Is Fangs, Fate & Other Bad Decisions Part Of A Series?

Wow, the fanart scene around 'Fate' is absolutely crowded, and if you scroll Pixiv, Twitter, or Reddit for long enough you'll start to notice the same faces popping up in R-18 and mature-tagged work again and again. A mix of pure popularity, striking character design, and canon or in-game alternate outfits drives which servants get the most mature fan art. Characters who are both iconic across the franchise and who have a lot of official costume variants (seasonal swimsuits, festival outfits, alternate versions like 'Alter' forms) naturally show up more — artists love drawing different takes on a familiar silhouette, and the 'Fate' fandom gives them tons to play with. Top of the list, no surprise to me, is Artoria Pendragon (the Saber archetype) and her many variants: regular Saber, Saber Alter, and the various costume-swapped iterations. She's basically the flagship face of 'Fate/stay night', so she gets endless reinterpretations. Right behind her is Nero Claudius (especially the more flamboyant, flirtatious versions), and Jeanne d'Arc in both her saintly Ruler form and the darker 'Jeanne Alter' — Jalter is basically fan art fuel because she contrasts with the pure, iconic Jeanne. Tamamo no Mae and Ishtar (and the related goddesses like Ereshkigal) are massive because of their fox/goddess designs and seductive personalities, while Scathach and several lancer types get attention for that fierce, elegant look. Mash Kyrielight has exploded in popularity too; her shield/armor aesthetic combined with the soft, shy personality makes for a lot of tender or more mature reinterpretations. On the male side, Gilgamesh and EMIYA/Archer get their fair share, but female servants dominate mature art overall. There are a few other patterns I keep noticing: servants with swimsuit or summer event skins see a big spike in mature content right after those outfits release — game events basically hand artists a theme. Characters who already have a “dark” or “alter” version (Saber Alter, Jeanne Alter, others) are also heavily represented because the change in tone invites more risqué portrayals. Popularity in mobile meta matters too: the more you see a servant on your friend list or in banners, the more likely artists are to create content of them. Platforms drive trends as well — Pixiv has huge concentrated volumes, Twitter spreads pieces fast, and Tumblr/Reddit collections help older works circulate. Tags like R-18, mature, and explicit are where most of this lives, and many artists use stylized commissions to explore variants fans request. I love seeing how artists reinterpret these designs: a classic Saber portrait can turn into a high-fashion boudoir piece, while a summer Tamamo can become cheeky and playful or deeply sensual depending on the artist’s style. I also enjoy when artists blend canon personality with unexpected scenarios — stoic characters in intimate, vulnerable moments or jokey NPC skins drawn seriously. For me, the way the community keeps celebrating the same iconic servants but always inventing something new is what makes browsing fanart endlessly fun.

I get pulled into this character’s head like I’m sneaking through a house at night — quiet, curious, and a little guilty. The diary isn’t just a prop; it’s the engine. What motivates that antagonist is a steady accumulation of small slights and self-justifying stories that the diary lets them rehearse and amplify. Each entry rationalizes worse behavior: a line that begins as a complaint about being overlooked turns into a manifesto about who needs to be punished. Over time the diary becomes an echo chamber, and motivation shifts from one-off revenge to an ideology of entitlement — they believe they deserve to rewrite everyone else’s narrative to fit theirs. Sometimes it’s not grandiosity but fear: fear of being forgotten, fear of weakness, fear of losing control. The diary offers a script that makes those fears actionable. And then there’s patterning — they study other antagonists, real or fictional, and copy successful cruelties, treating the diary like a laboratory. That mixture of wounded pride, intellectual curiosity, and escalating justification is what keeps them going, and I always end up oddly fascinated by how ordinary motives can become terrifying when fed by a private, persuasive voice. I close the page feeling unsettled, like I’ve glimpsed how close any of us can come to that line.

That instant the teeth meet flesh flips the moral ledger of the story and tells you everything you need to know about the protagonist's fate. I read the bite ending as both a literal plot device and a symbolic judgment: literally, it's infection, transformation, or death; symbolically, it's a point of no return that forces identity change. In stories like 'The Last of Us' or '28 Days Later' the bite is biological inevitability — once it happens, the character's fate is largely sealed and what follows is watching personality erode or mutate under the rules of the world. But it's also often philosophical. If the bite represents betrayal, obsession, or even salvation in vampire tales like 'Dracula' or 'Let the Right One In', the protagonist's fate becomes a moral endpoint rather than a medical one. The ending usually wants you to sit with the consequences: will they lose humanity, embrace a new monstrous freedom, or die resisting? For me, a bite ending that leaves ambiguity — a trembling hand, a half-healed scar, a mirror showing different eyes — is the best kind. It hangs the protagonist between two truths and forces the reader to choose which fate feels darker, which is honestly the part I love most.

I can't help but gush about how brutal and tragic Angron's arc is — if you want the clearest, deepest single-novel look at his fall and what he becomes, start with 'Betrayer'. Aaron Dembski-Bowden digs into the long, awful stretch from slave and gladiator to the primarch riven by the Butcher's Nails. That book doesn't just show his battlefield fury; it explores the psychological wreckage and how the Nails warp his agency. You see how he drifts toward chaos and what that means for his relationship with his legion and the wider Heresy. To fill in origin details and the slow-motion collapse, supplement 'Betrayer' with the Horus Heresy anthologies and the World Eaters-focused stories collected across the range. Several tales and novellas handle his youth on Nuceria, the gladiatorial pits, and the implants that define him. For the aftermath — the full, apocalyptic fate and the way he surfaces as something more than man — look to novels and short stories that follow the World Eaters after the Heresy; they show the legion's descent and his eventual monstrous transformation. Reading those together gives you a properly grim portrait that still hits me in the gut every time.

That child's stare in 'The Bad Seed' still sits with me like a fingernail on a chalkboard. I love movies that quietly unsettle you, and this one does it by refusing to dramatize the monster — it lets the monster live inside a perfect little suburban shell. Patty McCormack's Rhoda is terrifying because she behaves like the polite kid everyone trusts: soft voice, neat hair, harmless smile. That gap between appearance and what she actually does creates cognitive dissonance; you want to laugh, then you remember the knife in her pocket. The film never over-explains why she is that way, and the ambiguity is the point — the script, adapted from the novel and play, teases nature versus nurture without handing a tidy moral. Beyond the acting, the direction keeps things close and domestic. Tight interiors, careful framing, and those long, lingering shots of Rhoda performing everyday tasks make the ordinary feel stage-like. The adults around her are mostly oblivious or in denial, and that social blindness amplifies the horror: it's not just a dangerous child, it's a community that cannot see what's under its own roof. I also think the era matters — 1950s suburban calm was brand new and fragile, and this movie pokes that bubble in the most polite way possible. Walking away from it, I feel a little wary of smiles, which is both hilarious and sort of brilliant.

A grim, quiet logic explains why William March wrote 'The Bad Seed' in 1954, and I always come back to that when I reread it. He wasn't chasing cheap shocks so much as probing a stubborn question: how much of a person's cruelty is born into them, and how much is forged by circumstance? His earlier work — especially 'Company K' — already showed that he loved examining ordinary people under extreme stress, and in 'The Bad Seed' he turns that lens inward to family life, the suburban mask, and the terrifying idea that a child might be evil by inheritance. March lived through wars, social upheavals, and a lot of scientific conversation about heredity and behavior. Mid-century America was steeped in debates about nature versus nurture, and psychiatric studies were becoming part of public discourse; you can feel that intellectual current in the book. He layers clinical curiosity with a novelist's eye for small domestic details: PTA meetings, neighbors' opinions, and the ways adults rationalize away oddities in a child. At the same time, there’s an urgency in the prose — he was at the end of his life when 'The Bad Seed' appeared — and that sharpens the book's moral questions. For me, the most compelling inspiration is emotional rather than documentary. March was fascinated by the mismatch between surface normalcy and hidden corruption, and he used the cultural anxieties of the 1950s—about conformity, heredity, and postwar stability—to create a story that feels both intimate and cosmic in its dread. It's why the novel still creeps under the skin: it blends a personal obsession with larger scientific and social conversations, and it leaves you with that uneasy, lingering thought about where evil actually begins.

Pulling together those little coincidences and the big, historical echoes is what made 'All Roads Lead to Rome' land for me. The novel uses travel and convergence as a literal engine: separate lives, different eras, and scattered choices all swirl toward the city like tributaries joining a river. Instead of preaching that fate is fixed, the book dramatizes how patterns form from repeated decisions—someone takes the same detour, another forgives once too many, a third follows a rumor—and those micro-decisions accumulate into what readers perceive as destiny. I loved how the author drops small, recurring motifs—an old map, a broken watch, a stray phrase in Latin—that act like breadcrumbs. They feel like signs, but they also reveal how human attention selects meaning after the fact. Structurally, the chapters themselves mimic fate: parallel POVs that slowly compress, flashbacks that illuminate why a character makes a certain choice, and a pacing that alternates between chance encounters and deliberate planning. This creates a tension: are characters pulled by some invisible current toward Rome, or have they unknowingly nudged each other there? The novel leans into ambiguity, refusing a tidy answer, which is great because it respects the messiness of real life. On an emotional level, 'All Roads Lead to Rome' treats fate as a conversation between past and present—ancestors’ expectations, historical burdens, romantic longings—and the present-day ability to accept or reject those scripts. By the end I felt both unsettled and oddly comforted: fate here is neither tyrant nor gift, but a landscape you can learn to read. It left me thinking about the tiny choices I make every day.

Ever since I stumbled upon 'Algorithms to Live By', I've been low-key obsessed with how computer science concepts can streamline my messy human life. The book's take on the 'optimal stopping problem' totally changed how I approach decisions like apartment hunting or dating—turns out, the 37% rule is shockingly practical! After viewing 37% of options, you're primed to recognize 'good enough' when you see it. I also lean hard on the explore-exploit tradeoff now. Early in a new hobby or restaurant phase, I force myself to explore widely (explore mode), but once I find favorites, I switch to savoring them (exploit mode). It balances novelty with comfort perfectly. The chapter on sorting algorithms even made me reorganize my closet by frequency of use—suddenly getting dressed takes half the mental energy.