12 Answers2025-06-19
For me, it was a bit of a letdown that the killer was Max Hastings. At first, I was hoping it would be Pip’s brother or someone minor that we hadn’t paid much attention to early on in the story. But no, Max, the popular, privileged boyfriend, was the killer. And while the writing in this story is excellent, Max is just the most conventional choice for a killer in a story such as this. His discovery is really all because of Pip.
In retrospect, it wasn’t surprising that the killer was Max Hastings, the boyfriend of popular and privileged Pip. However, the actual identity of the killer was almost incidental to the reading experience. The true heart of the novel lies within the sixty-page or so climax where Pip slowly but surely pieces together the identity of the killer. And in this timeframe, as she grapples with the growing realization of who it is, so too does the reader. Together, they slowly reach the awful conclusion, and it’s a heart-pounding reading experience in which Pip must prove her conclusions while fighting for her life.
10 Answers2026-02-09
Consider the device on which you are reading. A phone and a questionable website can be a terrible combination. On a tablet or computer with a good ad-blocker, the ads are usually pretty bearable. But if you’re reading on a phone, you can try switching to “Reader View” on your browser once you’re on the correct chapter page. It won’t block any redirects, but it will strip out most of the ads and make the rest of the page layout look somewhat better. But honestly, phone is the worst way to read a double-page spread series like Innocent. The composition just gets lost. Read on a bigger screen if you can.
10 Answers2025-06-23
I’m still a bit confused as to how the killer got to know so many personal details about each of the characters. Did they know that [Character’s Name] has an irrational fear of [fear] or that there was a falling out between [two characters] for a specific reason? The book explains how they found out this information through general surveillance but it all seemed a bit too knowing and stalker-like for my comfort. This could have been left out or even been given to the reader in a different way. It almost seemed like there was a mole within the group of characters but that was never revealed.
Although the killer’s identity explains how they managed to gather all that information, it in itself does not explain how they managed to gain such profound insight into the others’ psyches. It is a minor plot hole that has been nagging at me – were they just extremely good at guessing or did they have a mole or a source within the group that we have not been told about?
9 Answers2025-06-15
In terms of the themes of the book it is interesting to note that the killer of the second group of people is arguably the most guilty person on the island of Indian Island. Wargrave’s victims are guilty of negligence, passion and greed but Wargrave’s own crime is that of premeditated and artistic murder for its own sake. So in his own strange way he is the most guilty person on the island and that is why he planned his own suicide to be part of his master plan. His plan for murder was a symmetrical one and he wished to complete the picture of his masterpiece by including his own death in the rhyme and making the last line ‘and then there were none’.
4 Answers2026-06-19
I think the Redwall series still holds up, even reading them as an adult.
The Hall Family Chronicles series by Jane Langton has been one of my favorites for 35 years. It's funny and whimsical and has a timeless quality.
Maybe Anne of Green Gables or Emily of New Moon by L..M. Montgomery?
7 Answers2026-06-18
Title discourse for the purposes of entertainment: the title for this novel, “I Lost Three Babies for My Don’s Innocent Savior” was generated by a romance novel title generator and it was perfect. The drama is all contained within the title itself, and yes, that would be me, and I would read that novel in release form as written based on that title alone. Any other uber-bonkers novel titles out there?
5 Answers2025-06-17
I'm bothered by the nonchalance with which the warning phase is treated. ‘We’re going to kill Santiago Nasar.’ ‘Okay, cool, good to know.’ This is how seriously they take the lives of others. I think this is how they really respond to the accusation of Santiago’s guilt, deep down: they don’t think the threat is real, or they don’t think it warrants. If they really thought a man guilty of murder was going to be killed, they would react in a much more extreme, divided way. But instead, they just shrug the whole thing off. The way they treat the plot to murder Santiago as a mere formality is itself a silent verdict on the seriousness of the charge against him. They enable the murder not because they believe in the cause of the murderer, but because they don’t believe in it enough to prevent it.
6 Answers2025-08-28
Am I the only one who noticed the ‘copycat’ killer’s MO mirrored his own past commits? I noticed this almost immediately. It was a huge red flag for me. In retrospect, it makes sense that the copycat’s MO would mirror Byung-soo’s past commits. The copycat was a fictional stand-in for Byung-soo to grapple with his past crimes. The ending is brilliant and the way the writer masked this obvious reveal as a plot hole rather than stellar character development is pure genius.
6 Answers2025-06-26
Really, all of the problems in this book could have been solved with communication. Jeremy and Verity had clearly huge problems in their marriage. Lowen had found out huge information about Jeremy’s wife’s past but hadn’t communicated that to him properly. If anyone had just sat down and talked out all of their problems, the whole tragic thing could have been avoided. But silence and secrecy and assumption were the villains of this domestic thriller. And the big killer thing left unspoken in the darkness between them.
9 Answers2025-12-04
For me, the ending of the film focuses most on the butler, Perrier, as his ‘death’ is the central event that kick-starts the chaos of the rest of the film. Seeing him get up from the floor, absolutely fine, and be handed an ‘A’ by Twain was the perfect end to his character’s journey as he was playing a part the whole time. His transformation from ‘dead’ butler to much-respected employee of the household, receiving accolades from all, is the final visual joke to emphasize the highly theatrical nature of the film. He takes a bow. In a small moment, all of the film’s key themes are sum up perfectly: nothing is as it seems and everything is all part of the show.