6 Answers2025-08-31
I must acknowledge that the P&V marketing machine is very good at what it does. So, you’ll find them on the cover of most classic sections in bookstores, and they are often good. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that they are the best translation of a given work, and therefore, other very good translations are dismissed solely on the basis of-store front hype.
And it creates a fascinating (and totally unfair) situation in which to laud Garnett or another translator one instantly appears to be a snarky, overhyping hipster contrarian challenging the givens of mass marketing. P&V is, for many, often the only good option, for specific books, however, another translator might be offering a far more suitable translation than P&V’s. Ultimately, one serves Dostoevsky, not the translator or publishing brand.
8 Answers2025-07-13
It’s interesting that no one has brought up the Constance Garnett translation of “Crime and Punishment” yet. While her translation is historical and oft-reprinted, reading it after P&V is like watching a movie with the contrast cranked down low. The rough edges of Garnett’s translation have all been smoothed over to make Dostoevsky’s work read like that of a slightly more agitated Jane Austen. But Dostoevsky isn’t Austen. He’s a tough, uncomfortable, and repetitive writer who dives deep into the psychological inner lives of his characters to expose their inner conflicts and psychological fears. The P&V translation has somehow managed to resurrect all of the edgey and uncomfortable aspects of Dostoevsky’s novel for English-speaking readers. While it’s true that some of the translations are a bit awkward, it’s sort of necessary in order to accurately portray the main character, Raskolnikov, as well as the dirty, sick, and oppressive city in which he lives. If you want to read a smooth and pleasant classic, then read something else. But “Crime and Punishment” is not for the faint of heart, and you’ll need a translation that isn’t afraid of the novel’s mess.
9 Answers2025-06-03
The translation by Michael R. Katz of the novel by Dostoevsky is called The Devils and I think this title is very significant. Demons connotes some sort of internal, perhaps even spiritual force, whereas The Devils implies a number of external, almost person-like forces of evil roaming around in society and corrupting it. In other words, The Devils is a far more politically charged novel than Demons and certainly less of a psychological study of the illness of Russia than the latter novel. My emphasis here is on the historical and polemical aspects of the novel and so by choosing a translation, one is also choosing to view the novel through a somewhat subtle but distinctive interpretive lens even as one reads the title of the novel. Does one see the evil in the novel as some sort of disease of the soul of Russia (Demons) or as a group of rather malicious individuals (The Devils)? Both readings are certainly possible in the novel and are supported by it.
11 Answers2025-08-18
I have a sort of contrarian perspective here. The best translations of literature are typically the oldest published versions, from the early part of the 20th century. This is because there is so much of value in the cultural filter of a translator. The translation becomes a sort of historical document of how the literature was perceived and assimilated by the English-speaking world of that era. I have a number of these very old published versions of Dostoevsky, some of which even I wouldn’t recommend to the general reader, for reasons already mentioned, yet they are of enormous value to the literary historian. For the enthusiast of literature with an interest in reception history, the old published versions are the ‘best’ in a totally different, meta sense.
10 Answers2025-06-07
I don’t get the translation debates for this book. The copy of Dr. Zhivago I read was a used book from my local used bookstore. It was the original 1958 translation by Max Hayward and Manya Harari. I had no problems with the translation. The book is a powerful story with hard characters and it’s a classic. I don’t think that there is overcompensation with translation of this book. Just find a decently reviewed copy and read it. The core of the book is so strong that it shines through.
12 Answers2026-07-29
There is a special case with Nietzsche’s notes and unfinished fragments, compiled under the title The Will to Power by his sister Elisabeth Forster-Nietzsche with often unbearable editorial bias, even Nazi bias. The Kaufmann and Hollingdale translation of The Will to Power includes critical comments on this score. Naturally, one must read this material with extreme caution, bearing in mind that it is not a book by Nietzsche. Translation of these notes requires a huge disclaimer; in fact, one should avoid all editions which present The Will to Power as a single, cohesive work by Nietzsche.
9 Answers2025-06-02
There are scam websites which are selling PDF versions of novels by famous authors and claiming that they are selling “exclusive rights” to read the work. I have seen this done for works by Mark Twain such as The Prince and the Pauper and A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court. They are simply ripping off the free PDF versions found on websites such as Project Gutenberg and then charging people to read work that can be had for free. Always check out the work in one of the official free repositories before buying. The copyright status of a work is its friend and prevents it from being artifically scarce.
4 Answers2026-02-04
For English-speaking readers, Willa and Edwin Muir’s translation of Kafka still is the most commonly available and conveys the specific atmosphere of his writings very well. The more recent translation by Breon Mitchell even strives for greater textual accuracy. Readers who are interested in legal and judicial contexts may also like to look at the web novel ‘After I Was Sentished to Death by the Three Men I Loved, Their True Punishment Began’. The situation of wrongful execution at the hands of the heroine’s three former lovers is shocking, but the focus of the story lies rather on the subsequent collapse of the three men and on their psychological aftermath than on the proceedings in court.
10 Answers2025-07-20
Has anyone here tried to read Nietzsche in the original German, even with very limited vocabulary and a dictionary? After spending an hour trying to get through one simple sentence, I realize how far from the original any translation is, not just in terms of language but also in structure and content.Each aphorism, for example, can take an hour to “read”, and only after having read it once does one begin to appreciate the work of the translator, who has to choose between the literal meaning of a word, the rhetorical force of a sentence and the poetic rhythm of a passage. In reading Nietzsche in translation I have given up searching for the “perfect” translation and now, instead, admire the courage of each translation as necessarily imperfect as it is.
8 Answers2025-08-15
This is a miniature compared to his larger works of fiction (i.e. ‘The Brothers Karamazov’ runs to 800 pages or so). But for me White Nights is even more wonderful than that. Because White Nights is Dostoevsky concentrated to their utmost extent – all the major Dostoevsky themes are there in the SPACE given to them for the exploration of alienation and of obsessive idealistic love of an “impossible” sort and of THE most painful sort of awareness of Self that there is. It can be read in two hours. In fact, I read it on a train journey – and sat for the remainder of the journey with my head pressed against the cold window. The ending affected me so very, very much. This tiny work is also of enormous re-readability – for me every 2 years or so. And the major new thing I have noticed each time is the depth, and variousness, of the terribly desperate, romantically-love-struck monologuing of the narrator.