How Do Jill And Eustace'S Relationship Grow In 'The Silver Chair'?

I get why people keep asking about Smita Thackeray and Balasaheb Thackeray — the Thackeray name stirs up so much curiosity. From my reading over the years, the plain truth is quieter than the tabloids make it out to be. There were whispers and gossip columns that tried to link them beyond the usual social and political circles, but I haven’t seen any solid, verifiable evidence that there was a romantic relationship or a secret marriage between them. What you mostly find in public records and mainstream reporting is that Smita has moved in overlapping circles with the Thackeray family because of politics, social events, and Mumbai’s connected social scene. Rumour mills thrive on ambiguity, and in Indian politics especially, opponents often seed stories to gain traction. So when someone with Smita’s visibility — a producer and social worker with a high profile — crosses paths with a towering figure like Balasaheb, speculation follows. But a sober look at credible news sources, family statements, and the lack of legal or documentary proof points to celebrity gossip rather than a hidden truth. For me, the takeaway is to treat those sensational claims skeptically and remember that public proximity ≠ a personal relationship; that feels like the real story here.

Tracing his path from gritty L.A. club nights to festival headline slots, the way Nikki Sixx grew his wealth feels like a classic rock star origin story mixed with modern creator economics. In the early years, income was raw and tied to albums and touring — the explosion of MTV and radio in the 1980s turned songwriting and performance into real money. Records like 'Shout at the Devil' and 'Theatre of Pain' sold millions, and that meant advances, royalties, and an ever-growing merchandise machine. Back then, you lived off the road, but the big tours and merch tables were where the cash multiplied, not just the checks from a label. As his career matured, different revenue streams kicked in. Songwriting royalties and publishing began to matter more than one-off album advances, and those recurring payments are the kind of money that compounds over decades. The dramatic lows he later turned into creative work — notably the memoir 'The Heroin Diaries' and the subsequent soundtrack by 'Sixx:A.M.' — opened up book sales, speaking, and sync opportunities. When your life becomes a bestselling memoir and then a Netflix-featured film like 'The Dirt', demand for back-catalog music, licensing deals, and merchandise surges, and that spike often has a lasting effect on catalog valuations. Beyond direct music and publishing income, he leveraged media platforms and branding. Radio shows, endorsements, and ongoing touring (including massive stadium runs and package tours that command huge ticket prices) move the needle substantially. Investors and buyers look at an artist’s catalog and future royalty streams; turning creative output into assets — whether that’s through smart publishing deals, licensing for ads/films, or merchandising and partnerships — is what turns a rock career into a long-term financial one. For me, the fascinating part is how he shifted from living paycheck-to-paycheck in the early chaos to shaping multiple income pillars. It’s a lesson in resilience: talent opens the door, but diversification and telling your story keep the lights on for decades — and that’s always kind of inspiring to see.

What a strange little piece of internet folklore the 'Shinji chair' image has become — I love how tiny fan sketches explode into global memes. From what I can tell, there isn't a single, universally agreed-upon credited creator for the original artwork. The image feels like classic fanwork: a simple, expressive drawing of Shinji from 'Neon Genesis Evangelion' sitting awkwardly on a chair, and it began circulating widely across imageboards, Twitter, Pixiv, and Tumblr. Different communities picked it up, remixed it, and attributed it to various users, but the earliest clear provenance seems murky. I spent time following repost timestamps and cached pages, and the pattern is typical: one or two Pixiv or Twitter posts pop up, then dozens of mirrors and edits. At several points the trail hits deleted accounts or anonymous imageboard posts, which is why people argue about the “original.” There are claims that an anonymous Japanese user uploaded an initial sketch on an imageboard and someone later reposted it on Twitter, but no definitive signature that survives. Ultimately I treat this as a fan-created meme that belongs to the community more than to a clear single author — that can be frustrating if you're trying to give credit, but it's also kind of beautiful how a tiny drawing of a sulky character from 'Neon Genesis Evangelion' traveled so far. I still get a chuckle picturing Shinji getting dragged into meme culture, honestly it makes the character feel oddly at home online.

It still surprises me how a single posture can turn into shorthand for a whole mood. The image of Shinji slumped in a chair from 'Neon Genesis Evangelion' filtered through early internet hubs — imageboards, Tumblr, and later Twitter and Reddit — and people started using that frozen, hollow expression as a reaction image. It worked because the show itself was already obsessed with inner life and awkward, painful introspection; that chair shot distilled a thousand emotional beats into one relatable thumbnail. Beyond the original screencap, the meme grew because of remix culture: folks photoshopped backgrounds, added captions about social anxiety or existential dread, and paired the image with nonchalant or deadpan text. Creators and fans then leaned into it, so other anime began to reuse the visual shorthand — a character sitting listlessly on a chair or bench now signals disconnection or deep awkwardness without any dialogue. For me, that evolution is deliciously meta: a scene meant to be personal becomes a universal emoji for modern malaise, and I still chuckle when a new show winks at the trope.

I get asked this all the time by friends who are worried about the looping thoughts and constant second-guessing in their relationships. From where I stand, therapy can absolutely help people with relationship OCD — sometimes profoundly — but 'cure' is a word I use carefully. ROCD is a form of obsessive-compulsive patterning that targets closeness, attraction, or the 'rightness' of a partner, and therapy gives tools to break those cycles rather than perform a magic wipe. In practice, cognitive-behavioral therapies like ERP (exposure and response prevention) tailored to relationship concerns, plus acceptance-based approaches, are the heavy hitters. When partners come into sessions together, you get practical coaching on how to respond to intrusive doubts without reassurance-seeking, how to rebuild trust amid uncertainty, and how to change interaction patterns that feed the OCD. Sometimes meds help, sometimes they don't; it depends on severity. What I’ve learned hanging around people dealing with ROCD is that progress looks like fewer compulsions and more tolerance for uncertainty, not zero intrusive thoughts forever. That shift — from reacting to noticing, breathing, and letting thoughts pass — feels like freedom. It’s messy but real, and I've watched couples regain warmth and curiosity when they stick with the work.

I get a little giddy talking about this kind of piece because the so-called 'tiger chair' that collectors drool over is really a classic of old Chinese furniture design, and the materials are as much about craft as they are about raw resources. The frame is almost always a dense hardwood — think huanghuali, zitan, or old rosewood — the kinds of timbers prized in Ming- and Qing-era pieces. These woods are heavy, oily, and beautifully grained, which is why they were chosen for chairs meant to last generations. Joinery matters as much as the wood itself: mortise-and-tenon joints locked together without modern nails, sometimes secured with wooden pegs. Surfaces will often have layers of lacquer or shellac; where lacquer was applied it protected the wood and gave that warm, deep sheen you see on museum pieces. The decorative bits — carved armrest ends, back splats, or little inlays — might include bone, mother-of-pearl, or simple brass fittings. Cushions that accompany originals were typically silk or silk brocade stuffed with cotton, horsehair, or kapok. When I run my hand along an original tiger chair I’m aware of those materials telling a quiet story: dense hardwood that’s been oiled for centuries, precise joinery that held despite centuries of use, and textiles that show the domestic side of its life. It’s not just a seat; it’s a compact history lesson wrapped in wood and cloth, and that’s what keeps me staring at the grain every time.

I get a kick out of watching how objects quietly climb in value, and the tale of a tiger chair is one of those satisfying slow-burn stories. Think of it like this: rarity is the engine. When an original piece—especially one with a distinctive motif like a tiger pattern or an unusual sculptural frame—survives decades in decent condition, the pool of originals shrinks naturally. People spill, reupholster badly, or trash things during moves, so scarcity drives collectors to pay more. Craftsmanship and provenance add fuel. If the chair was made by a respected workshop, uses solid materials, or has a label or paperwork tying it to an era or maker, collectors treat it like a piece of history. A chair with original upholstery or period-appropriate repairs is more desirable than one hacked into an unrecognizable version. Fashion and cultural nostalgia matter too; when interior trends swing toward bold patterns or retro pieces (think the surge after shows like 'Mad Men'), demand spikes. Then there’s the auction effect and social proof: one high-profile sale validates the market and brings more eyes. I love that a humble seat can become a storyteller—its value tells you people care about design, history, and good stories, and that always makes me smile when I spot one in a thrift shop or online listing.

I get asked this a lot by friends who want a cool themed nursery: tiger chair replicas can be safe, but it depends on several things. First off, size and stability matter more than you might think. If the chair is small and light, a toddler could tip it or try to climb on the arms; a low, wide base is way safer than narrow legs that wobble. Check for sharp corners, exposed screws, and little decorative bits that could loosen and become choking hazards. Also look at the seat height — low seats reduce fall risk. Materials and finishes are another big piece. Avoid chairs with unknown paints or finishes — lead paint is rare these days but still possible on older or cheap imports. Look for labels or test kits for low VOCs and non-toxic paints, and prefer fabrics that are washable and breathable. Certifications like ASTM, EN71, or CPSIA compliance (where relevant) are reassuring. If the chair has stuffing, choose firm foam rather than crumbly fill that can escape through seams. I usually anchor novelty furniture or keep it against a wall and supervise little ones; that extra bit of care has saved me from a handful of scares, and it makes me feel better about letting kids enjoy fun designs.