Is It Better To Read The Hobbit First Or Start With The Silmarillion?

2026-08-09 05:55:08
266
Partager
Quiz sur ton caractère ABO
Fais ce test rapide pour savoir si tu es Alpha, Bêta ou Oméga.
Odorat
Personnalité
Mode d’amour idéal
Désir secret
Ton côté obscur
Commencer le test

3 Réponses

Thomas
Thomas
Plot Explainer Chef
Honestly, skipping 'The Hobbit' altogether seems fine for some adults. It's written for a younger audience, and the tone can feel simplistic. If you want the deep lore, 'The Silmarillion' gives you the foundation, and then you can appreciate the references in 'The Lord of the Rings' directly. 'The Hobbit' is nice, but it's not essential for the core mythology. The movies cover the main beats well enough if you just need the gist for context later on.
2026-08-10 02:11:56
24
Elijah
Elijah
Story Interpreter Cashier
I'm the weirdo who'll argue for 'The Silmarillion' first under specific conditions. If you're coming from reading, say, classical mythology or dense historical texts for fun, you might actually prefer its tone. It establishes the cosmic stakes – why the world matters, why evil is so persistent. Then 'The Hobbit' becomes this charming, intimate story set in a vast, tragic universe.

You appreciate the Shire more knowing it's a tiny refuge built on ruins of ancient glory. Smaug feels like a lesser echo of Morgoth's dragons. The trade-off is you lose the mystery and gradual discovery, and 'The Hobbit' might feel simplistic afterward. I did it this way and don't regret it, but I'd never universally recommend it. It's a particular taste.
2026-08-12 01:08:16
19
Yara
Yara
Spoiler Watcher Engineer
Starting with 'The Hobbit' seems obvious, but I tried 'The Silmarillion' first years ago and wish I'd been warned. That dense historical tone and avalanche of names just made me put it down for months. My experience says begin with Bilbo's journey – you get familiar with Tolkien's voice through a story that actually has a conventional plot and characters who feel like people, not mythic archetypes.

Going from 'The Hobbit' to 'The Lord of the Rings' gives you the emotional foundation. Suddenly those songs and legends in Rivendell hint at deeper history. 'The Silmarillion' becomes rewarding because you care about Middle-earth's fate. Reading it first is like studying a family tree before meeting any relatives; the emotional connections are all backward.

Jumping straight into 'The Silmarillion' only works if you're naturally drawn to world-building over narrative. Some readers really love that epic, genealogical style from page one. For most of us, though, the dragon's gold and riddles in the dark are a much warmer welcome.
2026-08-15 15:56:10
16
Toutes les réponses
Scanner le code pour télécharger l'application

Livres associés

Autres questions liées

Should I read The Hobbit or The Silmarillion first in Tolkien's world?

6 Réponses2026-07-19 12:16:23
Think about the physical books. 'The Hobbit' often has wonderful illustrations (depending on the edition) that add to the charm. 'The Silmarillion' is usually just text, maybe with some diagrams. The tactile and visual experience of the first book can really set the tone. A cozy, illustrated 'Hobbit' feels like an invitation. A dense, text-block 'Silmarillion' feels like a challenge.

Should I read silmarillion before or after The Hobbit?

7 Réponses2025-08-30 03:51:48
I've always thought of Tolkien like a friend who hands you an enormous, slow-burning lamp — it lights up everything if you give it time. If you're choosing between 'The Silmarillion' and 'The Hobbit', start with 'The Hobbit' unless you're specifically craving ancient-myth vibes. 'The Hobbit' reads like a cozy, well-paced adventure with charming prose and a clear story arc; it's an easy doorway into Middle-earth and lets you meet the kind of humor and warmth that Tolkien can do so well. When I first picked it up on a rainy weekend, I finished it faster than I expected and felt ready for deeper lore. 'The Silmarillion' is a different beast: dense, lofty, and mythic. It's more like reading a collection of creation myths and heroic sagas than a conventional novel. If you jump into it without any footing in Tolkien's world, the dozens of names and the formal cadence can be intimidating. I found it far more rewarding after already knowing Bilbo, Frodo, and the feel of hobbiton — the emotional echoes land better when you recognize themes of loss, fate, and sacrifice. That said, if your main joy is grand myth and genealogies, reading 'The Silmarillion' first isn't wrong — it's just a different experience. Some friends of mine dove straight into it and loved the epic sweep; others waited until they'd savored 'The Hobbit' and 'The Lord of the Rings' and then reread everything with new appreciation. Personally, my preferred route is 'The Hobbit' → 'The Lord of the Rings' → 'The Silmarillion', with a detour to 'Unfinished Tales' or the appendices if I want more background. Pick what fits your mood, but let the books surprise you.

Should I read The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings first in Tolkien?

7 Réponses2026-07-19 06:21:32
Sometimes I recommend starting with the Rankin/Bass animated 'Hobbit' movie from the 70s. It's a charming, condensed version that captures the spirit. Watch that, then read the trilogy. It gives you the story beats and emotional highlights in about 90 minutes, which might be enough to satisfy the curiosity and let you dive into the main event. The book is better, of course, but as a time-saving introduction for a visual learner, the cartoon works. Then you can read the 'Hobbit' book later as a deeper dive.

Should you read The Hobbit first before The Lord of the Rings?

3 Réponses2026-08-09 14:13:40
I actually started with 'The Fellowship of the Ring' because that's what was on the shelf at my uncle's cabin one rainy week. I was twelve and didn't even know 'The Hobbit' existed. Jumping right into the Council of Elrond was confusing as hell—all these names and histories thrown at me. But in a weird way, that confusion mirrored the characters' own; they were piecing together this ancient threat, and so was I. It created this feeling of being thrown into a deep, lived-in world. Later, I went back and read 'The Hobbit'. It was like finding a prequel that filled in all these charming, lighter-toned backstories for Bilbo and Gandalf. Reading it first would have given me a smoother entry, sure, but I don't regret my path. Starting with the bigger, more complex epic made the discovery of its simpler, adventurous origin story its own kind of reward. My take is you can't really go wrong either way; they feed into each other beautifully.

Should I read The Hobbit before the Lord of the Rings books?

7 Réponses2026-07-31 08:26:46
If you’re reading to a younger person, 'The Hobbit' is the clear starting point. 'Lord of the Rings' can wait. But the same principle applies to adults new to fantasy—start with the accessible one.
Découvrez et lisez de bons romans gratuitement
Accédez gratuitement à un grand nombre de bons romans sur GoodNovel. Téléchargez les livres que vous aimez et lisez où et quand vous voulez.
Lisez des livres gratuitement sur l'APP
Scanner le code pour lire sur l'application
DMCA.com Protection Status