Is 'Dead In Long Beach California' Based On A True Story?

Lately I've been geeking out over long-range 'wuyan' forecasts and how people treat them like weather oracles. I tend to split my thinking into the short-term expectations versus the long-range probabilities. For day-to-day specifics — exact temperatures, timing of storms — the models are pretty solid out to about a week, sometimes a bit longer. Beyond that, chaos creeps in: small errors amplify, atmospheric waves shift, and the deterministic picture falls apart. So if someone hands you a single deterministic long-range map three weeks out, I treat it like a teaser rather than a plan. What I actually trust more is probabilistic guidance. Ensembles — many runs with slightly different starting conditions — give you a sense of spread. If 90% of ensemble members agree you'll get cooler-than-normal weather in a region two weeks out, that's meaningful. Seasonal outlooks are another animal: they aren't about exact days, they're about tendencies. Phenomena like El Niño/La Niña or a strong teleconnection can tilt months-long odds for wetter or drier conditions. Models have made great strides using satellite data and better physics, but uncertainty remains sizable. Practically, I look at trends, ensemble consensus, and well-calibrated probabilistic products rather than single deterministic forecasts. I also compare global centers like ECMWF, GFS ensembles, and regional blends to gauge confidence. Ultimately, long-range 'wuyan' predictions can point you toward likely patterns, not precise events — and I find that framing keeps my expectations sane and my planning useful.

I can't help but geek out over the hockey flow — it's one of those styles that looks effortless but actually wants a little intention. For a classic, wearable flow I aim for about 6–10 inches (15–25 cm) at the longest points: that’s usually the crown and the back. The idea is for the hair to sit past the ears and either kiss the collar or fall to the top of the shoulders when it’s straight. Shorter than about 6 inches usually won’t give you that sweeping, helmet-buffed look; much longer than 10–12 inches starts to feel more like a mane than a flow, unless you want a dramatic version. Sides and layers are where the cut makes or breaks. I like the sides to be blended but not buzzed — somewhere around 3–5 inches (7–13 cm) so the hair can tuck behind the ears or sweep back without looking boxy. Ask for long, textured layers through the back to remove bulk and create movement; point-cutting or razor texturizing helps thin thick hair so it won’t balloon out. The neckline should be natural and slightly shaggy rather than cleanly tapered — that soft, lived-in edge is part of the charm. Styling-wise, I keep it low-effort: towel dry, apply a light sea-salt spray or creamy texturizer, then either let it air dry or rough-blow and brush back with fingers. If you wear helmets, add an extra half-inch to the crown so the flow re-forms after sessions. Trim every 6–10 weeks to maintain shape, and be open with your barber about how much helmet time you get — that little detail changes the exact length I request. I love how the right length turns a messy mop into something that actually feels stylish and sporty.

If you're grinding hard clue scrolls in 'Old School RuneScape', the time to finish one can swing a lot depending on what steps it tosses at you and how prepared you are. Hard clues generally come with a handful of steps—think map clues, coordinate digs, emote steps, and the occasional puzzle. Some of those are instant if you’re standing on the right tile or have the emote gear ready; others force you to cross the map or even head into risky areas like the Wilderness. On average, I’d say an experienced tracer who’s got teleports, a spade, and a bank preset will knock a typical hard clue out in roughly 3–8 minutes. For more casual players or unlucky RNG moments, a single hard clue can easily stretch to 10–20 minutes, especially if it drops you on a remote island or requires running across several regions. One of the biggest time sinks is travel. If a coordinate pops up in a tucked-away spot (some coastal islands or remote Wilderness coordinates), you either need the right teleport, a set of boats, or a chunk of run time. Map clues that need an emote might only take a minute if you’re standing where you need to be; they can take longer if the map is cryptic and sends you on a small scavenger hunt. Puzzles and ciphers are usually quick if you use the community wiki or have a little practice, but there are those rare moments where a tricky puzzle adds several minutes. If you chain multiple hard clues back-to-back, you’ll naturally get faster — I’ve done runs averaging around 4–5 minutes per casket once I had a bank preset and a teleport setup, but my first few in a session always take longer while I round up gear and restore run energy. Practical tips that shave minutes: bring a spade and teleport jewelry (ring of dueling, amulet of glory, games necklace, etc.), stock teleport tabs for odd spots, use house teleports or mounted glory teleports if your POH is handy, and set up a bank preset if you have membership so you can instantly gear for emotes or wear weight-reducing equipment. Knowing a few common clue hotspots and having access to fairy rings or charter ships makes a massive difference — teleporting straight to Draynor, Varrock, or a clue-specific tile is game-changing. Also, keep a couple of spare inventory slots for clue tools and a decent amount of run energy or stamina potions while you’re doing longer runs. Bottom line: expect anywhere from about 3–8 minutes if you’re optimized and comfortable navigating the map, up to 10–20 minutes if you hit awkward coordinates or are underprepared. I love the variety though — the little micro-adventures are what keep treasure trails fun, and nothing beats that moment you dig up a casket and wonder what goofy or valuable item you’ll get next.

I used to think mastery was a single destination, but after years of scribbling in margins and late-night page revisions I see it more like a long, winding apprenticeship. It depends wildly on what you mean by 'mastering' — do you want to tell a clear, moving story with convincing figures, or do you want to be the fastest, most polished page-turner in your friend group? For me, the foundations — gesture, anatomy, panel rhythm, thumbnails, lettering — took a solid year of daily practice before the basics felt natural. After that first year I focused on sequencing and writing: pacing a punchline, landing an emotional beat, balancing dialogue with silence. That stage took another couple of years of making whole short comics, getting crushed by critiques, and then slowly improving. Tool fluency (inking digitally, coloring, using perspective rigs) added months but felt less mysterious once I studied tutorials and reverse-engineered comics I loved, like 'Persepolis' or 'One Piece' for pacing. Real mastery? I think it’s lifelong. Even now I set small projects every month to stretch a weak area — more faces, tighter thumbnails, better hands. If you practice consistently and publish, you’ll notice real leaps in 6–12 months and major polish in 2–5 years. For me, the ride is as rewarding as the destination, and every little page I finish feels like a tiny victory.

That's a fun mix-up to unpack — Chishiya and 'Squid Game' live in different universes. Chishiya is a character from 'Alice in Borderland', not 'Squid Game', so he doesn't show up in the 'Squid Game' finale and therefore can't die there. If what you meant was whether anyone with a similar name or role dies in 'Squid Game', the show wraps up with a very emotional, bittersweet ending: Seong Gi-hun comes out of the games alive but haunted, and several major players meet tragic ends during the competition. The finale is more about consequence and moral cost than about surprise resurrections. I get why the names blur — both series have the whole survival-game vibe, cold strategists, and memorable twists. For Chishiya's actual fate, you'll want to watch or rewatch 'Alice in Borderland' where his arc is resolved. Personally, I find these kinds of cross-show confusions kind of charming; they say a lot about how similar themes stick with us.

The chatter online about Chishiya really lights me up, because I love parsing every tiny frame. In my view, the strongest push for him being dead is cinematic: the way the camera lingers on his body, the pale lighting, and the reactions of the other characters that feel like finality. Writers frequently use that kind of staging to signal closure, and the music swells in a way that nails a funeral beat. There’s also the practical evidence—grave injuries he sustained, and the show gives us moments where his survival would have required a near-miracle. On the flip side, I keep circling back to how clever and evasive he’s been throughout 'Alice in Borderland'. I can’t easily forget his habit of leaving breadcrumbs and contingency plans; the narrative has a history of pulling knives out of hatboxes. The absence of a clear, unambiguous corpse shot and the showrunners’ love of ambiguity leave room for him to have slipped away or been rescued off-screen. Personally, I lean toward believing the creators wanted ambiguity on purpose — it fits the tone — but I also enjoy the sting of loss if he truly is gone.

Kadang kalimat bahasa Inggris itu terasa lebih dramatis dibanding terjemahannya, dan 'drop dead gorgeous' memang salah satunya. Bagi saya, frasa ini berarti 'sangat memukau sampai membuat orang terpana' — bukan literal bikin orang mati, melainkan gambaran kecantikan atau pesona yang ekstrem. Kalau saya menerjemahkan untuk pesan santai, saya sering memilih 'amat memesona', 'cantik luar biasa', atau 'memukau sampai napas terhenti'. Di sisi lain, saya selalu ingat konteks pemakaian: ini ekspresi kuat dan agak hiperbolis, cocok dipakai saat ingin memuji penampilan seseorang di momen spesial, seperti gaun pesta atau foto cosplay yang cetar. Untuk teks formal atau terjemahan profesional, saya biasanya menurunkan intensitasnya menjadi 'sangat memikat' agar tetap sopan. Intinya, terjemahan yang pas tergantung siapa yang bicara dan nuansa yang ingin disampaikan — saya pribadi suka pakai versi yang playful ketika suasana santai.

Kalau ngomongin frasa 'drop dead gorgeous', aku biasanya langsung kebayang seseorang yang penampilannya bikin orang lain ternganga—bukan sekadar cantik biasa, tapi levelnya membuat suasana seolah berhenti sejenak. Di percakapan sehari-hari, frasa ini sering dipakai untuk menggambarkan kecantikan atau ketampanan yang ekstrem dan dramatis. Aku suka bagaimana ekspresi ini terasa teatrikal; itu bukan pujian halus, melainkan lebih seperti tepuk tangan visual. Dalam konteks modern, beberapa sinonim menjaga nuansa dramanya sementara yang lain menekankan daya tarik dengan cara lebih casual atau empowering. Kalau mau daftar cepat, berikut beberapa sinonim populer dalam bahasa Inggris yang sering dipakai sekarang: 'stunning', 'breathtaking', 'jaw-dropping', 'gorgeous', 'knockout', 'to die for', 'drop-dead beautiful', 'smoking hot', dan slang seperti 'slay' atau 'slaying' serta 'hot AF' dan 'fine as hell'. Untuk nuansa yang lebih elegan atau netral, 'stunning' dan 'breathtaking' cocok; buat obrolan santai atau media sosial, 'slay', 'hot AF', atau emoji 🔥😍 works great. Dalam bahasa Indonesia kamu bisa pakai frasa seperti 'cantik/cakep setengah mati', 'bikin gagal fokus', 'mempesona', 'memukau', 'cantik parah', 'gorgeous parah', atau slang yang lebih ringan seperti 'kece banget' dan 'cantik banget'. Pilih kata tergantung suasana: formal vs gaul, pujian sopan vs godaan bercumbu. Penting juga ngeh ke nuansa: 'drop dead gorgeous' punya sentuhan dramatis dan kadang sedikit seksual—itu bukan sekadar 'pretty'. Jadi kalau mau lebih sopan atau profesional, pilih 'stunning' atau 'exceptionally beautiful'. Kalau ingin memberi kesan empowerment (misal memuji penampilan yang juga memancarkan kepercayaan diri), kata-kata seperti 'slaying' atau 'absolute stunner' kerja banget karena menggarisbawahi aksi, bukan hanya penampilan pasif. Di media sosial, kombinasi teks + emoji bisa mengubah tone: 'breathtaking 😍' terasa lebih hangat, sementara 'hot AF 🔥' lebih menggoda. Secara pribadi, aku suka variasi karena tiap kata punya warna sendiri. Kadang aku pakai 'breathtaking' waktu nonton adegan visual yang rapi, misalnya desain karakter di anime atau sinematografi di film. Untuk temen yang berdandan parah di acara, aku bakal bilang 'you look stunning' atau dengan gaya gaul bilang 'slay, sis'. Menemukan padanan yang pas itu seru—bahasa bisa bikin pujian terdengar elegan, lucu, atau menggoda—tergantung vibe yang mau disampaikan.