Is 'Years Are So Long' Based On A True Story?

Lately I've been geeking out over long-range 'wuyan' forecasts and how people treat them like weather oracles. I tend to split my thinking into the short-term expectations versus the long-range probabilities. For day-to-day specifics — exact temperatures, timing of storms — the models are pretty solid out to about a week, sometimes a bit longer. Beyond that, chaos creeps in: small errors amplify, atmospheric waves shift, and the deterministic picture falls apart. So if someone hands you a single deterministic long-range map three weeks out, I treat it like a teaser rather than a plan. What I actually trust more is probabilistic guidance. Ensembles — many runs with slightly different starting conditions — give you a sense of spread. If 90% of ensemble members agree you'll get cooler-than-normal weather in a region two weeks out, that's meaningful. Seasonal outlooks are another animal: they aren't about exact days, they're about tendencies. Phenomena like El Niño/La Niña or a strong teleconnection can tilt months-long odds for wetter or drier conditions. Models have made great strides using satellite data and better physics, but uncertainty remains sizable. Practically, I look at trends, ensemble consensus, and well-calibrated probabilistic products rather than single deterministic forecasts. I also compare global centers like ECMWF, GFS ensembles, and regional blends to gauge confidence. Ultimately, long-range 'wuyan' predictions can point you toward likely patterns, not precise events — and I find that framing keeps my expectations sane and my planning useful.

I can't help but geek out over the hockey flow — it's one of those styles that looks effortless but actually wants a little intention. For a classic, wearable flow I aim for about 6–10 inches (15–25 cm) at the longest points: that’s usually the crown and the back. The idea is for the hair to sit past the ears and either kiss the collar or fall to the top of the shoulders when it’s straight. Shorter than about 6 inches usually won’t give you that sweeping, helmet-buffed look; much longer than 10–12 inches starts to feel more like a mane than a flow, unless you want a dramatic version. Sides and layers are where the cut makes or breaks. I like the sides to be blended but not buzzed — somewhere around 3–5 inches (7–13 cm) so the hair can tuck behind the ears or sweep back without looking boxy. Ask for long, textured layers through the back to remove bulk and create movement; point-cutting or razor texturizing helps thin thick hair so it won’t balloon out. The neckline should be natural and slightly shaggy rather than cleanly tapered — that soft, lived-in edge is part of the charm. Styling-wise, I keep it low-effort: towel dry, apply a light sea-salt spray or creamy texturizer, then either let it air dry or rough-blow and brush back with fingers. If you wear helmets, add an extra half-inch to the crown so the flow re-forms after sessions. Trim every 6–10 weeks to maintain shape, and be open with your barber about how much helmet time you get — that little detail changes the exact length I request. I love how the right length turns a messy mop into something that actually feels stylish and sporty.

I got chills the first time I noticed how convincing that suspended infected looked in '28 Days Later', and the more I dug into making-of tidbits the cleverness really shone through. They didn’t float some poor actor off by their neck — the stunt relied on a hidden harness and smart camera work. For the wide, eerie tableau they probably used a stunt performer in a full-body harness with a spreader and slings under the clothes, while the noose or rope you see in frame was a safe, decorative loop that sat on the shoulders or chest, not the throat. Close-ups where the face looks gaunt and unmoving were often prosthetic heads or lifeless dummies that makeup artists could lash and dirty to death — those let the camera linger without risking anyone. Editing completed the illusion: short takes, cutaways to reaction shots, and the right lighting hide the harness and stitching. Safety teams, riggers and a stunt coordinator would rehearse every move; the actor’s real suspension time would be measured in seconds, with quick-release points and medical staff on hand. That mix of practical effects, rigging know-how, and filmcraft is why the scene still sticks with me — it’s spooky and smart at once.

If you're grinding hard clue scrolls in 'Old School RuneScape', the time to finish one can swing a lot depending on what steps it tosses at you and how prepared you are. Hard clues generally come with a handful of steps—think map clues, coordinate digs, emote steps, and the occasional puzzle. Some of those are instant if you’re standing on the right tile or have the emote gear ready; others force you to cross the map or even head into risky areas like the Wilderness. On average, I’d say an experienced tracer who’s got teleports, a spade, and a bank preset will knock a typical hard clue out in roughly 3–8 minutes. For more casual players or unlucky RNG moments, a single hard clue can easily stretch to 10–20 minutes, especially if it drops you on a remote island or requires running across several regions. One of the biggest time sinks is travel. If a coordinate pops up in a tucked-away spot (some coastal islands or remote Wilderness coordinates), you either need the right teleport, a set of boats, or a chunk of run time. Map clues that need an emote might only take a minute if you’re standing where you need to be; they can take longer if the map is cryptic and sends you on a small scavenger hunt. Puzzles and ciphers are usually quick if you use the community wiki or have a little practice, but there are those rare moments where a tricky puzzle adds several minutes. If you chain multiple hard clues back-to-back, you’ll naturally get faster — I’ve done runs averaging around 4–5 minutes per casket once I had a bank preset and a teleport setup, but my first few in a session always take longer while I round up gear and restore run energy. Practical tips that shave minutes: bring a spade and teleport jewelry (ring of dueling, amulet of glory, games necklace, etc.), stock teleport tabs for odd spots, use house teleports or mounted glory teleports if your POH is handy, and set up a bank preset if you have membership so you can instantly gear for emotes or wear weight-reducing equipment. Knowing a few common clue hotspots and having access to fairy rings or charter ships makes a massive difference — teleporting straight to Draynor, Varrock, or a clue-specific tile is game-changing. Also, keep a couple of spare inventory slots for clue tools and a decent amount of run energy or stamina potions while you’re doing longer runs. Bottom line: expect anywhere from about 3–8 minutes if you’re optimized and comfortable navigating the map, up to 10–20 minutes if you hit awkward coordinates or are underprepared. I love the variety though — the little micro-adventures are what keep treasure trails fun, and nothing beats that moment you dig up a casket and wonder what goofy or valuable item you’ll get next.

I used to think mastery was a single destination, but after years of scribbling in margins and late-night page revisions I see it more like a long, winding apprenticeship. It depends wildly on what you mean by 'mastering' — do you want to tell a clear, moving story with convincing figures, or do you want to be the fastest, most polished page-turner in your friend group? For me, the foundations — gesture, anatomy, panel rhythm, thumbnails, lettering — took a solid year of daily practice before the basics felt natural. After that first year I focused on sequencing and writing: pacing a punchline, landing an emotional beat, balancing dialogue with silence. That stage took another couple of years of making whole short comics, getting crushed by critiques, and then slowly improving. Tool fluency (inking digitally, coloring, using perspective rigs) added months but felt less mysterious once I studied tutorials and reverse-engineered comics I loved, like 'Persepolis' or 'One Piece' for pacing. Real mastery? I think it’s lifelong. Even now I set small projects every month to stretch a weak area — more faces, tighter thumbnails, better hands. If you practice consistently and publish, you’ll notice real leaps in 6–12 months and major polish in 2–5 years. For me, the ride is as rewarding as the destination, and every little page I finish feels like a tiny victory.

Lately I’ve been obsessing over the tiny decisions that decide whether a print lives for a week or a century, and that curiosity led me to a rather nerdy breakdown of prints in darkrooms. If a print is properly developed, fixed, washed, and dried, and you then tuck it away in true darkness, it can last decades or even over a century depending on materials. Silver-gelatin fiber prints that were well processed and optionally toned (selenium, gold) are famously durable. Color prints are a different beast — they’re much more sensitive and won’t tolerate the same long-term treatment. In an active darkroom under safelight, though, the story changes: safelights (red/amber) are designed to let you work without fogging paper, but papers have different safelight ratings. Resin-coated (RC) papers tolerate safelight exposure longer than some fiber papers, but I wouldn’t leave a print sitting under a safelight for hours; fogging can creep in. Practically, I avoid leaving important prints exposed to any safelight for more than the short time needed to handle them; for overnight storage in trays I put them in envelopes or cover them. If you’re storing prints long-term, use archival, acid-free sleeves, stable cool temperatures, and low humidity. I’ve rescued prints that were decades old and still gorgeous because someone cared about processing and storage—proof that darkrooms can be safe havens if you respect chemistry and climate.

The world of 'TharnType 2: 7 Years of Love' is rich with emotion and layered narratives, making it a goldmine for fan theories! One that stands out for me is the idea surrounding Tharn’s transformation over the years. Fans speculate that his journey isn't just about love but also about overcoming personal trauma. It’s fascinating to think about how his childhood experiences shape his relationships as an adult, especially with Type. Some believe he might harbor deeper fears of abandonment given his past, which could explain his emotional reactions throughout the series. Moreover, when analyzing the dynamics of Tharn and Type's relationship, there’s a theory suggesting that Type's constant need for validation is linked to his family background. It raises an intriguing possibility that both characters are on parallel journeys of self-discovery, constantly wrestling with insecurities that the other can help heal. What adds to this theory is moments in the show where Type seeks reassurance from Tharn, showcasing how their love isn’t just romantic but also deeply rooted in emotional support, healing old wounds together. Another theory that has gained traction is the possibility of a future time jump or spin-off. The ending of season two left room for speculation about how their lives might change as they progress in their careers and personal lives. Some fans envision a storyline where they navigate being a couple while managing their professional aspirations, which ties into a broader discussion about how relationships evolve over time. I think it’s refreshing to consider the pathways these characters could take beyond the confines of the original series, especially since the bond they've built is so powerful and multifaceted. Engaging with these theories has been a delightful journey for me, as it not only deepens my understanding of the characters but also allows for a richer community experience, discussing and dissecting what might come next for Tharn and Type. Fans are so creative with their interpretations, making the entire experience feel alive and dynamic!

Quietly fascinating question — the short version is that Hollywood has mostly skipped a dramatized, big-screen retelling that centers on Calvin Coolidge’s White House years. What you’ll find instead are documentaries, biographies, archival newsreels and the occasional cameo or passing reference in films and TV set in the 1920s. Coolidge’s style — famously taciturn, minimalist and uneventful compared to more scandal-prone presidents — doesn’t lend itself to the kind of melodrama studios usually chase, so filmmakers have often leaned on more overtly theatrical figures from the era. I’ve dug through filmographies and historical TV dramas, and the pattern is clear: if Coolidge shows up it’s usually as a background figure or through archival footage rather than as the protagonist. For richer context on the man himself I often recommend reading Amity Shlaes’ biography 'Coolidge' to get a vivid sense of his temperament and the political atmosphere; that kind of source often inspires indie filmmakers more than blockbuster studios. Period pieces like 'The Great Gatsby' adaptations or 'Boardwalk Empire' capture the cultural texture of Coolidge’s America — the jazz, the prosperity, the Prohibition tensions — even if the president himself never takes center stage. So while there aren’t many fictional films that dramatize his White House years the way we get with presidents like Lincoln or FDR, there’s a surprising amount to explore if you mix documentaries, primary sources, and fiction set in the 1920s. Personally I find that absence kind of intriguing — it feels like untapped storytelling territory waiting for someone who can make restraint feel cinematic.