Library

When Did The Term Danger Close Originate In Military Use?

2025-08-27 16:22:24 41

5 Answers

Ruby

2025-08-28 00:53:45

I still get a little tingle when I hear 'danger close' — the way it compresses risk, trust, and responsibility into two words. From what I’ve learned hanging out in military history forums and rifle-range conversations, the term isn't some medieval relic; it's a 20th-century development tied to the rise of modern indirect fires and air support. Back when artillery barrages and airstrikes became precise enough to be coordinated near friendly positions, troops needed a standard phrase so everyone knew they were accepting a higher level of risk.

The phrase became institutionalized in field manuals sometime around mid-century, and you see it pop up in doctrine from World War II onward, especially in conflicts where close air support and forward observers played big roles. Different services and nations set their own 'danger close' distance guidelines for various munitions, so the term’s practical meaning depends on who’s using it. If you're curious, skimming through after-action reports or declassified manuals from the Vietnam period will show plenty of real-world uses and clarifications.

Kevin

2025-08-28 05:05:54

Whenever I hear 'danger close' in a book or film, I think about how language adapts to stress. The phrase likely emerged as militaries formalized indirect fires in the early-to-mid 20th century; it’s found more solid footing in mid-century manuals and combat usage from WWII through Vietnam. In plain terms, it signals that weapons will be used close enough to friendly forces that higher risk is accepted and special clearance procedures apply.

I like comparing it to modern gaming callouts — short, decisive, and shared across a team — except here the stakes are real. Different branches and countries set their own proximity rules, so the phrase’s operational meaning varies, but its purpose is constant: to make sure everyone understands that help comes with risk. If you enjoy digging into military language, follow the trail from early artillery handbooks to later air-ground coordination manuals for the clearest picture.

Harper

2025-08-29 07:45:16

Funny thing — the phrase 'danger close' always felt dramatic to me, like a warning shouted across a battlefield in a movie. In reality it's more procedural and less cinematic: it developed as a concise way for forward observers and pilots to tell the folks calling in fires that ordnance would fall uncomfortably near friendly troops. The concept of warning that you're firing near your own guys goes back to artillery practice in the early 20th century, but the compact phrase 'danger close' became standard as militaries formalized fire-support procedures.

I dug through some old manuals and secondary sources years ago while doing a hobby research project, and what I found was that the term was formalized in mid‑20th century doctrine. During and after World War II and then through Korea and Vietnam, armies and air arms needed a short, unmistakable phrase for high-risk close-support missions. By the Vietnam era the wording appears regularly in U.S. and Commonwealth field manuals, and modern NATO procedures continue that tradition, even if exact distance thresholds differ by weapon and service. It’s one of those tidy bits of military language that grew out of necessity and stuck around because it’s unambiguous under pressure.

Ariana

2025-08-30 02:53:27

My take is more practical: 'danger close' is the kind of phrase that came out of hard lessons on the battlefield, not polite debate in committee rooms. The need to communicate simply and unambiguously when ordnance would land close to friendly forces drove its adoption. Think of early 20th-century artillery tactics evolving into coordinated air and artillery strikes—once you have mortars, guns, and planes supporting troops on the move, you need a shared language. The English-language phrase became common in Commonwealth and U.S. forces and shows up in doctrinal updates through World War II and the Vietnam era.

The neat thing is how doctrine kept refining it. Instead of a vague warning, modern procedures tie 'danger close' to specific conditions and require explicit acknowledgments from commanders accepting the increased risk. That procedural clarity probably saved lives, even while it acknowledged a grim trade-off. It’s one of those procedural phrases that reveals how militaries learn from painful experience.

Steven

2025-09-01 07:20:26

When I first read about 'danger close' I liked how plainspoken it was. It basically marks the boundary where fire support risks friendly troops, and the term gained traction as artillery and air support procedures were standardized in the 20th century. It’s not poetic — it’s a safety shorthand that shows up in mid-century field manuals and in combat reports from WWII, Korea, and Vietnam. Today it’s part of the lexicon in most Western militaries, used for calls for fire and close air support whenever munitions will land near friendly positions. If you like digging into doctrinal texts, those manuals will show how the phrase was formalized and adapted over decades.

View All Answers

Related Books

Warning: Danger

What happens when four very different males are brought together at an academy for supernatural creatures? Chaos, testosterone and of course … danger run amok. Each of the males has a secret, some more obvious than others. Are there even females capable of taming them, or will their secrets be too much? What if the ladies have secrets of their own? Werewolves, shapeshifters of different sorts, vampire and more! With each story that gets told, the danger increases. Will it finally catch up with them? “If you like her, then you’ll want to keep her alive.” Can the guys successfully date while being a total danger not only to themselves but to any females they encounter? Follow Troy, Jesse, Ryan and Dustin as they try to navigate school, love and being teenagers with supernatural powers unlike any other. For both the males and females alike, change is hard but denying true love is even more dangerous. How can they balance it all, and how will their families handle the new additions to their lives? Find out in this four part book, Warning: Danger.

106 Chapters

Danger zone

80 million worth is the book. Danger zone is the past edit. Updates will be in 80 million worth and not Danger zone.

Not enough ratings

9 Chapters

Illegal Use of Hands

"Quarterback SneakWhen Stacy Halligan is dumped by her boyfriend just before Valentine’s Day, she’s in desperate need of a date of the office party—where her ex will be front and center with his new hot babe. Max, the hot quarterback next door who secretly loves her and sees this as his chance. But he only has until Valentine’s Day to score a touchdown. Unnecessary RoughnessRyan McCabe, sexy football star, is hiding from a media disaster, while Kaitlyn Ross is trying to resurrect her career as a magazine writer. Renting side by side cottages on the Gulf of Mexico, neither is prepared for the electricity that sparks between them…until Ryan discovers Kaitlyn’s profession, and, convinced she’s there to chase him for a story, cuts her out of his life. Getting past this will take the football play of the century. Sideline InfractionSarah York has tried her best to forget her hot one night stand with football star Beau Perini. When she accepts the job as In House counsel for the Tampa Bay Sharks, the last person she expects to see is their newest hot star—none other than Beau. The spark is definitely still there but Beau has a personal life with a host of challenges. Is their love strong enough to overcome them all?Illegal Use of Hands is created by Desiree Holt, an EGlobal Creative Publishing signed author."

59 Chapters

Kissing Danger

"Is this what you want?" he murmurs, gaze gliding down to where his fingers linger dangerously on my upper thigh. Resting his hand on the surface beside me, he leans down above me. "You just have to say it, and it's yours." *** On her eighteenth birthday, Aven starts to notice strange things. She feels watched, and one day, when facing death, she is saved by a stranger. For years she wonders who he is or who he was. When facing death again, he comes back. Aven doesn't realise how special she is, or how many people will go at great lengths to protect her, and to use her hidden gifts for their own gain. Although no one wants her more than a powerful Immortal. However, his desire for her may prove to be deadly, and as her mate, his vow to protect her will prove to put their entire world at risk.

8.5

38 Chapters

Got Too Close

"You're a dangerous woman, Elena," He reached, turning on the shower beside her head. "I think your demons are making you see things wrong, Mr. Rossi," she murmured through the water spilling down her head. He laughed, "They are right; you're my trigger," his nose buried into the crook of her neck, he muttered, sending shivers down her spine. "And too bad a lot of people cross you..." ***** Her life came crashing down when she signed a contract marriage with the calm President Nikolai Rossi, who only had eyes on one woman who wasn't her. To make matters worse, she couldn't help but fall in love with him and his son, knowing he'd never reciprocate. After a terrible divorce, three years later, Elena Vero is a mother of one. She now has to return to Italy for business, unfortunately falling into the waiting palms of her ex-husband, who surprisingly wants her back. But being his wife has never been a bed of roses and never will it be, especially when she finds out he isn't all that he seems.

9.9

132 Chapters

BEHIND CLOSE DOORS

"You slept here?" George asked. "Yes, I…um,” Irene gulped, licking her lips and making a quick calculation in her mind on what to say, “I um…I was feeling hot when reading, so I decided to take a shower and might have fallen asleep after it. You just woke me up, have-have you been standing here? Um what's up, are you ready for work?” She asked while getting up to put on her nightwear. George watched her then sighed, “Irene, can I ask you something?” His eyes was burning red, and he was bitterly angry which was showing on his face “Why did you do this to me, what have I done to deserve the betrayal from you, What haven’t I done for you, what else do you need from a man i’ve not given to, why didn’t you tell me you want to be a model, why do you chose to let me know this way, do you want a divorce?” Irene and George had met in school and fallen in love, then their relationship had led into a beautiful marriage where she had been most happy until she had miscarried two pregnancies. Down and broken, George had decided to make her better by hiring a cook who would bring all her online delicacies to their dining table for her. But who would have expected that her one night of mistake would not only change her but would fill her beautiful marriage with lies? How is she to avoid her sins despite knowing it was wrong and still craving for it? How would she face her darling husband and tell him her darkest secret? But even though the sin was addictive, she had no idea what other secrets lies between, waiting to shatter her heart.

27 Chapters

Related Questions

How Do Soldiers Define Danger Close In Combat?

5 Answers2025-08-27 18:38:02

The phrase 'danger close' has always felt like a small radio line that carries a huge weight. For me, it means that someone is about to drop firepower within striking distance of my position — close enough that the margin for error has shrunk dramatically. Practically speaking, soldiers use it when indirect fires (artillery, mortars, naval gunfire) or close air support will impact near friendly troops; it’s a formal warning so everybody from the observer to the fire direction center knows to be extra careful. In practice there’s a ritual to it: the observer lays the target, gives coordinates, and explicitly announces 'danger close' when the nearest friendly element is within the prescribed threshold for that munition. That threshold changes by service and weapon, but the intent is constant — acknowledge higher risk, tighten checks, and often request precision or different effects. I’ve been on missions where danger close meant swapping to a different fuse, re-aiming by mere meters, or calling for a last-second confirmation from command. It’s scary, but when you trust your radios and your fire support team, it can also be the difference between holding ground and getting overrun. There’s always that hush before the impact; you hold your breath and hope training and comms do their job.

How Does The US Military Measure Danger Close Distances?

5 Answers2025-08-27 13:22:01

There's a neat mix of math, manuals, and sweat behind how 'danger close' gets measured. At its heart it's just geometry: we measure the horizontal distance between where friendly forces are and the intended impact point (or aim point) of the fire. That starts with precise coordinates — usually grid or lat/long — for both the friendly location and the target. Then you apply standard map/range calculations (or let fire-control systems do it) to get a range in meters. Doctrine supplies the key thresholds for various weapon systems and munitions, so once the computed distance is under a given threshold, the call becomes 'danger close.' But the process isn't purely numerical. Procedures force extra safeguards: the shooter must be told, higher headquarters or a designated clearance authority often has to acknowledge, and additional risk-reduction measures are required (switching to precision munitions, adjusting fuzes, changing fire patterns, or adding more observers). Digital tools like AFATDS or handheld GPS units speed the math, but the human moment — the verbal declaration and the acknowledgement — is what seals the risk control. I once watched this play out in a training lane where we were on the edge of a danger-close bracket; the radios had that clipped, clinical tone and everyone tightened up, double-checking grids and elevations. That blend of routine calculation and high-stakes judgment is what keeps it from being just another number on a map.

What Movies Portray Danger Close Moments Realistically?

5 Answers2025-08-27 17:45:11

Watching the opening of 'Saving Private Ryan' in a crowded theater felt like a bootcamp of cinema’s most honest moments — the chaos, the smell of cordite (at least in my imagination), and the tiny human reactions caught in the crossfire. That sequence nails danger-close in a way few films dare: it doesn’t glamorize heroics, it lingers on confusion and the way bodies and minds react when violence is literally a few meters away. Beyond that, I’d put 'Black Hawk Down' and 'Lone Survivor' in the same realistic bucket. Both focus on the claustrophobia of urban fighting and small-unit survival, where supporting fires, mortars, or aircraft are called in with the terrifying possibility of landing near your own people. The filmmakers used real military advisers, tight choreography, and sound design so bone-rattling you feel the concussive shockwaves. 'The Hurt Locker' deserves a shout too — it flips the concept: danger close isn’t only rounds; it’s a bomb's unpredictable proximity and the slow, nerve-ripped waits before something goes off. If you want the theater experience to match the content, watch these on a good sound system, and pay attention to camera distance, silence, and the way characters make split decisions. Those little details are what turn dramatized combat into something that actually feels real to me.

How Do NATO Forces Standardize Danger Close Protocols?

5 Answers2025-08-27 19:01:12

I’ve spent too many late nights reading through military manuals for fun, so I've picked up how NATO keeps everyone singing from the same hymn sheet when it comes to danger close situations. In plain terms, the alliance harmonizes terminology and procedures through common doctrine and standardization agreements so that a French forward observer, a Polish JTAC, and a U.S. fire direction center all know what a given phrase or safety threshold means. Practically that looks like a few layered controls: agreed definitions for what counts as 'danger close' for different munitions, pre-established risk or safety distances tied to weapons types, standardized call-for-fire/engagement formats, and clear authority chains for clearance to fire. Units use checks like positive identification of friendly locations, digital location sharing, and verification calls. Training and certification—especially for terminal controllers—are done to common NATO standards, and multinational exercises practice these flows until they’re second nature. When it gets real, there are extra mitigations: use of suppression, shifting fire to safeboxes, coordinated timing, and post-strike assessments. Those common procedures plus exercise-driven familiarity are what make multinational fires work without excessive risk to friendly forces—it's boring in the best way, because boring means safe and predictable, which everyone wants when shells are in the air.

How Do Medics Respond To Danger Close Casualty Scenarios?

5 Answers2025-08-27 16:33:47

When I'm thrown into a danger-close casualty situation, the first thing that kicks in is an almost reflexive checklist in my head: secure, stabilize, and move if needed. Practically that means I look for immediate threats — incoming fire, unstable structures, secondary devices — and try to get the wounded into whatever hard cover or concealment is available. If cover is impossible, I use smoke or suppression from teammates and keep people low while we do the basics for life threats: arrest massive bleeding, maintain an airway, and keep the casualty warm and conscious if possible. I've had to strip a lot of theory down to urgent, improvised action. I prioritize the person who can be saved quickest with the least resource drain so the whole group survives. Communication becomes everything: clear, short calls to teammates to request suppression, evacuation, or extra hands; and to the casualty to keep them oriented. After extraction to a slightly safer spot, I start a more thorough assessment, label priorities for evacuation, and hand them over with concise information to whoever's taking charge. It's messy, noisy, and terrifying, but training plus a calm voice makes a huge difference. I always carry a few spare dressings and a plan for who covers movement — that little predictability helps everyone act faster and with less panic.

How Do Civilian Contractors Mitigate Danger Close Risks?

5 Answers2025-08-27 02:27:19

I’ve been on enough dusty ranges and convoy overwatch jobs to know that mitigating 'danger close' risks isn’t just a checklist — it’s a habit you build before you even step outside. Before a mission I’ll do a layered risk assessment: map out firing fans, blast vectors, and worst-case casualty zones, then pick positions that maximize standoff without sacrificing mission effectiveness. I always insist on hardened shelter positions, marking evacuation routes, and rehearsing casualty evacuation until the team does it without thinking. Communication is everything. We run redundant radios with pre-defined brevity codes and verify GPS coordinates multiple times. If indirect fires or explosives are involved, we coordinate with the firing unit’s safety officer and get written confirmation of the planned munition effects and the exact 'danger close' waiver. When there’s any doubt, I push for a delay, an adjusted firing azimuth, or a different ordnance type. Finally, personal mitigation matters: blast-rated vehicles, ballistic helmets, fragmentation blankets, and minimizing time spent exposed. I’ll also log near-misses and debrief immediately so small lessons get locked into our SOPs — the little fixes keep me and the crew alive, and oddly, they make the day feel more under control than any checklist ever could.

Why Do Video Games Warn About Danger Close During Missions?

5 Answers2025-08-27 07:29:21

There's this tiny adrenaline spike I get whenever a 'danger close' ping flashes up on-screen — it feels like the game is leaning over my shoulder and whispering, "maybe back up." Designers use that warning for a bunch of practical reasons. First, it's about telegraphing: explosions, airstrikes, artillery, or even special enemy abilities can have big radii, and the warning gives you a chance to reposition so the game feels fair rather than arbitrary. Second, it's about pacing and tension. When a mission suddenly calls out a hazardous zone, it forces a quick decision — push through and risk it for an objective, or fall back and play safer. That decision-making is a huge part of what makes shooters and tactical games feel satisfying. On top of all that, the phrase comes straight from real-world military lingo, so it adds a dash of authenticity; I always smile when a mission narrator says it and my squadmates groan because we know chaos is coming. If you want a habit to pick up: listen for the audio cue and glance at your minimap. In co-op runs I learned to shout when I hear it — saves lives and makes for great comms chaos.

What Procedures Govern Danger Close Artillery Strikes?

5 Answers2025-08-27 08:11:56

I get drawn into this topic every time I read a military memoir or watch a documentary — there’s something tense and oddly careful about the whole process. At a high level, 'danger close' is less a wild risk and more a formal acknowledgment: you've got friendly forces close enough to a target that the supporting fires could endanger them, so extra layers of communication, confirmation, and command approval get triggered. Practically that means the person requesting fire has to clearly state that friendly troops are within the danger-close distance, and the supporting element (or higher command) runs a strict risk assessment. They’ll look at everything from munitions type to weather, the precision available, and the presence of civilians, then decide whether to proceed, delay, or use alternate methods like precision-guided rounds or air support. In my head I picture a hectic radio net where someone calmly repeats 'danger close' so everyone knows the stakes — that verbal flagging and higher-authority sign-off are key. There are also formal fire-support coordination measures and legal rules that differ by country and service. So while the basic idea is the same everywhere — warn, assess, mitigate, authorize — the exact distances, what counts as acceptable risk, and who grants permission vary. If you’re curious about doctrine specifics, look to official service manuals or open-source doctrine summaries, but remember that the real-life emphasis is always on caution and clear chain-of-command decisions rather than improvisation.

When Did The Term Danger Close Originate In Military Use?

5 Answers

Related Books

Related Questions

How Do Soldiers Define Danger Close In Combat?

How Does The US Military Measure Danger Close Distances?

What Movies Portray Danger Close Moments Realistically?

How Do NATO Forces Standardize Danger Close Protocols?

How Do Medics Respond To Danger Close Casualty Scenarios?

How Do Civilian Contractors Mitigate Danger Close Risks?

Why Do Video Games Warn About Danger Close During Missions?

What Procedures Govern Danger Close Artillery Strikes?

Popular Question

What Are The Key Plot Twists In 'The Fragile Threads Of Power'?

Where To Find Pdf To Epub Converter For Anime Novels?

Where Can I Read Passion Bl Novel For Free Online?

Where Can I Read The Long Lost Book Online For Free?

How Do Light Novels Integrate Great Man'S Theory Into Storytelling?

How To Create A Books I Read Journal For Tracking Novels?

Can I Get Bridgerton Books On Amazon Kindle Unlimited?

How Do I Force Save And Quit In Vim?

Do Great Fantasy Romance Books Often Get TV Series Adaptations?

Do Libraries Recommend Books Based On Other Books?

Popular Searches More