Which Violinists Are Known For Their Rendition Of Canon In G?

I dug through the usual places and can say with confidence where Obanai’s canon height shows up: official character profiles embedded in the collected manga volumes, the official fanbook, and the franchise’s own character pages. Specifically, the character data printed in the tankobon (manga volume) extras and the 'Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba Official Fanbook' list Obanai Iguro’s height as 160 cm (roughly 5'3"). Those official print sources are the gold standard because they come directly from authorial or publisher materials rather than community guesses. Beyond printed profiles, the anime’s official website and licensed English publisher material (for example, the character pages and guide text that accompany the English volumes) also repeat the 160 cm figure. Fan sites and wikis will often mirror those numbers, but I always cross-check against the original fanbook or the tankobon extras when I want a canonical citation. If you need to cite something in a discussion or a post, point to the fanbook page or the manga volume’s profile as your primary source; the anime site and the VIZ pages are handy backups and accessible to people who don’t read Japanese. All that said, you’ll still see people quoting slightly different conversions or rounding (5'3" vs 5'2.99"), and some game stats or promotional materials occasionally list approximations. For solid canon, go with the official fanbook or the character profile in the manga volumes — to me, that’s the satisfying, provable bit of trivia about Obanai.

'Canterbury Tales' is such a fascinating work that still resonates today, even centuries after it was written! The blend of humor and morality in Geoffrey Chaucer's storytelling reflects the rich tapestry of human experiences. Each character—from the witty Wife of Bath to the pious Parson—offers insights into society, love, and human flaws. I often find myself amazed at how current the themes feel; it’s almost like Chaucer was a time traveler observing our modern lives! The significance lies in its exploration of a wide range of social classes and occupations, shedding light on the diverse tapestry of medieval life. It gives us a glimpse into the past, complete with all its quirky characters, societal norms, and moral dilemmas. When I read it, I can't help but think about how similar our modern tales of ambition and personal stories really are. The characters' desires and follies remind me of the intricate web of relationships that exist today. Plus, the frame story structure of a pilgrimage is quite similar to the journeys we all undertake, both physically and metaphorically. It begs the question: what are our modern-day 'tales' as we embark on the adventures of life?

Chaucer's 'Canterbury Tales' is a fascinating tapestry of medieval life and storytelling, featuring characters from various walks of life on a pilgrimage to Canterbury. One of the standout tales, 'The Knight's Tale,' offers a thrilling account of two noble knights, Palamon and Arcite, who vie for the love of the beautiful Emelye. Their rivalry embodies themes of chivalry and fate, highlighting the complexities of love and honor. Another remarkable story is 'The Wife of Bath's Tale,' where we meet a strong and independent woman who challenges the norms of her time regarding marriage and power. Her tale speaks volumes about gender roles, making it particularly engaging for modern audiences. Then there’s 'The Miller's Tale,' a hilarious and bawdy narrative that juxtaposes with the idealism of 'The Knight's Tale.' It tells the story of a clever trickster named Nicholas and his outrageous plan to win over a carpenter's wife, which showcases Chaucer's skill in blending humor with social commentary. Each story not only entertains but also provides a glimpse into the values, beliefs, and quirks of the society of the time. There's so much richness in how he portrays human nature, and I simply can't get enough of the clever wit and layered storytelling throughout the collection. These tales serve as a mirror to the societal issues of Chaucer's England, making the reading experience feel both timeless and poignant. The vivid characters and their adventures invite readers to reflect on their own lives in a way that remains deeply relatable today.

You can pin the moment Rachel Price's return became official to a specific on-screen and off-screen one-two punch. On the show itself, her reappearance is presented as plainly canonical in season 4, episode 7, titled 'Homecoming' — that's where the narrative treats her presence as factual, characters react to her like she never stopped being part of the world, and plot threads that had been dangling since season 2 are finally hooked back in. That episode aired with enough fanfare that even casual viewers noticed the tonal shift: this wasn’t a dream-sequence or an alternate timeline device, it was the story moving forward with her included. Beyond the episode, the creative team reinforced the canonical status very quickly. The showrunner clarified things in an interview for the companion zine 'Behind the Frames', and a short tie-in novella, 'Echoes of the Past', explicitly ties Rachel’s reappearance into earlier plot mechanics rather than retconning. Together those pieces closed the door on debates about whether she was a retcon or a reality — the narrative architecture was adjusted to incorporate her return, not to gloss it over. What really sold it for me was how later episodes treated the consequences. Relationships and power dynamics shifted, long-ignored clues from season 1 got reinterpreted, and fan theories had to be revised. Seeing that slow ripple — the writers not just waving a character back into frame but reshaping scenes and motivations around her presence — is what made it feel canonical to me. It landed with weight, and I was buzzing about the implications for weeks afterward.

The beauty of 'Nah, I’d Derail Canon' lies in how it flips the script on classic storytelling tropes with a smirk. Instead of the protagonist dutifully following the 'chosen one' arc or playing by the rules of fate, this story revels in chaos—characters actively sabotage their own destinies, mock prophecies, and treat the 'grand narrative' like a sandbox to wreck. It’s not just about breaking the fourth wall; it’s about bulldozing through it with a wink. What really hooks me is how it turns power fantasies on their head. Typical isekai or shonen heroes grind to become unstoppable, but here, the MC’s 'power' is their refusal to play along. Side characters might groan as the plot crumbles, but that’s the joy—it’s a love letter to fans exhausted by predictable arcs. The humor’s sharp, too, poking fun at everything from 'training montages' to 'villain monologues.' It’s like the story’s whispering, 'What if we just… didn’t?' and running with that energy.

The charm of 'Nah, I’d Derail Canon' lies in how it flips expectations on their head. Fans adore stories that challenge the status quo, and this one delivers by taking familiar tropes and twisting them into something fresh. It’s not just about subverting canon for shock value—there’s a cleverness to how it recontextualizes character arcs and plot points, making old narratives feel new again. What really hooks people is the emotional payoff. When a story boldly goes off the rails but still respects the heart of the original work, it creates this exhilarating sense of unpredictability. You’re never quite sure where it’s headed, but you trust the journey. Plus, the community around it thrives on dissecting every twist, which adds another layer of fun.

Counting up Andromeda Tonks' connections in the canon feels like untangling a stubborn little knot of family pride, quiet rebellion, and real maternal warmth. At the center is her immediate Black family: she is the sister of Bellatrix Lestrange and Narcissa Malfoy, which sets up one of the sharpest contrasts in the series. Bellatrix is fanatically loyal to Voldemort and the pure-blood ideology, and that hostility toward Andromeda’s marriage is explicit and poisonous; Narcissa is more complicated, tied to family expectations but ultimately capable of compassion in her own way. The Black tapestry and the whole idea of 'always' pure-blood superiority make Andromeda’s choice to wed Ted Tonks an act of social exile — she’s literally disowned for love, and that shapes how she relates to the rest of her kin. Beyond the Black household, her marriage to Ted Tonks and her role as the mother of Nymphadora Tonks are what define her most warmly in the books. Ted is the reason she’s estranged from the Blacks, and Nymphadora’s presence in the Order and her friendship with people like the Weasleys and Remus Lupin creates a whole network around Andromeda. In 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows' Andromeda shows up at Shell Cottage and later becomes Teddy Lupin’s guardian after the Battle of Hogwarts; that grandmotherly bond is tender and canonical — she’s the family anchor for the next generation. Then there’s Sirius Black: he’s a cousin who shares her disgust for the worst parts of the family’s ideology, but both he and Andromeda suffer from family fracture and exile in different ways. There are also ties, quieter but meaningful, to people like Kingsley Shacklebolt, the Weasleys, Bill and Fleur — those friendships and alliances are part of what lets Andromeda live a decent life removed from pure-blood fanaticism. For me, her relationships are a small, compassionate counterpoint to the big, ugly loyalties in the series, and I always end up rooting for her steady, stubborn kindness.

Nothing gets me hyped faster than picturing Erza switching forms and turning a fight on its head. In canon, the armor that fans always point to first is the 'Heaven's Wheel Armor' — it’s her go-to for overwhelming offense, throwing swarms of swords and creating layered attacks that can cover every angle. I think of it as her signature all-purpose killer: great for fights where she needs to control space and keep enemies from regrouping. Beyond that, her heavy defensive sets are just as important. The big, tanky armors—often referred to by fans as variations of an 'Adamantine' or near-unbreakable armor—come out when Erza needs to absorb punishment and protect allies. Then there are the mobility and specialty armors (the flight/wing types or elemental-themed sets) she uses for niche counters: speed, ranged combat, or against magic-specific threats. Context matters: the strongest armor in one fight isn’t always the best in another. For me, the thrill is watching her read a battle and pick the perfect suit, which still gives me chills whenever I rewatch 'Fairy Tail'.