How Can Et Jaynes Probability Theory Help With Priors Selection?

2025-09-03 04:16:19 294

4 Answers

Grayson
Grayson
2025-09-05 17:31:05
I get a little giddy whenever Jaynes comes up because his way of thinking actually makes prior selection feel like crafting a story from what you truly know, not just picking a default. In my copy of 'Probability Theory: The Logic of Science' I underline whole paragraphs that insist priors should reflect symmetries, invariances, and the constraints of real knowledge. Practically that means I start by writing down the facts I have — what units are natural, what quantities are invariant if I relabel my data, and what measurable constraints (like a known average or range) exist.

From there I often use the maximum entropy principle to turn those constraints into a prior: if I only know a mean and a range, MaxEnt gives the least-committal distribution that honors them. If there's a natural symmetry — like a location parameter that shifts without changing the physics — I use uniform priors on that parameter; for scale parameters I look for priors invariant under scaling. I also do sensitivity checks: try a Jeffreys prior, a MaxEnt prior, and a weakly informative hierarchical prior, then compare posterior predictions. Jaynes’ framework is a mindset as much as a toolbox: encode knowledge transparently, respect invariance, and test how much your conclusions hinge on those modeling choices.
Zoe
Zoe
2025-09-06 04:22:46
I tend to tackle priors like I’d prep for a boss fight in a game: gather intel, exploit symmetry, and don’t overcommit to flashy choices. I’ll ask three quick questions: what do I truly know (constraints), what transformations should leave the problem unchanged, and how sensitive is my conclusion to the prior? Jaynes pushes using maximum entropy to encode exactly what you know and nothing more, so if I only know a mean and variance I pick the MaxEnt distribution for those constraints rather than guessing a shape.

A concrete habit I picked up is to try invariance arguments first: if the system is unchanged under shifts, consider a flat prior on location; if it’s unchanged by scale, consider a prior proportional to 1/parameter. But I never stop there — I run posterior predictive checks and priors sensitivity runs. If the posterior barely moves under these reasonable alternatives, I feel safe; if not, I either collect more data or build a hierarchical prior that shares strength across groups. Jaynes made me see priors as explicit encoding of knowledge, not mysterious knobs to tune.
Chase
Chase
2025-09-07 12:11:39
My approach is a little nerdy and a touch formal, but Jaynes’ principles make it concise. I usually start with the desiderata he champions: consistency, invariance under reparameterization where appropriate, and logical coherence with known constraints. That leads to two practical techniques I use in tandem: maximum entropy for encoding soft constraints, and transformation-group arguments for symmetry-based invariance priors.

For example, if I'm modeling the position of an object where shifts in the origin don't matter, I treat the location parameter as having a uniform prior. For a scale parameter (like a standard deviation or a rate), I consider priors that are form-invariant under scaling — often leading to 1/σ-type behavior or Jeffreys’ priors as a starting point. Jaynes steered me away from blind defaults; instead I translate physical or logical symmetries into mathematical demands. I also watch out for improper priors that break normalization and perform posterior predictive checks: simulate data from the prior-predictive, see if simulated datasets look plausible given domain knowledge, and iterate. When I can, I embed vague beliefs into hierarchical models so the data can inform hyperparameters, blending Jaynes’ logic with modern robustness practices.
Knox
Knox
2025-09-07 18:41:38
I like to keep priors honest and minimalistic, and Jaynes’ voice helps me do that. He taught me to convert precise pieces of knowledge into constraints and then use maximum entropy to avoid sneaking in extra assumptions. If all I know is that a parameter is positive, I don’t force a detailed shape — I pick a distribution that reflects positivity and scale-invariance if that’s sensible.

I always complement the theoretical choice with simple checks: prior predictive sampling, sensitivity sweeps with alternative invariant priors, and sometimes a hierarchical layer if borrowing strength is natural. It’s a gentle workflow: encode knowledge, respect symmetries, test robustness, and be ready to collect more data if the prior still decides everything — which usually tells me I need to learn more rather than pretend certainty.
View All Answers
Scan code to download App

Related Books

Help Me
Help Me
Abigail Kinsington has lived a shelter life, stuck under the thumb of her domineering and abusive father. When his shady business dealings land him in trouble, some employees seeking retribution kidnap her as a punishment for her father. But while being held captive, she begins to fall for one of her captors, a misunderstood guy who found himself in over his head after going along with the crazy scheme of a co-worker. She falls head over heels for him. When she is rescued, she is sent back to her father and he is sent to jail. She thinks she has found a friend in a sympathetic police officer, who understands her. But when he tries turns on her, she wonders how real their connection is? Trapped in a dangerous love triangle between her kidnapper and her rescuer, Abby is more confused than she has ever been. Will she get out from under her father's tyrannical rule? Will she get to be with the man she loves? Does she even know which one that is? Danger, deception and dark obsession turn her dull life into a high stakes game of cat and mouse. Will she survive?
10
37 Chapters
Can't help falling in love
Can't help falling in love
Meera Gupta, daughter of Niyati and Manish is an architect who comes back to India, after a long interval to visit her ailing grandfather, Prithviraj, whom she is most attached to. Her grandfather's last wish is getting her married and even though Meera is commitment phobic she knew she couldn't rest without fulfilling her grandfather's last wish. Arjun, son of Shantanu and Pratibha Goenka is a young man, working with his father and brothers for Goenka Constructions. He isn't ready for marriage, especially not arranged as he considers all the girls considered for his marriage to be immature and materialistic. The real fact is also that he isn't ready for marriage owing to the baggage from his past. Arjun's younger brother is Aakash is married to Divya who is Meera's cousin and confidante. To make matters worse for Arjun and Meera, Shantanu gives his word to Prithviraj to ensure that Arjun and Meera are married. To headstrong characters, who aren't ready for marriage are woven into a relationship, will they ever fall in love? Is love the only thing you need to make a marriage work?
10
8 Chapters
Exchange Help with Mr. Wolf
Exchange Help with Mr. Wolf
Harriet Morrison is at her senior year at North Point High. She eats her lunch at the janitor’s closet and thought of meeting the legendary wolf who lives in the forest and will always be the talk of the small town she’s living in. She went home into her parents’ fight then at night, her mother’s death. Two weeks later, her father gets rid of her because she wasn’t her real daughter. She inherited a farmhouse from her late mother but entered the wrong house and found the legendary wolf with his gamma, Harriet heard him talking to the tomb of his long-lost lover, a girl in his past that he has fallen in love with. So, out of the heat of the moment she asked him if she could live with him, and in return, they could pretend they could be together in order for him to go to school and find his long-lost lover to which the wolf agreed and her bullies ran away, but each time they interviewed a girl from her school that looks a lot like his lover, they open up a new quest that got her to discover secrets on her own self, family, her past, and her true identity. Can Harriet handle all of it with the help of the legendary wolf? Or would she end up dead with all the misery and demise she got?
Not enough ratings
93 Chapters
Can't Help Falling in Love (Book 1)
Can't Help Falling in Love (Book 1)
Sixteen years back, my family said he is like my brother. Ten years back, my friends said he is my crush. Eight years back, I confessed my love for him. Six years back, he left me, breaking my heart into pieces. Now, we met again on the day when my marriage was announced with someone else. This re-encountered made me realize that I still love him because I can't help falling in love with him again & again & again. Welcome to the story of Pravi and Aarvik.A love story that accidentally happened without the character's Knowledge. A love story which is forbidden by the families because of 2 reasons:1) Age Gap2) Well, why don't you go through the story once to know about it. Book 1) "Can't Help Falling in Love"-Completed; Book 2) "I Belong to Him"-Completed; Book 3) "My Mysterious Lover"-On Hold
10
110 Chapters
How Can I Get Rid of That Scandal?
How Can I Get Rid of That Scandal?
My husband's childhood sweetheart needed surgery, and he insisted that I be the one to operate on her. I followed every medical protocol, doing everything I could to save her. However, after she was discharged, she accused me of medical malpractice and claimed I’d left her permanently disabled. I turned to my husband, hoping he’d speak up for me, but he curtly said, “I told you not to act recklessly. Now look what’s happened.” To my shock, the hospital surveillance footage also showed that I hadn’t followed the correct surgical procedure. I couldn’t defend myself. In the end, I was stabbed to death by her super-alpha husband. Even as I died, I still couldn’t understand—how did the footage show my surgical steps were wrong? When I opened my eyes again, I was back on the day Joanna was admitted for testing.
8 Chapters
How Can You Know the Agony of Heart
How Can You Know the Agony of Heart
"What's wrong I did with you that you have been torturing me, for God's sake leave, I will never forget your favor, please..." She pleaded to him with teary eyes. But he grabbed her silky hair in his tight grasp and said. "Don't show me your crocodile tears, it's not impacting me, good man inside of me died a long time ago, the man who is standing in front of you is a stone made, a deaf stone, no matter how many times you beat your head with it, you will be at loss, what's wrong my dad and I did with you? nothing....but still I am suffering, and my dad.....my dad lost his life, after turning someone else life into miserable, how you people can remain happy.....?" He was not in his senses. She can't endure it anymore, so she remains silent. Hoor ul Ain was kidnapped and raped in a misunderstanding that her brother happened to elope with the sister of Shanzal on her very marriage day. How things will turn out when Shanzal know that her brother isn't involved in her sister eloping? Will Hoor ul Ain survive after facing his brutality? How Shanzal will face the situation after finding Hoor ul Ain guilty?
10
36 Chapters

Related Questions

How Does Ver Young Sheldon Connect To The Big Bang Theory?

5 Answers2025-10-14 02:17:34
I got hooked on 'Young Sheldon' because it feels like the missing origin story for all those bizarre anecdotes you heard on 'The Big Bang Theory'. The connection is simple and clever: 'Young Sheldon' is a literal prequel. It follows a kid genius growing up in East Texas and those childhood beats explain why adult Sheldon acts the way he does. Jim Parsons, who played adult Sheldon on 'The Big Bang Theory', narrates the show, so you get that same voice offering wry commentary, which emotionally bridges the two series. Beyond the narration, most of the connective tissue is in the details. Family members from 'The Big Bang Theory' — like his mother, father, twin sister, and Meemaw — appear in full, three-dimensional ways, showing how their relationships shaped him. Little things land like Easter eggs: the origins of Sheldon's routines, the early obsession with trains, why 'Soft Kitty' matters, and the first awkward hints of social confusion that become defining traits. Sometimes the timelines don’t line up perfectly, but I love seeing the references finally make sense; it adds layers to the jokes and gives the grown-up Sheldon more humanity, which I didn’t expect but totally appreciate.

Quand Sort La Saison 8 De Outlander Et Quelle Est La Date ?

3 Answers2025-10-13 15:24:12
Quelle excitation de parler enfin de la huitième saison de 'Outlander' — je me suis vraiment accroché au calendrier dès l'annonce ! La saison 8 a été lancée le 4 novembre 2023 sur la chaîne Starz aux États-Unis, et elle a été diffusée épisode par épisode sur une cadence hebdomadaire. C'était annoncé depuis un moment comme la saison finale, donc pour beaucoup d'entre nous, chaque sortie d'épisode avait ce petit goût d'adieu et de célébration en même temps. Pour les téléspectateurs hors des États-Unis, la disponibilité variait selon les territoires : certains ont pu la voir via des plateformes partenaires peu après la diffusion américaine, tandis que d'autres l'ont récupérée dans des catalogues internationaux un peu plus tard. Le format hebdomadaire permettait de savourer chaque épisode et de laisser les discussions et théories fuser entre fans — parfait pour les forums et les soirées visionnage. Sur le contenu, la saison conclut beaucoup d'arcs émotionnels autour de Claire et Jamie, tout en donnant de la place aux personnages secondaires qui ont grandi avec la série. Personnellement, j'ai adoré les choix de mise en scène et la façon dont la série a rendu justice à l'ambiance historique et aux tensions familiales; ça m'a donné des frissons plus d'une fois. Vraiment, une page se tourne mais quel final mémorable pour une saga qu'on a tous portée un peu dans notre quotidien.

La Stagione 7 Young Sheldon Avrà Cameo Da Big Bang Theory?

2 Answers2025-10-13 12:35:10
Che bella domanda — mi intriga l'idea di un cameo vero e proprio tra 'Young Sheldon' e 'The Big Bang Theory'! Personalmente, trovo la connessione tra le due serie molto affascinante perché funziona su più livelli: da un lato abbiamo la timeline che è decisamente sfavorevole ai cameo fisici (la storia di 'Young Sheldon' è ambientata decenni prima), dall'altro c'è già un filo diretto molto solido grazie alla voce narrante di Sheldon adulto. Quel legame narrativo rende ogni riferimento tremendamente piacevole, ma fa anche capire perché vedere i personaggi adulti in carne e ossa sarebbe straniante e difficile da giustificare. Detto questo, io penso che gli sviluppatori potrebbero giocare con soluzioni intelligenti: cameo vocali, flash-forward molto brevi, o addirittura sequenze in cui la narrazione si sposta improvvisamente al futuro per un attimo. Queste mosse sarebbero più credibili e meno forzate rispetto a un’apparizione prolungata di personaggi come Leonard o Penny. Inoltre ci sono sempre i piccoli Easter egg — oggetti, battute, o riferimenti al comportamento futuro dei personaggi — che fanno battere il cuore ai fan senza rompere la coerenza storica. Se guardo ad altre serie spin-off che ho seguito, spesso preferisco questi tocchi sottili ai grandi colpi di scena: mantengono il tono e premiano chi conosce entrambe le serie. Infine, parlando da spettatore un po' nostalgico, mi piace l’idea che la connessione resti elegante e mai gratuita. Se arriverà un cameo di un volto noto, spero sia scritto con cura e che serva una funzione narrativa chiara, non solo per suscitare applauso. Nel frattempo apprezzo ogni riferimento che lega i due mondi — la voce di Sheldon adulto, qualche battuta ricorrente, e quei dettagli che ti fanno fare “eh, ecco perché tutto è così” — e resto curioso su cosa prepareranno per la stagione 7. Sarebbe fantastico vedere qualcosa di sorprendente ma coerente, e io ci spero con un sorriso.

How Does John Bowlby’S Theory Relate To Emotional Bonds In Adults?

4 Answers2025-09-16 07:17:28
Exploring John Bowlby’s theory feels like peeling back layers on the complex nature of emotional bonds in adults. His idea of attachment, originally drawn from the bond between infants and caregivers, really resonates when we look at adult relationships. Think about it—those early experiences lay the foundation for how we approach connections later in life. If someone had a secure attachment to their parents, they’re generally more likely to express themselves openly with partners, trust deeply, and handle conflicts like a champ. On the flip side, those with insecure attachments might struggle with commitment or might even display anxious behaviors in their adult relationships. One fascinating aspect is the implications for friendships, too! Bowlby’s insights shine brightly in how we form close ties with friends. Securely attached adults often have a diverse group of friends, as they feel comfortable being vulnerable, while those with avoidant tendencies may stay distant, perhaps holding others at arm's length. It's like these attachment styles ripple outwards, influencing so much of our social lives. Of course, it’s not all doom and gloom for those with a rocky start. The beauty lies in the possibility of change. Many individuals work hard to identify their attachment styles and learn healthier ways to connect with others. Therapy, self-reflection, and mindful practices can help us shift towards a secure attachment, paving the way for richer, more fulfilling emotional bonds as adults. Reflecting on this, I've witnessed transformations in friends who consciously sought to better their relationships, reminding us that we're never stuck in our ways—that growth is always within reach!

Who Proposed The Dark Forest Theory And Why Is It Significant?

2 Answers2025-09-21 11:56:24
The dark forest theory was proposed by the Chinese author Liu Cixin in his groundbreaking novel 'The Dark Forest', which is the second book in his 'Three-Body Problem' trilogy. It’s intriguing because it posits a chilling hypothesis about why we haven't encountered extraterrestrial civilizations yet. Essentially, the theory suggests that the universe is akin to a vast, dark forest where every civilization acts like a hidden hunter. Each species, aware of the potential threat other civilizations might pose, prioritizes self-preservation. This enigmatic concept taps into the fear that any signal sent into space could alert a dangerous alien species to our presence, making us a target for annihilation. This theory stands out in the science fiction realm because it grapples with deep-seated questions about existence, conflict, and survival on a cosmic scale. It's not just about whether life exists elsewhere; it's about the inherent dangers of the universe. In 'The Dark Forest', Liu Cixin illustrates these ideas through intricate parallels to human society, where trust can be fleeting and survival sometimes necessitates straying into moral gray areas. I found it fascinating how he draws on game theory and philosophy to create such an unsettling yet thought-provoking narrative. Furthermore, the theory has ignited discussions in both science fiction fandoms and scientific circles. Many ponder its implications for the future of humanity if we do find alien life—will we make first contact, or will it end in catastrophe? Liu's exploration of this grim view invites readers to reflect on the very nature of intelligence and the potential for cooperation versus conflict across civilizations. It's a significant piece of literature that challenges our understanding of the cosmos and puts our fears into perspective, making us question the risks of exploring the great unknown!

What Characters From Dexter'S Laboratory Appear In Big Bang Theory?

2 Answers2025-09-29 01:22:53
Growing up, I was a huge fan of 'Dexter's Laboratory.' The show’s mix of science and adventure really captured my imagination! So, when I stumbled upon an episode of 'The Big Bang Theory' where Dexter made his cameo, I was ecstatic. It’s in Season 2, Episode 8 titled 'The Lizard-Spock Expansion.' In this episode, Sheldon dresses up as a 'Dexter’s Laboratory' version of the character to impress girls at a Halloween party. How cool is that? It’s such a great homage to a classic cartoon! It's funny how characters from different universes collide. Seeing Sheldon, who’s such an analytical and socially awkward guy, channeling Dexter’s genius really brought a smile to my face. That brilliant child scientist who constantly finds himself in trouble with his sister Dee Dee reflects Sheldon’s own experiences with his relationships. There’s also that playful rivalry happening there. The nerdy pop culture references sprinkled throughout 'The Big Bang Theory' never cease to amaze me, and this specific one hit all the right notes! Plus, if you delve deeper into the world of 'The Big Bang Theory,' you'll notice how well it embraces the idea of blending different fandoms. Remember when they make references to everything from 'Star Wars' to 'Doctor Who'? It creates such a vibrant tapestry of nerd culture that feels both warm and inclusive. This mix is what makes the show so relatable, reminding us that no matter where we are in life, there’s always a passion we can connect with, whether it be science, cartoons, or gaming! So, every time I see that episode, it rekindles the joy I felt watching those childhood cartoons, and it’s a delightful reminder of how those shows shaped our entertainment landscape! On another note, I’ve often pondered about the influence of these crossovers. They create a cool bridge between generations, don't they? Anyone who's ever partook in the joy of 'Dexter's Laboratory' would certainly feel that nostalgia when it pops up in contemporary shows like 'The Big Bang Theory.' All these memories just come rushing in, and it makes me appreciate how much fun creating connections through different media can be. Who knew that a little lab boy could blend so beautifully into a show about scientists, right? That's the magic of storytelling and art. It just brings everyone together!

How Do Leonard And Sheldon Complement Each Other On The Big Bang Theory?

4 Answers2025-09-28 13:52:09
The dynamic between Leonard and Sheldon in 'The Big Bang Theory' is nothing short of iconic. From the get-go, their contrasting personalities create a whirlwind of comedic moments and heartfelt interactions. Leonard embodies emotional intelligence and adaptability. He often finds himself playing the straight man to Sheldon's eccentricities, which makes for some hilarious situations. For instance, while Sheldon is rigid in his routines and struggles to understand social cues, Leonard approaches situations with a level of empathy that grounds their friendship. On Sheldon's end, his obsessive intellect and scientific prowess challenge Leonard, pushing him to grow and adapt in ways he might not have thought possible. I love how they navigate their friendship with humor and tension, especially when it comes to Sheldon's infamous ‘Roommate Agreement’. Every outrageous request from Sheldon tests Leonard's patience, yet somehow, he always finds a way to meet Sheldon halfway. These scenarios not only highlight their differences but also the bond that keeps them together. Ultimately, their relationship illustrates how opposites can attract and flourish; it’s about balance. Leonard provides warmth, while Sheldon presents a unique perspective on life, leading to moments where they genuinely learn from each other. Even when they bicker, it's clear they have each other’s backs, which adds layers to their friendship. I find this complexity refreshing and relatable, making their journey throughout the series so much more enjoyable. In a way, it reflects how we all need different perspectives in our lives, don’t you think?

What Are The Best Crossover Episodes Of Dexter'S Laboratory And The Big Bang Theory?

3 Answers2025-09-29 15:20:39
Crossover episodes are always a treat, especially when they bring together distinct shows that capture different aspects of our nerdy hearts! One that stands out to me is the 'The Big Bang Theory' episode titled 'The Space Probe Disintegration.' Although it’s not a direct crossover with 'Dexter's Laboratory', you can feel the underlying homage to the premise of a super-smart kid with a secret lab. The way Sheldon, Leonard, and the gang tackle scientific concepts while cracking jokes feels reminiscent of Dexter’s quirky experiments. The style of humor, heavily laced with geek culture, keeps you laughing while still diving into some science-heavy references. Then there’s the fan-made crossover that’s floating around—imagine Dexter teaming up with the gang after a freak accident transports him to their universe! The concept alone makes me giddy. Just think of the chaos when Dexter meets Sheldon! I can already see him rolling his eyes at Sheldon’s theories, while Sheldon admires his intellect. The witty exchanges would have us all in stitches. 'Dexter’s Laboratory' is so ‘90s, yet Sheldon’s character embodies a modern nerd archetype. It connects generations of fans who appreciate both the clever humor and scientific satire. What also brings these shows together is their exploration of intelligence in a humorous way. Imagine a theoretical episode where Dexter helps the team solve a scientific dilemma—what a mash-up that would be! This beautiful blend of intelligent humor and chaos is what makes any potential crossover so exciting.
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
DMCA.com Protection Status