Christopher Hitchens

ABO Personality Quiz
Take a quick quiz to find out whether you‘re Alpha, Beta, or Omega.
Scent
Personality
Ideal Love Pattern
Secret Desire
Your Dark Side
Start Test

Related Books

CHRISTOPHER

CHRISTOPHER

Men Of Manhattan #3. Christopher Royce had a hard life since the beginning, which led him to be a withdrawn and serious man. This is further aggravated after an event that marked his life, so Christopher decides to focus only on his work, making him even more lonely if possible. Nowadays, he only trusts a couple of people because it's impossible for him to open up once more. Full of resentment, distrust and tired with the life he's living, he accepts the present his best friend gives him for his birthday: A trip to Hawaii. What Christopher doesn't expect is that this trip will become the best experience of his life when he meets Helena; a happy, outgoing, tenacious woman determined to make the man with serious face and melancholic eyes see that life is too short not to take risks. The problem will come when the trip comes to an end and they have to say goodbye and walk away.
10 34 Chapters
Go Away Chris

Go Away Chris

She bought the ring herself. Ayesha Adams planned every detail which includes the venue, the words, even the dress her best friend picked out. She got down on one knee in front of every employee at Azul Corporation and told Chris, the man she had quietly loved for four years, that she wanted to spend her life with him. He told her to get up. That she had embarrassed him. That she should leave. Her dress ripped on the way out and Gemma filmed the whole thing. The next morning, Ayesha found out her best friend was pregnant for him. So she did the only thing left with any dignity in it. She resigned, packed her life into boxes, moved across the city, took out a loan, and built something of her own. She stopped being the girl no one looked at twice. She became someone men crossed rooms for.And Chris noticed. He calls but he ignores him. He shows up at her gallery. She smiles and asks him to leave. He donates anonymously to her business but she thanks no one in particular. He follows her to galas. She dances with other men. He is losing his mind and she is just getting started. But then her mother falls ill. And Chris does something that no amount of anger or pride or self-preservation can make Ayesha ignore.
0 74 Chapters
An English Writer

An English Writer

The novel is mainly about the forgotten British poet/writer named C. J Richards who lived in Burma/Myanmar in colonial times and he believed himself as a Burmophile. He served as I.C.S (Indian Civil Servant) and when he retired from I.C.S service, he was a D.C (District Commissioner) and he left for England a year before Burma gained its independence in 1948. He came to Burma in 1920 to work in civil service after passing the hardest I.C.S examination. He wrote several books on Burma and contributed many monthly articles to Guardian Magazine published in Burma from 1953 to 1974 or 1975. Though he wrote several books which had much literary merit to both communities, Britain and Burma (Myanmar), people failed to recognize him. The story has two parts: one part is set in the contemporary Yangon (then called Rangoon) in 2016 context and a young literary enthusiast named “Lin” found out unexpectedly the forgotten writer’s poetry book and there is surely a good deal of time gap that led him into a quest to know more about the author’s life. The setting is quite different comparing to colonial Burma and independence Myanmar (Burma), early twentieth century and 2016 which is a transitional period in Myanmar. The writer’s life is fictionalized in the novel and most of the facts are taken from his personal stories and other reference books. It is a kind of historical novel with a twist and it has comparatively constructed the two different periods in Myanmar history to convince readers, locally and abroad more about history, authorship, humanity, colonialism, and transitional development in Myanmar today.
0 61 Chapters
No Peace in Life or Death

No Peace in Life or Death

The day before Chris Carter and I were supposed to get engaged, my parents sent me to prison. Three years later, when I was finally released, Chris was the only one who came to pick me up. I knew he despised me. I trembled, keeping my head down, hoping to slip away unnoticed. But he blocked my path, frowning. “Emily York? You stink.” He pinched his nose and told me to get in the car. I fell to my knees, desperately begging him not to take me home. If he did, I would die. He looked at me with chilling indifference and said, “Then go ahead and die.” I agreed. But later, he cried and begged me to stay alive.
8.7 14 Chapters
Judged in the Court of Scumbags

Judged in the Court of Scumbags

My wife, Charlene Weber, has taken me to the Scumbag Court. If I'm found guilty, all my assets will be taken from me, and I'll face 10 years of imprisonment. Charlene, on the other hand, will get to marry her ideal man—Joel Quinlan—as she wishes. If I'm acquitted of all charges, Charlene will be made to divorce me without alimony. She'll also be cursed with bad luck and disfigured so badly she'll be the ugliest woman in the world. Conversely, I'll be given 10 million dollars in reparations and gain a lifetime's worth of good luck. Everyone is advising me to admit to my mistakes, but only because Charlene has always been a virtuous, devoted wife in their eyes. They think that there must surely be some complicated grievances between us at the moment. However, they are unaware that I've been reborn. This time, I'm going to tear off Charlene's mask of hypocrisy.
0 10 Chapters
The End of Love

The End of Love

On the day my father died, his seven most trusted men all met violent deaths within the same twenty-four hours. Hugh Castillo sacrificed his legs to butcher the gang and put me in power. “Taz, don’t be scared. Those monsters are gone. You’re finally free.” In the years he lay paralyzed, I tried over a thousand experimental drugs and prayed at every church across the country. I hunted down every possible remedy, praying for just one that would bring him back to his feet. When Hugh learned of this, he swallowed a bottle of pills one night to end his life. After he was revived, he smiled and wiped the tears from my face. “Taz, I don’t want to be a dead weight. You deserve a better life than this.” That night, we held each other and wept. We swore that from then on, no matter what, we would never leave each other behind. But seven years later, a sweet-looking girl showed up at my door with a thousand photos I was never meant to see. “Every month, while you were praying to God in churches, Huey was busy trying out new positions with me. “Ms. Sheargold, don’t you know that used goods like you kill a man’s desire? It was no wonder he’d rather play the cripple than touch you.” I looked through every single photo, then put them up for auction underground.
0 9 Chapters

What books did Christopher Hitchens write?

2 Answers2026-04-18 13:05:30
Christopher Hitchens was a writer who never shied away from controversy, and his books reflect that fearless intellect. One of his most famous works is 'God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything,' where he dismantles religious dogma with razor-sharp logic and wit. It’s a book that sparks debate no matter which side you’re on—I remember lending my copy to a friend, and we ended up arguing for hours. Another standout is 'Hitch-22,' his memoir, which is as much about his personal journey as it is about the political and ideological battles of his time. His writing style is so engaging that even when you disagree, you can’t stop reading.

Then there’s 'The Trial of Henry Kissinger,' where he makes a compelling case for why Kissinger should be held accountable for war crimes. Hitchens had a knack for blending thorough research with a punchy, almost journalistic urgency. And let’s not forget 'Letters to a Young Contrarian,' a sort of guidebook for free thinkers. It’s like having a conversation with him—acerbic, insightful, and deeply motivating. His work always leaves me feeling fired up, ready to question everything.

Why was Christopher Hitchens controversial?

2 Answers2026-04-18 09:50:08
Christopher Hitchens was one of those figures who could make you nod in agreement one moment and grit your teeth the next. His sharp wit and unapologetic stance on religion, particularly in his book 'God Is Not Great,' made him a lightning rod for debate. He didn’t just criticize religious institutions; he dismantled their moral authority with a blend of erudition and biting humor. For many secular folks, he was a hero, but for others, his tone came off as needlessly combative. His defense of the Iraq War further polarized opinions—even some of his longtime admirers felt betrayed by his support for what they saw as an unjust conflict.

What I find fascinating about Hitchens is how he thrived in contradiction. He could champion free speech while supporting controversial figures like Salman Rushdie, yet also align himself with neoconservative policies that seemed at odds with his earlier leftist leanings. His debates were legendary, not just for their content but for his sheer audacity—like when he drank whiskey onstage during a discussion about temperance. Love him or loathe him, he forced people to engage with uncomfortable ideas, and that’s a rare quality these days. The world feels quieter without his voice, though I’m sure he’d hate the sentimentality of that remark.

How did Christopher Hitchens die?

2 Answers2026-04-18 23:21:55
Christopher Hitchens' death was a significant loss to the world of letters and free thought. He passed away on December 15, 2011, after a brutal battle with esophageal cancer, which had metastasized to his lymph nodes and lungs. Diagnosed in 2010 while on tour for his memoir 'Hitch-22,' he faced the illness with characteristic wit and defiance, even continuing to write and debate until his final months. His essays during that period—collected in 'Mortality'—are some of his most poignant work, grappling unflinchingly with pain, faith, and the absurdity of death. Hitchens refused to soften his atheism or seek comfort in religion, famously quipping that if he heard about a terminal patient turning to prayer, he’d think, 'Good, that means they’re getting proper medical care.' His decline was swift but not silent; he left behind a legacy of razor-sharp polemics and a challenge to intellectual complacency.

What stays with me isn’t just the tragedy of his death but how he weaponized his final year. Every interview, every Vanity Fair column, became a masterclass in facing extinction without illusions. The way he mocked the 'celestial dictatorship' of religious consolation while enduring agonizing treatments—it was Hitchens at his most Hitchens-esque. Even critics who loathed his politics admitted his courage. I reread 'Mortality' sometimes when life feels fragile, and it’s like hearing his voice again: impatient, erudite, and utterly alive in the face of oblivion.

What were Christopher Hitchens' political views?

2 Answers2026-04-18 09:22:51
Christopher Hitchens was a fascinating figure whose political views evolved dramatically over his lifetime, and I've spent a lot of time wrestling with his contradictions. In his early years, he was a staunch Trotskyist, deeply embedded in the far left, even writing for socialist publications. His break with the left came gradually, but the Iraq War was a major turning point—he supported the intervention, which alienated many of his former allies. What I find compelling is how he never fit neatly into any ideology; he despised religious fundamentalism (famously calling religion 'the main source of hatred in the world') but also clashed with pacifists and anti-war activists. His support for free speech was absolute, even when it was uncomfortable, like his defense of cartoons mocking Islam. He had a knack for pissing off everyone at some point, which tells me he was more interested in principles than tribes.

Later in life, he called himself a 'Marxist' in method but not in belief, focusing more on secular humanism and anti-totalitarianism. His friendship with neoconservatives like Paul Wolfowitz confused a lot of people, but Hitch saw it as a marriage of convenience against what he viewed as greater evils. His debates on religion, like the one with William Lane Craig, are legendary, but his political shifts are just as gripping. I don’t agree with all his stances, but his fearlessness and wit make his legacy endlessly debatable—which is probably how he’d want it.

Where can I find Christopher Hitchens debates?

2 Answers2026-04-18 06:07:00
If you're looking for Christopher Hitchens' debates, YouTube is an absolute goldmine. I've spent countless hours diving into his fiery exchanges on religion, politics, and free speech. His legendary debates with figures like William Lane Craig or Tony Blair are must-watches—Hitchens' wit and command of language are electrifying. Beyond YouTube, platforms like C-SPAN's archives and dedicated philosophy sites like 'Debate.org' occasionally host his older appearances. Podcast apps sometimes have audio versions if you prefer listening on the go. One hidden gem? University lecture archives; he guest spoke at places like Oxford, and those lesser-known debates showcase his depth beyond the viral moments.

For a more curated experience, I’d recommend searching for compilations like 'Hitchens’ Best Moments'—they often lead you to full debates. And don’t skip his written work; books like 'God Is Not Great' expand on arguments he sharpened in live debates. The way he dismantles opponents with a mix of humor and historical evidence is something I still replay in my head years later.

Is Christopher Hitchens' God Is Not Great worth reading?

2 Answers2026-04-18 20:32:36
I picked up 'God Is Not Great' during a phase where I was deeply questioning religious dogma, and Hitchens' razor-sharp wit made it impossible to put down. His arguments aren't just logical—they're delivered with a ferocity that feels almost theatrical. The chapter on religious violence particularly stuck with me; he dismantles the idea of moral superiority in faith systems with historical examples that are as unsettling as they are undeniable. What I appreciate most is how he doesn’t shy away from tackling sacred cows (pun intended), whether it’s the hypocrisy of organized religion or the dangers of blind faith.

That said, the book isn’t for the faint of heart. Hitchens’ tone can be abrasive, and if you’re emotionally attached to religious beliefs, it might feel like a personal attack. But even when I disagreed, I admired his refusal to soften his stance. The section on 'celestial dictatorship' had me laughing out loud at its audacity. It’s less a scholarly dissection and more a passionate polemic—perfect for readers who enjoy intellectual combat. Just don’t expect a balanced debate; this is Hitchens at his most unapologetic.
Popular Searches
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
DMCA.com Protection Status