king's family and then Arjun, the second prince saw how beautiful she was, and then this feeling started growing in our Prince Arjun.
7.3
58 チャプター
When The Original Characters Changed
When The Original Characters Changed
The story was suppose to be a real phoenix would driven out the wild sparrow out from the family but then, how it will be possible if all of the original characters of the certain novel had changed drastically? The original title "Phoenix Lady: Comeback of the Real Daughter" was a novel wherein the storyline is about the long lost real daughter of the prestigious wealthy family was found making the fake daughter jealous and did wicked things. This was a story about the comeback of the real daughter who exposed the white lotus scheming fake daughter. Claim her real family, her status of being the only lady of Jin Family and become the original fiancee of the male lead. However, all things changed when the soul of the characters was moved by the God making the three sons of Jin Family and the male lead reborn to avenge the female lead of the story from the clutches of the fake daughter villain . . . but why did the two female characters also change?!
評価が足りません
16 チャプター
Appearances can be Deceptive
Appearances can be Deceptive
The story takes place in a small town where our protagonist moves eventually, there she meets Ethan and Draven two completely different men with the same goal, to love her unconditionally. Ethan being her neighbor and Draven her boss, the woman will be totally involved in a love triangle where there is no choice but to trust one of them, after all there is no way to block the feelings or the events, when Ayanne gets in danger one of them will come into action and also one of them will be our villain. Expect strong scenes and many negative feelings, our protagonist has suffered for decades in foster homes and love for her is not at all favorable. #Written by Thais Sthefany #Original work #Plagiarism is a crime #Any resemblance to reality was just fiction.
評価が足りません
128 チャプター
Into the Mind of Fictional Characters
Into the Mind of Fictional Characters
Famous author, Valerie Adeline's world turns upside down after the death of her boyfriend, Daniel, who just so happened to be the fictional love interest in her paranormal romance series, turned real. After months of beginning to get used to her new normal, and slowly coping with the grief of her loss, Valerie is given the opportunity to travel into the fictional realms and lands of her book when she discovers that Daniel is trapped among the pages of her book. The catch? Every twelve hours she spends in the book, it shaves off a year of her own life. Now it's a fight against time to find and save her love before the clock strikes zero, and ends her life.
10
6 チャプター
Mommy, Can Jordan Be My Daddy?
Mommy, Can Jordan Be My Daddy?
Anushka is a single mother and CEO of a profitable acquisitions firm. The last thing on her mind was getting involved with a man when her last relationship was filled with abuse and lies. However, when she and her daughter Dakota go on vacation they meet Jordan on the beach and her plans start wavering. Will Jordan be able to show Anushka and Dakota that love can mend even the most shattered of hearts or will others be able to tear them apart before they have a chance at love?
10
68 チャプター

関連質問

How Does The Redshirts Novel Parody Classic Sci-Fi Tropes?

5 回答2025-05-01 03:04:25
In 'Redshirts', the author brilliantly skewers classic sci-fi tropes by turning the expendable crew members into the main focus. The novel dives into the absurdity of how these 'redshirts' are always the first to die in shows like 'Star Trek', often without any real reason or development. The protagonist, Ensign Dahl, starts noticing the bizarre patterns—how the senior officers always survive against impossible odds, while his fellow crewmates drop like flies. The story takes a meta turn when Dahl and his friends discover they’re characters in a poorly written TV show. This realization leads them to confront the 'Narrative', a force that dictates their fates. The novel doesn’t just mock the trope; it explores the existential dread of being a disposable character in someone else’s story. It’s a hilarious yet poignant critique of how sci-fi often sacrifices depth for spectacle. What makes 'Redshirts' stand out is how it blends humor with deeper themes. The characters’ journey to break free from their predetermined roles mirrors the struggle for agency in real life. The book also pokes fun at the clichés of technobabble, deus ex machina, and the unrealistic heroics of main characters. By the end, it’s not just a parody—it’s a love letter to sci-fi fans, reminding us to question the stories we consume and the roles we play in them.

What Are The Main Character Arcs In The Redshirts Novel?

5 回答2025-05-01 23:36:49
In 'Redshirts', the main character arcs revolve around self-awareness and breaking free from narrative constraints. Ensign Andrew Dahl starts as a naive newbie on the starship Intrepid, but he quickly notices the absurdly high mortality rate of low-ranking crew members. His arc is about questioning the universe’s rules and taking control of his fate. Alongside him, Jenkins, a veteran who’s survived countless missions, evolves from a cynical survivor to a mentor figure, helping Dahl and others challenge the story’s logic. Dahl’s friends, Maia and Finn, also grow significantly. Maia begins as a by-the-book officer but learns to embrace chaos and unpredictability to survive. Finn, initially a jokester, matures into a serious strategist when faced with the reality of their situation. Together, they confront the 'narrative causality' that dictates their lives, ultimately deciding to rewrite their own story. The arcs are deeply meta, blending humor with existential questions about free will and storytelling.

How Does The Redshirts Novel Critique The Sci-Fi Genre?

5 回答2025-05-01 07:27:05
In 'Redshirts', John Scalzi brilliantly skewers the sci-fi genre by exposing the absurdity of disposable characters in classic space operas. The novel follows Ensign Andrew Dahl, who quickly realizes that low-ranking crew members on the starship Intrepid are doomed to die in away missions. Scalzi uses this premise to critique the lazy writing trope of sacrificing characters for cheap drama. What makes it sharp is how he layers meta-commentary. The characters discover they’re part of a poorly written TV show, and their deaths are dictated by a script. This self-awareness forces readers to question the ethics of storytelling—why do we accept certain characters as cannon fodder? Scalzi doesn’t just mock the genre; he challenges its conventions, pushing us to demand better narratives. By the end, the characters break free from their scripted fates, symbolizing a call for more thoughtful, character-driven sci-fi. It’s a love letter and a critique rolled into one, reminding us that even in fantastical settings, human stories matter.

What Are The Key Plot Twists In The Redshirts Novel?

5 回答2025-05-01 03:02:41
In 'Redshirts', the biggest twist hits when the crew of the 'Intrepid' realizes they’re characters in a poorly written TV show. It’s not just a meta-revelation—it’s a full-on existential crisis. They notice how their lives are dictated by absurdly dramatic plotlines and how they’re essentially cannon fodder for the show’s main characters. This discovery flips everything on its head. Instead of blindly following their 'destiny,' they decide to fight back against the narrative. What follows is a wild journey into the 'real world,' where they confront the show’s writers. This confrontation isn’t just about survival; it’s a critique of storytelling itself. The crew’s rebellion against their predetermined roles is both hilarious and profound. They force the writers to acknowledge their humanity, turning the tables on the very people who’ve been manipulating their lives. The twist isn’t just a plot device—it’s a commentary on free will, creativity, and the power of self-determination.

Why Do Redshirts Die So Often In Star Trek Episodes?

6 回答2025-10-27 03:30:19
Redshirts dying so often in 'Star Trek' always makes me grin and roll my eyes at the same time. I grew up watching the original run and quickly learned to scan the transporter room: if the nameless guy beaming down wore red, my popcorn went cold. Part of it is pure storytelling shorthand — the writers needed a quick way to raise stakes on away missions without killing off a main character. Those red-shirted extras were convenient dramatic fodder: anonymous, interchangeable, and expendable, which made every away mission feel genuinely dangerous without sacrificing the crew we actually cared about. I also get nerdy about the production side. In the earliest days, costume colors were coded so command wore gold while security and engineering wore red; that meant the people doing the grunt work got put in harm’s way more often. Casting guest actors for one-off roles was cheaper and faster than weaving in recurring corps-members, so you had a steady supply of folks whose job was basically to get blapped, mauled, or vaporized. Lighting, camera focus, and the limited special effects of the era made those exits feel tragic even if the character had zero screen time before dying. On a meta level, the redshirt became a cultural meme — shorthand for “disposable character.” Later shows like 'The Next Generation' and 'Voyager' toyed with or subverted the trope, and modern writers try harder to make even background folks feel real. Still, I can’t help but get a little excited when an unfamiliar red uniform beams down; it’s part dread, part nostalgia, and all of the silly fun that drew me into 'Star Trek' in the first place.

What Is The Origin Of The Term Redshirts In Sci-Fi?

6 回答2025-10-27 08:26:11
It's wild how a costume choice from a 1960s TV show turned into a whole storytelling shorthand. Back when 'Star Trek' filmed 'The Original Series', uniform colors were a quick visual shorthand for who did what on the ship: blue for science, gold for command, and red for engineering and security. The pattern you notice when you watch episodes is that the red-uniformed crew members are the ones who go down to the planet surface, get separated from the bridge crew, and often become the disposable casualty to show danger. Writers used those deaths to create stakes without sacrificing major characters, and viewers picked up on it fast. Fandom then turned observation into a term. By the 1970s and 1980s, lively fan discussions, convention banter, and fanzines were already labeling those expendable crew as 'redshirts'—a neat, slightly cheeky label for anyone who exists primarily to get killed and motivate the plot. The trope escaped 'Star Trek' and turned up everywhere that needed a quick way to show peril: movies, TV shows, and especially genre comedies that riff on the idea. For example, John Scalzi's novel 'Redshirts' leans into the concept and makes it the central joke and critique. I love that a little design choice got so cultural. It says something about how fans read stories and how small production decisions ripple outward into language and humor. Seeing a red-jacketed extra now always makes me grin a little, because I know what likely fate the script has in mind for them.

Are There Famous Redshirts Survivors In Star Trek Canon?

6 回答2025-10-27 08:28:37
Alright, here’s the short scoop with a bit of fan enthusiasm: the phrase 'redshirt' comes from the early days of 'Star Trek', especially 'The Original Series', where members of the operations/engineering/security division wore red and often ended up as expendable victims in away missions. That reputation sticks, but when you look at canon more closely it’s clear that plenty of famous red-clad characters actually survive and become central to the story. Take Nyota Uhura and Montgomery Scott — both wore red in 'The Original Series' and both survived through multiple episodes and feature films. Fast-forward to 'The Next Generation' era and the color coding flips a bit, but you still have prominent characters in red: Captain Picard, Commander Riker, and Worf (as head of security) all wear red at times and are very much not disposable. The trope is mostly about unnamed security officers and one-off crew who get killed to raise stakes; main cast members in red rarely meet that fate because writers need them around. I love how the term evolved from a costume quirk into a pop-culture shorthand. It’s funny and a little morbid, but also a reminder that a uniform color doesn’t decide your fate in the canon — story importance does. I still grin whenever a nameless redshirt shows up in a tense corridor scene, though I root for them to stick around.

Which Redshirts Episodes Are Fan Favorites To Watch?

3 回答2025-10-17 00:04:44
That weird little thrill of watching a landing party head out in bright red shirts never gets old for me; it’s part dread, part guilty amusement. If you want classic examples, fans always talk about episodes from 'Star Trek: The Original Series' where the away teams go down to the planet and the odds feel stacked against them. Episodes like 'Arena' and 'The Galileo Seven' come up a lot in conversations because they capture that anxious feeling of expendability — the camera lingers on background faces and you start silently rooting for the folks in red to make it back. The production design, the music, and the way the story funnels danger onto those shore parties is pure vintage sci-fi tension. Beyond just the thrills of who’ll survive, I also love episodes that flip the trope on its head. 'The Menagerie' and a few other TOS entries give the redshirts a little more humanity, even if they still serve the plot tension. For a modern, meta twist, I recommend checking out 'Lower Decks' (both the TNG episode and the animated series named 'Lower Decks' which riffs on the idea). Those take the redshirt anxiety and turn it into character-focused stories, so instead of anonymous casualties you get real stakes for junior crew members. Also, don’t miss John Scalzi’s novel 'Redshirts' if you want the whole trope deconstructed with humor and heart. Overall, my feeling is that watching these episodes is part nostalgia trip, part analysis of how ensemble storytelling assigns value to faces — and I keep going back because they’re equal parts fun and slightly cruel, in the best way.
無料で面白い小説を探して読んでみましょう
GoodNovel アプリで人気小説に無料で!お好きな本をダウンロードして、いつでもどこでも読みましょう!
アプリで無料で本を読む
コードをスキャンしてアプリで読む
DMCA.com Protection Status