1 คำตอบ2025-02-05 22:53:17
The Socs (pronounced ˈsoʊʃɪz / so-shehs, short form of Socials) are a group of rich teenagers who live on the west side (in the book and the musical), or the south side (in the movie). They are the rivals of the greasers, and were described as having "money, cars, and futures," according to Ponyboy Curtis.
Soc males wear Madras shirts and khakis and usually carry knives and handkerchiefs, whereas the females wear dresses. Ponyboy describes the Socs as smelling like English Leather shaving lotion and stale tobacco. They are also spotted driving expensive cars like Mustangs and Corvairs.
4 คำตอบ2025-08-30 15:33:56
Watching 'Johnny Mnemonic' in a cheap multiplex with a soggy bucket of popcorn taught me more about 1990s hype than any film class ever could.
Critics reacted so strongly because the movie promised the neon-drenched cyberpunk feast that William Gibson’s short story hinted at, but served something patchy and oddly hesitant. The original piece was compact and sharp; expanding it into a feature introduced awkward pacing, plot padding, and scenes that felt like they were there to hit runtime rather than deepen character. Add to that a performance style—Keanu Reeves’ clipped delivery—that many felt came off as wooden rather than cool, and you’ve got a casting vibe that critics love to pick apart.
There was also the sense that the film was trying to have it both ways: gritty subculture spectacle and mainstream action flick, neither fully realized. The special effects and production design looked great in places, but CGI and product placement aged badly, giving reviewers easy targets. For a movie riding on the cyberpunk label, comparisons to 'Blade Runner' and Gibson’s own aura were inevitable, and when expectations meet flaws, responses get loud. I still enjoy it now, though—there’s a weird energy to it that feels authentic to an era, even if critics at the time were merciless.
3 คำตอบ2025-08-30 12:01:20
I was at a dingy record stall when the whole fuss exploded, and it felt like being inside a live small-scale revolution. When 'God Save the Queen' dropped during the Silver Jubilee, the backlash came fast: the BBC and lots of retailers treated it like radioactive wax. Johnny Rotten didn’t fold or apologize — he leaned into it. His public posture was pure provocation and sarcasm: he kept insisting the song was a critique of class and privilege rather than a literal attack on people, and he used interviews to needle the establishment and laugh off censorship.
That defiance was energetic rather than theoretical. I remember people trading bootleg copies and talking about how the band claimed the record actually hit number one despite being pushed down the chart. For Johnny, the ban and the outrage were almost musical fuel. He framed the controversy as proof the song hit a nerve, and he delighted in the chaos: sneering at polite society, refusing to soften his language, and treating every media spat like free advertising. Years later he’d still speak with that same mixture of disdain and wry amusement, proud that the track stirred the pot and left a mark — not some apology, just a stubborn, brazen stance that felt very punk to me.
4 คำตอบ2025-03-24 09:01:06
The tension between the greasers and socs feels deeply rooted in their class differences. Greasers come from lower income households, facing struggles daily, while socs enjoy privilege and power. This creates a palpable animosity. In 'The Outsiders', you really see the divide: the greasers feel like they have to fight just to be seen and respected.
It’s more than just rivalry; it's a reflection of their harsh realities and societal neglect. Watching the way they clash, I felt their frustration and sadness. It's tragic how that divide can lead to violence instead of understanding. Each side has its own burdens, but they can’t see each other beyond their labels.
2 คำตอบ2025-08-31 03:10:14
There’s a wildness to Tristan in 'Legends of the Fall' that always grabs me — not just because he’s melodramatic or handsome on the screen, but because his violence feels like language for things he can’t say. For me, that starts with trauma. Tristan returns from the war with a body and mind that have been rewritten: hyper-alert, numb in places, and quick to react. Those are classic signs of what we'd now call PTSD — flashbacks, impulsive aggression, a need to control the uncontrollable. War robbed him of ordinary ways to connect, so when he’s overwhelmed by grief or jealousy, violence becomes a blunt instrument to express pain, protect what’s his, or punish a world that failed him.
Family dynamics feed into that too. Growing up under a mythic father and alongside two brothers creates pressure-cooker loyalties — love, rivalry, and guilt all tangled together. Tristan’s sense of honor and fierce protectiveness makes him act as if he’s defending not only his family but a way of life. When Alfred and Susannah’s relationship fractures, or when grief over Gabriel eats him from the inside, his responses are extreme because he has no model for vulnerability. Add to that alcohol, the code of masculinity at the time, and a sort of romanticized inevitability the story leans into — and you have a character whose violence is both personal wound and cultural symptom.
I also can’t help reading Tristan through a mythic lens: he’s written and filmed as a primitive force of nature — beautiful, dangerous, elemental. That stylization isn’t an excuse for his actions, but it shapes how we as an audience interpret them. The film amplifies this with sweeping landscapes and score, which sometimes romanticizes brutality instead of interrogating it. Personally, after watching or rereading 'Legends of the Fall' I often catch myself toggling between sympathy and frustration: sympathy for a guy clearly fractured by grief and war, and frustration at how his violence hurts everyone around him. If you want a deeper dive, pairing the story with things that explore trauma honestly, like 'All Quiet on the Western Front' or contemporary essays on war and masculinity, makes Tristan feel less like a tragedy of one man and more like a cautionary portrait of how societies fail the wounded.
3 คำตอบ2025-06-19 12:04:39
The conflict between the Socs and Greasers in 'The Outsiders' is raw and visceral, showing how class divides shape lives. The Socs, with their fancy cars and clean-cut looks, represent privilege and power, while the Greasers, marked by their greased hair and tough exteriors, symbolize the struggle of the working class. The tension isn’t just about fights—it’s about respect. The Socs attack because they can, flaunting their status, while the Greasers fight back because they have to, defending their dignity. The rivalry escalates tragically, culminating in Johnny’s act of self-defense and the eventual loss of innocence for Ponyboy. The book doesn’t paint either side as purely good or evil; instead, it humanizes both, revealing how societal pressures and misunderstandings fuel the cycle of violence.
4 คำตอบ2025-04-20 10:48:20
In 'The Outsiders', the rivalry between the Greasers and the Socs is more than just a clash of social classes—it’s a battle of identity and survival. The Greasers, from the wrong side of town, see the Socs as privileged kids who use their wealth to bully and intimidate. The Socs, on the other hand, view the Greasers as troublemakers, always looking for a fight. This tension escalates when Johnny, a Greaser, is violently attacked by a group of Socs, leaving him traumatized. The rivalry reaches its peak when Johnny kills Bob, a Soc, in self-defense, sparking a chain of events that forces both groups to confront the consequences of their hatred. What’s fascinating is how the novel humanizes both sides. Ponyboy, the narrator, realizes that the Socs have their own struggles, like Cherry’s confession about feeling trapped in her perfect world. The novel doesn’t glorify the rivalry but instead shows how it’s fueled by misunderstandings and societal pressures. It’s a raw portrayal of how class divides can lead to violence, but also how empathy can bridge the gap.
1 คำตอบ2024-12-04 00:14:52
Oh, it's a heartbreaking moment in 'The Outsiders', but yes, Johnny does die. After a gallant effort to rescue children from a burning church, Johnny sustains severe burns and injuries. Despite the best efforts to save him, he eventually succumbs to these injuries. The impact of his death is immense on the characters, especially Ponyboy and Dallas.